Damaged bike during test ride - what would you do?
#26
LBKA (formerly punkncat)
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Jawja
Posts: 4,299
Bikes: Spec Roubaix SL4, GT Traffic 1.0
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2208 Post(s)
Liked 960 Times
in
686 Posts
You don't?
Yes, any time I look at any type of car/moto/bike I always check essentials like fluids, tires, brakes, and so forth. You pull off in a car with no oil and blow the motor on your test drive is an expensive substitute for taking a few seconds to pop the hood and check the dip stick. I typically check and smell oil, trans fluid, dip a finger in the coolant where possible...ESPECIALLY when dealing with CL and/or bay sellers.
I do (indeed) kick the tires.
#27
LBKA (formerly punkncat)
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Jawja
Posts: 4,299
Bikes: Spec Roubaix SL4, GT Traffic 1.0
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2208 Post(s)
Liked 960 Times
in
686 Posts
The OP's situation is a bit fuzzy. It's not clearly the OP's fault like "crashing or dropping" the bike would be.
But, for example. if a pedal broke off in careful testing and the seller pulled the "you broke it, you bought it" line, they would probably have to learn to breath with a bike up their nose.
But, for example. if a pedal broke off in careful testing and the seller pulled the "you broke it, you bought it" line, they would probably have to learn to breath with a bike up their nose.
Obviously, it is a bit of a muddy situation in certain respects and could readily have turned into cops, court, and so forth.
It was good that OP knew he liked the bike and in spite of the issue was something they wanted at asking. Never assume, check.
#28
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2022
Location: GMT-5
Posts: 937
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 536 Post(s)
Liked 415 Times
in
274 Posts
Often C&V bikes are just pulled out of a garage and the tires inflated a bit. Owners might or might not check the brakes and shifting, and in the case of all but one of the C&V bikes I've bought in the last couple years, I wouldn't trust the bike to go and stop properly before I'd worked on it, and this incident highlights why.
If I see the wheels are true-ish, no play in the bottom bracket, seatpost budges, rear-derailleur not bent, that's enough of a green light for me and pay them for the bike and hastily throw it on my platform carrier.
The only time I would test drive a bike is if I feel that it would expose a defect that wasn't advertise, which gives me grounds to lowball more.
Likes For soyabean:
#29
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 7,877
Mentioned: 38 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6963 Post(s)
Liked 10,961 Times
in
4,687 Posts
You don't?
Yes, any time I look at any type of car/moto/bike I always check essentials like fluids, tires, brakes, and so forth. You pull off in a car with no oil and blow the motor on your test drive is an expensive substitute for taking a few seconds to pop the hood and check the dip stick. I typically check and smell oil, trans fluid, dip a finger in the coolant where possible...ESPECIALLY when dealing with CL and/or bay sellers.
Yes, any time I look at any type of car/moto/bike I always check essentials like fluids, tires, brakes, and so forth. You pull off in a car with no oil and blow the motor on your test drive is an expensive substitute for taking a few seconds to pop the hood and check the dip stick. I typically check and smell oil, trans fluid, dip a finger in the coolant where possible...ESPECIALLY when dealing with CL and/or bay sellers.
If any vehicle - car, bike, whatever - is advertised as 'for sale,' and a test drive or ride is allowed, then it's the seller's responsibility to ensure that the vehicle is in running order. Otherwise, what is the point of a test drive or ride, if the prospective buyer will be held responsible for any defects? Think about it.
I mean, seriously, answer this: if you responded to a used car ad, showed up, asked to take a test drive, and during the test drive the motor blew because there was no oil in it...YOU would take financial responsibility? If you claim "yes," I'm calling BS.
#30
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,272
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4255 Post(s)
Liked 1,354 Times
in
940 Posts
No one was asking about the case where somebody "crashed" or "dropped" the bike (situations where the buyer is more clearly responsible for the damage). But that's the question the "you broke it, you bought" chorus is providing "answers" to.
You don't?
Yes, any time I look at any type of car/moto/bike I always check essentials like fluids, tires, brakes, and so forth. You pull off in a car with no oil and blow the motor on your test drive is an expensive substitute for taking a few seconds to pop the hood and check the dip stick. I typically check and smell oil, trans fluid, dip a finger in the coolant where possible...ESPECIALLY when dealing with CL and/or bay sellers.
I do (indeed) kick the tires.
Yes, any time I look at any type of car/moto/bike I always check essentials like fluids, tires, brakes, and so forth. You pull off in a car with no oil and blow the motor on your test drive is an expensive substitute for taking a few seconds to pop the hood and check the dip stick. I typically check and smell oil, trans fluid, dip a finger in the coolant where possible...ESPECIALLY when dealing with CL and/or bay sellers.
I do (indeed) kick the tires.
Last edited by njkayaker; 03-15-22 at 12:58 PM.
#31
LBKA (formerly punkncat)
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Jawja
Posts: 4,299
Bikes: Spec Roubaix SL4, GT Traffic 1.0
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2208 Post(s)
Liked 960 Times
in
686 Posts
I'm not talking about what YOU do; I'm talking about responsibility.
If any vehicle - car, bike, whatever - is advertised as 'for sale,' and a test drive or ride is allowed, then it's the seller's responsibility to ensure that the vehicle is in running order. Otherwise, what is the point of a test drive or ride, if the prospective buyer will be held responsible for any defects? Think about it.
I mean, seriously, answer this: if you responded to a used car ad, showed up, asked to take a test drive, and during the test drive the motor blew because there was no oil in it...YOU would take financial responsibility? If you claim "yes," I'm calling BS.
If any vehicle - car, bike, whatever - is advertised as 'for sale,' and a test drive or ride is allowed, then it's the seller's responsibility to ensure that the vehicle is in running order. Otherwise, what is the point of a test drive or ride, if the prospective buyer will be held responsible for any defects? Think about it.
I mean, seriously, answer this: if you responded to a used car ad, showed up, asked to take a test drive, and during the test drive the motor blew because there was no oil in it...YOU would take financial responsibility? If you claim "yes," I'm calling BS.
I can only assume that the state you live in doesn't do "AS-IS" private sales?
Here in GA if you buy anything used, unless it is specifically stated concerning certain aspect of the sale it is as-is meaning that if you didn't take it to a mechanic, or do a through check and it blows up the second you sign the papers, it's still yours. By and large there is no responsibility to be held to in many cases. The only aspect that gets around this is if you can prove they purposefully hid something, such things like sellling a car as good, passed emissions and they removed the CEL bulb and similar. Even at that, proving it can be more costly than just eating it as a learning experience.
#32
Newbie
Thread Starter
I'm glad I seem to have made the right choice with how to handle it. We are all guilty at times of not taking precautions that seem obvious in retrospect. I learned a lesson, and won't make the same mistake again.
Likes For Velogoth:
#33
LBKA (formerly punkncat)
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Jawja
Posts: 4,299
Bikes: Spec Roubaix SL4, GT Traffic 1.0
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2208 Post(s)
Liked 960 Times
in
686 Posts
You and others took the "easy way out" of the discussion and talked about the "you broke it, you bought" it nonsense as if the seller can never really be at fault.
No one was asking about the case where somebody "crashed" or "dropped" the bike (situations where the buyer is more clearly responsible for the damage). But that's the question the "you broke it, you bought" chorus is providing "answers" to.
It's "obvious" and you and others ignored actually addressing the situation.
No one was asking about the case where somebody "crashed" or "dropped" the bike (situations where the buyer is more clearly responsible for the damage). But that's the question the "you broke it, you bought" chorus is providing "answers" to.
It's "obvious" and you and others ignored actually addressing the situation.
OP didn't say, but did he specifically ASK if it shifted correctly during their intercourse? I mean, the sellers wife was there who didn't know anything, so at that point you start checking things for safety before the ride. It isn't a cop out, it's smart practice. The act of shifting through all the gears while on the ride and not being super cautious about it was done on the assumption that everything was all right when it wasn't. There are nuances, certainly, but in this case it would not have been any more 'right' of OP to hand the bike back "it's broken" and leave the seller with something that no longer functioned properly because of that assumption.
Likes For Juan Foote:
#34
LBKA (formerly punkncat)
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Jawja
Posts: 4,299
Bikes: Spec Roubaix SL4, GT Traffic 1.0
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2208 Post(s)
Liked 960 Times
in
686 Posts
I paid the tax for not knowing.
As an aside, the car is actually running pretty well now. It does use oil and have a CEL issue to deal with relating to the low pressure fuel pump, but it's a super fun weekend and go to town car. Glad we got it (or, something to be specific) cause right afterwards my trusty steed the Titan had had to be in the shop twice for issues related to age and miles. We would have paid well more than the car cost in rental otherwise, so it all happened for a reason in my mind anyway.
*actually, being fair, it likely WAS the sellers fault. I figure they probably knew but thought it best in the interest of their business model not to say and feign ignorance about it. It would still be sitting there, I suspect, had they. Used car salesmen aren't thought so highly of for loads of reasons including this.
Last edited by Juan Foote; 03-15-22 at 01:05 PM.
#35
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,272
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4255 Post(s)
Liked 1,354 Times
in
940 Posts
Nothing defective is defective it it just sits there. If the limit screw wasn't set properly, that's not something the OP did.
Sure, he should have checked more carefully (I said that a while ago). That doesn't mean he "broke" it.
He needed to check things more carefully because that's really the only protection he has. Because, as we see here, the seller is going to scream "you broke it" for anything that goes awry.
There's no reason craiglist sellers can't be unscrupulous too.
He needed to check things more carefully because that's really the only protection he has. Because, as we see here, the seller is going to scream "you broke it" for anything that goes awry.
And in this, you are 100% correct. My not knowing about that aspect of the purchase wasn't the sellers fault*, it was mine. They obviously have a different standard of morality/disclosure than many might. Personally wouldn't be able to sleep at night if I sold something that I wasn't totally sure I had disclosed everything I knew about it...but I don't sell used cars either.
Last edited by njkayaker; 03-15-22 at 01:09 PM.
#37
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,272
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4255 Post(s)
Liked 1,354 Times
in
940 Posts
No, he didn't say he "broke it". Clearly, the failure occurred during his operation but, if he operated it appropriately, he didn't really "break it". If the limit screw isn't set properly, normal operation can throw the chain to the inside.
If you took a new television home and, when you turned it on, it released "magic smoke", did you "break it"?
If you took a new television home and, when you turned it on, it released "magic smoke", did you "break it"?
Last edited by njkayaker; 03-15-22 at 11:11 PM.
Likes For njkayaker:
#38
LBKA (formerly punkncat)
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Jawja
Posts: 4,299
Bikes: Spec Roubaix SL4, GT Traffic 1.0
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2208 Post(s)
Liked 960 Times
in
686 Posts
I will agree to disagree with you because this is completely pointless. The OP already did what he did and your and my opinion of it basically means ****.
#39
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,272
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4255 Post(s)
Liked 1,354 Times
in
940 Posts
The bike didn't seem to be set-up properly for normal use. Sure the OP should have checked more carefully but the bad set-up isn't his fault.
Likes For njkayaker:
#40
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Hacienda Hgts
Posts: 2,108
Bikes: 1999 Schwinn Peloton Ultegra 10, Kestrel RT-1000 Ultegra, Trek Marlin 6 Deore 29'er
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 822 Post(s)
Liked 1,960 Times
in
943 Posts
OP avoided a contentious situation by purchasing what was likely a malfunctioning and not known to the seller "problem" bike.
Dropping a chain is not unheard of but blowing up a wheel is.
Purchasing the bike was a very civil thing to do, but I would have not faulted the OP if he walked away from the deal either.
What would Judge Wapner do?
Dropping a chain is not unheard of but blowing up a wheel is.
Purchasing the bike was a very civil thing to do, but I would have not faulted the OP if he walked away from the deal either.
What would Judge Wapner do?
Likes For soyabean:
#42
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: South Carolina Upstate
Posts: 2,109
Bikes: 2010 Fuji Absolute 3.0 1994 Trek 850
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 762 Post(s)
Liked 555 Times
in
322 Posts
how would you even set a bike up to mis-shift and break the spokes?..Not sure what I would have done, but you can sleep well
#43
Newbie
Thread Starter
#44
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 7,877
Mentioned: 38 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6963 Post(s)
Liked 10,961 Times
in
4,687 Posts
I'm not talking about what YOU do; I'm talking about responsibility.
If any vehicle - car, bike, whatever - is advertised as 'for sale,' and a test drive or ride is allowed, then it's the seller's responsibility to ensure that the vehicle is in running order. Otherwise, what is the point of a test drive or ride, if the prospective buyer will be held responsible for any defects? Think about it.
I mean, seriously, answer this: if you responded to a used car ad, showed up, asked to take a test drive, and during the test drive the motor blew because there was no oil in it...YOU would take financial responsibility? If you claim "yes," I'm calling BS.
If any vehicle - car, bike, whatever - is advertised as 'for sale,' and a test drive or ride is allowed, then it's the seller's responsibility to ensure that the vehicle is in running order. Otherwise, what is the point of a test drive or ride, if the prospective buyer will be held responsible for any defects? Think about it.
I mean, seriously, answer this: if you responded to a used car ad, showed up, asked to take a test drive, and during the test drive the motor blew because there was no oil in it...YOU would take financial responsibility? If you claim "yes," I'm calling BS.
I can only assume that the state you live in doesn't do "AS-IS" private sales?
Here in GA if you buy anything used, unless it is specifically stated concerning certain aspect of the sale it is as-is meaning that if you didn't take it to a mechanic, or do a through check and it blows up the second you sign the papers, it's still yours. By and large there is no responsibility to be held to in many cases. The only aspect that gets around this is if you can prove they purposefully hid something, such things like sellling a car as good, passed emissions and they removed the CEL bulb and similar. Even at that, proving it can be more costly than just eating it as a learning experience.
Here in GA if you buy anything used, unless it is specifically stated concerning certain aspect of the sale it is as-is meaning that if you didn't take it to a mechanic, or do a through check and it blows up the second you sign the papers, it's still yours. By and large there is no responsibility to be held to in many cases. The only aspect that gets around this is if you can prove they purposefully hid something, such things like sellling a car as good, passed emissions and they removed the CEL bulb and similar. Even at that, proving it can be more costly than just eating it as a learning experience.
#45
LBKA (formerly punkncat)
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Jawja
Posts: 4,299
Bikes: Spec Roubaix SL4, GT Traffic 1.0
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2208 Post(s)
Liked 960 Times
in
686 Posts
You can't just offer some made up situation that isn't the same and expect the answer to apply to all equally. Straw man isn't it called?
#46
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 7,877
Mentioned: 38 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6963 Post(s)
Liked 10,961 Times
in
4,687 Posts
Yikes.
#47
LBKA (formerly punkncat)
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Jawja
Posts: 4,299
Bikes: Spec Roubaix SL4, GT Traffic 1.0
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2208 Post(s)
Liked 960 Times
in
686 Posts
This is a case of a bike malfunctioning on a test ride, before a transaction has taken place...And you offered a long post (#31, above) about laws pertaining to a buyer's responsibility AFTER making a purchase. And you're claiming that I'm the one offering "some made up situation"?
Yikes.
Yikes.
Come down out of your tower. Weather is fine down here.
#48
Over the hill
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 24,376
Bikes: Giant Defy, Giant Revolt
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 998 Post(s)
Liked 1,206 Times
in
692 Posts
That's the tricky part I referenced. It might come down to a matter of opinion of what's a "gentle" test drive. My point was just that if a seller said it's "as-is", I would be much more thorough with my inspection and delicate on the test ride. Not that anything that breaks during said test ride would be automatically my fault, but the seller might see it differently... and I have met some rather unreasonable people when it comes to things like that. I would have probably done the same thing the OP did, just to avoid an argument. Besides, I know how adjust that derailleur when I get home.
__________________
It's like riding a bicycle
It's like riding a bicycle
Last edited by urbanknight; 03-15-22 at 04:16 PM.
#49
Klaatu..Verata..Necktie?
Join Date: May 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 17,960
Bikes: Litespeed Ultimate, Ultegra; Canyon Endurace, 105; Battaglin MAX, Chorus; Bianchi 928 Veloce; Ritchey Road Logic, Dura Ace; Cannondale R500 RX100; Schwinn Circuit, Sante; Lotus Supreme, Dura Ace
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10424 Post(s)
Liked 11,896 Times
in
6,094 Posts
If the limit screw on the RD is set to allow it to travel too far inboard, you can toss the chain right into the spokes. I have two wheelsets for one of my bikes, one with a 6-speed freehub, and the other with a 6-speed freewheel. I have to remember to reset the limit screws when switching wheels because I HAVE put the chain into the spokes, fortunately never on the road, only on the workstand.
__________________
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."
"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."
"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
Likes For genejockey:
#50
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 7,877
Mentioned: 38 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6963 Post(s)
Liked 10,961 Times
in
4,687 Posts
Last edited by Koyote; 03-17-22 at 07:54 AM.