Crank Shortener for Catrike?
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Queensbury, NY
Posts: 177
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 47 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 17 Times
in
16 Posts
Crank Shortener for Catrike?
I have a slight, but annoying hip, impingement in my right hip, at the "top" of the stroke, when riding my Catrike Villager. I figure that a crank shortener for the right side might be helpful. I'm looking at the Hase, but they warn that they aren't compatible with "tapered cranks". TBH, I'm not sure whether the crank on the Villager is considered to be tapered or not.
So can anyone confirm whether the Hase would be compatible? If not, which crank shortener would you recommend?
Thanks!
So can anyone confirm whether the Hase would be compatible? If not, which crank shortener would you recommend?
Thanks!
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sin City, Nevada
Posts: 2,886
Bikes: Catrike 700, Greenspeed GTO trike, , Linear LWB recumbent, Haluzak Horizon SWB recumbent, Balance 450 MTB, Cannondale SM800 Beast of the East
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 523 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 229 Times
in
181 Posts
One place you can get authoritative information would be the Hostel Shoppe in Wisconsin https://hostelshoppe.com/. They will know if any of the Hase products will work with your Villager trike as they sell both brands and carry a variety of Hase crank shorteners. Wow, they are expensive.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,992
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2494 Post(s)
Liked 738 Times
in
522 Posts
If the impingment is at the 'top' of the stroke (leg compressed) a crank shortener is not going to help. In any case, the minimum adjustment is likely 1/4". You might make matters worse just jumping into a solution without a better assessment of exactly what is going on. I have to think there is 1/4" or more of adjustment possible in your seating just from skootching a little bit forward or back until things feel better.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 3,463
Bikes: Trident Spike 2 recumbent trike w/ e-assist
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1321 Post(s)
Liked 374 Times
in
288 Posts
Yup. Lots of cheaper alternatives. If you don't want to wear thicker soles, consider a lumbar support pad; the best are inflatable. You will gain the reach you need and also likely improve your back comfort as well.
#6
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Queensbury, NY
Posts: 177
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 47 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 17 Times
in
16 Posts
If the impingment is at the 'top' of the stroke (leg compressed) a crank shortener is not going to help. In any case, the minimum adjustment is likely 1/4". You might make matters worse just jumping into a solution without a better assessment of exactly what is going on. I have to think there is 1/4" or more of adjustment possible in your seating just from skootching a little bit forward or back until things feel better.
One place you can get authoritative information would be the Hostel Shoppe in Wisconsin https://hostelshoppe.com/. They will know if any of the Hase products will work with your Villager trike as they sell both brands and carry a variety of Hase crank shorteners. Wow, they are expensive.
EDIT: It doesn't look like Hostel Shoppe carries the item I'm considering. FWIW,
Last edited by newbert; 05-10-22 at 09:13 AM.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 3,463
Bikes: Trident Spike 2 recumbent trike w/ e-assist
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1321 Post(s)
Liked 374 Times
in
288 Posts
The impingement is indeed at the top of the stroke, when the hip is flexed to its maximum (ie-compressed). I don't understand why a crank shortener would not help though. Wouldn't it allow the leg/hip to compress LESS, which is what I'm looking for? I'll try skootching in the seat in the meantime. Thanks.
Cheaper alternatives are always good, Thx. But again, how would a lumbar support (inflatable or not), or thicker soles, help to lessen the angle of compression of the hip? I would think that it would force the hip to compress more, which is exactly what I don't want.
In the meantime, I'll contact hostelshoppe.com for compatibility, pricing and whether this would help my situation. Thx.
EDIT: It doesn't look like Hostel Shoppe carries the item I'm considering. FWIW, this is it.
Cheaper alternatives are always good, Thx. But again, how would a lumbar support (inflatable or not), or thicker soles, help to lessen the angle of compression of the hip? I would think that it would force the hip to compress more, which is exactly what I don't want.
In the meantime, I'll contact hostelshoppe.com for compatibility, pricing and whether this would help my situation. Thx.
EDIT: It doesn't look like Hostel Shoppe carries the item I'm considering. FWIW, this is it.
#8
Zircon Encrusted Tweezers
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: high ground
Posts: 1,347
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 261 Post(s)
Liked 131 Times
in
83 Posts
OP - just get some short cranks unless you specifically want a pendulum type device (which you haven't mentioned so far; don't be distracted by me mentioning it if that's not what you want). Bolt-on shorteners are a bit of a hack, and add lots of Q factor which is often non wanted. And having one crank longer than the other is also probably not a good idea.
#9
Senior Member
Seat angle - if anything, reclining more would reduce your hip angle, but would require moving the boom in. If you can, that's the cheapest thing to try first.
Short cranks (both, not just one) could help. After readjusting the pedal-to-seat distance, you'll end up with 1/2-3/4" of reduced hip flex. I agree, crank shorteners are almost the cost of a cheap short crankset, are clunky, and increase the 'Q' factor.
Short cranks (both, not just one) could help. After readjusting the pedal-to-seat distance, you'll end up with 1/2-3/4" of reduced hip flex. I agree, crank shorteners are almost the cost of a cheap short crankset, are clunky, and increase the 'Q' factor.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 3,463
Bikes: Trident Spike 2 recumbent trike w/ e-assist
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1321 Post(s)
Liked 374 Times
in
288 Posts
Not usually the case. I think it's safe to assume that people will adjust the reach to the pedals when they switch to short cranks so that they have the same bend in the knee at the "bottom" (max extension) of the stroke. At least they should, and especially so in the OP's case. With proper boom extension / reach to the cranks, short crank arms do reduce the hip angle at the top (min. extension) of the stroke, which is what the OP is after.
OP - just get some short cranks unless you specifically want a pendulum type device (which you haven't mentioned so far; don't be distracted by me mentioning it if that's not what you want). Bolt-on shorteners are a bit of a hack, and add lots of Q factor which is often non wanted. And having one crank longer than the other is also probably not a good idea.
OP - just get some short cranks unless you specifically want a pendulum type device (which you haven't mentioned so far; don't be distracted by me mentioning it if that's not what you want). Bolt-on shorteners are a bit of a hack, and add lots of Q factor which is often non wanted. And having one crank longer than the other is also probably not a good idea.