The 41 refugee thread
#101
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 6,840
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 31 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
OK, speaking of breaks...
In a recent race, a group got away with two of my teammates and two others. I hung out near the front of the peloton and tried to "cover." At one point, about 8 guys put in a big surge, and I sat on. Soon, this dwindled to three: me and two others from different teams. I sat on while they bridged up to the breakaway. That makes three from my team and four others.
Now, races here are pancake flat, and the break _always_ gets caught. We worked hard for a while (I put in a lot of work because one of my teammates is a strong finisher, unlike me), but we were caught a couple km later. One of my teammates chastised me (note: he didn't yell at me ;-), saying that three is too many and the field will chase the break down in that situation.
I tried to explain that I was sitting on a group of eight and then just continued, but he didn't really want to hear my explanation. So I ask the 33-collective: on a scale of 1 to 10, how bad were my tactics? And, what should I have done?
In a recent race, a group got away with two of my teammates and two others. I hung out near the front of the peloton and tried to "cover." At one point, about 8 guys put in a big surge, and I sat on. Soon, this dwindled to three: me and two others from different teams. I sat on while they bridged up to the breakaway. That makes three from my team and four others.
Now, races here are pancake flat, and the break _always_ gets caught. We worked hard for a while (I put in a lot of work because one of my teammates is a strong finisher, unlike me), but we were caught a couple km later. One of my teammates chastised me (note: he didn't yell at me ;-), saying that three is too many and the field will chase the break down in that situation.
I tried to explain that I was sitting on a group of eight and then just continued, but he didn't really want to hear my explanation. So I ask the 33-collective: on a scale of 1 to 10, how bad were my tactics? And, what should I have done?
i've been in lots of flat races that breaks stay away. lots of them.
#102
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur
Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times
in
1,417 Posts
Also, there's that one time that the break won't get caught. I had a teammate in a solo break and he managed to get away just as the road turned on a long straight with a dead tailwind. He managed to stay away and got the win. I hung like a barnacle on the chase group and got a free tow to the line and got some easy upgrade points.
#103
Senior Member
...
If your riding for someone else and you cover a break, what does that do for the rider your riding for? If the break stays away, your not really helping the rider your riding for, right? I mean, you probably won't work for the break, but how does that help the one your riding for?
...
If your riding for someone else and you cover a break, what does that do for the rider your riding for? If the break stays away, your not really helping the rider your riding for, right? I mean, you probably won't work for the break, but how does that help the one your riding for?
...
First, you aren't working so much for someone, but you are working for the good of the team. When someone says they are working "for someone", it means they are doing things that will keep that rider well rested and therefore increase his odds of winning should the "predicted outcome" play out. IOW, if the predicted outcome is a sprint, and your sheltered rider is a sprinter, then you do things to save him energy. You tow him around the pack, you chase breaks that look like they might stick, you lead him out at the finish.
If there is more than one of you on the team working for a single rider, or if the predicted outcome is a breakaway, then you might cover breaks. Particularly the early breaks. The early breaks probably won't stay away, but in case they do, it is helpful to the team's goal of winning to have a presence in that breakaway.
When you cover a break, it means you are in the break but not doing any work to assist it. This has many implications. If the break stays away, then you are well rested and have the best shot at winning at the line. If a teammate can bridge, it means there are two of you, one of which is well rested, which dramatically increases the odds of winning if the break stays away. If the break is brought back, it means that your teammate didn't have to contribute to the chase; if your teammate is a sprinter, then he and his leadout riders didn't burn any matches worrying about the breakaway, if he is a breakaway artist, then he is well rested to counterattack with a break that might stay away.
Typically, when covering a break, you aren't really trying to actively slow the break down. All that happens then is it gets caught quicker and another breakaway, one which you aren't in a position to cover, goes up the road. You are merely being present in the break, getting a free ride to whatever end the break is destined.
__________________
Cat 2 Track, Cat 3 Road.
"If you’re new enough [to racing] that you would ask such question, then i would hazard a guess that if you just made up a workout that sounded hard to do, and did it, you’d probably get faster." --the tiniest sprinter
Cat 2 Track, Cat 3 Road.
"If you’re new enough [to racing] that you would ask such question, then i would hazard a guess that if you just made up a workout that sounded hard to do, and did it, you’d probably get faster." --the tiniest sprinter
#104
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 28,387
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac SL2, Specialized Tarmac SL, Giant TCR Composite, Specialized StumpJumper Expert HT
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
And to be clear above I wasn't suggesting to actively slow the break down, but perhaps actively slow the chase down. That said if it were a chase that was separate from the pack I probably would have done the same thing and just sat on.
#105
Senior Member
Having three teammates in the break means that the other four riders don't really count for anything; it might as well be a break of three teammates. The teammates of the four other riders will chase the break down even though they have guys in the break. So basically, instead of having four teams not contributing to the chase, you are in a situation where it's one team against the entire peloton. Ideally, one or two of the weaker teammates drop back and the strongest remains. The guys who dropped back then work to disrupt the chase, and the remaining guy or guys works with the break to keep it away.
Ideally. But how often does "ideally" happen? If everyone in the break were rotating through at it still only took a couple km to bring it back, then it's unlikely that any tactic would have kept the break alive. Too many people took an interest in chasing right from the start. If that happens, no amount of tactics will make the outcome any different.
__________________
Cat 2 Track, Cat 3 Road.
"If you’re new enough [to racing] that you would ask such question, then i would hazard a guess that if you just made up a workout that sounded hard to do, and did it, you’d probably get faster." --the tiniest sprinter
Cat 2 Track, Cat 3 Road.
"If you’re new enough [to racing] that you would ask such question, then i would hazard a guess that if you just made up a workout that sounded hard to do, and did it, you’d probably get faster." --the tiniest sprinter
Last edited by Brian Ratliff; 08-04-10 at 01:54 PM.
#106
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 6,840
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 31 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
^ Pedaleur's team mate has a valid discussion point, but bottom line, a group of 4 is up the road. 2 of Pedaleur's team mates are in it so ignoring individual abilities, they have a 2 in 4 or 50% probability of winning.
when the 8-person chase group goes, Pedaleur is correct to jump on to it, because he has to assume that the break is going to become 12 strong, ignoring individual attributes, 3 in 12 is better than 2 in 11. that the chase became 3 including Pedaleur only strengthens this argument because 3 in 7 are better odds than 2 in 6.
when it becomes 3 in 7 and uncooperative, it's up to the 3 to thin the herd. if I'm one of the 4, assuming no other representation, i work, just hard enough to be fluid while paying attention to what's going on. I'll take my legs against 7 than against the field.
when the 8-person chase group goes, Pedaleur is correct to jump on to it, because he has to assume that the break is going to become 12 strong, ignoring individual attributes, 3 in 12 is better than 2 in 11. that the chase became 3 including Pedaleur only strengthens this argument because 3 in 7 are better odds than 2 in 6.
when it becomes 3 in 7 and uncooperative, it's up to the 3 to thin the herd. if I'm one of the 4, assuming no other representation, i work, just hard enough to be fluid while paying attention to what's going on. I'll take my legs against 7 than against the field.
#108
My idea of fun
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Gainesville, FL
Posts: 9,920
Bikes: '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '02 Kona Lavadome, '07 Giant TCR Advanced, '07 Karate Monkey
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 41 Post(s)
Liked 59 Times
in
36 Posts
Honest question. I am not racing this year, although I have raced extensively in the past, and am seriously thinking about it for next year. Meanwhile I am working hard at getting back into shape via solo and group rides. Is it OK to post in the Training Status thread or is it frowned upon?
#109
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 6,840
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 31 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#110
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 339
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Similarly... Am I ridiculous for racing in Crank Bro's eggbeaters? Is there an advantage to something like Look or Speedplay that I'm not seeing?
#111
Ż\_(ツ)_/Ż
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Redwood City, CA
Posts: 10,978
Bikes: aggressive agreement is what I ride.
Mentioned: 109 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 967 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
Honest question. I am not racing this year, although I have raced extensively in the past, and am seriously thinking about it for next year. Meanwhile I am working hard at getting back into shape via solo and group rides. Is it OK to post in the Training Status thread or is it frowned upon?
I hope so. I've only done 1 race (a hill climb) and haven't yet done a mass-start (this weekend), but I read and post into that thread. As long as you're on topic, I don't think anyone minds.
#112
Resident Alien
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Location, location.
Posts: 13,089
Mentioned: 158 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 349 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
6 Posts
Sitting on a bridge that you think has a shot of making it up is a good move. You're delivering a set of fresh legs for your team and providing at least the same odds for your team to win, there's really no downside. Exception would be if you're supposed to be sheltering your sprinter.
It's likely that when the pack saw a large group heading up to the break, that's when they started chasing. You being in it wasn't any great trigger, unless you're the 800 pound gorilla in the field.
#114
pan y agua
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 31,273
Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1428 Post(s)
Liked 697 Times
in
353 Posts
I can think of several reasons that you might not pick the MTB Eggbeaters as your ideal choice for Road racing, such as shoe choice availability, and to a lessor degree, cornering angle, and platform size. But if you already have them, and like them, there's no real need to change.
__________________
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
#115
**** that
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: CALI
Posts: 15,402
Mentioned: 151 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1099 Post(s)
Liked 104 Times
in
30 Posts
(my SPDs were not well cared for, probably loose, creaked at 800+ watts)
#116
Banned.
Join Date: May 2006
Location: ATX, Ex So Cal
Posts: 11,058
Bikes: Ridley Noah-Scott Addict-Orbea Ordu
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I'd wholly disagree. If you've got real horsepower and enough guys working to keep the speed up, the pack can at best match your speed and that's it. Most of my races finish with the break staying away. Sometimes the break is just me. I watched the entire Toyota United team try to chase down Moninger in a crit, he ended up lapping them.
Sitting on a bridge that you think has a shot of making it up is a good move. You're delivering a set of fresh legs for your team and providing at least the same odds for your team to win, there's really no downside. Exception would be if you're supposed to be sheltering your sprinter.
It's likely that when the pack saw a large group heading up to the break, that's when they started chasing. You being in it wasn't any great trigger, unless you're the 800 pound gorilla in the field.
Sitting on a bridge that you think has a shot of making it up is a good move. You're delivering a set of fresh legs for your team and providing at least the same odds for your team to win, there's really no downside. Exception would be if you're supposed to be sheltering your sprinter.
It's likely that when the pack saw a large group heading up to the break, that's when they started chasing. You being in it wasn't any great trigger, unless you're the 800 pound gorilla in the field.
#117
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 198
Bikes: 2007 Trek Madone 5.2 SRAM Force
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
If i use my SwissStop pads on my alumminum rims do i need to pick out the little shards of alumminum before using them with my carbons? I've been told yes and no so i'm slightly confused.
#119
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 198
Bikes: 2007 Trek Madone 5.2 SRAM Force
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Well i'm wondering if it would scratch the carbon braking surface which would also put the rims out of warranty. That is if there is visible proof of using something other than carbon specific pads.
#120
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 28,387
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac SL2, Specialized Tarmac SL, Giant TCR Composite, Specialized StumpJumper Expert HT
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
If you can see bits of stuff from the alu rims then you should clean them or not use them. The SwissStop Yellows are supposed to be less prone to picking up crap from the rims, but ymmv.
#121
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Santa Cruz Mountains
Posts: 6,169
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
yes.Yes, for reynolds anyhow.
even using carbon specific pads with aluminium shards in it would void the warranty, the way I understand it.
What's hard about swappng pads?
BTW Reynolds have new pads which I'm told are better (at least on Reynolds rims) and cost half as much as SwissStop Yellows.
What's hard about swappng pads?
BTW Reynolds have new pads which I'm told are better (at least on Reynolds rims) and cost half as much as SwissStop Yellows.
#122
Arrogant Roadie Punk
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: California
Posts: 2,353
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I usually ride aluminum rims all week then Reynolds Assaults on the weekends for races and such (though the last couple of weeks I've been too 'lazy' to switch from the Assaults), but I do usually look at the surface of the swiss stops. i take off the pad holder, gently file down just the surface and look for little bits. most of the time i dont find anything, but one time the back pads looked like steel wool.....anyways I do it as part of a pre-race bike prep and its take just a few minutes.
#124
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 28,387
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac SL2, Specialized Tarmac SL, Giant TCR Composite, Specialized StumpJumper Expert HT
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
I got the greens for my alu rims, they work better with them anyway. I switch to yellows when I run carbon
#125
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 7,621
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 485 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
thank you for this thread... the stupid in the 41 needed a relief valve.
Here's a 33 sorta question. I've been told that the better measure of power is normalized power vs. average power. What's the difference and how is normalized power calculated?
Here's a 33 sorta question. I've been told that the better measure of power is normalized power vs. average power. What's the difference and how is normalized power calculated?