Bike fit - reach too long?
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2021
Posts: 5
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Bike fit - reach too long?
Hi there,
I am new to road bikes, have been ridden a cross bike / fitness bike with aggressive setup so far. Ordered a road bike with all tools saying I should get the 56 cm size.
It translate to 56 cm seat tube, 56 cm effective horizontal top tube, 393 mm reach and 563 mm stack.
I feel like in this position the reach is too far out. Have taken this sloppy picture, hope it's good enough. The stem is 10 cm long, I feel like shortening it by 1 cm is not enough, and going shorter will affect the bike handling too much ( so I read).
Problem is that the 54 cm size version doesn't look that different, when put into the bikegeocalc visualizer besides the lower stack with 546 mm. Effective reach (front saddle to the handle bar) will be shortened by 8 mm. The 383 mm reach , thus 1 cm shorter reach, is a bit negated by the bigger drop.
Cannot post photo yet, because new here on the forum.
I am new to road bikes, have been ridden a cross bike / fitness bike with aggressive setup so far. Ordered a road bike with all tools saying I should get the 56 cm size.
It translate to 56 cm seat tube, 56 cm effective horizontal top tube, 393 mm reach and 563 mm stack.
I feel like in this position the reach is too far out. Have taken this sloppy picture, hope it's good enough. The stem is 10 cm long, I feel like shortening it by 1 cm is not enough, and going shorter will affect the bike handling too much ( so I read).
Problem is that the 54 cm size version doesn't look that different, when put into the bikegeocalc visualizer besides the lower stack with 546 mm. Effective reach (front saddle to the handle bar) will be shortened by 8 mm. The 383 mm reach , thus 1 cm shorter reach, is a bit negated by the bigger drop.
Cannot post photo yet, because new here on the forum.
#2
On Your Left
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Long Island, New York, USA
Posts: 8,373
Bikes: Trek Emonda SLR, Sram eTap, Zipp 303
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3004 Post(s)
Liked 2,433 Times
in
1,187 Posts
You can always buy a cheap stem and see it it rides.
$18
https://www.ebay.com/itm/Aluminium-C...sAAOSw7pldQYno
$18
https://www.ebay.com/itm/Aluminium-C...sAAOSw7pldQYno
#3
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2021
Posts: 5
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I haven't taken that bike out for ride, just static mounting onto it and trying out positions and getting a feel for it.
The return policy wouldn't allow it for me to do a test ride I think, and I am not eager to ask for it.
But generally speaking, does getting a smaller frame (and adding a smaller stem) solve the issue or is that bike no matter the size simply not for me?
The return policy wouldn't allow it for me to do a test ride I think, and I am not eager to ask for it.
But generally speaking, does getting a smaller frame (and adding a smaller stem) solve the issue or is that bike no matter the size simply not for me?
#5
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2021
Posts: 5
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
53 cm top tube, effective horizontal tt is ~56 cm
53 cm seat tube
10 cm stem
It has a mountain bike handlebar though with some bar ends installed.
On a road bike you add another extra 12 cm to that to reach the hoods.
I should have known that the reach is not too much telling, I got mislead by myself thinking that around 39 cm reach is fine, which it is on my bike and any bike with handlebars that are sloped backwards.
Of course I expected, and intended, to ride a lower position, with my torso tilted forwards, but I think looking at my photo on the bike, I think my arms are too stretched out plus my shoulders are rolled forwards.
53 cm seat tube
10 cm stem
It has a mountain bike handlebar though with some bar ends installed.
On a road bike you add another extra 12 cm to that to reach the hoods.
I should have known that the reach is not too much telling, I got mislead by myself thinking that around 39 cm reach is fine, which it is on my bike and any bike with handlebars that are sloped backwards.
Of course I expected, and intended, to ride a lower position, with my torso tilted forwards, but I think looking at my photo on the bike, I think my arms are too stretched out plus my shoulders are rolled forwards.
Last edited by weeniecyclist; 01-02-21 at 04:27 PM.
#6
Senior Member
I don't ascribe poor handling or overly quick handling to a really short stem. I've got long legs/short torso and have put really short stems on bikes (as short as 35mm). I've got road bikes with 45mm, 60mm, and 80mm. As GlennR said it's cheap to try a shorter stem.
#7
Very Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Always on the Run
Posts: 1,211
Bikes: Giant Quasar & Fuji Roubaix
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 413 Post(s)
Liked 343 Times
in
244 Posts
I'm just going to assume you have already adjust your saddle fore and aft. With that said, I'm just going to add that the human body is also very adaptable. My old Giant is much too large for me at 60 cm, but i now find it to be my most comfortable bike after many miles in the saddle. It took me a while to get the saddle adjusted just right, but when I did that made all the difference in the world. Good luck,
Likes For Bigbus:
#8
Drip, Drip.
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Southern Ontario
Posts: 1,575
Bikes: Trek Verve E bike, Felt Doctrine 4 XC, Opus Horizon Apex 1
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1034 Post(s)
Liked 193 Times
in
163 Posts
You can always buy a cheap stem and see it it rides.
$18
https://www.ebay.com/itm/Aluminium-C...sAAOSw7pldQYno
$18
https://www.ebay.com/itm/Aluminium-C...sAAOSw7pldQYno
A long stem such as around 100mm would definitely assist with handling at high speed, but thats not to say that a shorter stem wouldn't be unstable while offering faster handling.
#9
just another gosling
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,526
Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3884 Post(s)
Liked 1,936 Times
in
1,382 Posts
Set up a camera or get some help. Get on the bike, grab the hoods, straighten your back and lean forward until your forearms are horizontal. Take photo from the side. Your upper arms should make an approximate right angle with your torso if reach is correct. This does depend to some extent on your saddle fore-and-aft position. Ideally your saddle should be set so that when pedaling you can briefly take your hands off the bars without sliding forward on a level saddle. If you can't, move your saddle back.
__________________
Results matter
Results matter
Likes For Carbonfiberboy:
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,853
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1067 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 259 Times
in
153 Posts
If you are happy with the fit on your cross bike you should of got a road frame that enabled you to duplicate it.
If you are unsure of the fit get one done on your cross bike and then see if you can achieve it on your road frame.
If you are unsure of the fit get one done on your cross bike and then see if you can achieve it on your road frame.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 2,433
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 741 Post(s)
Liked 412 Times
in
230 Posts
Is this a compact style frame? I am a little confused about the frame size. I ride Treks and even though the seat tube is around 58cm, they consider the frame a 60cm in terms of fit. If you have an effective frame size equal to the top tube, that is a long reach for a road bike.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 6,864
Bikes: Trek Domane SLR 7 AXS, Trek CheckPoint SL7 AXS, Trek Emonda ALR AXS, Trek FX 5 Sport
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 760 Post(s)
Liked 1,717 Times
in
1,003 Posts
I haven't taken that bike out for ride, just static mounting onto it and trying out positions and getting a feel for it.
The return policy wouldn't allow it for me to do a test ride I think, and I am not eager to ask for it.
But generally speaking, does getting a smaller frame (and adding a smaller stem) solve the issue or is that bike no matter the size simply not for me?
The return policy wouldn't allow it for me to do a test ride I think, and I am not eager to ask for it.
But generally speaking, does getting a smaller frame (and adding a smaller stem) solve the issue or is that bike no matter the size simply not for me?
#13
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2021
Posts: 5
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Set up a camera or get some help. Get on the bike, grab the hoods, straighten your back and lean forward until your forearms are horizontal. Take photo from the side. Your upper arms should make an approximate right angle with your torso if reach is correct. This does depend to some extent on your saddle fore-and-aft position. Ideally your saddle should be set so that when pedaling you can briefly take your hands off the bars without sliding forward on a level saddle. If you can't, move your saddle back.
I think it's a bit more than 90°, when drawing an rectangle laying it over my back and the upper arms.
#14
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2021
Posts: 5
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
6 more post. Anyways, I am going to return this bike for a 54 sized bike and try my luck with that one.
Effective reach is only 8 mm shorter, but going from there it should be easier to make it fit right, instead of a bike too big.
Effective reach is only 8 mm shorter, but going from there it should be easier to make it fit right, instead of a bike too big.
#15
just another gosling
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,526
Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3884 Post(s)
Liked 1,936 Times
in
1,382 Posts
It's weird that the 54 will fit almost the same except for more drop. Is that desirable for you? If you get on the bike in that horizontal forearms position and pedal, is there a decent gap between your legs and torso? Would you like to be lower or not?
__________________
Results matter
Results matter
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Posts: 5,920
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1814 Post(s)
Liked 1,692 Times
in
973 Posts
Why not tell us what bike model you are talking about? The more information you provide the better the answers even without pictures
#18
Full Member
I recently got a Domane and found that with the difference in geometry, I had to go down a size from my standard 54cm to a 52cm. Just looking at the number, while they were in the general ballpark, it really exposed itself once I took it for a ride. One of the Mechanics had his 52 Checkpoint (similar to the Domane) in the shop and I ultimately found that way more comfortable in a 52 than the 54. Really need to get on one and test drive first to see how it fits.
What size is your Trek ALR?
I had a 52 cm Domane (frame is now damaged, needs to be replaced), have a 2011 Madone in 52 cm (H2 fit), and have an Emonda on the way (52 cm H2).
I was comfortable on the Domane & I am on the Madone.
I want to replace the Domane, and have debated on going down a size to the 50.
Do you have different sizes on your ALR & Domane?
Thanks
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 6,864
Bikes: Trek Domane SLR 7 AXS, Trek CheckPoint SL7 AXS, Trek Emonda ALR AXS, Trek FX 5 Sport
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 760 Post(s)
Liked 1,717 Times
in
1,003 Posts
What size is your Trek ALR?
I had a 52 cm Domane (frame is now damaged, needs to be replaced), have a 2011 Madone in 52 cm (H2 fit), and have an Emonda on the way (52 cm H2).
I was comfortable on the Domane & I am on the Madone.
I want to replace the Domane, and have debated on going down a size to the 50.
Do you have different sizes on your ALR & Domane
Thanks
I had a 52 cm Domane (frame is now damaged, needs to be replaced), have a 2011 Madone in 52 cm (H2 fit), and have an Emonda on the way (52 cm H2).
I was comfortable on the Domane & I am on the Madone.
I want to replace the Domane, and have debated on going down a size to the 50.
Do you have different sizes on your ALR & Domane
Thanks