11-34 vs 11-30
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
11-34 vs 11-30
I picked up cycling earlier this year and got myself a Giant Road bike 8-speed 11-34 cassette. I think I have outgrown my bike but also want something new with all the bells and whistle. I’m looking at upgrading to a Canyon CF Ultimate 11-speed 11x30 but since I live next to hills and all my routes require some type of climbing. I was wondering if anyone can tell me if by me going to an 11x30, is it equivalent to what I have now? Worse? Better?
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,890
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4788 Post(s)
Liked 3,914 Times
in
2,545 Posts
I trust you understand the chainrings makes just as much of a difference. (Your gear ration is the chainring teeth divided by the cassette teeth. The ratio is all that matters, not the cassette size.)
Tell us how many teeth on your small chainring and on the bike(s) you are looking at.
Tell us how many teeth on your small chainring and on the bike(s) you are looking at.
#3
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Sorry still a little new with all the gear ratio to fully understand. But my old bike is 34/50 and the bike I want to get is 36/52.
#4
Senior Member
OK.. so a 36/52 is going to be a gear or two harder to push uphill than a 34/50, and a 11-30 will be one or two harder than a 11-34 cassette... sounds like you're going to lose 3 or 4 gears for the hill climbs (and have extra for the descents and flats).... in simple math...your old bike gave you an easiest gear of 34/34 and what you're looking at is going to give you 30/36.... so about 16% harder on the slackest gear.
Likes For Beach Bob:
#5
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Thank you for the detailed explanation! Looks like I’ll just have to change the chainring to a 34/50 to close the gap of the lost gears. Was planning on upgrading the new bikes group set anyways. Now I have a better idea of what to get. Thanks a bunch! Appreciate it!
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 6,864
Bikes: Trek Domane SLR 7 AXS, Trek CheckPoint SL7 AXS, Trek Emonda ALR AXS, Trek FX 5 Sport
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 760 Post(s)
Liked 1,717 Times
in
1,003 Posts
if you stick with a 50/34 - 11-34 config, you should be able to swap cassettes without changing chains or removing links, so if you want to ride the 11-30 one day, then you can just swap out the cassette from the 11-34.
#8
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Do you suggest upgrading the cassette to a 11-34 instead? I think it depends on the rear derailleur what the max teeth you can have on the cassette and might need to change the whole drivetrain anyways. Looking for any tips or suggestion of what I can do to get the best drivetrain possible for climbing. I’m fortunate enough to have a buddy that works for popular bike part manufacturer where I can get the parts for a fraction of the cost. So that’s another reason why I don’t mind upgrading.
Likes For Jayson17:
#9
Occam's Rotor
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 7,248
Mentioned: 61 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2366 Post(s)
Liked 2,331 Times
in
1,164 Posts
I have a 34T cassette paired with a 46/30T crank, and make use of all the low gearing. A second wheelset I use primarily off-road has an 11-36T cassette.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,952
Bikes: Specialized Roubaix, Canyon Inflite AL SLX, Ibis Ripley AF, Priority Continuum Onyx, Santana Vision, Kent Dual-Drive Tandem
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 871 Post(s)
Liked 726 Times
in
436 Posts
What RD is on the Ultimate? If it's Ultegra Di2 GS, it will do 34t. Other Shimano RDs might officially support fewer max teeth, but can usually fit 2-4 more than spec.
You would be losing weight on the bike, so 36-34 front/rear wouldn't be too much worse than what you have. Of course if you don't mind the cost of smaller chainrings, then that's always an option.
You would be losing weight on the bike, so 36-34 front/rear wouldn't be too much worse than what you have. Of course if you don't mind the cost of smaller chainrings, then that's always an option.
#11
velo-dilettante
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: insane diego, california
Posts: 8,311
Bikes: 85 pinarello treviso steel, 88 nishiki olympic steel. 95 look kg 131 carbon, 11 trek madone 5.2 carbon
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1626 Post(s)
Liked 3,112 Times
in
1,682 Posts
op says "hills.." are said hills connected to bigger mountains or ridiculously steep? where exactly is this riding area in question? makes a difference as
well as how often you're using that easiest gear to spin on the steepest/longest uphills...? every ride or rarely? on the steepest part(s), wishing you had
an easier gear to spin or just standing for a spell up it?
well as how often you're using that easiest gear to spin on the steepest/longest uphills...? every ride or rarely? on the steepest part(s), wishing you had
an easier gear to spin or just standing for a spell up it?
Last edited by diphthong; 11-22-20 at 02:44 AM.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Hacienda Hgts
Posts: 2,100
Bikes: 1999 Schwinn Peloton Ultegra 10, Kestrel RT-1000 Ultegra, Trek Marlin 6 Deore 29'er
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 821 Post(s)
Liked 1,955 Times
in
941 Posts
I picked up cycling earlier this year and got myself a Giant Road bike 8-speed 11-34 cassette. I think I have outgrown my bike but also want something new with all the bells and whistle. I’m looking at upgrading to a Canyon CF Ultimate 11-speed 11x30 but since I live next to hills and all my routes require some type of climbing. I was wondering if anyone can tell me if by me going to an 11x30, is it equivalent to what I have now? Worse? Better?
Likes For CAT7RDR:
#13
Drip, Drip.
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Southern Ontario
Posts: 1,575
Bikes: Trek Verve E bike, Felt Doctrine 4 XC, Opus Horizon Apex 1
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1034 Post(s)
Liked 193 Times
in
163 Posts
I seriously don't see the point in upgrading, unless your current bike doesn't fit you comfortably. That would be the only reason to want to switch it up.
buying a new bike and changing out the cassette and front crankset is even more silly imo.
FWIW, my current road bike has 40/54 chain ring and a 14/34t freewheel in the back. 2x5. I don't have any issues climbing, although I do find myself using the lowest gear often up the hills and I'm sure that many people would be better off with some more climbing ratios than me.
buying a new bike and changing out the cassette and front crankset is even more silly imo.
FWIW, my current road bike has 40/54 chain ring and a 14/34t freewheel in the back. 2x5. I don't have any issues climbing, although I do find myself using the lowest gear often up the hills and I'm sure that many people would be better off with some more climbing ratios than me.
#14
Drip, Drip.
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Southern Ontario
Posts: 1,575
Bikes: Trek Verve E bike, Felt Doctrine 4 XC, Opus Horizon Apex 1
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1034 Post(s)
Liked 193 Times
in
163 Posts
Fitting onto your bike properly is more important than any fancy feature you can get on a modern bike.
#15
Senior Member
If your RD can handle it go with 11-32 or 34
You will like the 52 up front. The difference in 2 teeth up front is minimal compared to 2 or 4 in back.
You will like the 52 up front. The difference in 2 teeth up front is minimal compared to 2 or 4 in back.
#16
Expired Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: TN
Posts: 11,499
Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3649 Post(s)
Liked 5,382 Times
in
2,732 Posts
They don't have to be mutually exclusive you know. Besides which, there have been some pretty bizarre configurations recently touted on BF as "proper fit." OP, consider the source when you evaluate BF advice.
#17
Expired Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: TN
Posts: 11,499
Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3649 Post(s)
Liked 5,382 Times
in
2,732 Posts
OP, another thing to consider is that bikes are often sold with gearing the manufacturer considers appropriate for intended use. For example, a bike that comes with 52-36 and 11-30 will also likely have a "race" or more aggressive fit. A bike with 50-34 and 11-32 might have more of an "endurance" fit. Since you have a source for parts, switching out a crank may not be a big deal. However, if you get a frame with too much saddle to bar drop than you are comfortable with, you'll be stuck with a huge stack of spacers or some other kludge that you will regret.
Likes For shelbyfv:
#18
serious cyclist
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Austin
Posts: 21,147
Bikes: S1, R2, P2
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9334 Post(s)
Liked 3,679 Times
in
2,026 Posts
OP, another thing to consider is that bikes are often sold with gearing the manufacturer considers appropriate for intended use. For example, a bike that comes with 52-36 and 11-30 will also likely have a "race" or more aggressive fit. A bike with 50-34 and 11-32 might have more of an "endurance" fit. Since you have a source for parts, switching out a crank may not be a big deal. However, if you get a frame with too much saddle to bar drop than you are comfortable with, you'll be stuck with a huge stack of spacers or some other kludge that you will regret.
Likes For Bah Humbug:
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8,515
Mentioned: 69 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3241 Post(s)
Liked 2,512 Times
in
1,510 Posts
Likes For seypat:
#20
Expired Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: TN
Posts: 11,499
Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3649 Post(s)
Liked 5,382 Times
in
2,732 Posts
Yep, my first "nicer" bike, a Raleigh Comp, came with 52-42 and maybe a 23 largest cog. Almost 50 years ago.... World seemed much flatter back then!
#21
Senior Member
Ah yes, the days of my youth, when I bent a Regina 23 on my 42 tooth front going up Smugglers... To be 21 again! What impresses me most are fellow 60 year olds or better still using those gears. I’m not proud, I’ll take my 36-32!
#22
serious cyclist
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Austin
Posts: 21,147
Bikes: S1, R2, P2
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9334 Post(s)
Liked 3,679 Times
in
2,026 Posts
Yes, but the timeframe I've been riding is especially funny to me no just because it's the part I've seen, but that when I started "nice" bikes came with gearing harder than I could use. Now they come with gearing easier than I want. And for the few years in the middle they came with the gearing I want, I was marathoning. Awesome.
Likes For grizzly59:
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8,515
Mentioned: 69 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3241 Post(s)
Liked 2,512 Times
in
1,510 Posts
I still have 52/42 on all of my bikes.......
............with a 30T granny included.
More often that not, I'm on the 52/42, but the granny is there if I need it. The main benefit is reduced shifting. Where I live the terrain is up/down/up/down. Instead of shifting 5-7 with the front/back then returning the other way in a minute or two, I can shift the front once or twice and cover the same range. Over a multiple hour/all day ride that helps a lot. Otherwise, my right forearm muscles get extremely tight. I eventually lose the ability to shift, brake or even grip the handlebar with that hand. Safety becomes an issue.
............with a 30T granny included.
More often that not, I'm on the 52/42, but the granny is there if I need it. The main benefit is reduced shifting. Where I live the terrain is up/down/up/down. Instead of shifting 5-7 with the front/back then returning the other way in a minute or two, I can shift the front once or twice and cover the same range. Over a multiple hour/all day ride that helps a lot. Otherwise, my right forearm muscles get extremely tight. I eventually lose the ability to shift, brake or even grip the handlebar with that hand. Safety becomes an issue.
Likes For seypat:
#25
Klaatu..Verata..Necktie?
Join Date: May 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 17,907
Bikes: Litespeed Ultimate, Ultegra; Canyon Endurace, 105; Battaglin MAX, Chorus; Bianchi 928 Veloce; Ritchey Road Logic, Dura Ace; Cannondale R500 RX100; Schwinn Circuit, Sante; Lotus Supreme, Dura Ace
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10397 Post(s)
Liked 11,849 Times
in
6,066 Posts
The Endurace comes with an 11-34 cassette and 52/36 crankset, so your lowest gear will be 36 x 34, a bit larger than your current 34 x 34, but not as bad as 36 x 30!
EDIT: I bought an Endurace myself in July. and have been very happy with it. Living in an area with lots of hills, I find myself using ALL the gears, although the 34 tooth cog, not as much as I thought I would.
__________________
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."
"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."
"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles