Vintage rims and spoke tension general guidelines questions?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Toledo Ohio
Posts: 1,493
Bikes: 1964 Huffy Sportsman, 1972 Fuji Newest, 1973 Schwinn Super Sport (3), 1982 Trek 412, 1983 Trek 700, 1989 Miyata 1000LT, 1991 Bianchi Boardwalk, plus others
Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 582 Post(s)
Liked 697 Times
in
393 Posts
Vintage rims and spoke tension general guidelines questions?
So, I got myself one of those inexpensive spoke tension meters. I have no illusions of it giving accurate tension figures, but just got it to give relative readings to have closer to even tensions all around the wheel. I’ve only built a few wheels but trued many more after I got the Park stand. It is kind of rewarding to do and is a good winter chore. I’ve read many posts on these, and I have the Jobst Brandt book.
My question is a bit vague in wanting some general tension guidelines for different situations. I have read higher tension for eyeletted rims in general. How about single wall vs box section? 3 cross vs 4? Other observations? My stuff is from maybe 1964-1990 and mostly 36 hole with a couple 32. Not looking for any hard rules, but just general observations from more experienced builders.
I have quite a few bikes so not thousands of miles ridden each. In general, I think I err to the side of lower tension in my past attempts with just going by sound of a plucked spoke, and I don’t break any spokes on my rides. Truing is fairly easy, but it doesn’t seem correct to more or less guess whether to tighten on one side or loosen on the other. With the new meter, I am really looking for spokes that are either somewhat tighter or looser. Some general theories would be of help when deciding overall tightness as relating to what the rim is capable of.
My question is a bit vague in wanting some general tension guidelines for different situations. I have read higher tension for eyeletted rims in general. How about single wall vs box section? 3 cross vs 4? Other observations? My stuff is from maybe 1964-1990 and mostly 36 hole with a couple 32. Not looking for any hard rules, but just general observations from more experienced builders.
I have quite a few bikes so not thousands of miles ridden each. In general, I think I err to the side of lower tension in my past attempts with just going by sound of a plucked spoke, and I don’t break any spokes on my rides. Truing is fairly easy, but it doesn’t seem correct to more or less guess whether to tighten on one side or loosen on the other. With the new meter, I am really looking for spokes that are either somewhat tighter or looser. Some general theories would be of help when deciding overall tightness as relating to what the rim is capable of.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Peoria, IL
Posts: 4,463
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1824 Post(s)
Liked 3,366 Times
in
1,572 Posts
There was a time when tension gauges didn't exist, and the subject of tension wasn't really addressed in any sort of quantitative way. Jobst Brandt's book, The Bicycle Wheel, was the first to try to look at the engineering in a wheel and tried to de-mystify the topic. Even Jobst didn't provide a clear answer. From page 105 of the book:
The wheels I built back in the day were looser than what I build now. A loose wheel is more likely to lead to fatigue failure of the spokes.
Rims have improved since then, and even the spokes are better (I'm thinking of 1970's Robergel steel spokes).
My only advice would be to find similar wheels built by someone you trust, and try to duplicate the spoke tension in those wheels.
Steve in Peoria (and I don't have a spoke tension gauge)
FINDING THE RIGHT TENSION
The following method works well in determining proper spoke tension for
conventional road rims of up to 43 0 grams with 3 6 spokes. Tighten all the spokes
a quarter turn at a time, starting at the valve stem hole. Once a distinct tone can
be made by plucking, and spokes are not easily squeezed together by grasping
them in pairs, it is time to check tension. After each round of tightening, test the
tension by stress relieving. If the wheel becomes untrue in two large waves
during stress relieving, the maximum, safe tension has been exceeded. Approach
this tension carefully to avoid major rim distortions. When the wheel loses
alignment from stress relieving, loosen all spokes a half turn before retruing the
wheel.
The following method works well in determining proper spoke tension for
conventional road rims of up to 43 0 grams with 3 6 spokes. Tighten all the spokes
a quarter turn at a time, starting at the valve stem hole. Once a distinct tone can
be made by plucking, and spokes are not easily squeezed together by grasping
them in pairs, it is time to check tension. After each round of tightening, test the
tension by stress relieving. If the wheel becomes untrue in two large waves
during stress relieving, the maximum, safe tension has been exceeded. Approach
this tension carefully to avoid major rim distortions. When the wheel loses
alignment from stress relieving, loosen all spokes a half turn before retruing the
wheel.
Rims have improved since then, and even the spokes are better (I'm thinking of 1970's Robergel steel spokes).
My only advice would be to find similar wheels built by someone you trust, and try to duplicate the spoke tension in those wheels.
Steve in Peoria (and I don't have a spoke tension gauge)
#3
Wrench Savant
Box-section rims can take more tension than non-box sections.
Eyelets will take more tension than non-eyelets (unless you use spoke washers).
One thing you could do is find a wheel with the same gauge of spokes you believe to have the correct tension (front and rear are different, so one of each) and take 5-10 tension measurements on that and use that as your guide for the wheels you build. Once it is built, you can assess if the spokes need to be SLIGHTLY more loose or more tight.
Eyelets will take more tension than non-eyelets (unless you use spoke washers).
One thing you could do is find a wheel with the same gauge of spokes you believe to have the correct tension (front and rear are different, so one of each) and take 5-10 tension measurements on that and use that as your guide for the wheels you build. Once it is built, you can assess if the spokes need to be SLIGHTLY more loose or more tight.
Likes For balindamood:
#4
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Toledo Ohio
Posts: 1,493
Bikes: 1964 Huffy Sportsman, 1972 Fuji Newest, 1973 Schwinn Super Sport (3), 1982 Trek 412, 1983 Trek 700, 1989 Miyata 1000LT, 1991 Bianchi Boardwalk, plus others
Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 582 Post(s)
Liked 697 Times
in
393 Posts
Yep, I read that in my Jobst book. I am a bit reluctant to tighten to deformation though. I did that once however and had no bad results. I know manufacturers might give readings in general. I was just trying to decipher any rhyme or reason to it. For example my miyata has Ukia single walled rims with no eyelets, while others like some Wolber I have are box rims with eyelets. Many other varieties too. Since everything is old, I don’t go real tight, and as you suggest, I compare to ones that a bike shop did for a cautious upper limit. Maybe if I put thousands of miles on each bike, I would break some spokes, but I don’t currently with my bikes.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: North, Ga.
Posts: 2,401
Bikes: 3Rensho-Aerodynamics, Bernard Hinault Look - 1986 tour winner, Guerciotti, Various Klein's & Panasonic's
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 159 Post(s)
Liked 375 Times
in
162 Posts
I tend to think that there is some overthinking going on. I have always built wheels by feel. Once they are straight, true and round they tend to stay that way.
Likes For embankmentlb:
#6
Senior Member
Yep, I read that in my Jobst book. I am a bit reluctant to tighten to deformation though. I did that once however and had no bad results. I know manufacturers might give readings in general. I was just trying to decipher any rhyme or reason to it. For example my miyata has Ukia single walled rims with no eyelets, while others like some Wolber I have are box rims with eyelets. Many other varieties too. Since everything is old, I don’t go real tight, and as you suggest, I compare to ones that a bike shop did for a cautious upper limit. Maybe if I put thousands of miles on each bike, I would break some spokes, but I don’t currently with my bikes.
I usually try to tension to about 90-100 on rear drive side, NDS comes in at 50s +/-, front about 90 (rim brake), measured with a Park tension meter (actual accuracy unknown).
With the high spoke count and 3 cross, this is firm enough. Rears are common tension balance for 8-10 speed hubs (NDS about 50-60% of DS). Not very hard on my wheels and have very little problems with my wheels after build and one touch-up (after 50 miles +/-).
Likes For KCT1986:
#7
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Toledo Ohio
Posts: 1,493
Bikes: 1964 Huffy Sportsman, 1972 Fuji Newest, 1973 Schwinn Super Sport (3), 1982 Trek 412, 1983 Trek 700, 1989 Miyata 1000LT, 1991 Bianchi Boardwalk, plus others
Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 582 Post(s)
Liked 697 Times
in
393 Posts
This is probably quite true and your method has been my practice, and thousands of others too I bet. Reading other posts here in the winter months led me to think “why not”? Another tool is always fun and I thought it could be informative. Too cold here to do much riding, so basement wrenching is relaxing.
Likes For sd5782:
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: The Urban Shores Of Michigami
Posts: 1,748
Bikes: ........................................ .....Holdsworth "Special"..... .......Falcon "Special".......... .........Miyata 912........... ........................................
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 702 Post(s)
Liked 671 Times
in
419 Posts
I think this is a good way of building a wheel assuming the rim is flat and round to start with, this way uniform spoke tension (+-) is doable. But if you are truing a bent wheel, uniform tension is going to be difficult if not impossible.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Peoria, IL
Posts: 4,463
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1824 Post(s)
Liked 3,366 Times
in
1,572 Posts
Yep, I read that in my Jobst book. I am a bit reluctant to tighten to deformation though. I did that once however and had no bad results. I know manufacturers might give readings in general. I was just trying to decipher any rhyme or reason to it. For example my miyata has Ukia single walled rims with no eyelets, while others like some Wolber I have are box rims with eyelets. Many other varieties too. Since everything is old, I don’t go real tight, and as you suggest, I compare to ones that a bike shop did for a cautious upper limit. Maybe if I put thousands of miles on each bike, I would break some spokes, but I don’t currently with my bikes.
One purpose of adequate spoke tension is to keep the nipples from coming loose. If your wheels aren't coming out of true, then the tension is good enough for that purpose.
A second purpose is to keep the spokes from fatiguing too much from changes in tension as the wheel rotates (as I understand it). If you aren't breaking spokes, then it's not a problem. Of course, you'll only know for sure after 20,000 miles or so, so it's not easy to tell. That's where the folks who build a ton of wheels have an advantage!
On the other side of the tension question is stuff like pulling nipples through rims, or cracking at the eyelets (especially on anodized rims). Some Trek Matrix rims were notorious for this. This is especially a concern when building with relatively new hubs that require more dish than a 6 speed Campy Record hub.
It's good that you've checked wheels at the local shop, especially if the wheels are similar to yours. If the folks replying to this thread can offer their wheel configurations and the tension that they've used, that might be a useful database.
Steve in Peoria
Likes For steelbikeguy:
#10
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Toledo Ohio
Posts: 1,493
Bikes: 1964 Huffy Sportsman, 1972 Fuji Newest, 1973 Schwinn Super Sport (3), 1982 Trek 412, 1983 Trek 700, 1989 Miyata 1000LT, 1991 Bianchi Boardwalk, plus others
Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 582 Post(s)
Liked 697 Times
in
393 Posts
So anodized is a caution point at upper limit. I only have a couple of those, but that is the sort of caution that I am looking to note and remember.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: North, Ga.
Posts: 2,401
Bikes: 3Rensho-Aerodynamics, Bernard Hinault Look - 1986 tour winner, Guerciotti, Various Klein's & Panasonic's
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 159 Post(s)
Liked 375 Times
in
162 Posts
This is probably quite true and your method has been my practice, and thousands of others too I bet. Reading other posts here in the winter months led me to think “why not”? Another tool is always fun and I thought it could be informative. Too cold here to do much riding, so basement wrenching is relaxing.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2022
Location: Pac NW
Posts: 1,924
Bikes: several Eddy Merz (ride like Eddy, braze like Jim!)
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1075 Post(s)
Liked 1,798 Times
in
653 Posts
wow, new information. I wasn't aware that this tool existed.
I always spun the wheel and held a small metal tool against the spokes to hear the "ting ting ting ting ting….."
If one was loose, more of a "tong"
isolate and tighten.
I always spun the wheel and held a small metal tool against the spokes to hear the "ting ting ting ting ting….."
If one was loose, more of a "tong"
isolate and tighten.
__________________
"Leave the gun. Take the Colnagos."
"Leave the gun. Take the Colnagos."
Likes For Robvolz:
#13
Full Member
Join Date: Oct 2022
Location: UK, New Forest
Posts: 269
Bikes: 1980 Gitane sprint,1977 Motobécane C4, 1977 Carlton Clubman, 1959 Claud Butler European
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 69 Post(s)
Liked 122 Times
in
78 Posts
SD 5782 great post. was thinking about such a post when I came across this thread. It is hard to find a tension figure for vintage rims. My taste is pre-1980 French steel bikes with tubular tyres. So we are talking 28”, 20mm external and second hand mostly.
I have noticed when using double butted 2.0/1.8/2.0 stainless spokes bringing the tension on a park tool up to 20 (lol, remember spinal tap?) it lost its shape so easy when trying the final few tweaks to match spoke tension.
I have found fr 17/17 & 17/18 ds and 11 nds to have a feel of about right. I have tested spoke tension on factory build vintage wheels and recently bought a pair of wheels which had been custom built and not used for the last 25 years (granted they may have lost tension) and their tension was this or just under. All 36 spokes btw.
If you have some vintage wheels and a park tool tension gauge how about popping it down here? Yes we have to allow calibration differences, but it will be an interesting aggregate.
I have noticed when using double butted 2.0/1.8/2.0 stainless spokes bringing the tension on a park tool up to 20 (lol, remember spinal tap?) it lost its shape so easy when trying the final few tweaks to match spoke tension.
I have found fr 17/17 & 17/18 ds and 11 nds to have a feel of about right. I have tested spoke tension on factory build vintage wheels and recently bought a pair of wheels which had been custom built and not used for the last 25 years (granted they may have lost tension) and their tension was this or just under. All 36 spokes btw.
If you have some vintage wheels and a park tool tension gauge how about popping it down here? Yes we have to allow calibration differences, but it will be an interesting aggregate.
#14
aged to perfection
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: PacNW
Posts: 1,801
Bikes: Dinucci Allez 2.0, Richard Sachs, Alex Singer, Serotta, Masi GC, Raleigh Pro Mk.1, Hetchins, etc
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 829 Post(s)
Liked 1,240 Times
in
655 Posts
don't follow the spoke tension guidelines for vintage rims and wheels. Find a wheel that is well built, and listen to / feel the tension
65 - 80 kgf with a high level of uniformity is what you should shoot for.
what Jobst doesn't tell you is that once you over tension the wheel, it is compromised and will not be reliable - you would not want to ride it.
think about the elastic range of the spokes, and not ultimate tension
/markp
65 - 80 kgf with a high level of uniformity is what you should shoot for.
what Jobst doesn't tell you is that once you over tension the wheel, it is compromised and will not be reliable - you would not want to ride it.
think about the elastic range of the spokes, and not ultimate tension
/markp
#15
Wheelman
Join Date: Aug 2021
Location: Putney, London UK
Posts: 831
Bikes: 1982 Holdsworth Avanti (531), 1961 Holdsworth Cyclone
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 291 Post(s)
Liked 656 Times
in
331 Posts
I read somewhere that Mavic specced 90kgf max for their tubular rims BITD.
Here's what they currently say:
I've build Mavic Monthlery Route and MA2 with 90kgf on front and DS, 7 and 8 speed in 126mm.
Works fine and no issues, but I don't kerb hop and I'm 87kg.
Here's what they currently say:
Respect the appropriate spoke tensions; Mavic recommends spoke tensions between 70 and 90 kg (for a front or rear wheel on the free wheel side with a
crossed 3 pattern). Inappropriate spoke tension can generate too much stress and damage the rim;
From https://technicalmanual.mavic.com/te...ucts/2_119.pdfcrossed 3 pattern). Inappropriate spoke tension can generate too much stress and damage the rim;
I've build Mavic Monthlery Route and MA2 with 90kgf on front and DS, 7 and 8 speed in 126mm.
Works fine and no issues, but I don't kerb hop and I'm 87kg.
Likes For Aardwolf:
#16
Ride, Wrench, Swap, Race
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Northern California
Posts: 9,181
Bikes: Cheltenham-Pedersen racer, Boulder F/S Paris-Roubaix, Varsity racer, '52 Christophe, '62 Continental, '92 Merckx, '75 Limongi, '76 Presto, '72 Gitane SC, '71 Schwinn SS, etc.
Mentioned: 132 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1562 Post(s)
Liked 1,285 Times
in
856 Posts
Too much tension (times spoke count) can potato-chip a singlewall rim on the truing stand, and even 36h dbl-walled rims could suffer the same.
I once pulled an eyelet out of a Module-E rim at about 100kg, but it happened months later while just sitting in storage.
The other day I added a mere 2mm spacer to the right side of my new SR Maxima's Superbe Pro rear axle to accomodate a wider-spaced Uniglide freewheel having better ratios replacing a U-6 freewheel.
After dishing and equi-tensioning, I ended up with a uniform 80kg on the driveside, and that is plenty for the Araya narrow clincher rim. Be assured that this is better tension than OEM bike wheels almost ever come with or came with.
I bought generic carbon wheels recently having 24 spokes on the rear wheel. Drive-side tension was only 70kg, and not particularly uniform at that!
High-grade, low-spoke-count carbon wheels often have their very thin spokes tensioned up around 140kg, off-road wheels like this take a real beating for years without problems. Usually they are brought to me when the nipples start failing from corrosive sealant having entered the rim cavity, and it's a lot of work removing all of the crumbly nipples while saving the expensive spokes for my re-assembling.
I once pulled an eyelet out of a Module-E rim at about 100kg, but it happened months later while just sitting in storage.
The other day I added a mere 2mm spacer to the right side of my new SR Maxima's Superbe Pro rear axle to accomodate a wider-spaced Uniglide freewheel having better ratios replacing a U-6 freewheel.
After dishing and equi-tensioning, I ended up with a uniform 80kg on the driveside, and that is plenty for the Araya narrow clincher rim. Be assured that this is better tension than OEM bike wheels almost ever come with or came with.
I bought generic carbon wheels recently having 24 spokes on the rear wheel. Drive-side tension was only 70kg, and not particularly uniform at that!
High-grade, low-spoke-count carbon wheels often have their very thin spokes tensioned up around 140kg, off-road wheels like this take a real beating for years without problems. Usually they are brought to me when the nipples start failing from corrosive sealant having entered the rim cavity, and it's a lot of work removing all of the crumbly nipples while saving the expensive spokes for my re-assembling.
Likes For dddd:
#17
Full Member
Join Date: Oct 2022
Location: UK, New Forest
Posts: 269
Bikes: 1980 Gitane sprint,1977 Motobécane C4, 1977 Carlton Clubman, 1959 Claud Butler European
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 69 Post(s)
Liked 122 Times
in
78 Posts
So we have an aggregate of 65-90kgf with one at 100kgf. I have a pair of old nos first edition Ambrosio Montreal which don’t have a great name on velo base for tension and retaining eyelets. I pulled these up to near 100kgf to see how they reacted (I like to push limits to see where they are lol). They were very, very sensitive to get to 0.2mm runout. I later dropped them by 15 kgf and they were much happier. That was a fun night for me……I really need to get out more……
I shoot for about 77-80 kgf on a vintage rim and it was good to see other people are around the same figure on a vintage rim build.
I shoot for about 77-80 kgf on a vintage rim and it was good to see other people are around the same figure on a vintage rim build.
#18
señor miembro
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Pac NW
Posts: 6,597
Bikes: '70s - '80s Campagnolo
Mentioned: 92 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3860 Post(s)
Liked 6,450 Times
in
3,190 Posts
Likes For SurferRosa:
#19
aged to perfection
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: PacNW
Posts: 1,801
Bikes: Dinucci Allez 2.0, Richard Sachs, Alex Singer, Serotta, Masi GC, Raleigh Pro Mk.1, Hetchins, etc
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 829 Post(s)
Liked 1,240 Times
in
655 Posts
there is no way to describe the right tension in terms of sound, but comparing what you know to be a well built wheel, with the sound of the one you're working on, is a big help.
/markp
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Southern Maryland
Posts: 1,447
Bikes: A few
Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 289 Post(s)
Liked 195 Times
in
102 Posts
Bill Mould is another great resource for wheelbuilding information. He's built wheels for a lot of the prop riders in the US.
I was fortunate to find a set of NOS Martano rims for my '71 Masi project. My wheelbuilding experience is not extensive. I've built wheels over the years, but have also had wheels distort from over tensioning the spokes.
For the Martano's, I didn't want to take a chance, and was fortunate to find Bill Mould locally. We met, he gave me some pointers, and I have been able to build up a decent set of wheels.
Bill has several CD's available on wheelbuilding, that I have found to be very beneficial.
I was fortunate to find a set of NOS Martano rims for my '71 Masi project. My wheelbuilding experience is not extensive. I've built wheels over the years, but have also had wheels distort from over tensioning the spokes.
For the Martano's, I didn't want to take a chance, and was fortunate to find Bill Mould locally. We met, he gave me some pointers, and I have been able to build up a decent set of wheels.
Bill has several CD's available on wheelbuilding, that I have found to be very beneficial.
#21
Ride, Wrench, Swap, Race
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Northern California
Posts: 9,181
Bikes: Cheltenham-Pedersen racer, Boulder F/S Paris-Roubaix, Varsity racer, '52 Christophe, '62 Continental, '92 Merckx, '75 Limongi, '76 Presto, '72 Gitane SC, '71 Schwinn SS, etc.
Mentioned: 132 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1562 Post(s)
Liked 1,285 Times
in
856 Posts
A couple of points about "pinging" or plucking same-side spokes for comparative tensions:
----You have to keep a finger on any crossing spoke, lest the two spokes both produce ringing.
----Different gauge spokes sound wildly different, why we never substitute a different-gauge spoke. Even spoke length affects the tone.
----Small differences in tension produce seemingly big changes in ring tone.
I always check the tone of adjacent same-side spokes for their ring pitch (tension) before tightening or loosening a spoke.
The idea here is to be improving the spoke tension uniformity while truing a wheel, not making it more uneven.
The spokes on the opposite side that are adjacent to a spoke you are about to adjust should also be checked for uneven tensions, since it might be better to adjust those spokes to achieve true-ness.
----You have to keep a finger on any crossing spoke, lest the two spokes both produce ringing.
----Different gauge spokes sound wildly different, why we never substitute a different-gauge spoke. Even spoke length affects the tone.
----Small differences in tension produce seemingly big changes in ring tone.
I always check the tone of adjacent same-side spokes for their ring pitch (tension) before tightening or loosening a spoke.
The idea here is to be improving the spoke tension uniformity while truing a wheel, not making it more uneven.
The spokes on the opposite side that are adjacent to a spoke you are about to adjust should also be checked for uneven tensions, since it might be better to adjust those spokes to achieve true-ness.
Likes For dddd:
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Bastrop Texas
Posts: 4,464
Bikes: Univega, Peu P6, Peu PR-10, Ted Williams, Peu UO-8, Peu UO-18 Mixte, Peu Dolomites
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 954 Post(s)
Liked 1,619 Times
in
1,039 Posts
I really like my Cheap ChiCom Tension meter, but it has come with some caveats. The one I got cannot really be calibrated. It came with a printed Table of Equivalents but I have not really tested it for comparison to other meters. My solution was to go through my small stable of bikes and take readings of the wheels and spoke tension on them. I accumulated an average tension for my meter and that is what I go for... generally.
I did help a young guy down the street get his meter checked. He had a new TREK that went severely out of round after an Owie. We drove into town and used his Cheap meter to measure the tension on brand new TREKs at the shop of his bicycle wheels. Of course the readings were much different then TREK specs but he got a ball park figure for the tension he needed on his bike with his particular meter.
I don't build wheels from scratch but my meter has been an important part of resurrecting more then a few trashed wheel sets...
__________________
No matter where you're at... There you are... Δf:=f(1/2)-f(-1/2)
No matter where you're at... There you are... Δf:=f(1/2)-f(-1/2)
Likes For zandoval:
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Bastrop Texas
Posts: 4,464
Bikes: Univega, Peu P6, Peu PR-10, Ted Williams, Peu UO-8, Peu UO-18 Mixte, Peu Dolomites
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 954 Post(s)
Liked 1,619 Times
in
1,039 Posts
When ever I pump up my tires I go through the motions of lifting the bikes up, spinning the wheel, and dragging a wooden stick across the spokes to check for differences in tone. I also do a little squeeze on them looking for big differences.
I fondly remember the days I could just jump on a bike and take off without a care... Ha
__________________
No matter where you're at... There you are... Δf:=f(1/2)-f(-1/2)
No matter where you're at... There you are... Δf:=f(1/2)-f(-1/2)
Likes For zandoval:
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 14,742
Bikes: Yes
Mentioned: 525 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3230 Post(s)
Liked 3,862 Times
in
1,439 Posts
Here's my take on this. If you're a professional wheel builder, you need to build wheels to a higher standard of reliability. If you're building wheels for yourself, you have the advantage that your wheelbuilder rides along with you every time you're on the bike. If I build a wheel for myself and after 20,000 miles it starts breaking spokes, I replace all the spokes and start over. I get more wheel building experience that way. Frankly, if I paid my LBS to build a wheel for me and it started breaking spokes after 20,000 miles, I wouldn't be too upset. If I build a wheel for myself and it goes out of true after a few rides, I true it and ride on. That's where I'd be unhappy with a wheel I paid to have built.
__________________
My Bikes
My Bikes
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Peoria, IL
Posts: 4,463
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1824 Post(s)
Liked 3,366 Times
in
1,572 Posts
Here's my take on this. If you're a professional wheel builder, you need to build wheels to a higher standard of reliability. If you're building wheels for yourself, you have the advantage that your wheelbuilder rides along with you every time you're on the bike. If I build a wheel for myself and after 20,000 miles it starts breaking spokes, I replace all the spokes and start over. I get more wheel building experience that way. Frankly, if I paid my LBS to build a wheel for me and it started breaking spokes after 20,000 miles, I wouldn't be too upset. If I build a wheel for myself and it goes out of true after a few rides, I true it and ride on. That's where I'd be unhappy with a wheel I paid to have built.
Fortunately, I have the feeling that you'll experience wheels going out of true due to low spoke tension before fatigue becomes an issue. As long as you recognize that low tension is the reason for the recurring untrueness, you should be able to correct the situation. Back in the 70's when I learned to build wheels, I don't recall that there was an explicit mention of the relationship between tension and fatigue. Of course, there were no tension gauges either... in the Cyclo-Pedia catalog article about wheel building and truing that was part of my education, it just said "Tighten the nipples only 1/8 turn. Keep repeating until you feel the tension is correct". I do still stop once I get to 1/8 turn increments, but the whole idea of knowing what tension is correct is pretty unquantified. Even Jobst said to tighten until the rim started to collapse, which never quite made sense to me.
I think I had to wait until I could check the tension in friends' wheels (that I had faith in) before I got a good feel for what the proper tension should be. I still check my new wheels against my old wheels when deciding when the tension is adequate. I haven't invested in a tension gauge. Instead, I just grab pairs of spokes and see how far they flex when I squeeze... very much like the hand-stressing in the photo below.
Steve in Peoria