Bike tire width
#26
Full Member
Join Date: Jun 2021
Location: Barboursville, Va
Posts: 278
Bikes: N+1
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 94 Post(s)
Liked 419 Times
in
159 Posts
maybe it’s your tires, not the psi. I took a ride at lunch and pumped my veloflex robaix (25mm tubular) up to 100 psi and it was comfortable and fast. Rolling over rumble strip at 25mph+ wasn’t even bad. I’m also about 180lbs, and ride a steel frame.
#27
Full Member
#28
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,424
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4399 Post(s)
Liked 4,846 Times
in
2,999 Posts
But some others are not so good, often stating pressures that are clearly too high for anything other than their own ass covering!
#29
Full Member
Just started riding a few months ago. Started on 23s….then tried 25s and 28s…..now I’m riding on 32mm tubeless. Loving the 32s.
#30
climber has-been
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 7,102
Bikes: Scott Addict R1, Felt Z1
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3427 Post(s)
Liked 3,563 Times
in
1,790 Posts
An observation:
The trend in 700c tire widths seems to be approaching from below 32mm, which is an interesting number.
During the "bicycle boom" in the 1970s, the most popular clincher tire size for a road bike was 27 x 1-1/4".
1-1/4" is about 32mm. Hmm.
Another size at the time (for the really high end road bike) was 27 x 1-1/8", and 1-1/8" is about 28mm. Also hmm.
After 50 years of "trying something different", we are converging to the popular tire widths from the 1970s.
The trend in 700c tire widths seems to be approaching from below 32mm, which is an interesting number.
During the "bicycle boom" in the 1970s, the most popular clincher tire size for a road bike was 27 x 1-1/4".
1-1/4" is about 32mm. Hmm.
Another size at the time (for the really high end road bike) was 27 x 1-1/8", and 1-1/8" is about 28mm. Also hmm.
After 50 years of "trying something different", we are converging to the popular tire widths from the 1970s.
Last edited by terrymorse; 06-27-21 at 09:39 AM.
#31
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 219
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 111 Post(s)
Liked 69 Times
in
51 Posts
#32
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,424
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4399 Post(s)
Liked 4,846 Times
in
2,999 Posts
A pressure guide that I like:
https://axs.sram.com/guides/tire/pressure
https://axs.sram.com/guides/tire/pressure
#33
don't try this at home.
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: N. KY
Posts: 5,939
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 973 Post(s)
Liked 511 Times
in
351 Posts
A pressure guide that I like:
https://axs.sram.com/guides/tire/pressure
https://axs.sram.com/guides/tire/pressure
At 170 lbs, with wide 20.5 mm internal width rims, GP5000 tires with tubes. On these rims, my tires measure an actual 29mm wide. (I was running GP4000 25mm, and those measured 28mm on these rims. It looks like the 25s are bigger than advertised, and 28s are accurate.)
The calculator says:
73-74 psi front, 78-79 psi rear.
I've been running 65 psi front, 75-78 psi rear. Lately, 68-70 psi front, 80 psi rear. Either set of pressures seems fast to me. I have a mix of super smooth new pavement and bumpy patched roads and chipseal
On my adventure/gravel bike, I can mount 38mm smooth tread tires that have flexible road bike sidewall construction. (Compass tires, now Rene Herse. One of them developed a bulge, and I don't recall hitting anything. I'll probably change to something else.)
They measured an actual 39mm.
The calculator says 51 psi front, 55 psi rear. That seems way high.
I used 38 psi front, 45 psi rear. That's quite amazing on rough chipseal roads -- it just floats over the gravelly surface. Coasting downhill, I was just as fast as road bike riders with 25mm tires. I think these are quite efficient. 200 grams heavier, though.
Pinch flats
I increased the 28mm from 65 front to (hopefully) slightly reduce the chance of pinch flats. I haven't had one in more than a year, but I do try to be careful. I rarely get pinch flats from potholes. It's usually from a piece of large gravel / small rock sitting isolated on an otherwise nice road. And speed is a big factor. I can roll over these at cruising speeds, but downhill speeds mash the tire flat against the rim, slitting the tube in a "snakebite".
Likes For rm -rf:
#34
don't try this at home.
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: N. KY
Posts: 5,939
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 973 Post(s)
Liked 511 Times
in
351 Posts
Air volume
A tire and wheel inflated cross section is somewhat like a circle. So the air volume is that cross section area x the tire "length", the circumference. The more air volume, the less pressure is needed to keep the tire from flattening out.
It still surprises me how fast the area and volume go up: Area of circles = 3.1416 * (width/2) ^2. That's the forumula Pi * r squared.
Diameter vs area:
18mm: 254 sq mm. Heh, had to add this one. I saw a guy riding a classic 70s Italian road bike with 20mm tires. (Might have been 18mm?) Those look tiny now. The pressure calculator says 128 psi front, 136 rear.
23mm: 415 sq mm. 18% less than 25mm.
25mm: 490 sq mm.
28mm: 615. 25% more
32mm: 804. 64% more.
38mm: 1134. 231%
45mm: 1590. 325%
A tire and wheel inflated cross section is somewhat like a circle. So the air volume is that cross section area x the tire "length", the circumference. The more air volume, the less pressure is needed to keep the tire from flattening out.
It still surprises me how fast the area and volume go up: Area of circles = 3.1416 * (width/2) ^2. That's the forumula Pi * r squared.
Diameter vs area:
18mm: 254 sq mm. Heh, had to add this one. I saw a guy riding a classic 70s Italian road bike with 20mm tires. (Might have been 18mm?) Those look tiny now. The pressure calculator says 128 psi front, 136 rear.
23mm: 415 sq mm. 18% less than 25mm.
25mm: 490 sq mm.
28mm: 615. 25% more
32mm: 804. 64% more.
38mm: 1134. 231%
45mm: 1590. 325%
Last edited by rm -rf; 06-27-21 at 07:22 PM.
Likes For rm -rf:
#35
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 14
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Road bikes typically have a 700mm outer dimension, and widths that start at 23mm.Road tires are usually less than 30mm wide, although you can find tires up to 45mm for bikes designed for gravel roads.
#36
Advocatus Diaboli
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Wherever I am
Posts: 8,635
Bikes: Merlin Cyrene, Nashbar steel CX
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4733 Post(s)
Liked 1,532 Times
in
1,003 Posts
Every calculator seems to always miss something though. This one only has one type of "Road" surface. Also it presumably tries to guess the tire width for the rim width entered. OTOH, asking for rim type is nice as it's also presumably it's building in safety factors and ETRTO standards based on PSI combined with inner rim widths. Hence why if you switch between hooked vs hookless TL rim types, the resulting recommendation drops quite a bit (which from pure theoretical performance standpoint I don't think should be case).
#37
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 219
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 111 Post(s)
Liked 69 Times
in
51 Posts
Do you mean actual tire width vs labelled tire width?
Doesn't the outer diameter of the tire change a bit with different rim widths? Perhaps this has an effect on the chances of rolling the tire off the rim or 'burping' a tubeless tire?
Last edited by VicBC_Biker; 06-28-21 at 10:02 AM.
#38
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Mission Viejo
Posts: 5,806
Bikes: 1986 Cannondale SR400 (Flat bar commuter), 1988 Cannondale Criterium XTR, 1992 Serotta T-Max, 1995 Trek 970
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1943 Post(s)
Liked 2,164 Times
in
1,323 Posts
My understanding, and real life experience, is that a rim’s internal width is a factor in the tire’s inflated width.
The same tire on an 18mm internal width will measure wider than when it is mounted on a 14mm internal width rim.
I think this has played out in mfg’s more current offerings. GP4000 vs GP 5000 measured width on the same rim comes to mind.
John
The same tire on an 18mm internal width will measure wider than when it is mounted on a 14mm internal width rim.
I think this has played out in mfg’s more current offerings. GP4000 vs GP 5000 measured width on the same rim comes to mind.
John
#39
Advocatus Diaboli
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Wherever I am
Posts: 8,635
Bikes: Merlin Cyrene, Nashbar steel CX
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4733 Post(s)
Liked 1,532 Times
in
1,003 Posts
Yes. I mean that calculator takes the nominal width that's listed on the tire, and is likely using some sort of conversion factor to what actual inflated tire width to use in its calculations, based on the rim width entered. I would think it would be more accurate to ask for the actual measured width than trying to guess though. It's a known thing that different models/brands of tires inflate to differing actual widths for the same rim.
#40
Cheerfully low end
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 1,977
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 646 Post(s)
Liked 1,044 Times
in
667 Posts
My understanding, and real life experience, is that a rim’s internal width is a factor in the tire’s inflated width.
The same tire on an 18mm internal width will measure wider than when it is mounted on a 14mm internal width rim.
I think this has played out in mfg’s more current offerings. GP4000 vs GP 5000 measured width on the same rim comes to mind.
John
The same tire on an 18mm internal width will measure wider than when it is mounted on a 14mm internal width rim.
I think this has played out in mfg’s more current offerings. GP4000 vs GP 5000 measured width on the same rim comes to mind.
John
Otto
#41
Senior Member
The tire's construction is more important than it's width. Jan Heine of Bicycle Classics has done a lot of testing rolling resistance of tires. He is selling a line of tires , "Rene Herse", formerly "Compass", made by Panaracer. I like them.
#42
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 490
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 252 Post(s)
Liked 67 Times
in
48 Posts
That's only true for racing, not for sporting rides where what counts is the thrill or feel of going fast even if you lace the ride with coffee stops. But if fast tire means flimsy light tire that punctures easily, that takes the fun out of being fast.
#43
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Mission Viejo
Posts: 5,806
Bikes: 1986 Cannondale SR400 (Flat bar commuter), 1988 Cannondale Criterium XTR, 1992 Serotta T-Max, 1995 Trek 970
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1943 Post(s)
Liked 2,164 Times
in
1,323 Posts
John
#44
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,424
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4399 Post(s)
Liked 4,846 Times
in
2,999 Posts
There’s nothing more annoying than settling into a nice fast group in a Sportive ride and then getting dropped because of a flat. So I generally choose to trade off a few watts of rolling resistance for extra puncture protection on long Sportive/GFs.
#45
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Gulf Breeze, FL
Posts: 4,128
Bikes: Rossetti Vertigo
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 229 Post(s)
Liked 119 Times
in
70 Posts
Funny how less than 10 years ago there were threads just like this with people scientifically proving that 23mm tires were ideal in virtually all conditions. Anything over 25mm was a grandpa tire...something only an old dude on a beach cruiser would use.