Notices
General Cycling Discussion Have a cycling related question or comment that doesn't fit in one of the other specialty forums? Drop on in and post in here! When possible, please select the forum above that most fits your post!

Which Bike

Old 11-11-15, 10:12 PM
  #1  
kappakall
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Georgia
Posts: 61
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Which Bike

1st I'm a noob to the site and a 10 month rider.

I currently have a 2013 Fuji Altamira 2.3 with Ultergra components.

Thinking about moving up to a 2015 Cannondale Supersix evo with sram red.

Based on my research this is what I've found are positives to new bike:
1. sram red is better that ultegra and lighter
2. the carbon used on the cannondale is better that the c5 carbon on the fuji
3. it appears that the cannondale is lighter
4. better wheels on cannondale

Here is what I don't know:
1. Will the 2 or 3lbs lighter increase my overall speed?
2. I've heard that the cannondale is stiffer, what does that really mean?
3. both bikes are race bikes I'm assuming.

Any help on the difference would be appreciated.
kappakall is offline  
Old 11-11-15, 11:33 PM
  #2  
GamblerGORD53
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Elevation 666m Edmonton Canada
Posts: 2,474

Bikes: 2013 Custom SA5w / Rohloff Tourster

Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1233 Post(s)
Liked 318 Times in 245 Posts
Try the road forum. They all have silly fiber bikes.
GamblerGORD53 is offline  
Old 11-12-15, 06:33 AM
  #3  
indyfabz
Senior Member
 
indyfabz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 39,212
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18397 Post(s)
Liked 15,485 Times in 7,316 Posts
Originally Posted by GamblerGORD53
Try the road forum. They all have silly fiber bikes.
No we don't.
indyfabz is offline  
Likes For indyfabz:
Old 11-12-15, 07:05 AM
  #4  
Maelochs
Senior Member
 
Maelochs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,480

Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE

Mentioned: 144 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7648 Post(s)
Liked 3,465 Times in 1,831 Posts
As I believe was asked in the Road forum ... since you already have an awesome carbon-fiber-frame bike, why do you want another? If you have been riding for less than a year, it is almost certain you have not gotten everything out of that Fuji. However, if you have the cash, a new bike is always a thrill (I will get rid of the old one for you ... just ship it to me and I will take care of disposal ... I will even pay for shipping.)

However, as many of us can attest, getting a new bike expecting night/day performance gains will always lead to disappointment unless the old bike came from Wal-Mart. You probably won't notice any difference between the two, and probably won't be noticeably faster. In all likelihood, you will like both bikes and perform exactly the same on both--in which case why drop the money?

For the cost of the SuperSix Evo, you could hire a trainer, which would probably do ten times as much to increase your speed.

But, again, if you have the cash, why not? Just don't expect to feel like you have moved up to a new level , because the most important part of the bike--the rider--will not have changed.
Maelochs is offline  
Old 11-12-15, 01:23 PM
  #5  
Drew Eckhardt 
Senior Member
 
Drew Eckhardt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Mountain View, CA USA and Golden, CO USA
Posts: 6,341

Bikes: 97 Litespeed, 50-39-30x13-26 10 cogs, Campagnolo Ultrashift, retroreflective rims on SON28/PowerTap hubs

Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 550 Post(s)
Liked 325 Times in 226 Posts
Originally Posted by kappakall
1st I'm a noob to the site and a 10 month rider.
Here is what I don't know:
1. Will the 2 or 3lbs lighter increase my overall speed?
Yes. You'll be 1-2% faster up-hill. On level ground the weight change won't have a measurable effect. The big difference is SRAM vs Shimano - which shifting interface do you prefer? You may really like an extra cog or not care.

Your speed increase up steep hills is inversely proportional to total weight. For example, as a 135 pound climber dropping from a 18 to 15 pound bike will make you (135 + 18) / (135 + 15) = 1.02, up to 2% faster. That's 30 seconds per hour of climbing. As a 200 pound rider the change will only make you 1.4% faster.

3 pounds is 1.4kg. 20 miles/hour is 8.9 meters/second. 9.8 m/s^2 * 1.4kg * 8.9 m/s * .004 Crr = 0.49W out of 200+, so you're saving about 0.25% of your power on level ground. Most of that is overcoming aerodynamic drag proportional to the cube of speed so you could expect speed to increase with the cube root of 1.00250 = 1.0008 and 0.08%.

Last edited by Drew Eckhardt; 11-12-15 at 01:43 PM.
Drew Eckhardt is offline  
Old 11-12-15, 01:42 PM
  #6  
Phil_gretz
Zip tie Karen
 
Phil_gretz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Fair Oaks Ranch, TX
Posts: 7,004

Bikes: '13 Motobecane Fantom29 HT, '16 Motobecane Turino Pro Disc, '18 Velobuild VB-R-022, '21 Tsunami SNM-100

Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1465 Post(s)
Liked 1,542 Times in 806 Posts
Better fit. Better aerodynamics. Better wheels. These may help you.

A new bike won't likely make much of a difference unless it accomplishes one of the above 3.

Save your money and ride more.
Phil_gretz is offline  
Old 11-12-15, 01:45 PM
  #7  
1983
Senior Member
 
1983's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 164
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by GamblerGORD53
Try the road forum. They all have silly fiber bikes.
Not me.
1983 is offline  
Old 11-12-15, 01:47 PM
  #8  
1983
Senior Member
 
1983's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 164
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Drew Eckhardt
Yes. You'll be 1-2% faster up-hill. On level ground the weight change won't have a measurable effect. The big difference is SRAM vs Shimano - which shifting interface do you prefer? You may really like an extra cog or not care.

Your speed increase up steep hills is inversely proportional to total weight. For example, as a 135 pound climber dropping from a 18 to 15 pound bike will make you (135 + 18) / (135 + 15) = 1.02, up to 2% faster. That's 30 seconds per hour of climbing. As a 200 pound rider the change will only make you 1.4% faster.

3 pounds is 1.4kg. 20 miles/hour is 8.9 meters/second. 9.8 m/s^2 * 1.4kg * 8.9 m/s * .004 Crr = 0.49W out of 200+, so you're saving about 0.25% of your power on level ground. Most of that is overcoming aerodynamic drag proportional to the cube of speed so you could expect speed to increase with the cube root of 1.00250 = 1.0008 and 0.08%.
Wind resistance increases relative to velocity squared, not cubed.

WR = 1/2(rho)v^2(CD)A

In your last calculation, you've already accounted for (g1.kg) by noting 3lbs in the opening. Ie weight is (mass)(gravity) so if you know the weight then no need to include that breakdown.

Last edited by 1983; 11-12-15 at 01:59 PM.
1983 is offline  
Old 11-12-15, 02:30 PM
  #9  
Drew Eckhardt 
Senior Member
 
Drew Eckhardt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Mountain View, CA USA and Golden, CO USA
Posts: 6,341

Bikes: 97 Litespeed, 50-39-30x13-26 10 cogs, Campagnolo Ultrashift, retroreflective rims on SON28/PowerTap hubs

Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 550 Post(s)
Liked 325 Times in 226 Posts
Originally Posted by 1983
Wind resistance increases relative to velocity squared, not cubed.

WR = 1/2(rho)v^2(CD)A
The force is proportional to velocity squared. Power is force multiplied by distance divided by time. You're covering more distance in the same time so power is proportional to velocity cubed.

That's why it takes me about 700W to break 30 MPH on flat ground while 200W is enough to average 20 MPH. 30 MPH is 1.5X the speed, and 1.5^3 = 3.375 suggesting 675W.


In your last calculation, you've already accounted for (g1.kg) by noting 3lbs in the opening. Ie weight is (mass)(gravity) so if you know the weight then no need to include that breakdown.
Kilograms are mass not weight. You need to multiply by gravity to get weight and therefore force normal in newtons.

1 joule = 1 kg*m^2/s^2
1 watt = 1 joule/s or 1 kg*m^2/s^3

9.8 m/s^2 * 1.4 kg * 8.9m/s * .004 Crr (dimensionless) = 0.49 kg*m^2/s^3 = 0.49 W

Last edited by Drew Eckhardt; 11-12-15 at 02:42 PM.
Drew Eckhardt is offline  
Old 11-12-15, 02:40 PM
  #10  
fietsbob
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NW,Oregon Coast
Posts: 43,598

Bikes: 8

Mentioned: 197 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7607 Post(s)
Liked 1,355 Times in 862 Posts
Step 1 , find a Dealer for the brand you are interested in . then test ride the bike ..
Carbon fiber is a Lot of hand labor .. thats why so much is coming from places where the labor costs Less..
fietsbob is offline  
Old 11-12-15, 02:46 PM
  #11  
1983
Senior Member
 
1983's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 164
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Drew Eckhardt
The force is proportional to velocity squared. Power is force multiplied by distance divided by time. You're covering more distance in the same time so power is proportional to velocity cubed.
You lost me with "aerodynamic drag" which I recognize as drag force or wind resistance given the context.

So then, you are doing this: [1/2rho(v^2)CD(A)]*[F(V)]

to get this: [1/2rho(CD)A]*F*v^3 using communicative property, right?



Originally Posted by Drew Eckhardt
Kilograms are mass not weight. You need to multiply by gravity to get weight and therefore force normal in newtons.

1 joule = 1 kg*m^2/s^2
1 watt = 1 joule/s or 1 kg*m^2/s^3

9.8 m/s^2 * 1.4 kg * 8.9m/s * .004 Crr (dimensionless) = 0.49 kg m^2/s^3 = 0.49 W
Right, which is what I said. You started by mentioning weight (3lb) then converted it to kg, then multiplied it by g, which nets you the weight which you started with. Why not just take the 3lbs directly into the equation?

Last edited by 1983; 11-12-15 at 03:22 PM.
1983 is offline  
Old 11-12-15, 03:55 PM
  #12  
slimyfrog
Senior Member
 
slimyfrog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: SF East Bay
Posts: 349
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
... or you could add/remove a water bottle and actually find out.
slimyfrog is offline  
Old 11-13-15, 03:36 PM
  #13  
shelbyfv
Expired Member
 
shelbyfv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: TN
Posts: 11,499
Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3649 Post(s)
Liked 5,382 Times in 2,732 Posts
OP's other thread on this https://www.bikeforums.net/road-cycli...need-help.html
shelbyfv is offline  
Old 11-13-15, 04:14 PM
  #14  
habilis
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Morris County, NJ
Posts: 1,102

Bikes: 90's Bianchi Premio, Raleigh-framed fixed gear, Trek 3500, Centurion hybrid, Dunelt 3-spd, Trek 800

Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2167 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
I currently have three bikes. The most expensive (which is a reasonable road bike) is my least favorite. I acquired it used, and it didn't need any work at all. I prefer to ride the fixed gear bike that I built on an old frame for about $200. My current favorite, however, is a low-end MTB that someone left out for the trash. I put $50 worth of parts into it, plus a lot of adjustment. My point: you may get more out of a possession if you put something into it besides money.
habilis is offline  
Old 11-13-15, 05:19 PM
  #15  
BillyD
Administrator
 
BillyD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Hudson Valley, NY
Posts: 32,978

Bikes: Merlin Cyrene '04; Bridgestone RB-1 '92

Mentioned: 325 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11952 Post(s)
Liked 6,599 Times in 3,465 Posts
Originally Posted by shelbyfv
That one's not doing too good.
__________________
See, this is why we can't have nice things. - - smarkinson
Where else but the internet can a bunch of cyclists go and be the tough guy? - - jdon
BillyD is offline  
Old 11-13-15, 05:22 PM
  #16  
smarkinson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 1,003
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 332 Post(s)
Liked 13 Times in 7 Posts
Don't get the Cannondale whatever you do.

In the other thread you mentioned one of the reasons for returning the Fuji was because of a noise in the bottom bracket. Well, Cannondale and their use of the pressfit BB30 bottom bracket is rather notorious for creaking bottom bracket noises. Seriously, google "bb30 bottom bracket creaking".
smarkinson is offline  
Old 11-13-15, 05:22 PM
  #17  
veganbikes
Clark W. Griswold
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: ,location, location
Posts: 13,458

Bikes: Foundry Chilkoot Ti W/Ultegra Di2, Salsa Timberjack Ti, Cinelli Mash Work RandoCross Fun Time Machine, 1x9 XT Parts Hybrid, Co-Motion Cascadia, Specialized Langster, Phil Wood Apple VeloXS Frame (w/DA 7400), R+M Supercharger2 Rohloff, Habanero Ti 26

Mentioned: 54 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4330 Post(s)
Liked 3,955 Times in 2,644 Posts
Originally Posted by kappakall
1st I'm a noob to the site and a 10 month rider.

I currently have a 2013 Fuji Altamira 2.3 with Ultergra components.

Thinking about moving up to a 2015 Cannondale Supersix evo with sram red.

Based on my research this is what I've found are positives to new bike:
1. sram red is better that ultegra and lighter
2. the carbon used on the cannondale is better that the c5 carbon on the fuji
3. it appears that the cannondale is lighter
4. better wheels on cannondale

Here is what I don't know:
1. Will the 2 or 3lbs lighter increase my overall speed?
2. I've heard that the cannondale is stiffer, what does that really mean?
3. both bikes are race bikes I'm assuming.

Any help on the difference would be appreciated.
Not a huge fan of the crabons but I can give you my thoughts on SRAM after some test rides most significantly on a Moots Ti Frame (but also on a fuji cross 1.3). I dig what they do and their underdog nature (or at least more in the past) but their shifting is odd. I love the fact the brake lever is purely for braking but the double tap had me unsure if I had run through my cassette or not.
Sram Red is certainly light but honestly unless you are a racing or just have ridiculous money it isn't going to give you such a huge performance boost.

If you really want to spend your money wisely get a custom made frame which can come in just about any material though my top choice would be high quality steel followed by titanium. You can still get lightweight but with steel and Ti you get durability and if you go custom you can get a frame built for you and your specs.

If not the custom route, get a nice set of wheels for the Fuji. You can either get a really nice set built by someone like Bill Mould or Peter White (two long time wheel builders with lots of experience) using high quality components, or you can buy some premade wheels (some of which are handmade some aren't) from a company like Zipp or ENVE or DT Swiss.

A stiffer bike is generally going to help transfer more power to the pedals but also be a little harsher ride. The bottom bracket is generally an area you want some stiffness but maybe not throughout the entire bike unless of course you are racing.
veganbikes is offline  
Old 11-13-15, 05:52 PM
  #18  
RPK79
Custom User Title
 
RPK79's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: SE MN
Posts: 11,239

Bikes: Fuji Roubaix Pro & Quintana Roo Kilo

Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2863 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 31 Times in 14 Posts
Originally Posted by BillyD
That one's not doing too good.
It's doing alright...
RPK79 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
NyoGoat
Road Cycling
35
03-29-17 02:00 PM
kappakall
Road Cycling
207
11-13-15 01:03 PM
singlespeedscot
Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational)
1
01-17-11 04:07 PM
buckeyefan
Road Cycling
19
08-06-10 07:37 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.