Converting between Power, VO2, and METs
#1
climber has-been
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 7,108
Bikes: Scott Addict R1, Felt Z1
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3430 Post(s)
Liked 3,566 Times
in
1,792 Posts
Converting between Power, VO2, and METs
Putting this here to make it searchable, so when anyone (I) needs to do a conversion, they (I) can find it. Please comment if you think I got something wrong, and I'll update.
These conversions are based on a leg ergometry equation from ACSM's Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription, (a paper book that I am too cheap to buy).
Definitions:
Conversions from PWR (W/kg):
Source: PowerPoint from immagic.com
--------
UPDATE:
Since the ACSM formula is limited to "sub-maximal aerobic effort", it doesn't apply to VO2max.
However, this paper:
Hawley, J. A., & Noakes, T. D. (1992). Peak power output predicts maximal oxygen uptake and performance time in trained cyclists. European journal of applied physiology and occupational physiology, 65(1), 79–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01466278
has a formula for VO2max and peak power, based on a ramped power test, starting at 100 watts and increasing by 25 watts every 150 seconds.
Definitions:
These conversions are based on a leg ergometry equation from ACSM's Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription, (a paper book that I am too cheap to buy).
Definitions:
- MET: Metabolic Equivalent of Task. A common measure used by scientists. One MET unit is roughly the energy expended when sitting quietly, set by convention at an oxygen consumption (VO2) of 3.5 ml/kg/min.
- VO2: A person's rate of oxygen consumption, typically in units of milliliters per kilogram body mass per minute (ml/kg/min).
- PWR: Power to Weight Ratio. Power produced at the cranks divided by body mass (watts/kg).
Conversions from PWR (W/kg):
- VO2 (ml/kg/min) = (10.8 * PWR) + 7
- METs = 0.286 * VO2 = (3.09 * PWR) + 2
- steady state sub-maximal aerobic exercise
- power range 50-200 watts
Source: PowerPoint from immagic.com
--------
UPDATE:
What About Power At VO2max?
Since the ACSM formula is limited to "sub-maximal aerobic effort", it doesn't apply to VO2max.
However, this paper:
Hawley, J. A., & Noakes, T. D. (1992). Peak power output predicts maximal oxygen uptake and performance time in trained cyclists. European journal of applied physiology and occupational physiology, 65(1), 79–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01466278
has a formula for VO2max and peak power, based on a ramped power test, starting at 100 watts and increasing by 25 watts every 150 seconds.
Definitions:
- Peak Power Output (PPO): highest power achieved (Watts)
- Body Mass (BM): body mass of cyclist (kg)
- Peak Power to Weight Ratio (PPWR): PPO divided by BM (W/kg)
- VO2max: maximum oxygen consumption (ml/min/kg)
- Calculate VO2max from PPO: VO2max = (1000 / BM) * (0.01141 * PPO + 0.435)
- Calculate VO2max from PPWR: VO2max = 11.41 * PPWR + (435 / BM)
- Calculate PPWR from VO2max: PPWR = 0.0876 * VO2max - (38.12 / BM)
Last edited by terrymorse; 03-05-23 at 08:32 PM.
Likes For terrymorse:
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 2,038
Bikes: addict, aethos, creo, vanmoof, sirrus, public ...
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1277 Post(s)
Liked 1,392 Times
in
710 Posts
a (probably) dumb question that doesn’t seem to be readily explained or answered.
if using the formula above to calculate VO2 MAX, what duration does the power output need to be sustained for? is the watt value intended to be FTP, a power output level the can be sustained indefinitely, peak for 5 min, etc?
if using the formula above to calculate VO2 MAX, what duration does the power output need to be sustained for? is the watt value intended to be FTP, a power output level the can be sustained indefinitely, peak for 5 min, etc?
__________________
#4
climber has-been
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 7,108
Bikes: Scott Addict R1, Felt Z1
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3430 Post(s)
Liked 3,566 Times
in
1,792 Posts
a (probably) dumb question that doesn’t seem to be readily explained or answered.
if using the formula above to calculate VO2 MAX, what duration does the power output need to be sustained for? is the watt value intended to be FTP, a power output level the can be sustained indefinitely, peak for 5 min, etc?
if using the formula above to calculate VO2 MAX, what duration does the power output need to be sustained for? is the watt value intended to be FTP, a power output level the can be sustained indefinitely, peak for 5 min, etc?
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2021
Posts: 4,083
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2333 Post(s)
Liked 2,097 Times
in
1,314 Posts
Seems like pretty good rules of thumb. Thumbs up.
FTP and VO2 max relationship does vary especially older athletes. Maybe they get more efficient as some have proposed to explain the high capacity utilization or maybe oldtimers just more stupid
FTP and VO2 max relationship does vary especially older athletes. Maybe they get more efficient as some have proposed to explain the high capacity utilization or maybe oldtimers just more stupid
#7
• —
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Land of Pleasant Living
Posts: 12,233
Bikes: Shmikes
Mentioned: 59 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10167 Post(s)
Liked 5,860 Times
in
3,154 Posts
A third and, to my mind, more likely, possibility is that VO2max falls faster than FTP with age. Certainly true in my case. Longitudinal studies are needed to answer the question.
#8
just another gosling
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,533
Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3889 Post(s)
Liked 1,938 Times
in
1,383 Posts
I started doing rando when I started getting dropped on the hills in competitive group rides, and did very well with rando. I also see that trend in various event rides. We lose the high end first. Experience in pacing might have something to do with it, too.
__________________
Results matter
Results matter
Likes For Carbonfiberboy:
#9
climber has-been
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 7,108
Bikes: Scott Addict R1, Felt Z1
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3430 Post(s)
Liked 3,566 Times
in
1,792 Posts
When you no longer can go fast, go long.
This was the inspiration for some of the "death march" rides in California. We olds may no longer contest the city limit sign, but we tend to do okay on the longer stuff.
Likes For terrymorse:
#10
just another gosling
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,533
Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3889 Post(s)
Liked 1,938 Times
in
1,383 Posts
There was a saying going around in the clubs, I don't know if it's still around:
When you no longer can go fast, go long.
This was the inspiration for some of the "death march" rides in California. We olds may no longer contest the city limit sign, but we tend to do okay on the longer stuff.
When you no longer can go fast, go long.
This was the inspiration for some of the "death march" rides in California. We olds may no longer contest the city limit sign, but we tend to do okay on the longer stuff.
__________________
Results matter
Results matter
#11
climber has-been
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 7,108
Bikes: Scott Addict R1, Felt Z1
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3430 Post(s)
Liked 3,566 Times
in
1,792 Posts