North Carolina bill to require bicycle registration/fee
#52
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: northern Deep South
Posts: 8,901
Bikes: Fuji Touring, Novara Randonee
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2604 Post(s)
Liked 1,928 Times
in
1,210 Posts
I'd suggest you write or email the chambers of commerce in Boone, Blowing Rock, Elk Park, etc., and tell them that if this bill passes you'll do your recreational rides in Tennessee, Virginia, and Kentucky. Note how many times you rode in N.C. in the last few years, how much you spent in gas, lodging, and especially food (be generous with your estimate). Let them do the heavy work for you.
#53
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,098 Times
in
5,054 Posts
This article makes a good point to mention to NC drivers--the bill would make DMV even worse to deal with:
https://www.wsoctv.com/news/local/ne...-fee/925473034
DMV has its hands full dealing with cars.
https://www.wsoctv.com/news/local/ne...-fee/925473034
DMV has its hands full dealing with cars.
#54
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Lincoln Ne
Posts: 9,924
Bikes: RANS Stratus TerraTrike Tour II
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3352 Post(s)
Liked 1,056 Times
in
635 Posts
With all the crime going on, do you really want the police out issuing little Susie a ticket for not registering her side walk bike.
#57
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 3,947
Bikes: Trek 1100 road bike, Roadmaster gravel/commuter/beater mountain bike
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2281 Post(s)
Liked 1,710 Times
in
936 Posts
The only thing that stops a bad guy with a bike is a good guy with a bike.
Ted Kennedy's car has killed more people than my bike.
They can have my bike when they unclip it from my cold, dead feet.
The right to bear bikes:
Last edited by Milton Keynes; 02-27-19 at 12:51 PM.
#58
Generally bewildered
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Eastern PA, USA
Posts: 3,037
Bikes: 2014 Trek Domane 6.9, 1999 LeMond Zurich, 1978 Schwinn Superior
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1152 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times
in
251 Posts
Property taxes should pay for stuff related to the property.
The tax on gas should pay for the needs of cars and trucks using the road.
Income tax should pay for stuff that allows us to earn an income.
The tax on gas shouldn't pay for MUPs and bikelanes. Cyclists should. I would make the case that sales tax on the bike doesnt begin to pay for MUPs, bikelanes, police and EMT response for injured cyclists, etc.
If you make the point that property and income and sales tax are coopted by politicians to pay for stuff that has no bearing on anyone's well-being but their own, well, we agree.
#59
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 1,268
Bikes: Bianchi Ti Megatube; Colnago Competition; Planet-X EC-130E; Klein Pulse; Amp Research B4; Litespeed Catalyst; Trek Y11
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 605 Post(s)
Liked 480 Times
in
260 Posts
Does anyone want to guess what is the current corporate - actually, what it /was/ for 2018 - tax rate in North Carolina?
3-effing-% !!! And they're gonna lower it to 2.5% for 2019! (Three cheers for the US Conservative idea of what is "tax reform"!) This is something you might like to question your local representatives about.
There's where you're coming up short in revenue for cycling infrastructure.
But hey, instead let's screw over cyclists for a tenner... because they can, makes for a good soundbite, etc.
3-effing-% !!! And they're gonna lower it to 2.5% for 2019! (Three cheers for the US Conservative idea of what is "tax reform"!) This is something you might like to question your local representatives about.
There's where you're coming up short in revenue for cycling infrastructure.
But hey, instead let's screw over cyclists for a tenner... because they can, makes for a good soundbite, etc.
#60
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,488
Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE
Mentioned: 144 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7652 Post(s)
Liked 3,473 Times
in
1,834 Posts
Too, as a Conservative I believe in use taxes: taxes should fall on those that use public stuff. So cars should pay a license fee and taxes on gas should pay for roads. If we bikers want to use roads or MUPS, we should pay for em. Not fair to let the general public pay for our (bikers) convenience.
Cars do damage, causing the road to flex on the bed. Trucks are devastating. The forces involved with even gigantic fat cyclists like myself are negligible. And also ... roads are paid out of the general fund because we all eat groceries, use electricity and the sewer system if there is one, get mail, get our trash hauled, send our kids to school, go to work ... in other words, roads are of benefit Generally, even to people who never leave their homes. Gas taxes etc. are ways to raise extra money ... not all of which goes to repairing roads.
But hey ... if we are going straight-up user fees, i am all for it. I do 3,00-5,000 miles per year and even with all the groceries i could ever haul, never weigh a quarter ton or exceed 40 mph. And I never cause gridlock. Let's work out a sliding scale of fiscal impact, and I will shell out my 32 cents a year for my portion of the road damage I do.
A metal license plate is ridiculous. Given gubmint efficiency, it might cost more than ten bucks to stamp out! Should be a tamper-evident sticker with a license number, with additional plastic cards with RFID that you can hide in the seat tube, handlebars, and wheel rim. Initially useless, but if registration hits a critical mass, it might help a little bit with theft recovery and tracking down owners of stolen bikes.
of course, removing the card would then be made a crime---and lots of legit cyclists will get busted for changing a seat post and forgetting to swap the card.
Also, as I mentioned above---there won't suddenly be more cops on the street to search for stolen bikes. Right now you can engrave IDs on your electronics, and register their serial numbers and all that, and unless they show up in a local pawn shop and the staff Chooses to check the current list, none of that matters. The stuff stolen in burglaries goes through a fence and out onto the market and Nobody cares because the time and money involved in tracking every stolen VCR (sorry, DVD player) would be astronomical, and the unit can be replaced for a hundred bucks.
No one will care about your stolen bike any more then than they do now. There will not be teams of cops in antenna-studded vans triangulating lost bike signals. If they find a bike that was reported stolen, you might get a phone call ... and the whole system will cost millions by the time every leech in the capitol attaches riders and amendments---and in the end the money will end up going to adding lanes or traffic signals outside new developments, and cyclists will be worse off.
#61
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Oahu, HI
Posts: 1,396
Bikes: 89 Paramount OS 84 Fuji Touring Series III New! 2013 Focus Izalco Ergoride
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 285 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 74 Times
in
54 Posts
What!read about Hawaii is that this works because enforcement just requires checking the bike shops for compliance, and no "on the streer" enforcement is done. Basically, its a sales tax on new bikes.
Does anyone actually register the imported bikes? How much is the fee? I know that l wouldn't want the extra trip to the DMV, and would probably skip it if I knew no one was enforcing it.
What!read about Hawaii is that this works because enforcement just requires checking the bike shops for compliance, and no "on the streer" enforcement is done. Basically, its a sales tax on new bikes.
Does anyone actually register the imported bikes? How much is the fee? I know that l wouldn't want the extra trip to the DMV, and would probably skip it if I knew no one was enforcing it.
It costs $5 to transfer a registration to new owner.
scott s.
.
#62
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,488
Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE
Mentioned: 144 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7652 Post(s)
Liked 3,473 Times
in
1,834 Posts
My point is merely this: Taxes should at least approximate utility received. That way, no one gets a free ride at another's expense.
Property taxes should pay for stuff related to the property.
The tax on gas should pay for the needs of cars and trucks using the road.
Income tax should pay for stuff that allows us to earn an income.
The tax on gas shouldn't pay for MUPs and bikelanes. Cyclists should. I would make the case that sales tax on the bike doesnt begin to pay for MUPs, bikelanes, police and EMT response for injured cyclists, etc.
If you make the point that property and income and sales tax are coopted by politicians to pay for stuff that has no bearing on anyone's well-being but their own, well, we agree.
Property taxes should pay for stuff related to the property.
The tax on gas should pay for the needs of cars and trucks using the road.
Income tax should pay for stuff that allows us to earn an income.
The tax on gas shouldn't pay for MUPs and bikelanes. Cyclists should. I would make the case that sales tax on the bike doesnt begin to pay for MUPs, bikelanes, police and EMT response for injured cyclists, etc.
If you make the point that property and income and sales tax are coopted by politicians to pay for stuff that has no bearing on anyone's well-being but their own, well, we agree.
And considering how much it costs it seems likely that taxing cyclists enough to pay just for painting,. let alone building, bike lanes, would be prohibitive. And as for building bike lanes ... how do we separate the cost of bike lanes from the cost of car lanes on a new road? Income tax is on earned income .... what does it pay for? Cops, firefighters, roads ... politicians. So why should a tax on fuel only pay for roads? After all, it is not a user-fee system. If ti were, only people who needed cops would pay for cops. Only people who had fires would pay for fire fighters.
See any problems there?
How about education? Why should my "property" taxes pay for education? I have no kids in the school system.
Also .... as was mentioned above, businesses frequently get Huge tax breaks .... supposedly because they "create jobs," but anyone who actually pays attention can see how infrequently that happens ... there is plenty of money and influence changing hands, but none of it is adding to tax revenues .... more like revolving door employment for legislators, or campaign support ... "you help us, and we will get you from the state house to congress ... where you can help us more ..."
Concepts are wonderful .... but the world is concrete, not conceptual. I am about sick and tired of being fed wonderful rhetoric about completely unreal and imaginary systems, while being vastly underserved for what i spend. I hear a lot about "Runn government like a business," but in reality, government has no competition, so it is NOT a business. I cannot influence the government by not buying its products. I cannot shop around for a government which provides more value for my dollar, or better customer service to address complaints.
I will Gladly pay taxes for services rendered. Can i get some service, please?
Anyway ... i don' want to get this thread moved. later.
#63
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 1,794
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1027 Post(s)
Liked 325 Times
in
204 Posts
This guy is simply playing to his voter base. Bikes annoy drivers (the majority of voters) and anything that is environmentally friendly annoys republicans (the voters he needs to keep happy).
#64
Advocatus Diaboli
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Wherever I am
Posts: 8,635
Bikes: Merlin Cyrene, Nashbar steel CX
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4733 Post(s)
Liked 1,532 Times
in
1,003 Posts
Don't MUPs pay for themselves in taking commuters out of cars which damage roads requiring costly repair bills more more than bikes do?
#65
Junior Member
I'll even go a little further. I recently worked for 6 weeks in TX and told everyone I knew that the drivers north of Houston were the most courteous drivers to cyclists I have ever encountered. Maybe got honked at 2x. Every driver either waited behind me when there was no bike lane/shoulder, moved into the left lane to pass, or the oncoming lane to pass. I left there with a new appreciation for how they treated cyclists and I have ridden in CA, SD, WY, CO, CT, NJ, NY, PA, DE, MD, VA and NC.
Anyway, to not entirely derail the thread. I remember having to do this as a kid. Always went down to the police station to register the bike if the LBS didn't do it upon purchase.
#66
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: South Carolina Upstate
Posts: 2,109
Bikes: 2010 Fuji Absolute 3.0 1994 Trek 850
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 762 Post(s)
Liked 555 Times
in
322 Posts
bought my NC fishing license yesterday (I live in SC). $38 bucks up from last years $36 bucks and the year before that $30 bucks. SC license is $10 bucks
Doubt this bike thing will pass but for sure NC is in your pocket a good bit more than SC is
Doubt this bike thing will pass but for sure NC is in your pocket a good bit more than SC is
#67
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: St Peters, Missouri
Posts: 30,225
Bikes: Catrike 559 I own some others but they don't get ridden very much.
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1572 Post(s)
Liked 643 Times
in
364 Posts
Collecting the fees and maintaining the records will cost more than the fees, nevermind the cost to enforce the rule. This'd be one of those things where the po-po should speak up and say this is impossible, don't pass this crap bc we're not gonna enforce it.
I'd be curious to hear how much revenue they expect to generate with this.
I'd be curious to hear how much revenue they expect to generate with this.
__________________
My greatest fear is all of my kids standing around my coffin and talking about "how sensible" dad was.
My greatest fear is all of my kids standing around my coffin and talking about "how sensible" dad was.
#68
Been Around Awhile
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,972
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,535 Times
in
1,045 Posts
Probably not; the number of commuters in the U.S. who switch their mode of travel from motor vehicle to bicycle due to the presence of MUP(s) (somewhere) along the commuter route probably amounts to an insignificant slice of the commuting population. In a dense urban area like NYC more than likely the bicycling commuter would be switching from public transit, rather than an auto commute.
#69
Generally bewildered
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Eastern PA, USA
Posts: 3,037
Bikes: 2014 Trek Domane 6.9, 1999 LeMond Zurich, 1978 Schwinn Superior
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1152 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times
in
251 Posts
On the other hand, cycling uses no fuel, so you decrease the fuel tax revenue used for road maintenance.
#70
Palmer
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 8,621
Bikes: Mike Melton custom, Alex Moulton AM, Dahon Curl
Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1663 Post(s)
Liked 1,817 Times
in
1,057 Posts
BTW, 'gas' taxes as a means to pay for motor vehicle user needs are increasingly problematic. Example: the driver of a Corolla pays ~50% more gas tax than the driver of a Prius for pretty much the same benefits. The Leaf driver pays no gas taxes at all. Hmm.
Caveat: at the extreme, a 'user fees' model would turn citizens into serfs, bound to the land and required to buy permission from their government to move about. Surely there's some minimum level of travel access a free society needs to provide to allow 'pursuit' of happiness (IMHO a bridge, tunnel, etc. that does not provide safe passage for anything but motor vehicles fails this standard.)
Last edited by tcs; 02-28-19 at 10:07 AM.
#71
Palmer
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 8,621
Bikes: Mike Melton custom, Alex Moulton AM, Dahon Curl
Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1663 Post(s)
Liked 1,817 Times
in
1,057 Posts
#72
Generally bewildered
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Eastern PA, USA
Posts: 3,037
Bikes: 2014 Trek Domane 6.9, 1999 LeMond Zurich, 1978 Schwinn Superior
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1152 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times
in
251 Posts
... motor vehicle operators should be covering that portion solely expended on their activities. Likewise, any public hospital & emergency care should in part be funded by some sort of motor vehicle taxation...
BTW, 'gas' taxes as a means to pay for motor vehicle user needs are increasingly problematic. ...
Caveat: at the extreme, a 'user fees' model would turn citizens into serfs, bound to the land and required to buy permission from their government to move about. Surely there's some minimum level of travel access a free society needs ...
BTW, 'gas' taxes as a means to pay for motor vehicle user needs are increasingly problematic. ...
Caveat: at the extreme, a 'user fees' model would turn citizens into serfs, bound to the land and required to buy permission from their government to move about. Surely there's some minimum level of travel access a free society needs ...
On your other points, I think we agree. Gas taxes could be one aspect of user-fees. Own a car? Pay a yearly fee to support road repair and police and EMT support. Could be based on a standard fee, or based upon mileage.
I'm not really wedded to this, it was just spit-ballin' around the idea that folks who benefit from something should pay for it, and folks who don't use it shouldn't be too burdened by taxes for it.
On one point we do agree: good public roads and highways make for an efficient economy. Dwight Eisenhower realized this when he saw the autobahns in Germany, which is why he pushed for our national highway system.
But again, I'm speculatin'. I will repeat: I don't think that legislator's proposing a 10 dollar tax on bikes is solely grounds for campaigning against the guy.
#73
Senior Member
regarding the fishing (and other hunting) licenses: out of state licenses will always be higher than the same licenses will be in your home state, unless there is some kind of agreement between the states, like the fishing licenses in Smoky Mtn park.
regarding the idiotic HB157 bill proposal: after calming down a bit, I sent an email to BikeWalkNC to see if they had any kind of 'generic' letter I could send to the state representatives.
I live in Asheville, have several bicycles, and am truly appalled at HB157.
Is there any kind of 'form letter' available, stating some facts about how this would not work, how it would be a bad idea overall, how it would make the DMV more of a mess than it already is, that I could send to each member of the state house and senate, and perhaps the governor too?
I learned of this bill on bikeforums.net, in this thread:
North Carolina bill to require bicycle registration/fee - Bike Forums
and I'd like to do as much as possible to kill this bill asap.
Please let me know
Thank you.
This was their reply:
We are working on this now. Look for something in the next 24-48 hours after we do some more information gathering on this bill as well as complete streets codification, the removal of the 2013 funding limitation, Safe Routes to School, and the changes to the bicycle definition bill.
regarding the idiotic HB157 bill proposal: after calming down a bit, I sent an email to BikeWalkNC to see if they had any kind of 'generic' letter I could send to the state representatives.
I live in Asheville, have several bicycles, and am truly appalled at HB157.
Is there any kind of 'form letter' available, stating some facts about how this would not work, how it would be a bad idea overall, how it would make the DMV more of a mess than it already is, that I could send to each member of the state house and senate, and perhaps the governor too?
I learned of this bill on bikeforums.net, in this thread:
North Carolina bill to require bicycle registration/fee - Bike Forums
and I'd like to do as much as possible to kill this bill asap.
Please let me know
Thank you.
This was their reply:
We are working on this now. Look for something in the next 24-48 hours after we do some more information gathering on this bill as well as complete streets codification, the removal of the 2013 funding limitation, Safe Routes to School, and the changes to the bicycle definition bill.
#74
Palmer
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 8,621
Bikes: Mike Melton custom, Alex Moulton AM, Dahon Curl
Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1663 Post(s)
Liked 1,817 Times
in
1,057 Posts
Uh, yeah, well, I was imagining a reductio ad absurdum of a specific user fee before you could walk from your front step to the store, paying for the creation and maintenance of sidewalks and compensate the government for the ongoing loss of tax revenue due to taking the land used for sidewalks off the tax roles. Even under a user fee model, I believe some minimum level of free movement needs to be provided for out of general revenue. Airbus 380s need to pay their own way; Amish buggies not so much; draw the line in between.
#75
- Soli Deo Gloria -
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Northwest Georgia
Posts: 14,779
Bikes: 2018 Rodriguez Custom Fixed Gear, 2017 Niner RLT 9 RDO, 2015 Bianchi Pista, 2002 Fuji Robaix
Mentioned: 235 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6844 Post(s)
Liked 736 Times
in
469 Posts
This is the right approach rather than wringing hands or arguing about it on forums that no representative will ever see.
Organize a polite and courteous protest ride to the state capitol or past Representative Jeffrey Elmore's home. Make sure the media knows about the protest ride.
Call the newspapers. Make sure the media knows that this discriminates against poor people who ride bikes to work.
Show up at the state house in Spandex. Walk into your reps office in cleats and ask to speak to the representative.
Act up. Make a noise.
Remember that complaining and arguing here doesn't do anything.
-Tim-
regarding the idiotic HB157 bill proposal: after calming down a bit, I sent an email to BikeWalkNC to see if they had any kind of 'generic' letter I could send to the state representatives.
This was their reply:
We are working on this now. Look for something in the next 24-48 hours after we do some more information gathering on this bill as well as complete streets codification, the removal of the 2013 funding limitation, Safe Routes to School, and the changes to the bicycle definition bill.
This was their reply:
We are working on this now. Look for something in the next 24-48 hours after we do some more information gathering on this bill as well as complete streets codification, the removal of the 2013 funding limitation, Safe Routes to School, and the changes to the bicycle definition bill.
Call the newspapers. Make sure the media knows that this discriminates against poor people who ride bikes to work.
Show up at the state house in Spandex. Walk into your reps office in cleats and ask to speak to the representative.
Act up. Make a noise.
Remember that complaining and arguing here doesn't do anything.
-Tim-