How many gears is too many?
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2021
Posts: 6
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
How many gears is too many?
What is the ideal number of gears in rear cassette? 12? 13? 20?
I think the bike industry keeps adding gears as a marketing tool, even if it is at the expense of engineering efficiency. Does anyone agree?
The more gears you add, you (i) lose chain thickness (so faster wear or lower tension limit), (ii) reduce the spoke angle (so less wheel strength) and (iii) maybe get thinner gears (so faster wear?). At what point is it too much?
How do you think this plays out over the coming years? Keep adding gears until there are too many snapped chains or taco'd wheels? I suspect that after 14-15 gears, chains will start to wear out too fast and customers will start complaining, and then they'll go back to 12 or 13 gears.
How do you think this plays out?
Thanks.
I think the bike industry keeps adding gears as a marketing tool, even if it is at the expense of engineering efficiency. Does anyone agree?
The more gears you add, you (i) lose chain thickness (so faster wear or lower tension limit), (ii) reduce the spoke angle (so less wheel strength) and (iii) maybe get thinner gears (so faster wear?). At what point is it too much?
How do you think this plays out over the coming years? Keep adding gears until there are too many snapped chains or taco'd wheels? I suspect that after 14-15 gears, chains will start to wear out too fast and customers will start complaining, and then they'll go back to 12 or 13 gears.
How do you think this plays out?
Thanks.
Likes For armille1:
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Oahu, HI
Posts: 1,396
Bikes: 89 Paramount OS 84 Fuji Touring Series III New! 2013 Focus Izalco Ergoride
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 285 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 74 Times
in
54 Posts
Maybe they develop a continuous variable shift system that can give you any possible gear-inch between two extremes. Then you just need to spec the extremes.
scott s.
.
scott s.
.
Likes For scott967:
#3
Senior Member
I sometimes wonder if having more gears means that you just wind up shifting more often, which means more wear and tear on levers, derailleurs, chain, cables, etc.
#4
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,531
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10897 Post(s)
Liked 7,384 Times
in
4,144 Posts
2x11 is the ideal number of gears for a drivetrain, so the correct answer is 11 cogs in back is ideal.
#6
Full Member
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 201
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 77 Post(s)
Liked 88 Times
in
57 Posts
What is the ideal number of gears in rear cassette? 12? 13? 20?
I think the bike industry keeps adding gears as a marketing tool, even if it is at the expense of engineering efficiency. Does anyone agree?
The more gears you add, you (i) lose chain thickness (so faster wear or lower tension limit), (ii) reduce the spoke angle (so less wheel strength) and (iii) maybe get thinner gears (so faster wear?). At what point is it too much?
How do you think this plays out over the coming years? Keep adding gears until there are too many snapped chains or taco'd wheels? I suspect that after 14-15 gears, chains will start to wear out too fast and customers will start complaining, and then they'll go back to 12 or 13 gears.
How do you think this plays out?
Thanks.
I think the bike industry keeps adding gears as a marketing tool, even if it is at the expense of engineering efficiency. Does anyone agree?
The more gears you add, you (i) lose chain thickness (so faster wear or lower tension limit), (ii) reduce the spoke angle (so less wheel strength) and (iii) maybe get thinner gears (so faster wear?). At what point is it too much?
How do you think this plays out over the coming years? Keep adding gears until there are too many snapped chains or taco'd wheels? I suspect that after 14-15 gears, chains will start to wear out too fast and customers will start complaining, and then they'll go back to 12 or 13 gears.
How do you think this plays out?
Thanks.
Actually the 3x9 system was one of the best ever designed but became obsolete Manufacturers sold everyone on the latest fad the 2x10 system which was replaced by the 2x11 and now the 2x12, so we went from 27 gear combos to 20, to 22 and now 24 and lets not discuss the single gear chainrings. I miss the old 3x9 gear sets, they had excellent mid range choices, great granny gears and the rear cassettes didn't look like dinner plates. The manufacturers must be laughing every time they sell a groupset for more money with less components and costs.
Oh well..
Likes For N2deep:
#7
Le savonnier
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Oregon
Posts: 1,706
Bikes: I can count 'em on one hand
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 729 Post(s)
Liked 597 Times
in
269 Posts
More than 8 or 9 seems like overkill to me, but stuff marches on regardless of what I think. I agree with N2deep that 3x9 was probably the apex of gear development.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: South Shore of Long Island
Posts: 2,762
Bikes: 2010 Carrera Volans, 2015 C-Dale Trail 2sl, 2017 Raleigh Rush Hour, 2017 Blue Proseccio, 1992 Giant Perigee, 80s Gitane Rallye Tandem
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1073 Post(s)
Liked 999 Times
in
710 Posts
I'm quite happy with 12sp, the only thing I dislike is the production of 9 and 10t cogs requiring different cassette freehub bodies. Don't know where people live that they need such extreme gear ranges but if you really need more gearing than an 11-48 or 52 provides with a single chainring then get a second chainring. Otherwise its just a move to make a decent system obsolete for the sake of cramming that 9t on there. If you really need to redesign the freehub, make it better in every way so its worth switching, not just to keep up with the latest trend.
Likes For Russ Roth:
#9
Just Pedaling
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: US West Coast
Posts: 957
Bikes: YEP!
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 313 Post(s)
Liked 491 Times
in
325 Posts
There actually is a shaft drive system that uses a single ring with infinite number of gearing possibilities between two extremes. No indexing just friction. Twist it one way for taller gearing and the other for lower gearing. There's a utube vid of it in action. Because of the few moving parts involved aside from the drive shaft it will probably be the next greatest thing once the bugs are worked out of it.
Likes For SpedFast:
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Elevation 666m Edmonton Canada
Posts: 2,456
Bikes: 2013 Custom SA5w / Rohloff Tourster
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1221 Post(s)
Liked 314 Times
in
241 Posts
3x s actually only have 15 different combos. The rest are an illusion.
All my bikes have 1 x 1 cog. LOL. IGH or nothing for me.
My Rohloff14 will put all else to shame on a heavyweight. Slower starts and hills, but otherwise it just floats along. It weighs 4 times what a CF does.
The SA RD3 is just as easy, with 48/ 63/ 84 GI.
All my bikes have 1 x 1 cog. LOL. IGH or nothing for me.
My Rohloff14 will put all else to shame on a heavyweight. Slower starts and hills, but otherwise it just floats along. It weighs 4 times what a CF does.
The SA RD3 is just as easy, with 48/ 63/ 84 GI.
#12
Senior Member
Well eventually they will start removing gears again and come up with a reason for that being better . In the mtn bike world there are already some options for just that. Box and Microshift already make 8-10 wide ranges groupsets and they all aren't cheap. You can spend some real money on Box's 1x9 group if you want.
https://boxcomponents.com/collections/prime-9-filter
https://boxcomponents.com/collections/prime-9-filter
#13
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Mississauga/Toronto, Ontario canada
Posts: 8,721
Bikes: I have 3 singlespeed/fixed gear bikes
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4227 Post(s)
Liked 2,488 Times
in
1,286 Posts
The less the better....I prefer just one.
Likes For wolfchild:
#14
Forum Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Kalamazoo MI
Posts: 21,321
Bikes: Fuji SL2.1 Carbon Di2 Cannondale Synapse Alloy 4 Trek Checkpoint ALR-5 Viscount Aerospace Pro Colnago Classic Rabobank Schwinn Waterford PMount Raleigh C50 Cromoly Hybrid Legnano Tipo Roma Pista
Mentioned: 58 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3059 Post(s)
Liked 6,376 Times
in
3,689 Posts
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,163
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4271 Post(s)
Liked 4,706 Times
in
2,906 Posts
What is the ideal number of gears in rear cassette? 12? 13? 20?
I think the bike industry keeps adding gears as a marketing tool, even if it is at the expense of engineering efficiency. Does anyone agree?
The more gears you add, you (i) lose chain thickness (so faster wear or lower tension limit), (ii) reduce the spoke angle (so less wheel strength) and (iii) maybe get thinner gears (so faster wear?). At what point is it too much?
How do you think this plays out over the coming years? Keep adding gears until there are too many snapped chains or taco'd wheels? I suspect that after 14-15 gears, chains will start to wear out too fast and customers will start complaining, and then they'll go back to 12 or 13 gears.
How do you think this plays out?
Thanks.
I think the bike industry keeps adding gears as a marketing tool, even if it is at the expense of engineering efficiency. Does anyone agree?
The more gears you add, you (i) lose chain thickness (so faster wear or lower tension limit), (ii) reduce the spoke angle (so less wheel strength) and (iii) maybe get thinner gears (so faster wear?). At what point is it too much?
How do you think this plays out over the coming years? Keep adding gears until there are too many snapped chains or taco'd wheels? I suspect that after 14-15 gears, chains will start to wear out too fast and customers will start complaining, and then they'll go back to 12 or 13 gears.
How do you think this plays out?
Thanks.
So what are the limitations? Well I think it mainly comes down to the number of gears people are demanding rather than any real "technical" limitation. 14 or 15 unique gear ratios appears to be enough for the entire mainstream road, gravel, mtb market, which can be achieved today with a 2x11/12 or older 3x8/9 etc. The recent rise of 1x systems suggests that a significant part of the market (mtb, gravel in particular) are already happy enough with 11, 12 or 13 unique ratios. This is the tipping point.
So my prediction? In 10 years time 1x14 or even 1x15 right across the board. It's the logical end-game and resolves the long standing "wart" that is the front derailleur.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,652
Bikes: too many sparkly Italians, some sweet Americans and a couple interesting Japanese
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 560 Post(s)
Liked 546 Times
in
396 Posts
The crankset effects my ideal number of gears, but I understand your point. Depends where I am at. In town I could get by with 1 but 3 would work and is really all I need, at the cabin in the foothills I might get by with 8 cogs but usually use at least 9 and visiting the kids on the coast 5 or 6 would do everything I need. So point taken, as a recreational rider I admit my three 2x11 really don't offer anything of real value.
#17
Palmer
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 8,576
Bikes: Mike Melton custom, 1982 Stumpjumper, Alex Moulton AM, 2010 Dawes Briercliffe, 2017 Dahon Curl i8, 2021 Motobecane Turino 1x12
Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1644 Post(s)
Liked 1,785 Times
in
1,041 Posts
Likes For tcs:
#18
Dirty Heathen
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: MC-778, 6250 fsw
Posts: 2,188
Bikes: 1997 Cannondale, 1976 Bridgestone, 1998 SoftRide, 1989 Klein, 1989 Black Lightning #0033
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 889 Post(s)
Liked 906 Times
in
534 Posts
Are we doing this again?
Who out here is running, or has even seen a 3x11 or 3x12? Show of hands.
Bueller?...... Bueller?
1x11 or x12 with the giant 48t cassette cogs you guys are so scared of is the MTB configuration. On a bike with full suspension and 29x2.3" wheels (that's 700x60) it makes total sense, especially from an engineering and packaging standpoint. If you were following MTB tech in the 1990s, the array of suspension designs was staggering, as mfgrs tried to make a bike that worked going uphill as well as down, while carrying the 3x7/8 drivetrain of the era.
Top-flight road racing favors more gears, too, in the "Marginal Gains" era, where efficiency rules, and no watt is wasted.
But then pro road racing doesn't really apply to how most people (who aren't on BikeForums) actually use bicycles.
I do think you're going to see more 1x9/-10/-11 in the 'sport / fitness' market, since FD shifting is a dark art to the average consumer. 1x would provide adequate performance for the'typical' user. It also has the follow-on effect of making the bike simpler and cheaper to build (lower part count), although they probably won't cost any less to buy.
Who out here is running, or has even seen a 3x11 or 3x12? Show of hands.
Bueller?...... Bueller?
1x11 or x12 with the giant 48t cassette cogs you guys are so scared of is the MTB configuration. On a bike with full suspension and 29x2.3" wheels (that's 700x60) it makes total sense, especially from an engineering and packaging standpoint. If you were following MTB tech in the 1990s, the array of suspension designs was staggering, as mfgrs tried to make a bike that worked going uphill as well as down, while carrying the 3x7/8 drivetrain of the era.
Top-flight road racing favors more gears, too, in the "Marginal Gains" era, where efficiency rules, and no watt is wasted.
But then pro road racing doesn't really apply to how most people (who aren't on BikeForums) actually use bicycles.
I do think you're going to see more 1x9/-10/-11 in the 'sport / fitness' market, since FD shifting is a dark art to the average consumer. 1x would provide adequate performance for the'typical' user. It also has the follow-on effect of making the bike simpler and cheaper to build (lower part count), although they probably won't cost any less to buy.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Hacienda Hgts
Posts: 2,082
Bikes: 1999 Schwinn Peloton Ultegra 10, Kestrel RT-1000 Ultegra, Trek Marlin 6 Deore 29'er
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 811 Post(s)
Liked 1,945 Times
in
935 Posts
Depends?
MTB, touring, gravel, cross, enduro, DH, mountains, flats, hilly, tri, TT, cruiser, trailered, cargo, electric, tandem, FG/SS, . . ?
OP what specifically are you referring to?
MTB, touring, gravel, cross, enduro, DH, mountains, flats, hilly, tri, TT, cruiser, trailered, cargo, electric, tandem, FG/SS, . . ?
OP what specifically are you referring to?
Likes For CAT7RDR:
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 4,812
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1591 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,015 Times
in
570 Posts
For casual riding, the range is far more significant than the number of gears. We did fine with 5 back in the day. Beyond 7 or 8 I don't think there's much benefit if you aren't racing or at least chasing top speeds. I would expect that CVT will become more viable in the future.
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Thornhill, Canada
Posts: 747
Bikes: United Motocross BMX, Specialized Langster, Giant OCR, Marin Muirwoods, Globe Roll2, VROD:)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 236 Post(s)
Liked 400 Times
in
242 Posts
I do mostly solo rides in areas where I'm familiar with so my first choice would be one of my single speeds.
However, for these casual rides I think a 3spd would be ideal. eg. a granny gear for the hills/headwind, a gear for the flats (42x16) and one when I want to pick up the pace a bit and the legs are feeling strong. Wouldn't need one for downhill because I like to coast
I have an older 24spd road bike that I converted to a flat-bar 8spd. I take this bike when riding in unfamiliar terrain and barely use more than 4 gears.
However, for these casual rides I think a 3spd would be ideal. eg. a granny gear for the hills/headwind, a gear for the flats (42x16) and one when I want to pick up the pace a bit and the legs are feeling strong. Wouldn't need one for downhill because I like to coast
I have an older 24spd road bike that I converted to a flat-bar 8spd. I take this bike when riding in unfamiliar terrain and barely use more than 4 gears.
#22
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Lincoln Ne
Posts: 9,924
Bikes: RANS Stratus TerraTrike Tour II
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3352 Post(s)
Liked 1,054 Times
in
634 Posts
Now the mfg have dropped clear back to the 1x 11 or 12. Gotta keep stirring up the pot so people will buy the "latest" thing.
As someone else stated the 3x 8 or 9 is about ideal.
As someone else stated the 3x 8 or 9 is about ideal.
Likes For rydabent:
#24
Old fart
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,934
Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3571 Post(s)
Liked 3,366 Times
in
1,915 Posts
I'm sure that's at least part of it. The number of rear sprockets is an easily quantifiable metric to include in marketing literature.