Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > General Cycling Discussion
Reload this Page >

It seems Di2 is here to stay.

Search
Notices
General Cycling Discussion Have a cycling related question or comment that doesn't fit in one of the other specialty forums? Drop on in and post in here! When possible, please select the forum above that most fits your post!

It seems Di2 is here to stay.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-01-22, 12:11 PM
  #51  
GhostRider62
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Posts: 4,083
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2333 Post(s)
Liked 2,097 Times in 1,314 Posts
Originally Posted by base2
Post 2: Avoided cable cost, adjustability in cold.

Post 4: Speed of shift. Touch of button. Grown on poster over time.

Post 8: Arthritis. To get hydro brake. (Bundled tech)

Post 10: To allow automatic systems.

Post 12: Has both, plans to go e-shift, again.

Post 13: Maintenance avoidance.

Post16: Maintenance, adjustment. Plans to keep.

Post 23: Trimming.

Post 30: Never anything else again.

Post 32: Easy install.

Post 35: Different modes. Sequential shifting.

Post 40: Shifting modes. Lever designation.

...& of course Good ol' post 26: Never missed a shift, reliable, & uniquely suited to competitive endeavors. No plans to go back indicated.

Did you read the thread?




---------
Thanks, all.
I do feel enlightened. Not much of the benefits listed here are readily apparent from a few short-ish test rides. I do feel my question has been satisfactorily answered.

In particular, the possibility for automated drivetrains (Nuvinci, Alfine, e-bike) & accessibility/configurability for disabled mobility to the masses are both things that had not occurred to me that present genuine innovation that would be more difficult with mechanical approaches.
I agree with all those points. Myself, I thought I would never have electronic shifting because I sort of like old ways. But due to hand and arm pain/weakness, I simply could not shift my SRAM mechanical 11 speed. Going to electronic made shifting possible. I love it. I've gotten some strength back and can shift my old shifters but wouldn't give up the electronic because it is that much easier to install, maintain, and use. One little push and I can move the RD across the entire cassette.

Last edited by GhostRider62; 07-01-22 at 12:27 PM.
GhostRider62 is offline  
Old 07-01-22, 12:24 PM
  #52  
tomato coupe
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,936

Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3942 Post(s)
Liked 7,284 Times in 2,941 Posts
Originally Posted by base2
Post 2: Avoided cable cost, adjustability in cold.

Post 4: Speed of shift. Touch of button. Grown on poster over time.

Post 8: Arthritis. To get hydro brake. (Bundled tech)

Post 10: To allow automatic systems.

Post 12: Has both, plans to go e-shift, again.

Post 13: Maintenance avoidance.

Post16: Maintenance, adjustment. Plans to keep.

Post 23: Trimming.

Post 30: Never anything else again.

Post 32: Easy install.

Post 35: Different modes. Sequential shifting.

Post 40: Shifting modes. Lever designation.

...& of course Good ol' post 26: Never missed a shift, reliable, & uniquely suited to competitive endeavors. No plans to go back indicated.

Did you read the thread?
Yes, I did. And only one of those posts supports your conclusion that the technology has to grow on you. The rest point out the advantages.
tomato coupe is offline  
Old 07-01-22, 01:21 PM
  #53  
Camilo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,760
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1109 Post(s)
Liked 1,200 Times in 760 Posts
Originally Posted by DMC707
Now that its moving into the 105 level -- i'd say its here to stay
Sram, keeping Shimano on its toes, has put electronic down to Rival, and it appears to be very popular, most likely because of the price point and functional near-equivalence to higher priced groups.

Last edited by Camilo; 07-01-22 at 01:24 PM.
Camilo is offline  
Old 07-01-22, 01:31 PM
  #54  
Camilo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,760
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1109 Post(s)
Liked 1,200 Times in 760 Posts
With the advent of super wide range 1X systems (I'm talking LOW gears, pie plate cassettes and capable rear derailleurs), one of the advantages of electronic shifting to the new rider is going away. I've long felt that a lot of (most?) new riders don't know how to, or care to know how to properly and effectively use the front crankset. I've thought and commented years ago that "wouldn't it be nice that some sort of automatic shifting of the entire system was possible, so the rider didn't have to understand when to shift from one front chainwheel to the otther". I'm serious, I know many riders who really don't "get" when or how to do front shifting. Electronic shifting can be put in automatic (aka "sequential") mode or even sold as that as the default. Poof, the mysteries of front shifting are gone. But like I said, with 1x systems getting very close to providing the low gears of common 2X or even 3x systems, that is less of an advantage. When my kids were young, I obtained and passed from first kid to second, a simple 1X8 kid sized MTB. It didn't really have low enough gearing for the hills around our house, but for bike path, family rides, it was perfect for a beginning rider learning how to shift.
Camilo is offline  
Likes For Camilo:
Old 07-01-22, 01:32 PM
  #55  
Rolla
Guest
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Posts: 2,888
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1346 Post(s)
Liked 3,270 Times in 1,439 Posts
Originally Posted by base2
Think of this as an attempt at a sort of meta-analysis. An information seeking exercise. What critical observation or piece of information did I, a fallible, opinionated human with limited senses & life experience miss in my observation of the electronic shifting system experiment?
When people say "don't overthink it," this is what they're talking about. Try electronic shifting. If you like it, use it. If you don't, don't. A studied analysis won't change anything. When did we lose the ability to trust our own sensibilities?
Rolla is offline  
Likes For Rolla:
Old 07-01-22, 01:34 PM
  #56  
Steve B.
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: South shore, L.I., NY
Posts: 6,858

Bikes: Flyxii FR322, Cannondale Topstone, Miyata City Liner, Specialized Chisel, Specialized Epic Evo

Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3221 Post(s)
Liked 2,048 Times in 1,170 Posts
Originally Posted by GhostRider62
I agree with all those points. Myself, I thought I would never have electronic shifting because I sort of like old ways. But due to hand and arm pain/weakness, I simply could not shift my SRAM mechanical 11 speed. .
I had similar issues with Shimano mt. bike trigger shifters, many decades of hand injuries left my thumbs very weak and I had issues with XT and SLX shifters. I swapped to an XT Di2 system and its wonderful. I think Di2 is even better on a mt. bike than a road bike (I have both) as you shift a lot more often on a mt. bike, so having easy and perfect shifts is more noticeable. As well I've done no maintenance. I just hope I never snap a rear derailer as that's expensive.
Steve B. is online now  
Old 07-01-22, 01:35 PM
  #57  
Camilo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,760
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1109 Post(s)
Liked 1,200 Times in 760 Posts
Originally Posted by Rolla
When people say "don't overthink it," this is what they're talking about. Try electronic shifting. If you like it, use it. If you don't, don't. A studied analysis won't change anything. When did we lose the ability to trust our own sensibilities?
I love science and engineering, I totally respect scientists and engineers, and am grateful for their knowledge, but sometimes I think there's too many scientists and engineers trying to shoe horn their skills into internet hobby forums.

Last edited by Camilo; 07-01-22 at 01:39 PM.
Camilo is offline  
Old 07-01-22, 01:51 PM
  #58  
Rolla
Guest
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Posts: 2,888
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1346 Post(s)
Liked 3,270 Times in 1,439 Posts
Originally Posted by Camilo
I love science and engineering, I totally respect scientists and engineers, and am grateful for their knowledge, but sometimes I think there's too many scientists and engineers trying to shoe horn their skills into internet hobby forums.
Science and engineering are great. But this is more like, "I don't like the feel of electronic shifting, so please explain it to me until I do."
I just don't think every emotional response requires an in-depth analytical study to validate it.
Rolla is offline  
Likes For Rolla:
Old 07-02-22, 12:10 AM
  #59  
Polaris OBark
ignominious poltroon
 
Polaris OBark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 3,997
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2223 Post(s)
Liked 3,407 Times in 1,779 Posts
Hey hey, my my.
Di2 will never die.
There's more to these shifters
Than meets the eye
Hey hey, my my.

My my, hey hey
Di2 is here to stay
It's better to burn out
Than drain the battery.
My my, hey hey

Out with the mechanical
and into the electronic
You pay for this,
like never before
And once you've tried it
you can't go back
When you're out of the mechanical
and into Di2
Polaris OBark is offline  
Likes For Polaris OBark:
Old 07-02-22, 04:24 AM
  #60  
nel e nel
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2020
Posts: 44

Bikes: 2017 Specialized Hardrock Disc; 199? Royce Union freestyle bike; 2021 Specialized Roubaix

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22 Post(s)
Liked 32 Times in 11 Posts
Originally Posted by Polaris OBark
I got it in 2014 because then, in order to get hydraulic shifting, I had to get it, as it was bundled when first released. I have zero regrets. I went from friction down-tube shifting (which I really liked) to Di2. I never owned a bike with mechanical "brifters." I do now (Campy on mine -- replaced the friction shifters, 105 on a couple of family bikes, etc), and I never really got used to the levers and find Di2 much more pleasant to use. The feedback is in the cadence, not making my hands hurt (this is hyperbole for me, but my wife has arthritic hands, so her new bike is going to have Di2).

The battery recharge is a non-issue. I let it run down intentionally when I first got it, just to see firsthand what would happen (stops shifting in the front first). I charge every 4 to 6 months, and haven't been caught out.

My only objection is vaguely philosophical: you shouldn't need to charge a battery to be able to ride a bike. But I got over it pretty quickly.
One could argue that your legs are batteries that need charging before every ride.
nel e nel is offline  
Old 07-02-22, 05:51 AM
  #61  
wolfchild
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Mississauga/Toronto, Ontario canada
Posts: 8,721

Bikes: I have 3 singlespeed/fixed gear bikes

Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4227 Post(s)
Liked 2,488 Times in 1,286 Posts
I have absolutely no interest in electronic shifting.
wolfchild is offline  
Likes For wolfchild:
Old 07-02-22, 06:18 AM
  #62  
bruce19
Senior Member
 
bruce19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Lebanon (Liberty Hill), CT
Posts: 8,473

Bikes: CAAD 12, MASI Gran Criterium S, Colnago World Cup CX & Guru steel

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1743 Post(s)
Liked 1,280 Times in 740 Posts
Electronic shifting is sort of like disc brakes. Are they "better" than what went before? Probably. Are rim brakes and mechanical shifting a problem.....nope. Do I want to add a couple thousand dollars and some weight to the cost of a new bike. Probably not. I'm just fine with my 15 lb GURU Photon and it's Dura Ace 11-sp mechanical system and rim brakes.
bruce19 is offline  
Likes For bruce19:
Old 07-02-22, 08:22 AM
  #63  
Polaris OBark
ignominious poltroon
 
Polaris OBark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 3,997
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2223 Post(s)
Liked 3,407 Times in 1,779 Posts
Originally Posted by wolfchild
I have absolutely no interest in electronic shifting.
Thanks for sharing. I will notify Shimano, SRAM and Campy forthwith!
Polaris OBark is offline  
Likes For Polaris OBark:
Old 07-02-22, 08:26 AM
  #64  
Polaris OBark
ignominious poltroon
 
Polaris OBark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 3,997
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2223 Post(s)
Liked 3,407 Times in 1,779 Posts
Originally Posted by nel e nel
One could argue that your legs are batteries that need charging before every ride.
Even when my Garmin's "body battery" estimate is very low (which it often is), I can still pedal the thing.

But the battery discharge worry on Di2 is not realistic. I don't even bother to check it more than once every month or two. Things just don't happen that fast. (My oldest kid has it, and has been plagued with some sort of random discharge problems that have a bad habit of appearing on race day. As annoyed as I am, I realize this is a very rare fluke.)
Polaris OBark is offline  
Old 07-02-22, 09:07 AM
  #65  
Sy Reene
Advocatus Diaboli
 
Sy Reene's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Wherever I am
Posts: 8,631

Bikes: Merlin Cyrene, Nashbar steel CX

Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4729 Post(s)
Liked 1,531 Times in 1,002 Posts
I think that a lot of the impetus for these kind of new tech discussions also stem from the new and inherent additional costs that go along with. There is no 12 speed Shimano mech shifting - remaining to be seen if 105 will come in 12s. So Di2 carries a built-in hefty price tag - by all accounts there are some pluses, but are they $1,000 worth of pluses? Same would go for disc brakes -- sure they work great, but they also cost more and weigh more. The choices remaining to have a high end framed bike built without being bundled with the newer tech (and price tags) are very diminished, so that there's now an tech inflation price tag that's unavoidable.
Sy Reene is offline  
Old 07-02-22, 01:02 PM
  #66  
tomato coupe
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,936

Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3942 Post(s)
Liked 7,284 Times in 2,941 Posts
Originally Posted by wolfchild
I have absolutely no interest in electronic shifting.
I have no interest in lima beans.
tomato coupe is offline  
Likes For tomato coupe:
Old 07-02-22, 01:14 PM
  #67  
spdntrxi
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: East Bay Area ,CA
Posts: 1,762

Bikes: not enough

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 189 Post(s)
Liked 86 Times in 52 Posts
anybody else think this is an odd title after how long Di2 has been around ?
  • Anyways to the op, maybe if you had small hands (like some petite women might). Di2 would come in handy.
  • For me personally I have some issue with my fingers and di2 helps me out there, so it's very welcome system for me.
spdntrxi is offline  
Likes For spdntrxi:
Old 07-02-22, 01:40 PM
  #68  
Sy Reene
Advocatus Diaboli
 
Sy Reene's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Wherever I am
Posts: 8,631

Bikes: Merlin Cyrene, Nashbar steel CX

Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4729 Post(s)
Liked 1,531 Times in 1,002 Posts
Originally Posted by spdntrxi
anybody else think this is an odd title after how long Di2 has been around ?
True. A couple differences though to the past. It remains to be seen if there will continue any mechanical in the top 3 tier groups for Shimano while upping the speeds to the same level.

Different now because of this, is we've seemingly lost the option to just get an upgrade kit to Di2 if we decide we want to try and have some leftover money 1-2 years down the road from buying the bike. Prior to the CV-related supply chain crises, there were 11s Di2 upgrade kits you could get for about $1k, and AFAIK, you could install on eg. an otherwise equipped 105 mech bike. So at least there was the option to afford a decent 105 equipped bike, then spend another $1k and gain electronic shifting.

As an example, a Tarmac SL6 Sport can be bought for $3500, and used to be able to add Di2 shifting to bring to about $4500 or so. Now, lowest cost model equipped Tarmac with Di2 will run you $8300 if their website is current. Not all makers are this off though. Cervelo (via Excel) seems to offer a $5k low option, and Trek's Di2 Emonda is only $6k
Sy Reene is offline  
Old 07-02-22, 04:10 PM
  #69  
spdntrxi
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: East Bay Area ,CA
Posts: 1,762

Bikes: not enough

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 189 Post(s)
Liked 86 Times in 52 Posts
Originally Posted by Sy Reene
True. A couple differences though to the past. It remains to be seen if there will continue any mechanical in the top 3 tier groups for Shimano while upping the speeds to the same level.

Different now because of this, is we've seemingly lost the option to just get an upgrade kit to Di2 if we decide we want to try and have some leftover money 1-2 years down the road from buying the bike. Prior to the CV-related supply chain crises, there were 11s Di2 upgrade kits you could get for about $1k, and AFAIK, you could install on eg. an otherwise equipped 105 mech bike. So at least there was the option to afford a decent 105 equipped bike, then spend another $1k and gain electronic shifting.

As an example, a Tarmac SL6 Sport can be bought for $3500, and used to be able to add Di2 shifting to bring to about $4500 or so. Now, lowest cost model equipped Tarmac with Di2 will run you $8300 if their website is current. Not all makers are this off though. Cervelo (via Excel) seems to offer a $5k low option, and Trek's Di2 Emonda is only $6k
dont blame it on Di2... everyone across the board has pretty much increase the price of their frames/bikes. New stuff always pays the premium, this is not a new concept.
spdntrxi is offline  
Old 07-02-22, 04:57 PM
  #70  
Sy Reene
Advocatus Diaboli
 
Sy Reene's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Wherever I am
Posts: 8,631

Bikes: Merlin Cyrene, Nashbar steel CX

Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4729 Post(s)
Liked 1,531 Times in 1,002 Posts
Originally Posted by spdntrxi
dont blame it on Di2... everyone across the board has pretty much increase the price of their frames/bikes. New stuff always pays the premium, this is not a new concept.
It's both new and not new. 12s isn't new (Campy and SRAM have had for a while; 13s even). Di2 isn't obviously new. What's new is there's a larger barrier to entry and no upgrade path (barring complete swap of entire drivetrain) from mech to electronic shifting.
Sy Reene is offline  
Old 07-02-22, 06:00 PM
  #71  
spdntrxi
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: East Bay Area ,CA
Posts: 1,762

Bikes: not enough

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 189 Post(s)
Liked 86 Times in 52 Posts
Originally Posted by Sy Reene
It's both new and not new. 12s isn't new (Campy and SRAM have had for a while; 13s even). Di2 isn't obviously new. What's new is there's a larger barrier to entry and no upgrade path (barring complete swap of entire drivetrain) from mech to electronic shifting.
it's new for Shimano.. and that's all that matters for Shimano.
I had etap11.. AXS was more expensive when it came out..
you really going to count EkAR.. which is 1X system.. you save money but not having an FD.

It's really hard to have an upgrade path from say 10 to 11, 11 to 12 and so. Who is doing it. SRAM didn't either. Going from etap11 to AXS I had to change everything. Atleast Shimano I could use my chainrings from 11 to 12.(non Shimano) and my freehub if I choose. Also on my TT bike the 9180 levers will work with 12 speed, I do wish 9170 road levers had the same cross compatibility.

I have no intention of every going back to mechanical gears
spdntrxi is offline  
Old 07-03-22, 12:11 AM
  #72  
Camilo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,760
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1109 Post(s)
Liked 1,200 Times in 760 Posts
Originally Posted by spdntrxi
anybody else think this is an odd title after how long Di2 has been around ?
  • Anyways to the op, maybe if you had small hands (like some petite women might). Di2 would come in handy.
  • For me personally I have some issue with my fingers and di2 helps me out there, so it's very welcome system for me.
I refer you to post 32
Camilo is offline  
Old 07-03-22, 03:10 AM
  #73  
Ogsarg
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Hollister, CA (not the surf town)
Posts: 1,734

Bikes: 2019 Specialized Roubaix Comp Di2, 2009 Roubaix, early 90's Giant Iguana

Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 641 Post(s)
Liked 1,517 Times in 549 Posts
Originally Posted by Polaris OBark
Even when my Garmin's "body battery" estimate is very low (which it often is), I can still pedal the thing.

But the battery discharge worry on Di2 is not realistic. I don't even bother to check it more than once every month or two. Things just don't happen that fast. (My oldest kid has it, and has been plagued with some sort of random discharge problems that have a bad habit of appearing on race day. As annoyed as I am, I realize this is a very rare fluke.)
I had that same thing happen on my bike. I would charge it completely and it would go out in less than 100 miles. I thought the battery was defective and was going to make a warranty claim. I read a post about the charger being important and saw that the ma rating of the charger was important. The one I was using met the spec but decided to try a different one and problem solved.

When working properly, worrying about the battery is just silly. I typically charge mine when I think it's been a month or two even if it doesn't need it. If by some chance it does go low, you get up to a thousand miles with the RD still working.
Ogsarg is offline  
Old 07-03-22, 07:51 AM
  #74  
wvridgerider
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Wild Wonderful West Virginia
Posts: 545

Bikes: Gunnar Crosshairs, Surly Karate Monkey, Specialized Fuze, Bianchi Volpe, too many others and a lot of broken frame

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 35 Post(s)
Liked 70 Times in 21 Posts
Just think, if there is another Carrington Event,I can still ride my bike that has mechanical shifting.
wvridgerider is offline  
Likes For wvridgerider:
Old 07-03-22, 09:08 AM
  #75  
PeteHski
Senior Member
 
PeteHski's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,381
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4387 Post(s)
Liked 4,827 Times in 2,983 Posts
Originally Posted by jackb
Whatever the so-called advantages of electronic shifting, the reason for it is two-fold. Americans love newness accompanied by convenience. I'm sure that electronic shifting is sure and efficient, but there are some whose goal is not to do something in the easiest and most efficient way. My bikes shift well enough. When they get out to tune I sometimes miss a shift. No bid deal. What if Shimano came out with voice activated shifting? Some cyclists would hail this as a major breakthrough. Now you don't even need to press a button. Just give a voice command like one does to that idiotic Alexa system. But the main reason we have all these technological developments is that companies want to make more and more money. One way to do this is make cyclists believe that they are on outdated equipment. Once you are convinced that you are not on the cutting edge of high tech and efficiency you'll be ready to spend thousands on a new bike. The industry is quite pleased.

As a human being, I like doing things manually. I like turning the lights on and off in my house. I like walking places. I like using my body in many ways. Of course I use modern conveniences like most other people, but I use them selectively. Some relieve me from hard, tedious work, but even then I like hard tedious work every now and then. If one likes electronic shifting, there you go. But for many it is not necessary at all and, in the long run, just costs more money. I'd like to see some rogue company produce and promote simple, basic bicycles at a reasonable cost. Four and five thousand dollars is simply too much to pay for a bike. Pedaling for fun is what most of us like about cycling, not pedaling for speed or to win something or to do something in the most efficient manner. But again, to each his own. Some people yearn to own a driverless car. Many of us do not.
So any further bicycle development beyond your personal expectations is a waste of time and there should be a fixed upper limit for their cost. Again in line with your personal expectations.

Note: Nobody is asking Shimano to make a voice activated gear shift. Why? Because it doesn't really make any sense.
PeteHski is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.