How to Make Car-centric Southern California Safer for Bicyclists
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
How to Make Car-centric Southern California Safer for Bicyclists
If you live in Los Angeles County and surrounding areas, here is some information about accidents.
Link to ABC7 news article - How to make car-centric Southern California safer for bicyclists
Link to map of High Injury Nework roadmap.
Link to map of collisions in region
Link to map of fatalities with details of time/place
"SCAG’s Regional HIN shows that 65 percent of all fatal and serious injuries occurred on just 5.5 percent of the regional transportation network. The HIN is primarily located in equity areas, with about 81 percent of the roadway miles in SB 535 Disadvantaged Communities, Environmental Justice Areas, or Communities of Concern."
Link to ABC7 news article - How to make car-centric Southern California safer for bicyclists
Link to map of High Injury Nework roadmap.
Link to map of collisions in region
Link to map of fatalities with details of time/place
"SCAG’s Regional HIN shows that 65 percent of all fatal and serious injuries occurred on just 5.5 percent of the regional transportation network. The HIN is primarily located in equity areas, with about 81 percent of the roadway miles in SB 535 Disadvantaged Communities, Environmental Justice Areas, or Communities of Concern."
Last edited by Bad Lag; 05-09-23 at 10:32 AM.
#2
Been Around Awhile
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,951
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,517 Times
in
1,031 Posts
If you live in Los Angeles County and surrounding areas, here is some information about accidents.
Link to ABC7 news article - How to make car-centric Southern California safer for bicyclists
Link to map of High Injury Nework roadmap.
Link to map of collisions in region
Link to map of fatalities with details of time/place
"SCAG’s Regional HIN shows that 65 percent of all fatal and serious injuries occurred on just 5.5 percent of the regional transportation network. The HIN is primarily located in equity areas, with about 81 percent of the roadway miles in SB 535 Disadvantaged Communities, Environmental Justice Areas, or Communities of Concern."
Link to ABC7 news article - How to make car-centric Southern California safer for bicyclists
Link to map of High Injury Nework roadmap.
Link to map of collisions in region
Link to map of fatalities with details of time/place
"SCAG’s Regional HIN shows that 65 percent of all fatal and serious injuries occurred on just 5.5 percent of the regional transportation network. The HIN is primarily located in equity areas, with about 81 percent of the roadway miles in SB 535 Disadvantaged Communities, Environmental Justice Areas, or Communities of Concern."
Solutions: more money, more planning
https://www.bikeforums.net/advocacy-...high-whit.html
Last edited by I-Like-To-Bike; 05-09-23 at 10:45 AM.
Likes For I-Like-To-Bike:
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,970
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2475 Post(s)
Liked 722 Times
in
513 Posts
That thread is locked, and for good reason. The o.p. wasn't the reason. And it wouldn't be the reason here either. Tell you what though, if anymore turn out like that one, I'm cancelling my subscription.
#4
Full Member
What's the solution? Based on the title of the thread, I was expecting the OP to include a solution, but I just see a list of articles and a claim that most of the problem is in certain areas. What is the solution?
#5
Senior Member
Thread Starter
I provided links to some of the sites referenced in the article for the convenience of the reader, so they were not easily overlooked.
Read it, take what you can or will from it.
My daily rides are on these maps, so I paid close attention to the details.
P.S. - I am pleased to see this thread was not locked. The links provide information ("Just the facts, Mam.") about cycling safety in the Los Angeles basin and southern California, in general.
Last edited by Bad Lag; 05-10-23 at 11:04 AM.
Likes For greatbasin:
#7
Senior Member
Thread Starter
You'll have to take that up that issue with ABC7. Do you want me to provide their number to you, or can you handle that, yourself?
Just for reference, there is discussion of safety options available to city planners. So, there is that.
Just for reference, there is discussion of safety options available to city planners. So, there is that.
Last edited by Bad Lag; 05-10-23 at 11:33 PM.
#8
Been Around Awhile
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,951
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,517 Times
in
1,031 Posts
The solution was in the cited article and it is what could be expected: "Solution: More money and planning." And of course more money for planners and the organizations that employ them.
#9
Full Member
So the proposed how-to is more government spending? How novel. Has anyone noticed the government is worse than broke? It's at least $100 Trillion in debt and has monetized its debt so that an original $1 Federal Reserve Note is now worth $0.03. So the solution is to take it from 3 cents to zero? And that will make us safer? No, it will make us go to war and the government will send the poor people first. Why is it the government's role to make anyone safer? Maybe safer from violent criminals, but bicycle safety? The government's unique feature is its monopoly on the use of physical force. It should use that feature to put violent criminals in prison and not to make people pay for useless bicycle safety planning. Is this justified because it's supposed to serve poor people and thereby redistribute the wealth in a socialist scheme? Do you think those poor people want protected bike lanes so they can stay poor? Or a car? Suppose they were riding their bike to work (hardly a safe assumption). Which would they elect to spend their paychecks on? Useless government boondoggles only serve as a war on the poor to keep them dependent on even more government spending.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,970
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2475 Post(s)
Liked 722 Times
in
513 Posts
The Government may be broke, but it doesn't have to be. Enough said. Bike lanes, separated bike lanes, enough to be useful for practical bicycle transportation, is not possible on this Earth. Too late. We'd have to nuke the whole works and start all over with a different design. So ... "what's the solution?". You're not going to like this but the solution is looking more and more like a total non-essential vehicle ban in city centers. Congestion pricing, maybe, but there would inevitably be exceptions carved out for this that and the other thing, and you would get right back to, or nearly back to status quo in a short time.
#12
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,094 Times
in
5,053 Posts
So the proposed how-to is more government spending? How novel. Has anyone noticed the government is worse than broke? It's at least $100 Trillion in debt and has monetized its debt so that an original $1 Federal Reserve Note is now worth $0.03. So the solution is to take it from 3 cents to zero? And that will make us safer? No, it will make us go to war and the government will send the poor people first. Why is it the government's role to make anyone safer? Maybe safer from violent criminals, but bicycle safety? The government's unique feature is its monopoly on the use of physical force. It should use that feature to put violent criminals in prison and not to make people pay for useless bicycle safety planning. Is this justified because it's supposed to serve poor people and thereby redistribute the wealth in a socialist scheme? Do you think those poor people want protected bike lanes so they can stay poor? Or a car? Suppose they were riding their bike to work (hardly a safe assumption). Which would they elect to spend their paychecks on? Useless government boondoggles only serve as a war on the poor to keep them dependent on even more government spending.
Do you have this insane apocalyptic freak out every time there's road construction? There's a hell whole lot more of spending going into that.
Likes For livedarklions:
#13
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,094 Times
in
5,053 Posts
The Government may be broke, but it doesn't have to be. Enough said. Bike lanes, separated bike lanes, enough to be useful for practical bicycle transportation, is not possible on this Earth. Too late. We'd have to nuke the whole works and start all over with a different design. So ... "what's the solution?". You're not going to like this but the solution is looking more and more like a total non-essential vehicle ban in city centers. Congestion pricing, maybe, but there would inevitably be exceptions carved out for this that and the other thing, and you would get right back to, or nearly back to status quo in a short time.
So you're going to ban cars from cities that were primarily designed to fascilitate travel by car, and you don't think that's going to require us to "nuke the whole works and start with a different design"? Makes absolutely no sense that putting in marginal improvements won't require less, not more, redesign and construction.
Likes For jon c.:
#15
Been Around Awhile
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,951
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,517 Times
in
1,031 Posts
And more than 80% of these roads, called "High Injury Networks," are in underserved communities designated by the state or SCAG that have a higher share of people of color, low-income residents or areas that are vulnerable to multiple sources of pollution.
"Something that we've known for years at BikeLA is just the disproportionate impact on more vulnerable communities," said Eli Akira Kaufman, executive director of BikeLA.
"Something that we've known for years at BikeLA is just the disproportionate impact on more vulnerable communities," said Eli Akira Kaufman, executive director of BikeLA.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 4,812
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1591 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,015 Times
in
570 Posts
I did read all the links. Had to search a bit to find it but I did indeed see that single reference to people of color. And I do understand the even a single such reference trouble you a great deal. Again, your position is clear.
Likes For jon c.:
#17
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,094 Times
in
5,053 Posts
Maybe if you read the cited reference you wouldn't have to speculate. Perhaps you can then speculate what the multiple references to "underserved", disadvantaged" and "vulnerable" communities" means; maybe even speculate about what the intent is with the reference to communities with "higher share of of people of color."
While ignoring low income and communities with lots of pollution? Why are you afraid of data about the actual distribution of resources?
If you're done with your attempted thread hijack by race-baiting dog whistle, I'd love it if someone from the area could give us their perspectives on the maps, etc.