Road Test/Bike Review (1986) Richard SACHS Signature
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Central Florida, USA
Posts: 1,991
Bikes: Litespeed (9); Slingshot (9); Specialized (3); Kestrel (2); Cervelo (1); FELT (1); Trek (2)
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 436 Post(s)
Liked 3,470 Times
in
999 Posts
Road Test/Bike Review (1986) Richard SACHS Signature
__________________
WTB: Slingshot bicycle promotional documents (catalog, pamphlets, etc).
WTB: American Cycling May - Aug, Oct, Dec 1966.
WTB: Bicycle Guide issues 1984 (any); Jun 1987; Jul, Nov/Dec 1992; Apr 1994; 1996 -1998 (any)
WTB: Bike World issue Jun 1974.
WTB: Slingshot bicycle promotional documents (catalog, pamphlets, etc).
WTB: American Cycling May - Aug, Oct, Dec 1966.
WTB: Bicycle Guide issues 1984 (any); Jun 1987; Jul, Nov/Dec 1992; Apr 1994; 1996 -1998 (any)
WTB: Bike World issue Jun 1974.
Likes For SpeedofLite:
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Peoria, IL
Posts: 4,475
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1829 Post(s)
Liked 3,373 Times
in
1,579 Posts
Neat!
I hadn't seen this interview before, and it's the first time I'd heard about Mr. Sachs preference for very low bottom brackets! I gotta admit, I got used to a 10 1/2" bottom bracket on my mid 70's Raleigh Gran Sport. I kept that dimension when I had two subsequent custom frames built, and had one builder ask if I really wanted it that low.
Personally, now that I have another bike with a high bottom bracket (about 11"?), I'm not sure that it's a major difference in how the bike handles. With clipless pedals, there's little chance of grounding a pedal in a turn with the lower BB (unlike with conventional pedals). On the bike with the high BB, when I stop at an intersection, I have to get off of the saddle in order to put a foot down.
Another topic that got my attention was the use of SLX tubing on a large frame. As someone who rides 62cm frames, c-t, I'd always thought that SL was too light. Not sure if SLX was considered good enough. I did notice that a SP down tube was used, along with SP fork blades, so that was a good choice to improve the torsional stiffness. The minor tendency to shimmy wasn't surprising, but now I'm wondering if the bike would be considered to "plane".
Thanks for sharing the article!
Steve in Peoria
I hadn't seen this interview before, and it's the first time I'd heard about Mr. Sachs preference for very low bottom brackets! I gotta admit, I got used to a 10 1/2" bottom bracket on my mid 70's Raleigh Gran Sport. I kept that dimension when I had two subsequent custom frames built, and had one builder ask if I really wanted it that low.
Personally, now that I have another bike with a high bottom bracket (about 11"?), I'm not sure that it's a major difference in how the bike handles. With clipless pedals, there's little chance of grounding a pedal in a turn with the lower BB (unlike with conventional pedals). On the bike with the high BB, when I stop at an intersection, I have to get off of the saddle in order to put a foot down.
Another topic that got my attention was the use of SLX tubing on a large frame. As someone who rides 62cm frames, c-t, I'd always thought that SL was too light. Not sure if SLX was considered good enough. I did notice that a SP down tube was used, along with SP fork blades, so that was a good choice to improve the torsional stiffness. The minor tendency to shimmy wasn't surprising, but now I'm wondering if the bike would be considered to "plane".
Thanks for sharing the article!
Steve in Peoria
Likes For steelbikeguy:
#3
Junior Member
I've owned several Richard Sachs frames over the years, but none at present. I've copied the dimensions of my most recent RS frameset on to my current custom bikes.
I do prefer a low bottom bottom bracket; I consider 26 cm (10.25") my favorite. (Previously used on Richard Sachs and 1979 Pinarello).
I don't notice much difference in BB height when riding on the flat, but when descending, the lower BB feels more stable (secure). To me, a 27cm BB height (previously: 2001 Mercian) feels perched high up and doesn't feel as stable. 26.0 to 26.5 cm, to me, feels much better.
I found that a 25.5 cm (10") BB felt a slight bit soft under pedaling force. (Transition from one RS frame to another.)
All bikes were/are 60 cm c-t, with 175mm cranks and Look pedals.
I do prefer a low bottom bottom bracket; I consider 26 cm (10.25") my favorite. (Previously used on Richard Sachs and 1979 Pinarello).
I don't notice much difference in BB height when riding on the flat, but when descending, the lower BB feels more stable (secure). To me, a 27cm BB height (previously: 2001 Mercian) feels perched high up and doesn't feel as stable. 26.0 to 26.5 cm, to me, feels much better.
I found that a 25.5 cm (10") BB felt a slight bit soft under pedaling force. (Transition from one RS frame to another.)
All bikes were/are 60 cm c-t, with 175mm cranks and Look pedals.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 20,305
Mentioned: 130 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3464 Post(s)
Liked 2,828 Times
in
1,995 Posts
In the clipless pedal era ( most recent, not the original Look ) a low bottom bracket is less of a concern.
Riders are very adaptable, one learns the machine.
way back I had two race bikes, one with a very high bracket. Terrific for criterium racing, I could pedal through a corner and hear my competition behind dig a pedal in the turn.
very useful on the last corner.
today, not that necessary.
do find it interesting that so many plastic frames have 70 mm of drop.
Riders are very adaptable, one learns the machine.
way back I had two race bikes, one with a very high bracket. Terrific for criterium racing, I could pedal through a corner and hear my competition behind dig a pedal in the turn.
very useful on the last corner.
today, not that necessary.
do find it interesting that so many plastic frames have 70 mm of drop.
Likes For repechage:
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: In transit
Posts: 1,897
Bikes: 07 Vanilla, 98 IRD road frame built up with 25th Ann DA, Surly cross check with 105 comp, 78 Raleigh Comp GS, 85 Centurionelli
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 87 Post(s)
Liked 923 Times
in
191 Posts
I love the comparison of the design aesthetic of the Campy gruppo to a Ford Taurus!
Likes For poprad:
#6
Senior Member
__________________
Check out www.djcatnap.com for articles on vintage Japanese & French bicycle restorations, components and history.
Check out www.djcatnap.com for articles on vintage Japanese & French bicycle restorations, components and history.
Likes For Catnap:
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 13,444
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4232 Post(s)
Liked 2,947 Times
in
1,806 Posts
^^^Great quote.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: Wake Forest, NC
Posts: 5,783
Bikes: 1989 Cinelli Supercorsa
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3504 Post(s)
Liked 2,922 Times
in
1,774 Posts
I love the broadside photo of the entire bike along with the detail photos, all with simple backgrounds. Seems that in today's magazines, we rarely get broadside photos; often all we get are "wedge" shots of the bike taken at extreme angles from the front or rear.
Likes For smd4: