Racer Tech Thread
#5526
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Folsom, CA
Posts: 3,888
Mentioned: 32 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 417 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
I had a similar issue recently. My Praxis conversion BB was squeaking/creaking. I removed and re-installed it twice, no dice. Ordered a new BB. While waiting for the BB to get here, I swapped out the new Look Kéo Max pedals and the noise went away. Now I'm waiting for the warranty replacement pedals.
The only time I'd get a quiet ride was the 30 miles or so after re-installing the BB. First ride last night with the loctite was quiet, but was only 30 miles. I'll uncross my fingers after a few hundred more miles of silence
#5529
Cat 2
I have a cannondale with oldschool bb30. Creaks are just a part of my life now.
ALthough the new bougie bb / derailleur pulleys are nice and aren't making too much noise yet.
ALthough the new bougie bb / derailleur pulleys are nice and aren't making too much noise yet.
#5530
Senior Member
my front shifting has been a little off lately (having to really swing the lever) still have to fiddle with the cable, but when messing with the shifter the other day with the cable unhooked, it didn't feel like the shifter was really clicking through, so it might need a good internal cleaning/relubing. But I might just be trying to think of a good excuse to upgrade the 8 speed to 10 speed, which is an idea that enters my mind periodically, especially since I have 11 speed on my cx bike
i have messed with the fit a bit, in August the fitter put my 120mm stem at +17 degrees, and I flipped it to -17 and did Saturday's race and a casual ride outside the other day with no real discomfort (I had just been riding indoors previously but I find my indoor and outdoor riding feels totally different). Hoping it sticks
i have messed with the fit a bit, in August the fitter put my 120mm stem at +17 degrees, and I flipped it to -17 and did Saturday's race and a casual ride outside the other day with no real discomfort (I had just been riding indoors previously but I find my indoor and outdoor riding feels totally different). Hoping it sticks
#5531
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur
Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times
in
1,417 Posts
How long on each? Mike's installed a Wheels Manuf. adapter sleeve on my Quarq and it was good for a season and a half, then started creaking like a rocking chair. Just installed a Praxis 2 weeks ago and it's been dead quiet (and a lot less drag, even better).
#5535
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Redlands, CA
Posts: 6,313
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 842 Post(s)
Liked 469 Times
in
250 Posts
After buying a Tacx Neo that put me at 4 power measurement devices in my household. Since I got the Direto in February, it was a tad high but I didn't worry too much about it; my power was good on the road too. What I can do against my peers in group rides is maybe the best its ever been.
I use the CX bike on the Direto that has a Stages and they were close; within 5 watts or so. However, after getting my Neo this week it was noticeably low. So I ran some tests in a wattage comparison app and using 215 watts as a low base its close to this:
Neo = 215w (just purchased)
Vectors = 218w (used outdoors)
Stages = 230w (used on Direto)
Direto = 235w (used indoors )
Is this important? Yes and No; on the high end it puts me at 4.3 w/kg ftp, on the low end 4 w/kg. With State TT's 7 weeks away the former was giving the hope I had a chance to stand on top of the podium (it depends who shows, as always). For other races, I'd gladly trade in that .3 w/kg for legit bike handling skills (but that's for another post). Anyway, on to finding what's accurate;
After researching the best way to find a which one is accurate, I decided on the Vector Power Meter Advanced Torque Test below. My other option was to have someone with an SRM try out the Smart Trainers (which maybe I'll still do).
I followed the test protocols, and like any great mathematician, I showed my work:
Mass (kg) 29.4 lb = 13.33562 kg
Gravity = 9.81
Length (m) 170mm = .170m
Mass * Gravity * Length = 22.239813474 (expected result)
Left test = 22.22, 22.22, 22.25 (22.23 avg) Spot on!
Right test = 22.04, 21.91, 22.08 (22.01 avg) Close Enough?
After that I'm more or less happy with my Vectors; I believe that should put me within 1% on the right (I used an online calculator, got lazy)!
Tough pill to swallow, but I suck again. The good thing is I now have a baseline and I believe the Tacx Neo is spot on as well and the drive train contributes to the small loss. As for the Direto that's going to my wife, which the extra watts may help if we ride together in Zwift (I'll probably put in a ticket to Elite).
I use the CX bike on the Direto that has a Stages and they were close; within 5 watts or so. However, after getting my Neo this week it was noticeably low. So I ran some tests in a wattage comparison app and using 215 watts as a low base its close to this:
Neo = 215w (just purchased)
Vectors = 218w (used outdoors)
Stages = 230w (used on Direto)
Direto = 235w (used indoors )
Is this important? Yes and No; on the high end it puts me at 4.3 w/kg ftp, on the low end 4 w/kg. With State TT's 7 weeks away the former was giving the hope I had a chance to stand on top of the podium (it depends who shows, as always). For other races, I'd gladly trade in that .3 w/kg for legit bike handling skills (but that's for another post). Anyway, on to finding what's accurate;
After researching the best way to find a which one is accurate, I decided on the Vector Power Meter Advanced Torque Test below. My other option was to have someone with an SRM try out the Smart Trainers (which maybe I'll still do).
I followed the test protocols, and like any great mathematician, I showed my work:
Mass (kg) 29.4 lb = 13.33562 kg
Gravity = 9.81
Length (m) 170mm = .170m
Mass * Gravity * Length = 22.239813474 (expected result)
Left test = 22.22, 22.22, 22.25 (22.23 avg) Spot on!
Right test = 22.04, 21.91, 22.08 (22.01 avg) Close Enough?
After that I'm more or less happy with my Vectors; I believe that should put me within 1% on the right (I used an online calculator, got lazy)!
Tough pill to swallow, but I suck again. The good thing is I now have a baseline and I believe the Tacx Neo is spot on as well and the drive train contributes to the small loss. As for the Direto that's going to my wife, which the extra watts may help if we ride together in Zwift (I'll probably put in a ticket to Elite).
#5538
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,449
Mentioned: 64 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 693 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The 15-16s were talking about yaw of the VOS cross winds. I told them if they just went 30 or so the yaw would always be within the ideal angle for the rims.
I got weird stares (I am used to that).
Many kids don't understand the yaw is the resultant vector of the wind and the velocity of the bike vectors.
Wind tunnels have the bike at an angle for yaw.
Are there any tunnels that turn the bike into (reduce yaw) as power goes up? I don't know if it is needed, but that is closer to the real effect of speed and yaw.
I got weird stares (I am used to that).
Many kids don't understand the yaw is the resultant vector of the wind and the velocity of the bike vectors.
Wind tunnels have the bike at an angle for yaw.
Are there any tunnels that turn the bike into (reduce yaw) as power goes up? I don't know if it is needed, but that is closer to the real effect of speed and yaw.
You can have the tunnels run at different wind speeds. Sometimes that is valuable.
#5539
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,449
Mentioned: 64 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 693 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
After buying a Tacx Neo that put me at 4 power measurement devices in my household. Since I got the Direto in February, it was a tad high but I didn't worry too much about it; my power was good on the road too. What I can do against my peers in group rides is maybe the best its ever been.
I use the CX bike on the Direto that has a Stages and they were close; within 5 watts or so. However, after getting my Neo this week it was noticeably low. So I ran some tests in a wattage comparison app and using 215 watts as a low base its close to this:
Neo = 215w (just purchased)
Vectors = 218w (used outdoors)
Stages = 230w (used on Direto)
Direto = 235w (used indoors )
Is this important? Yes and No; on the high end it puts me at 4.3 w/kg ftp, on the low end 4 w/kg. With State TT's 7 weeks away the former was giving the hope I had a chance to stand on top of the podium (it depends who shows, as always). For other races, I'd gladly trade in that .3 w/kg for legit bike handling skills (but that's for another post). Anyway, on to finding what's accurate;
After researching the best way to find a which one is accurate, I decided on the Vector Power Meter Advanced Torque Test below. My other option was to have someone with an SRM try out the Smart Trainers (which maybe I'll still do).
I followed the test protocols, and like any great mathematician, I showed my work:
Mass (kg) 29.4 lb = 13.33562 kg
Gravity = 9.81
Length (m) 170mm = .170m
Mass * Gravity * Length = 22.239813474 (expected result)
Left test = 22.22, 22.22, 22.25 (22.23 avg) Spot on!
Right test = 22.04, 21.91, 22.08 (22.01 avg) Close Enough?
After that I'm more or less happy with my Vectors; I believe that should put me within 1% on the right (I used an online calculator, got lazy)!
Tough pill to swallow, but I suck again. The good thing is I now have a baseline and I believe the Tacx Neo is spot on as well and the drive train contributes to the small loss. As for the Direto that's going to my wife, which the extra watts may help if we ride together in Zwift (I'll probably put in a ticket to Elite).
I use the CX bike on the Direto that has a Stages and they were close; within 5 watts or so. However, after getting my Neo this week it was noticeably low. So I ran some tests in a wattage comparison app and using 215 watts as a low base its close to this:
Neo = 215w (just purchased)
Vectors = 218w (used outdoors)
Stages = 230w (used on Direto)
Direto = 235w (used indoors )
Is this important? Yes and No; on the high end it puts me at 4.3 w/kg ftp, on the low end 4 w/kg. With State TT's 7 weeks away the former was giving the hope I had a chance to stand on top of the podium (it depends who shows, as always). For other races, I'd gladly trade in that .3 w/kg for legit bike handling skills (but that's for another post). Anyway, on to finding what's accurate;
After researching the best way to find a which one is accurate, I decided on the Vector Power Meter Advanced Torque Test below. My other option was to have someone with an SRM try out the Smart Trainers (which maybe I'll still do).
I followed the test protocols, and like any great mathematician, I showed my work:
Mass (kg) 29.4 lb = 13.33562 kg
Gravity = 9.81
Length (m) 170mm = .170m
Mass * Gravity * Length = 22.239813474 (expected result)
Left test = 22.22, 22.22, 22.25 (22.23 avg) Spot on!
Right test = 22.04, 21.91, 22.08 (22.01 avg) Close Enough?
After that I'm more or less happy with my Vectors; I believe that should put me within 1% on the right (I used an online calculator, got lazy)!
Tough pill to swallow, but I suck again. The good thing is I now have a baseline and I believe the Tacx Neo is spot on as well and the drive train contributes to the small loss. As for the Direto that's going to my wife, which the extra watts may help if we ride together in Zwift (I'll probably put in a ticket to Elite).
Looks like you are basically testing the slope.
Ideally you want a larger mass (larger will yield lower error) and to know the mass quite precisely. Error should be on the order of 1/10,000th of what is being measured. (E.g. 2g on 20kg)
It actually matters when doing static tests for setting slope.
#5540
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,449
Mentioned: 64 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 693 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#5542
Cat 2
Just playing devil's advocate here. Everyone is entitled to their opinion about what bike is best and what data they want to look at!
#5543
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Redlands, CA
Posts: 6,313
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 842 Post(s)
Liked 469 Times
in
250 Posts
What is your goal? Are you trying to prove the vectors are accurate or consistent?
Looks like you are basically testing the slope.
Ideally you want a larger mass (larger will yield lower error) and to know the mass quite precisely. Error should be on the order of 1/10,000th of what is being measured. (E.g. 2g on 20kg)
It actually matters when doing static tests for setting slope.
Looks like you are basically testing the slope.
Ideally you want a larger mass (larger will yield lower error) and to know the mass quite precisely. Error should be on the order of 1/10,000th of what is being measured. (E.g. 2g on 20kg)
It actually matters when doing static tests for setting slope.
Unfortunately I don't quite have that accurate a scale, it seemed close enough to confirm that power meter was the accurate one.
#5544
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,449
Mentioned: 64 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 693 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Big-S claims it's the same aero as the original venge or the new tarmac rim brakes. And we've seen data that suggests disc specific wheels are more slippery than rim brake wheels. The weight of the frame is the same, albeit the disc gruppo will weigh more and I suppose the caliper may or may not create a bit more drag, but is it offset by the wheels?
Just playing devil's advocate here. Everyone is entitled to their opinion about what bike is best and what data they want to look at!
Just playing devil's advocate here. Everyone is entitled to their opinion about what bike is best and what data they want to look at!
The rim brake version was as aero as the original Venge. At this point disc calipers and rotors increase drag. That may change in the future (though I suspect it may never be true at zero yaw).
Disc groups are heavier, and IME for equivalent bikes the disc brake fork is heavier than the rim braking equivalent.
So far we are not seeing anything materially different as far as aerodynamics of disc-specific rims. Truthfully I don’t know if the rim brake track was much of a hindrance.
However one cuts it, the Tarmac disc is both heavier and less aero than the rim take SL6.
One may PREFER the disc brake version, of course, but it won’t be for those two traits.
#5545
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,449
Mentioned: 64 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 693 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
More accuracy, but consistency as well. From riding them for years I don't feel they're inconsistent. With 2 power meters averaging 300w and 2 power meters averaging 280w I just wanted to know where I was at.
Unfortunately I don't quite have that accurate a scale, it seemed close enough to confirm that power meter was the accurate one.
Unfortunately I don't quite have that accurate a scale, it seemed close enough to confirm that power meter was the accurate one.
If you’re talking about a bathroom scale they are often +/-0.2# (even if they read out to the tenth). May want to check what that does to your calculations esp if it is the worst case.
Your weight could be 29.15# or 29.64# but register 29.4.
I appreciate your experiment.
An accurate static measurement is one step toward an accurate meter, though it doesn’t guarantee the meter is accurate over a variety of scenarios. For example, we know with some enters (Stages) the accuracy can and does vary with cadence and rate of change of cadence.
#5546
Cat 2
I agree with the first part, but data is data.
The rim brake version was as aero as the original Venge. At this point disc calipers and rotors increase drag. That may change in the future (though I suspect it may never be true at zero yaw).
Disc groups are heavier, and IME for equivalent bikes the disc brake fork is heavier than the rim braking equivalent.
So far we are not seeing anything materially different as far as aerodynamics of disc-specific rims. Truthfully I don’t know if the rim brake track was much of a hindrance.
However one cuts it, the Tarmac disc is both heavier and less aero than the rim take SL6.
One may PREFER the disc brake version, of course, but it won’t be for those two traits.
The rim brake version was as aero as the original Venge. At this point disc calipers and rotors increase drag. That may change in the future (though I suspect it may never be true at zero yaw).
Disc groups are heavier, and IME for equivalent bikes the disc brake fork is heavier than the rim braking equivalent.
So far we are not seeing anything materially different as far as aerodynamics of disc-specific rims. Truthfully I don’t know if the rim brake track was much of a hindrance.
However one cuts it, the Tarmac disc is both heavier and less aero than the rim take SL6.
One may PREFER the disc brake version, of course, but it won’t be for those two traits.
Graph below from Slowtwitch(https://www.slowtwitch.com/Tech/Disc...Drag_6073.html) and seems to be cross checked by the Spec windtunnel guys for drag (they claim no difference at 0*, 8s over 40k in a crosswind).
Regarding weight, yes it is heavier. (you could always use crazy light rotors. https://www.bikerumor.com/2016/11/18...-brake-rotors/) ((PPS, don't do this.)
Regarding rims; I thought I had seen data to back my claim up, but upon trying to find it again, I was unable. I'll cede that point until I can find the graphs.
#5548
Senior Member
I'm going down with the rim brake ship lol I have my $250 powertap wheel and I got what I think is an awesome deal on my new cross bike ($700 for 11speed sram), probably because it has canti brakes
#5549
Cat 2
Said it a few weeks ago, but here is the first 12 speed road grouppo. Some new stuff going on there. Direct mount derailleur, campy direct mount rim brakes and 12 speed that is compatible without new wheels. Also their new wheels are pretty rad looking too. https://www.bikerumor.com/2018/04/09...train-details/ Also I'm expecting more news from sea otter this year, but we shall see.
Last edited by Ttoc6; 04-09-18 at 09:50 PM. Reason: Road