Touring on tubeless tires
#1
faster downhill
Thread Starter
Touring on tubeless tires
recently purchased 2017 specialized sequoia and converted 42c sawtooth tires to tubeless. planning a tour from san francisco to la in may and am interested in thoughts on touring on tubeless tires. i like the flat protection, rode 25 miles with large staple through tire without loosing any psi, and reduction in weight. i may be crazy but i feel the bike rolls better on tubeless tires and i can run a bit lower pressure which offers more comfort. the other question is what recommendation on tubeless psi with 250-275lbs on bike (including rider)
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 38,141
Mentioned: 209 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17766 Post(s)
Liked 14,128 Times
in
6,706 Posts
I ride tubeless road. Have for several years. Love the feel. However, not all punctures will self-seal at a sufficient pressure. Carry at least one spare tube. With issues of durability, I don't have any desire to tour on tubeless.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 8,088
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 686 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
5 Posts
I have bikepacked tubleless, have a tubeless road bike, cx bike, and two mountain bikes.
I'm a fan, myself, but things can be finicky at times. When I bikepacked, I still took two tubes with me, a small 2oz bottle of sealant, and patches, just so I was covered for emergencies. I would have probably only carried one tube and no sealant if I wasn't tubeless, but I'm always paranoid that the worst case scenario will play out and I'll be stranded somewhere with two flats and only one tube. Still, a few extra ounces of weight trumps having to change a tube in my book. Tubeless has failed on me a couple of times, but I can't even count the number of times it's saved me from having to change a tube.
I'm a fan, myself, but things can be finicky at times. When I bikepacked, I still took two tubes with me, a small 2oz bottle of sealant, and patches, just so I was covered for emergencies. I would have probably only carried one tube and no sealant if I wasn't tubeless, but I'm always paranoid that the worst case scenario will play out and I'll be stranded somewhere with two flats and only one tube. Still, a few extra ounces of weight trumps having to change a tube in my book. Tubeless has failed on me a couple of times, but I can't even count the number of times it's saved me from having to change a tube.
#4
#5
faster downhill
Thread Starter
I've ridden 1.5k miles on sequoia with tubeless tires and they have been more than durable. quite the contrary they have been more than durable by avoiding several flat tires. I rode 25 miles with an annoying ticking sound that i couldnt identify and when i got home found a large staple through tire with no loss of psi. thats durable!
#6
2-Wheeled Fool
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 2,486
Bikes: Surly Ogre, Brompton
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1385 Post(s)
Liked 675 Times
in
456 Posts
If I have my next bike tubeless, and I DO get a flat - will I get that sealant all over my hands if I try to put a tube in it to get it home? I'm not afraid of getting my hands dirty - I'd just like to know what to expect. Should you pack a pair of nitrile gloves along with a spare tube?
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 38,141
Mentioned: 209 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17766 Post(s)
Liked 14,128 Times
in
6,706 Posts
I've ridden 1.5k miles on sequoia with tubeless tires and they have been more than durable. quite the contrary they have been more than durable by avoiding several flat tires. I rode 25 miles with an annoying ticking sound that i couldnt identify and when i got home found a large staple through tire with no loss of psi. thats durable!
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 38,141
Mentioned: 209 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17766 Post(s)
Liked 14,128 Times
in
6,706 Posts
Maybe, but it's water soluble so it's not a big deal. I have put a tube in a couple of times and didn't mind what mess there was.
#9
faster downhill
Thread Starter
This is why I initially asked for thoughts on touring with tubeless. So your thoughts are that tubeless tires will not last as long or wear as well as clincher tire? That may be the case, but I would suggest that treadlife or wear would be quite dependent on design/compound of tire not on whether it has a tube inside it.
#10
Senior Member
I'd roll with what you have. The Sawtooth tires are robust. Tubeless is fine and riding to LA isn't a long tour, so consider it an experiment for future tours. I bet a lot of us would also appreciate a report once you finish the tour.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Texas Hill Country
Posts: 276
Bikes: Invictus, Valeria, Jackie, and Vanguard
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 92 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
6 Posts
I have a lot of curiosity about tubeless myself. Can we get a complete rundown of the pros and cons, and also get a description of worst-case scenarios, what causes them, and their likelihood?
Here's what I've gathered so far:
Pros
Slight weight reduction
Virtually no flats
Can run lower pressure
Better "feel"
Cons
More expensive
Less choices/availability
Initial setup can be annoying
More disastrous in the event of total failure
Seems like mountain bikers like tubeless more than anyone, but I've yet to understand why. The only reason that makes sense is they like low pressure more than anyone else.
Also, if the tires are glued to the rims, how do you take them off when your tires wear down?
Here's what I've gathered so far:
Pros
Slight weight reduction
Virtually no flats
Can run lower pressure
Better "feel"
Cons
More expensive
Less choices/availability
Initial setup can be annoying
More disastrous in the event of total failure
Seems like mountain bikers like tubeless more than anyone, but I've yet to understand why. The only reason that makes sense is they like low pressure more than anyone else.
Also, if the tires are glued to the rims, how do you take them off when your tires wear down?
#12
Senior Member
Also, if the tires are glued to the rims, how do you take them off when your tires wear down?
Tubeless tires are not glued to the rim. They're literally just clinchers without an inner tube; the air pressure holding the tire bead against the rim wall keeps that interface sealed. In the event that the system stops being able to hold a tubeless seal for some reason or another, you can install an inner tube and run it like a normal clincher.
The tires that get glued to the rim are tubulars. Tubular tires do not have a bead; the tire's casing is sewed up around an inner tube.
People typically use a tacky glue to attach road tubulars to their rims, which allows them to be removed by basically just ripping them off. You then pop your spare onto the rim, inflate, and go... being careful to not corner very hard, since the spare isn't properly glued. To clean a rim of old glue when doing a fresh glue job, heat and solvents can be used.
Seems like mountain bikers like tubeless more than anyone, but I've yet to understand why. The only reason that makes sense is they like low pressure more than anyone else.
Low pressure offers more consistent grip, and because it allows the tire to work better as suspension, it can also be faster on rough surfaces.
#14
Senior Member
I have a lot of curiosity about tubeless myself. Can we get a complete rundown of the pros and cons, and also get a description of worst-case scenarios, what causes them, and their likelihood?
Here's what I've gathered so far:
Pros
Slight weight reduction
Virtually no flats
Can run lower pressure
Better "feel"
Cons
More expensive
Less choices/availability
Initial setup can be annoying
More disastrous in the event of total failure
Seems like mountain bikers like tubeless more than anyone, but I've yet to understand why. The only reason that makes sense is they like low pressure more than anyone else.
Also, if the tires are glued to the rims, how do you take them off when your tires wear down?
Here's what I've gathered so far:
Pros
Slight weight reduction
Virtually no flats
Can run lower pressure
Better "feel"
Cons
More expensive
Less choices/availability
Initial setup can be annoying
More disastrous in the event of total failure
Seems like mountain bikers like tubeless more than anyone, but I've yet to understand why. The only reason that makes sense is they like low pressure more than anyone else.
Also, if the tires are glued to the rims, how do you take them off when your tires wear down?
I have found that with my Stan's No Tubes wheels and tires that I was able to seat the tires easily with only a frame pump, but that may not be typical based on comments I have heard from others.
The sealant is not the messy nasty stuff that I experienced when I tried slime tubes. It is water soluble and easily rinses off of hands, clothing, and tools.
I like the feel of a light tire with supple sidewalls and going tubeless helps with that.
I pack really light so I am more likely to run skinny road bike tires for my on road touring, but if I were going to run fat tires on tour, I'd definitely consider tubeless. I'd probably carry a tube if on a long tour especially where services might be few and far between, but not expect to use it.
I have never tried road tubeless so I will not comment on that setup.
#15
Senior Member
superpletch, If you have a rim-tire combination that's maintaining pressure, why not? It's still good to have a tube in the repair kit. I imagine that tire pressure is going to be at whatever the tire's maximum listed pressure is.
Balancing the load between front and rear will be important at your weight and I'd load the front heavier than the rear, as that is the stronger wheel. Also due to the all-up weight, the tires will wear faster than with a lighter load whether they're tubeless or not.
Brad
Balancing the load between front and rear will be important at your weight and I'd load the front heavier than the rear, as that is the stronger wheel. Also due to the all-up weight, the tires will wear faster than with a lighter load whether they're tubeless or not.
Brad
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 8,088
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 686 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
5 Posts
The guys on bikepacking.com seem to like it.
Traveling Tubeless for Bikepacking and Touring - BIKEPACKING.com
Traveling Tubeless for Bikepacking and Touring - BIKEPACKING.com
#17
Senior Member
recently purchased 2017 specialized sequoia and converted 42c sawtooth tires to tubeless. planning a tour from san francisco to la in may and am interested in thoughts on touring on tubeless tires. i like the flat protection, rode 25 miles with large staple through tire without loosing any psi, and reduction in weight. i may be crazy but i feel the bike rolls better on tubeless tires and i can run a bit lower pressure which offers more comfort. the other question is what recommendation on tubeless psi with 250-275lbs on bike (including rider)
#18
Upgrading my engine
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Alamogordo
Posts: 6,218
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 125 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I'm going to do my south-north ride tubeless. Right now I have a Hutchinson Intensive on the rear with over 2600 miles on it and it's still going strong. There are 2 spots that I can tell have been sealed, but I didn't notice either one while riding. I ride in an area with a lot of thorns. No flats at all on this tire. It's not a cheap tire, but there are always deals if you're patient.
I don't have any real worries about going tubeless on the ride. I'm going to take 2 spare tubes and a patch kit with me (which I would have done on a standard setup anyway) in case **** hits the fan. That happened to me once on my old Fusion 5s (garbage tires, BTW) and it really wasn't as messy as I was expecting it to be.
I ride tubeless mainly for the protection against thorns. The ability to run lower tire pressure is a nice side benefit. I don't ride anything super low around here because the roads are pretty good, but you never know what you're going to run into on a tour. If the roads are **** or you run into a lot of rain it's nice to have the option to go low on the tire pressure.
I don't have any real worries about going tubeless on the ride. I'm going to take 2 spare tubes and a patch kit with me (which I would have done on a standard setup anyway) in case **** hits the fan. That happened to me once on my old Fusion 5s (garbage tires, BTW) and it really wasn't as messy as I was expecting it to be.
I ride tubeless mainly for the protection against thorns. The ability to run lower tire pressure is a nice side benefit. I don't ride anything super low around here because the roads are pretty good, but you never know what you're going to run into on a tour. If the roads are **** or you run into a lot of rain it's nice to have the option to go low on the tire pressure.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Universe Spain
Posts: 952
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 230 Post(s)
Liked 428 Times
in
195 Posts
I've ridden 1.5k miles on sequoia with tubeless tires and they have been more than durable. quite the contrary they have been more than durable by avoiding several flat tires. I rode 25 miles with an annoying ticking sound that i couldnt identify and when i got home found a large staple through tire with no loss of psi. thats durable!
wow thats a lot, 25miles
#20
#21
Senior Member
#22
Newbie
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 4
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#23
Senior Member
I have sutured a tire on tour. Threw it out as soon as possible though.
On the tubeless topic, I would love to tour tubeless, but flying with tubeless is a mess. Since I almost never tour without flying, tubeless is a dead end sadly.
On the tubeless topic, I would love to tour tubeless, but flying with tubeless is a mess. Since I almost never tour without flying, tubeless is a dead end sadly.
#24
Senior Member
Personally, I'd just deflate the tires close the valves and take my chances.
I guess that it is possible that a TSA agent could intentionally pop a bead off the rim, but IME adents are far more likely to be incompetent than malicious
That said you could remove the sealant and even rinse it out if you were worried. I doubt that is necessary though. I'd imagine if you really wanted to you could remove the sealant with a syringe inserted through the valve stem. I've read of someone changing sealant that way. So unseating the bead wouldn't even be necessary to remove most of the sealant. Also the stuff is water based so a little minor spillage isn't a huge deal any way.
Given that tubeless is very common these days I'd imagine lots of people fly with tubeless and I have not heard horror stories. Have folks here generally had success? Horror stories?
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,424
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1041 Post(s)
Liked 1,079 Times
in
554 Posts
I kind of hate replying to zombie threads, but I found this interesting. My experience with tubeless is limited, but I have trouble imagining this being a huge issue. With the rim/tire combos I have used beads stay seated unless you make fairly considerable effort to unseat it. The valves can be closed so I wouldn't expect any mess.
Personally, I'd just deflate the tires close the valves and take my chances.
I guess that it is possible that a TSA agent could intentionally pop a bead off the rim, but IME adents are far more likely to be incompetent than malicious
That said you could remove the sealant and even rinse it out if you were worried. I doubt that is necessary though. I'd imagine if you really wanted to you could remove the sealant with a syringe inserted through the valve stem. I've read of someone changing sealant that way. So unseating the bead wouldn't even be necessary to remove most of the sealant. Also the stuff is water based so a little minor spillage isn't a huge deal any way.
Given that tubeless is very common these days I'd imagine lots of people fly with tubeless and I have not heard horror stories. Have folks here generally had success? Horror stories?
Personally, I'd just deflate the tires close the valves and take my chances.
I guess that it is possible that a TSA agent could intentionally pop a bead off the rim, but IME adents are far more likely to be incompetent than malicious
That said you could remove the sealant and even rinse it out if you were worried. I doubt that is necessary though. I'd imagine if you really wanted to you could remove the sealant with a syringe inserted through the valve stem. I've read of someone changing sealant that way. So unseating the bead wouldn't even be necessary to remove most of the sealant. Also the stuff is water based so a little minor spillage isn't a huge deal any way.
Given that tubeless is very common these days I'd imagine lots of people fly with tubeless and I have not heard horror stories. Have folks here generally had success? Horror stories?