Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Electronics, Lighting, & Gadgets
Reload this Page >

Weather proof/Corrosion proof connectors

Notices
Electronics, Lighting, & Gadgets HRM, GPS, MP3, HID. Whether it's got an acronym or not, here's where you'll find discussions on all sorts of tools, toys and gadgets.

Weather proof/Corrosion proof connectors

Old 06-21-20, 06:04 PM
  #26  
2_i 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 3,692

Bikes: Trek 730 (quad), 720 & 830, Bike Friday NWT, Brompton M36R & M6R, Dahon HAT060 & HT060, ...

Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 834 Post(s)
Liked 332 Times in 247 Posts
Originally Posted by steelbikeguy
I normally just place connectors near the headlight, tail light, and dynamo. I can normally keep the wires tied up to the bracket that the item mounts to. If you don't need to make a disconnection at these vertical runs of wire, maybe you can move the connectors near the lights?
Sure, good advice. Here, there were other considerations, though. The two ends, where the connectors could be moved, were already overcrowded, so midway became a choice. Another, is that I ended up combining components not originally meant to work together and I wanted to retain as much of original wire as possible not wanting to venture yet into opening them. With this the connectors ended up being wherever the wire ran out.

Originally Posted by steelbikeguy
indeed... it's all a matter of trading off the priorities and making compromises between them.
I haven't thought much about field repairs. I solder the wire in my connector pins and use heatshrink to provide strain relief (i.e. keep them from flexing near the area where the solder has wicked up the wire strands). This, along with good support of the wires, has provided very reliable wiring.
I should say that I've worked with electronics and wiring for most of my professional life, and have seen a lot of failures at connectors. Some were my fault, I have to admit. That was where I learned about the damage from overcrimping a wire in a connector pin or terminal lug.
Properly done, wires and connectors can be very reliable.
Bike electrics is quite a niche area. Economically, it does not make much sense to optimize connectors specifically for such a market. In practice we have to repurpose connectors optimized for something else. That leads to maybe more struggle than elsewhere. To ensure strain relief on a bike, I now start putting a piece of a shift cable into the heatshrink sleeve.
2_i is offline  
Old 06-21-20, 09:32 PM
  #27  
u235
Senior Member
 
u235's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 1,185
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 437 Post(s)
Liked 133 Times in 86 Posts
Originally Posted by RGMN
Few people are skilled enough to properly solder wires.
Same with crimping AND having the right tool for the exact thing you are crimping together. Not having the right equipment and skill is ripe for eventual failure there too. In either situation, I wouldn't solder or pre tin a crimp. I have soldered or crimped as required critical equipment professionally. In the regular world where most people are using run of the mill multipurpose crimp kits and an all in one squeeze crimper, gas tight is not an option.

Last edited by u235; 06-22-20 at 09:53 AM.
u235 is offline  
Old 06-22-20, 09:02 AM
  #28  
steelbikeguy
Senior Member
 
steelbikeguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Peoria, IL
Posts: 4,449
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1820 Post(s)
Liked 3,324 Times in 1,563 Posts
Originally Posted by RGMN
Never tin the wire prior to crimping in the contact. This guarantees you will not get a gas tight crimp. And get poor electrical contact as well. If you feel you need to solder the wire to "seal" them do it after crimping, not before. Or just use blocked wire and not worry about it.
I just noticed the reference to blocked wire. It's probably overkill for bikes, but I have used it on construction equipment... some of the connectors end up under water for prolonged periods, despite the gear not being expressly designed for that. I've seen damage where water did wick up the strands of a length of water, cause corrosion of the circuit board, leading to the failure of the board.
One factor was that the electronic device had a volume of air in it. As things heated up and cooled down, it acted as an air pump, pulling in air or water via the wire strands. The device had a "pigtail" of wire that connected it to the outside world. In retrospect, we should have used a bulkhead connector to avoid that sort of problem.... although there are potential problems with that too.

Ahhh... part of the fun of design is finding out all of the ways to get yourself in trouble!

Steve in Peoria
steelbikeguy is offline  
Old 06-22-20, 11:15 AM
  #29  
RGMN
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 565
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 241 Post(s)
Liked 231 Times in 152 Posts
Originally Posted by 2_i
Bike electrics is quite a niche area. Economically, it does not make much sense to optimize connectors specifically for such a market. In practice we have to repurpose connectors optimized for something else. That leads to maybe more struggle than elsewhere. To ensure strain relief on a bike, I now start putting a piece of a shift cable into the heatshrink sleeve.
That is the issue, isn't it? The bicycle electronics area is a niche and there are no good solutions. I've often wondered why no one has tried taking a Di2 extension cable and cutting it half, using the cut ends on the permanent connections and the Di2 connector as the disconnect point. We know the Di2 connectors survive on a bike, and are nice and small, but I don't have a clue if the wire size inside them would be adequate for the current being run.


Originally Posted by steelbikeguy
I just noticed the reference to blocked wire. It's probably overkill for bikes, but I have used it on construction equipment... some of the connectors end up under water for prolonged periods, despite the gear not being expressly designed for that. I've seen damage where water did wick up the strands of a length of water, cause corrosion of the circuit board, leading to the failure of the board.

One factor was that the electronic device had a volume of air in it. As things heated up and cooled down, it acted as an air pump, pulling in air or water via the wire strands. The device had a "pigtail" of wire that connected it to the outside world. In retrospect, we should have used a bulkhead connector to avoid that sort of problem.... although there are potential problems with that too.


Ahhh... part of the fun of design is finding out all of the ways to get yourself in trouble!


Steve in Peoria
Nice to see someone has fought the same issues. Sometimes I feel like I'm the only one who's seen them. A couple of engineers at my company recently retire. Them, myself, and 1 other engineer were the corporate subject matter experts on connector issues. I'm now trying to train up a few others but I doubt I'll get it done before I depart the company in December. I feel sorry for the engineer that will be left. I had a engineer who couldn't believe that water would actually wick thru a wire. I told him he either needed to vent his electronics housing or use blocked wire to stop the water ingress issue he was seeing. He didn't listen and a customer experienced some spectacular failures due to water ingress into the electronics. We are now in the middle of a recall to replace 12,000 units with units that have a GoreTex vent.
RGMN is offline  
Old 06-22-20, 04:47 PM
  #30  
Pop N Wood
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,379

Bikes: 1982 Bianchi Sport SX, Rayleigh Tamland 1, Rans V-Rex recumbent, Fuji MTB, 80's Cannondale MTB with BBSHD ebike motor

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 667 Post(s)
Liked 529 Times in 355 Posts
Why not use the waterproof connectors I referenced in post 21? don't know if they are rated for submersion but the automotive industry has been using metri pak connectors for decades now. The definitely eliminate the need for separate boxes for protection while the positive retention connectors eliminate the need for external velcro tie downs.

Pigtail connectors and the heat gun solder connectors seem like an excellent DIY solution for people with no soldering skills.
Pop N Wood is offline  
Old 06-22-20, 06:57 PM
  #31  
2_i 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 3,692

Bikes: Trek 730 (quad), 720 & 830, Bike Friday NWT, Brompton M36R & M6R, Dahon HAT060 & HT060, ...

Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 834 Post(s)
Liked 332 Times in 247 Posts
Originally Posted by Pop N Wood
Why not use the waterproof connectors I referenced in post 21? don't know if they are rated for submersion but the automotive industry has been using metri pak connectors for decades now. The definitely eliminate the need for separate boxes for protection while the positive retention connectors eliminate the need for external velcro tie downs.
There is no strain relief. They tend to be made for thicker wire than I would normally use on a bike. If you want to be able to replace components, the price seems to go up by an order of magnitude.
2_i is offline  
Old 06-22-20, 07:20 PM
  #32  
sweeks
Senior Member
 
sweeks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Chicago area
Posts: 2,541

Bikes: Airborne "Carpe Diem", Motobecane "Mirage", Trek 6000, Strida 2, Dahon "Helios XL", Dahon "Mu XL", Tern "Verge S11i"

Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 978 Post(s)
Liked 574 Times in 395 Posts
Originally Posted by unterhausen
There are connection greases that you can get in the electrical section, but I like dielectric grease since I have it around for working on cars. It doesn't take much.
These are also called "silicone" grease. I have a tube I bought at Radio Shack years ago and still have plenty left. I use it especially on the connector to my dynohub. Winter salt can be hard on connections.
Silicone Greases
sweeks is offline  
Old 06-23-20, 09:27 AM
  #33  
steelbikeguy
Senior Member
 
steelbikeguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Peoria, IL
Posts: 4,449
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1820 Post(s)
Liked 3,324 Times in 1,563 Posts
Originally Posted by RGMN
Nice to see someone has fought the same issues. Sometimes I feel like I'm the only one who's seen them. A couple of engineers at my company recently retire. Them, myself, and 1 other engineer were the corporate subject matter experts on connector issues. I'm now trying to train up a few others but I doubt I'll get it done before I depart the company in December. I feel sorry for the engineer that will be left. I had a engineer who couldn't believe that water would actually wick thru a wire. I told him he either needed to vent his electronics housing or use blocked wire to stop the water ingress issue he was seeing. He didn't listen and a customer experienced some spectacular failures due to water ingress into the electronics. We are now in the middle of a recall to replace 12,000 units with units that have a GoreTex vent.
I've been in a couple of positions where I seemed to be one of the few who had enough experience to avoid doing dumb things (or at least smart enough to not do dumb things two or three times). People would come to me, looking for advice on their problem, and after answering the same question a couple of times, started writing up some design guidelines. I had seen similar guidelines earlier in my career, which contained a lot of the lessons that were learned the hard way.

I hope someone is updating the guidelines that I've written, but I don't expect it. There hasn't been much respect for technical knowledge for quite a while. People seem to think you can just hire a new, cheap engineer and they somehow know everything. Well, even if management never really appreciated some of the wise engineers that helped train me, I know that I appreciate them!

Steve in Peoria
steelbikeguy is offline  
Old 06-11-21, 12:15 AM
  #34  
boomhauer
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
boomhauer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 780
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 226 Post(s)
Liked 45 Times in 32 Posts
Well. It's been a year. Soldering wires together then heat shrink worked. I ride my bike daily in all kinds of weather (but not in a coastal area). This is the first time I haven't had to fiddle with my connections for a year.

I wanted a removable connection from the dynamo to the lights and the Sinewave phone charger but figured that if I really needed to remove wires I could just snip them and start again.
I've tried various connectors over the years and covered them with grease but they always seemed to have some issue. Probably over sensitive to the low voltage involved in a dynamo hub.
All the responses were very enlightening (being an engineer myself working with control systems) .
I feel like a semi-idiot for fooling around with aluminum connectors before.

Last edited by boomhauer; 06-11-21 at 03:26 PM.
boomhauer is offline  
Likes For boomhauer:
Old 06-11-21, 01:14 AM
  #35  
Trevtassie
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Down Under
Posts: 1,936

Bikes: A steel framed 26" off road tourer from a manufacturer who thinks they are cool. Giant Anthem. Trek 720 Multiroad pub bike. 10 kids bikes all under 20". Assorted waifs and unfinished projects.

Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1188 Post(s)
Liked 1,154 Times in 640 Posts
Been using these for a few years now, cheap and work well. https://www.ebay.com/itm/171866680184
Trevtassie is offline  
Likes For Trevtassie:
Old 06-12-21, 03:01 PM
  #36  
2_i 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 3,692

Bikes: Trek 730 (quad), 720 & 830, Bike Friday NWT, Brompton M36R & M6R, Dahon HAT060 & HT060, ...

Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 834 Post(s)
Liked 332 Times in 247 Posts
Depending on a bike I have used the Schmidt coaxial connector or variants of 2.8mm spade connectors. Off the cuff : One should not use the dynamo voltage as an excuse for poor workmanship.
2_i is offline  
Old 06-16-21, 08:51 AM
  #37  
Litespeedlouie
Full Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Seattle
Posts: 327

Bikes: Litespeed, O'Brien, Specialized, Fuji

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 15 Times in 9 Posts
Stuffing a connector with Nyogel 760G seems to be what car makers do to their connectors, so makes sense to me. I just use the stuff on flashlight threads. Nyogel is incredibly expensive if you try to buy it by name, but you can get the exact same Nye product rebranded as Ford/Motorcraft XG-12 electrical grease for about $15 for a 3oz tube. It's a synthetic PAO grease, not silicone.

The previously linked article about dielectric greases:
https://support.newgatesimms.com/cho...tor-lubricant/
sounds like Nye-speak, but also interesting is their advice to NOT use silicone electrical grease:
https://support.newgatesimms.com/not...al-connectors/
Litespeedlouie is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.