Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

Old 60s Mercier technical challenge

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

Old 60s Mercier technical challenge

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-21-21, 05:16 PM
  #26  
non-fixie 
Shifting is fun!
 
non-fixie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: South Holland, NL
Posts: 11,006

Bikes: Yes, please.

Mentioned: 280 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2198 Post(s)
Liked 4,600 Times in 1,764 Posts
The 122 BCD 37T inner ring I mentioned earlier also fits the Stronglight 49 chainset you posted. And the good news is that you can buy those new:

https://www.redclovercomponents.com/..._37_Teeth.html
__________________
Are we having fun, or what ...



non-fixie is offline  
Old 08-22-21, 01:18 AM
  #27  
JackJohn
WingsToWheels
Thread Starter
 
JackJohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: France
Posts: 231

Bikes: Italian, French, British

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 84 Post(s)
Liked 66 Times in 41 Posts
Originally Posted by Charles Wahl
There is a way to get a Campagnolo Nuovo derailleur to wrap more chain: longer cage plates. Just Google "campagnolo long cage plates" or search for same on eBay.
https://www.somafab.com/archives/pro...ur-cage-plates

Soma used to make these, but unfortunately don't appear to now -- available on eBay for close to the Soma price of $45 though.

I bought a set of plates made by BFer @Henry III back in the day, still haven't had a project to use them on, but may get to them yet.
A smart and practical solution to keep in mind, still unsure if want to do this to a nice Campy
Originally Posted by non-fixie
The 122 BCD 37T inner ring I mentioned earlier also fits the Stronglight 49 chainset you posted. And the good news is that you can buy those new:

https://www.redclovercomponents.com/..._37_Teeth.html
Excellent, very useful !!!
JackJohn is offline  
Old 08-27-21, 05:23 PM
  #28  
JackJohn
WingsToWheels
Thread Starter
 
JackJohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: France
Posts: 231

Bikes: Italian, French, British

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 84 Post(s)
Liked 66 Times in 41 Posts
Ok, enough reading and researching over the past days.
I had a “go” from my friend for a potential switch to a Simplex rd, provided it’s a nice one with no or minimal delrin. If I understand correctly the Simplex range, this basically narrows down to the SX410-610-810 and the SLJ models.
Among the SX, the 410 seems the most available (but not the GT version).
Concerning the SLJ, among the different posts, I read verktyg impressive tests on these models and how they might not clear on some >24t fw if cogs are too close (e.g. 7s fws). Also interesting were some comments on how it could possibly be hard to wrap chain if a large triple crankset is used, and on how it is not easy to recognize Simplex models (the latter point being reassuring as I was starting to doubt about my cognitive skills when going through the Simplex catalogues )
Given my project would require a triple crank and an up to 24-28t fw, it is important to identify the proper Simplex rd model and mounting before spending money to purchase it.

Here below some SX410 photos from ads on ebay, I’ll post some SLJ asap.

Ad no. 1




Ad no.2


Last edited by JackJohn; 08-29-21 at 10:50 AM.
JackJohn is offline  
Old 08-29-21, 10:57 AM
  #29  
JackJohn
WingsToWheels
Thread Starter
 
JackJohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: France
Posts: 231

Bikes: Italian, French, British

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 84 Post(s)
Liked 66 Times in 41 Posts
And here a couple of SLJ found on local ads. The second one has black bolts, maybe a later and higher capacity derailleur? It also has a hanger, not sure if it can be direct mounted to the frame with its bolt.

Any suggestions welcome on these Simplex solutions as to whether they might work with the targeted setup. Thanks !!!

Ad no.1



Ad no.2

JackJohn is offline  
Old 08-30-21, 08:04 AM
  #30  
top506
Death fork? Naaaah!!
 
top506's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: The other Maine, north of RT 2
Posts: 5,325

Bikes: Seriously downsizing.

Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 559 Post(s)
Liked 629 Times in 280 Posts
I've used the 4/6/810 RD on a triple crank (52/42/28) with a 13-25 7 block successfully. Granted, the 28 was a bail-out used only with the 25t rear cog.
If you go with a Simplex RD, remember that they mount in a very different manner.











Top
__________________
You know it's going to be a good day when the stem and seatpost come right out.

(looking for a picture and not seeing it? Thank the Photobucket fiasco.PM me and I'll link it up.)
top506 is offline  
Old 08-30-21, 03:36 PM
  #31  
JackJohn
WingsToWheels
Thread Starter
 
JackJohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: France
Posts: 231

Bikes: Italian, French, British

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 84 Post(s)
Liked 66 Times in 41 Posts
Originally Posted by top506
I've used the 4/6/810 RD on a triple crank (52/42/28) with a 13-25 7 block successfully. Granted, the 28 was a bail-out used only with the 25t rear cog.
If you go with a Simplex RD, remember that they mount in a very different manner.
Excellent, thanks top506 , this is the kind of combinations I’m targeting, so good to know. Although the Simplex mount in a “very different manner” seems scaring… More seriously, is there any particularly setup detail to be aware of? I was looking for a direct mount derailleur to simply bolt on the Simplex dropout hole, am I missing something?
JackJohn is offline  
Old 08-30-21, 04:40 PM
  #32  
top506
Death fork? Naaaah!!
 
top506's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: The other Maine, north of RT 2
Posts: 5,325

Bikes: Seriously downsizing.

Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 559 Post(s)
Liked 629 Times in 280 Posts
The actual attachment is from the rear of the RD. The Allen socket on the front is only to adjust spring tension. There's a pretty good blow by blow procedure here on the forums somewhere.

Top

Last edited by top506; 08-30-21 at 04:50 PM.
top506 is offline  
Old 08-30-21, 05:10 PM
  #33  
bikemig 
Senior Member
 
bikemig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Middle Earth (aka IA)
Posts: 20,435

Bikes: A bunch of old bikes and a few new ones

Mentioned: 178 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5888 Post(s)
Liked 3,471 Times in 2,079 Posts
I'm running the Simplex SX 410 RD on my 1982 Peugeot PXN 10. It came stock on the bike. It can handle an impressive amount of chain for a short cage RD. In fact, that's true with a number of simplex RDs. Plus they have upper and lower pivots and shift better than a campy.

Here's a good description:

https://mariposabicycles.ca/2016/01/...ng-derailleur/

I'm running 50/36 rings and a 14-28 freewheel on the PXN 10; the SX 410 handles that nicely.

Velobase has it handling a max cog of 30 with 30 teeth of chain wrap. I have used that RD with a 30 tooth in the back. It worked fine.

VeloBase.com - Component: Simplex SX410 T

Personally I wouldn't run a triple. I'd go with a stronglight 86 bcd crank (or the TA if you prefer) and run it with smaller rings (say for example a 48/32). If you get a 13-28 6 speed suntour ultra freewheel, you'll end up with pretty decent gear ratios. Think about cutting out the top and the bottom a bit and focus on the middle gears. There are always trade offs in building an old bike. I reckon that's part of their charm.

I have a 70s Mercier 300 I need to build up and that's more or less what I'm going to do. I want to be able to climb some hills on that bike.

Last edited by bikemig; 08-30-21 at 05:17 PM.
bikemig is offline  
Likes For bikemig:
Old 08-31-21, 07:05 AM
  #34  
Phil_gretz
Zip tie Karen
 
Phil_gretz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Fair Oaks Ranch, TX
Posts: 7,004

Bikes: '13 Motobecane Fantom29 HT, '16 Motobecane Turino Pro Disc, '18 Velobuild VB-R-022, '21 Tsunami SNM-100

Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1465 Post(s)
Liked 1,542 Times in 806 Posts
On my 1971 Jeunet, I went with a Campy Victory crank that offered 116 bcd. That way, I could use a 47-36T combination. On the rear, I have 14-24 with a NR. This yields 89 gear inches on the top end and 40 gear inches on the low end. This range fits the purpose of this bike and matches my abilities perfectly. True, I spin out at 32 mph or so. Who cares?

Also, I'll confess that the Victory crankset isn't period correct at all, but it doesn't look harshly out of place either. So...


Last edited by Phil_gretz; 08-31-21 at 07:11 AM.
Phil_gretz is offline  
Likes For Phil_gretz:
Old 08-31-21, 07:30 AM
  #35  
repechage
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 20,305
Mentioned: 130 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3464 Post(s)
Liked 2,829 Times in 1,995 Posts
Originally Posted by JackJohn
Excellent, thanks top506 , this is the kind of combinations I’m targeting, so good to know. Although the Simplex mount in a “very different manner” seems scaring… More seriously, is there any particularly setup detail to be aware of? I was looking for a direct mount derailleur to simply bolt on the Simplex dropout hole, am I missing something?
a key point to note, when using a “short” cage rear derailleur, note the comment about “bailout” - to get error proof and no damage shifting with a wide range triple and pretty wide range rear freewheel, a long cage rear derailleur is what is needed
repechage is offline  
Old 08-31-21, 03:24 PM
  #36  
JackJohn
WingsToWheels
Thread Starter
 
JackJohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: France
Posts: 231

Bikes: Italian, French, British

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 84 Post(s)
Liked 66 Times in 41 Posts
Originally Posted by top506
The actual attachment is from the rear of the RD. The Allen socket on the front is only to adjust spring tension. There's a pretty good blow by blow procedure here on the forums somewhere.

Top
Ok, I see
Originally Posted by bikemig
I'm running the Simplex SX 410 RD on my 1982 Peugeot PXN 10. It came stock on the bike. It can handle an impressive amount of chain for a short cage RD. In fact, that's true with a number of simplex RDs. Plus they have upper and lower pivots and shift better than a campy.

Here's a good description:

https://mariposabicycles.ca/2016/01/...ng-derailleur/

I'm running 50/36 rings and a 14-28 freewheel on the PXN 10; the SX 410 handles that nicely.

Velobase has it handling a max cog of 30 with 30 teeth of chain wrap. I have used that RD with a 30 tooth in the back. It worked fine.

VeloBase.com - Component: Simplex SX410 T

Personally I wouldn't run a triple. I'd go with a stronglight 86 bcd crank (or the TA if you prefer) and run it with smaller rings (say for example a 48/32). If you get a 13-28 6 speed suntour ultra freewheel, you'll end up with pretty decent gear ratios. Think about cutting out the top and the bottom a bit and focus on the middle gears. There are always trade offs in building an old bike. I reckon that's part of their charm.

I have a 70s Mercier 300 I need to build up and that's more or less what I'm going to do. I want to be able to climb some hills on that bike.
Thanks for the tips, the SX410 seems the one providing the most flexibility and solutions. A double crank would be ok if, as in your case, you have a small enough inner chainring and a large FW, I didn't think old front derailleurs could handle a double 50-36, interesting. By "cutting" do you mean avoid extreme crossing like big-big or small-small when installing a triple?

Originally Posted by Phil_gretz
On my 1971 Jeunet, I went with a Campy Victory crank that offered 116 bcd. That way, I could use a 47-36T combination. On the rear, I have 14-24 with a NR. This yields 89 gear inches on the top end and 40 gear inches on the low end. This range fits the purpose of this bike and matches my abilities perfectly. True, I spin out at 32 mph or so. Who cares?

Also, I'll confess that the Victory crankset isn't period correct at all, but it doesn't look harshly out of place either. So...
Interesting, thanks for sharing, admittedly my friend needs slightly higher gear ratios...
Originally Posted by repechage
a key point to note, when using a “short” cage rear derailleur, note the comment about “bailout” - to get error proof and no damage shifting with a wide range triple and pretty wide range rear freewheel, a long cage rear derailleur is what is needed
Yes definitely right, unfortunately I couldn't manage to find long cage Simplex RDs yet, but it seems the SX410 could be a nice compromise, doesn't it?

Anyway, the picture is getting clearer thanks to all of you. The only remaining doubts concern SLJ derailleurs which would be the nicest Simplex solution: I admit still struggling to understand if and which one might be suitable for this project given verktyg comments and tests in a specific thread on these derailleurs. Any suggestion is more than welcome...
JackJohn is offline  
Old 08-31-21, 04:10 PM
  #37  
bikemig 
Senior Member
 
bikemig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Middle Earth (aka IA)
Posts: 20,435

Bikes: A bunch of old bikes and a few new ones

Mentioned: 178 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5888 Post(s)
Liked 3,471 Times in 2,079 Posts
Originally Posted by JackJohn
Ok, I see

Thanks for the tips, the SX410 seems the one providing the most flexibility and solutions. A double crank would be ok if, as in your case, you have a small enough inner chainring and a large FW, I didn't think old front derailleurs could handle a double 50-36, interesting. By "cutting" do you mean avoid extreme crossing like big-big or small-small when installing a triple?


snip . . .
I'm suggesting cutting out the high and the low gears. There are always trade offs with gearing on old bikes. A compact double with a decent size freewheels gets you a lot of very usable gears. The stronglight 99 has an 86 bcd crank. It can go as low as 28. The TA cyclotourist can go as low as 26.

Triples will give you more gears but you may not be happy with the shifting performance running old school derailleurs.
bikemig is offline  
Old 08-31-21, 05:41 PM
  #38  
repechage
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 20,305
Mentioned: 130 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3464 Post(s)
Liked 2,829 Times in 1,995 Posts
Originally Posted by Phil_gretz
On my 1971 Jeunet, I went with a Campy Victory crank that offered 116 bcd. That way, I could use a 47-36T combination. On the rear, I have 14-24 with a NR. This yields 89 gear inches on the top end and 40 gear inches on the low end. This range fits the purpose of this bike and matches my abilities perfectly. True, I spin out at 32 mph or so. Who cares?

Also, I'll confess that the Victory crankset isn't period correct at all, but it doesn't look harshly out of place either. So...
There is a 5 pin GS crank, rare but out there. Has the Record look.
When I was racing it was 47x15 (44x14 was allowed too) to stay with the cat 1's it was hummingbird legs.
repechage is offline  
Likes For repechage:
Old 12-10-21, 05:57 AM
  #39  
JackJohn
WingsToWheels
Thread Starter
 
JackJohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: France
Posts: 231

Bikes: Italian, French, British

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 84 Post(s)
Liked 66 Times in 41 Posts
After a few months the Mercier restoration is finally over.
I finally opted for a triple Stronglight 99 crank (found one with a drilled small chainring) to work with a Simplex SX410 rd, shifting is fine and they can handle a wide gear range. A new bottom bracket was necessary, luckily the chosen spindle length was fine and the chainline came up quite right. The Campagnolo fd can handle the triple, although it uses all the possible extension on the outside to reach the big chainring. I left the original brake shoes, but braking is not optimal. I will probably need to make an exception to the vintage rule and use modern ones. Indeed, the bike is all period correct from the end of the ‘60s, excepting the wheels which are a few years younger. Final weight at around 24.5lbs is fine, not the lightest but still light for a 58-size Reynolds 3-tubes.
Here’s a picture of the “bijou”, hope you like it, and thanks again for all the advices.

JackJohn is offline  
Likes For JackJohn:
Old 12-10-21, 06:30 AM
  #40  
C9H13N 
Full Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: North Seattle
Posts: 387

Bikes: Davidson ’81

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 120 Post(s)
Liked 229 Times in 121 Posts
The bike looks great! I am glad you went with the Simplex rather than modify the hanger, and kept it mostly French.

Love the hard ano rims too, not everyone does, but they’re my favorite.
C9H13N is offline  
Old 12-10-21, 02:06 PM
  #41  
JackJohn
WingsToWheels
Thread Starter
 
JackJohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: France
Posts: 231

Bikes: Italian, French, British

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 84 Post(s)
Liked 66 Times in 41 Posts
Originally Posted by C9H13N
The bike looks great! I am glad you went with the Simplex rather than modify the hanger, and kept it mostly French.

Love the hard ano rims too, not everyone does, but they’re my favorite.
thanks, yes, French components on a French bike was the best solution! We had long discussions around black anodized rims and eventually decided they would have been nice with the bike colors, glad you like them.
JackJohn is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.