Raleigh Cotterless Conversion - Your Opinion!
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 1,238
Bikes: bunch of junk
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
2 Posts
Raleigh Cotterless Conversion - Your Opinion!
Hey fellow C&V'ers,
The question that is somehow older than time itself - which route to take when converting a Nottingham Raleigh to cotterless cranks?
Yes, this topic has been beat to death over many decades. The bike is a common Sports which I want to convert to a Clubman for more spirited riding. I know that the original cranks are totally fine when paired with good quality pins, but I'm anywhere from 220-240lbs depending on what I had for lunch. I'd like to convert it over for peace of mind when putting the power down, especially out of the saddle. I plan on using one of those retro-looking track cranks they have around these days.
15 year old me converted a Record to cotterless with nothing but a different spindle and a good helping of loc-tite. No lockring! I don't remember it not working.. but these days I have a little bit of expendable income and don't mind buying parts every now and then. Especially if they'll prevent me from being stranded on the side of the road.
I really can't decide how I'd like to do it, all the options have pros and cons. Personally I'm leaning towards the Velo-Orange threadless option (the nuclear option) as long as my BB is a 71. I haven't measured it yet - which I know is the first step. Hah!
What would you do?
The question that is somehow older than time itself - which route to take when converting a Nottingham Raleigh to cotterless cranks?
Yes, this topic has been beat to death over many decades. The bike is a common Sports which I want to convert to a Clubman for more spirited riding. I know that the original cranks are totally fine when paired with good quality pins, but I'm anywhere from 220-240lbs depending on what I had for lunch. I'd like to convert it over for peace of mind when putting the power down, especially out of the saddle. I plan on using one of those retro-looking track cranks they have around these days.
15 year old me converted a Record to cotterless with nothing but a different spindle and a good helping of loc-tite. No lockring! I don't remember it not working.. but these days I have a little bit of expendable income and don't mind buying parts every now and then. Especially if they'll prevent me from being stranded on the side of the road.
I really can't decide how I'd like to do it, all the options have pros and cons. Personally I'm leaning towards the Velo-Orange threadless option (the nuclear option) as long as my BB is a 71. I haven't measured it yet - which I know is the first step. Hah!
What would you do?
#2
Phyllo-buster
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 8,829
Bikes: roadsters, club bikes, fixed and classic
Mentioned: 133 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2287 Post(s)
Liked 2,028 Times
in
1,244 Posts
I'm similar in weight and never have cotter issues but I've always had access to good ones and I have a cotter pin press. Get some good cotters from Bikesmith and buy a nice Williams or Chater lea crankset. It will suit the bike and last as long as you'll need it.
Or convert it if you must, it's your bike, but use a lockring.
Or convert it if you must, it's your bike, but use a lockring.
Last edited by clubman; 12-22-18 at 06:36 PM.
#3
Old Bike Craphound
I converted a cottered Raleigh 20 to a cotterless ST crankset by replacing the spindle with a mountain bike ST spindle. Following Sheldon Brown's site I was expecting to need smaller bearings, but it all went together with the same cups (including lockring) and 0.25" bearings. Mostly helpful to me to lower the weight and make changing the crankring easier now that it is 110 BCD. Good luck.
-Will
-Will
#4
Friendship is Magic
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 22,930
Bikes: old ones
Mentioned: 304 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26243 Post(s)
Liked 10,227 Times
in
7,097 Posts
...the most trouble free conversion is probably done using Phil Wood 26tpi rings and the proper Phil cartridge BB. But they're not cheap. I've never used a VO threadless. I have done at least one conversion by reaming and rethreading to Italian, but it seems like a lot of work and requires some tools that would cost you more than the Phil conversion.
The MTB spindle with the old cups and bearings works fine, and is cheap, but IME the availability of those spindles has gone by the way. Maybe someone knows of a source, but the last time I did one, I looked through an entire bin of spindles at the co-op and found only one that would work. You might increase your available universe of spindles if you were willing to face the BB down from 71 to 68 mm. It's only 1.5mm off each side with a facing tool. But you can't undo it once it's done.
The MTB spindle with the old cups and bearings works fine, and is cheap, but IME the availability of those spindles has gone by the way. Maybe someone knows of a source, but the last time I did one, I looked through an entire bin of spindles at the co-op and found only one that would work. You might increase your available universe of spindles if you were willing to face the BB down from 71 to 68 mm. It's only 1.5mm off each side with a facing tool. But you can't undo it once it's done.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: The First State.
Posts: 1,168
Bikes: Schwinn Continental, Schwinn Paramount, Schwinn High Plains, Schwinn World Sport, Trek 420, Trek 930,Trek 660, Novara X-R, Giant Iguana. Fuji Sagres mixte.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 35 Post(s)
Liked 22 Times
in
10 Posts
Pardon my ignorance but could one use a 73mm square taper mountain bike cartridge? The non-drive side cup would theoretically protrude 2mm which would not appear to be a big deal.
#6
Old Bike Craphound
1. find a way to use the existing cups
2. buy new cups with the 26tpi threading
3 re-tap the bottom bracket
each option has challenges.
-Will
#7
Junior Member
There is a fourth option: use a cartridge with plastic cups. The cup threads will be recut/mangled on insertion, so this is a kludge but appears to work.
I used a Sunrace cartridge that takes cottered cranks as a fix for severely worn BB threads, keeping the original drive-side cup.
The installation has been trouble-free for at least 4 years. (I am about 74kg, or 165lb.)
A web site that I can no longer find suggested that some Dutch bike shops do this routinely.
I used a Sunrace cartridge that takes cottered cranks as a fix for severely worn BB threads, keeping the original drive-side cup.
The installation has been trouble-free for at least 4 years. (I am about 74kg, or 165lb.)
A web site that I can no longer find suggested that some Dutch bike shops do this routinely.
Last edited by gilesa; 12-23-18 at 04:50 AM. Reason: Spelling
#8
Full Member
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Greenville, SC / Asheville, NC
Posts: 293
Bikes: '74 Raleigh Professional, '73 Raleigh Grand Prix, '84 Nishiki Medalist, '85 Gazelle Champion Mondial AB, '81 Peugeot Course, '79 Univega Gran Rally, '85 Torpado Super Strada
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 67 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
10 Posts
I really can't decide how I'd like to do it, all the options have pros and cons. Personally I'm leaning towards the Velo-Orange threadless option (the nuclear option) as long as my BB is a 71. I haven't measured it yet - which I know is the first step. Hah!
What would you do?
What would you do?
The VO site says “Customers report that they also work in Raleigh frames with a 71mm wide BB shell.” Sounds like they haven’t tested it to confirm compatibility.
#9
feros ferio
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: www.ci.encinitas.ca.us
Posts: 21,764
Bikes: 1959 Capo Modell Campagnolo; 1960 Capo Sieger (2); 1962 Carlton Franco Suisse; 1970 Peugeot UO-8; 1982 Bianchi Campione d'Italia; 1988 Schwinn Project KOM-10;
Mentioned: 44 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1384 Post(s)
Liked 1,293 Times
in
819 Posts
There is a fourth option: use a cartridge with plastic cups. The cup threads will be recut/mangled on insertion, so this is a kludge but appears to work.
I used a Sunrace cartridge that takes cottered cranks as a fix for severely worn BB threads, keeping the original drive-side cup.
The installation has been trouble-free for at least 4 years. (I am about 74kg, or 165lb.)
A web site that I can no longer find suggested that some Dutch bike shops do this routinely.
I used a Sunrace cartridge that takes cottered cranks as a fix for severely worn BB threads, keeping the original drive-side cup.
The installation has been trouble-free for at least 4 years. (I am about 74kg, or 165lb.)
A web site that I can no longer find suggested that some Dutch bike shops do this routinely.
__________________
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
#10
Bikes are okay, I guess.
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Richmond, Virginia
Posts: 9,128
Bikes: Waterford Paramount Touring, Giant CFM-2, Raleigh Sports 3-speeds in M23 & L23, Schwinn Cimarron oddball build, Marin Palisades Trail dropbar conversion, Nishiki Cresta GT
Mentioned: 69 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2647 Post(s)
Liked 2,445 Times
in
1,557 Posts
Doable, I'm sure. I plan to put a Stronglight crank on my Sports using the original cups and lockring, and here's a Sprite of the same vintage as my Sports at the local co-op and it is sporting a cotterless conversion. Too much junk around for me to get a better look at it.
#11
Ride, Wrench, Swap, Race
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Northern California
Posts: 9,170
Bikes: Cheltenham-Pedersen racer, Boulder F/S Paris-Roubaix, Varsity racer, '52 Christophe, '62 Continental, '92 Merckx, '75 Limongi, '76 Presto, '72 Gitane SC, '71 Schwinn SS, etc.
Mentioned: 132 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1554 Post(s)
Liked 1,273 Times
in
845 Posts
The key to arriving at a satisfyingly-firm bottoming out of the cups in the shell was to grease everything and use a back-and-forth action with a long wrench as the cup moves steadily inward toward it's final destination. I now have about 7 years of riding on it (a few thousand miles at least), and can't imagine it ever loosening.
Another thing making this easier is a long 1/2"-drive flex-handle, which allows the force to be applied to the handle in plane with the splined fit of the tool in the cup, which reduces to zero any tendency for the tool splines to tilt out of the cup while doing the hard work (figure about ten minutes per side for tightening if you've positioned the bike on it's tires with the wrench-turner on the opposite side of bike from which cup is being worked in. Get the drive-side cup fully in before working on the other cup as usual. Over-torquing a UN71 fixed cup can break off the flange (or cause it to break free while in service), but is of no functional consequence other than the loss of part of the spline's depth, but which also makes the bb laterally adjustable toward the left side. I would avoid this though and instead select the bb length with great care.
The latest tools use a larger hex in lieu of any square-drive socket, so an 18" adjustable wrench can similarly be tilted so as to keep the handle in plane with the splines. I am recalling now that the 18" adjustable wrench was what I actually used that day back in 2011 or so.
One problem is that the UN70/71/91 bottom brackets with alloy driveside cup are long out of production, and the newer ones all have steel driveside threading.
Likely it would be fine to cut directionally-sharp self-tapping notches along the bb's steel threading, but which would somewhat alter the frame's threading in a permanent way.
#12
Banned
# 1 is the BB Raleigh thread * or standard British ?
*1 3/8" (1.375) - 26 tpi vs 1.370" x 24 tpi
*1 3/8" (1.375) - 26 tpi vs 1.370" x 24 tpi
#13
Abuse Magnet
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,888
Bikes: '91 Mtn Tek Vertical, '74 Raleigh Sports, '72 Raleigh Twenty, '84 Univega Gran Turismo, '09 Surly Karate Monkey, '92 Burley Rock-n-Roll, '86 Miyata 310, '76 Raleigh Shopper
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 151 Post(s)
Liked 172 Times
in
86 Posts
On my Sports, I used the original cups, a 73mm Shimano spindle, and 6mm balls, per Sheldon. Worked out very well. ymmv
Likes For arex:
#14
Senior Member
Hey fellow C&V'ers,
The question that is somehow older than time itself - which route to take when converting a Nottingham Raleigh to cotterless cranks?
Yes, this topic has been beat to death over many decades. The bike is a common Sports which I want to convert to a Clubman for more spirited riding. I know that the original cranks are totally fine when paired with good quality pins, but I'm anywhere from 220-240lbs depending on what I had for lunch. I'd like to convert it over for peace of mind when putting the power down, especially out of the saddle. I plan on using one of those retro-looking track cranks they have around these days.
15 year old me converted a Record to cotterless with nothing but a different spindle and a good helping of loc-tite. No lockring! I don't remember it not working.. but these days I have a little bit of expendable income and don't mind buying parts every now and then. Especially if they'll prevent me from being stranded on the side of the road.
I really can't decide how I'd like to do it, all the options have pros and cons. Personally I'm leaning towards the Velo-Orange threadless option (the nuclear option) as long as my BB is a 71. I haven't measured it yet - which I know is the first step. Hah!
What would you do?
The question that is somehow older than time itself - which route to take when converting a Nottingham Raleigh to cotterless cranks?
Yes, this topic has been beat to death over many decades. The bike is a common Sports which I want to convert to a Clubman for more spirited riding. I know that the original cranks are totally fine when paired with good quality pins, but I'm anywhere from 220-240lbs depending on what I had for lunch. I'd like to convert it over for peace of mind when putting the power down, especially out of the saddle. I plan on using one of those retro-looking track cranks they have around these days.
15 year old me converted a Record to cotterless with nothing but a different spindle and a good helping of loc-tite. No lockring! I don't remember it not working.. but these days I have a little bit of expendable income and don't mind buying parts every now and then. Especially if they'll prevent me from being stranded on the side of the road.
I really can't decide how I'd like to do it, all the options have pros and cons. Personally I'm leaning towards the Velo-Orange threadless option (the nuclear option) as long as my BB is a 71. I haven't measured it yet - which I know is the first step. Hah!
What would you do?
My bike has nasty-feeling bearings, so needs a total overhaul (front hub, BB, and headset before I can ride and evaluate it.
But I don't think your concern about damaging cotter pins has any merit. If you can get your existing crankset dismantled and rebuild it carefully using pins from Bikesmith Design, you will have an installation that is as good as new. Talk to Mark Stonich at Bikesmith Design about weight limits and durability - I don't think you have anything to worry about if you put it together right.
I don't know if it would help, but the BB shell could be cut down with facing tooling to 68 mm width, which would facilitate using spindles or cartridge BBs following the ISO BB standard. But we still have to deal with the 26 tpi versus the 24 tpi difference in thread pitch.
Last edited by Road Fan; 12-29-18 at 07:40 AM.
#15
Senior Member
This response is really late, sorry to awake the zombie. I never followed up to share what I finally did.
I decided to try to keep the original Raleigh threads without re-facing the Raleigh BB shell, and used a TA 314 BB spindle. If it didn't work there was always the LBS with a thread-cutter.
Getting the original cotters out was a very hard job, but the original spindle was only a little damaged. I was, however, very down on cotters! I dug out my TA box o' crap and found the 314 spindle diameter fit through the holes in the BB cups, and that the distance between the TA spindle bearing tracks was the same as that of the original Raleigh Industries BB spindle. Therefore, the TA 314 spindle and the TA 5-vis 50.4 mm crank arms would (and do) fit into the Raleigh BB shell and bearing set. I tried it without a chainring to see if the crank arm ends both cleared the chainstays by the same margin! Next I bolted on a 46-tooth TA chainring (touring), and its clearance and true spinning were great! Later on I checked the chainring widths and decided I needed the wider Pista chainring to match the rear sprocket, which required a ⅛ chain. I found a 49 tooth Pista ring and now that's what I have on the frame.
Current steps are to install the "new" alloy rear rim (Wolber/Super Champion Modele 58 40/32) on the original 1952 AW steel hub, an alloy FM from 1954, or an alloy AW from 1953. The FM is my preference, but we'll see if I can get the indicator out to check it. It feels funny. If it's a problem I might just go with the alloy AW. I also have to lace and true the original front rim.
It's not about weight-weenieing, but I think these changes will reduce the bike weight by about 1 pound. I'll never actually prove it, however. The tires will be wired on Pasela Tserv rather than Dunlop Special High-pressure. I guess they are about the same. A Kalloy seat pin replacing a rusty steel Raleigh Industries post gets probably another 2 ounces, at most. So far all the other parts are planned to be original 70 year old Raleigh Industries.
I decided to try to keep the original Raleigh threads without re-facing the Raleigh BB shell, and used a TA 314 BB spindle. If it didn't work there was always the LBS with a thread-cutter.
Getting the original cotters out was a very hard job, but the original spindle was only a little damaged. I was, however, very down on cotters! I dug out my TA box o' crap and found the 314 spindle diameter fit through the holes in the BB cups, and that the distance between the TA spindle bearing tracks was the same as that of the original Raleigh Industries BB spindle. Therefore, the TA 314 spindle and the TA 5-vis 50.4 mm crank arms would (and do) fit into the Raleigh BB shell and bearing set. I tried it without a chainring to see if the crank arm ends both cleared the chainstays by the same margin! Next I bolted on a 46-tooth TA chainring (touring), and its clearance and true spinning were great! Later on I checked the chainring widths and decided I needed the wider Pista chainring to match the rear sprocket, which required a ⅛ chain. I found a 49 tooth Pista ring and now that's what I have on the frame.
Current steps are to install the "new" alloy rear rim (Wolber/Super Champion Modele 58 40/32) on the original 1952 AW steel hub, an alloy FM from 1954, or an alloy AW from 1953. The FM is my preference, but we'll see if I can get the indicator out to check it. It feels funny. If it's a problem I might just go with the alloy AW. I also have to lace and true the original front rim.
It's not about weight-weenieing, but I think these changes will reduce the bike weight by about 1 pound. I'll never actually prove it, however. The tires will be wired on Pasela Tserv rather than Dunlop Special High-pressure. I guess they are about the same. A Kalloy seat pin replacing a rusty steel Raleigh Industries post gets probably another 2 ounces, at most. So far all the other parts are planned to be original 70 year old Raleigh Industries.
#16
Bikes are okay, I guess.
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Richmond, Virginia
Posts: 9,128
Bikes: Waterford Paramount Touring, Giant CFM-2, Raleigh Sports 3-speeds in M23 & L23, Schwinn Cimarron oddball build, Marin Palisades Trail dropbar conversion, Nishiki Cresta GT
Mentioned: 69 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2647 Post(s)
Liked 2,445 Times
in
1,557 Posts
Thanks for the update!
#17
ambulatory senior
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Peoria Il
Posts: 6,347
Bikes: Austro Daimler modified by Gugie! Raleigh Professional and lots of other bikes.
Mentioned: 76 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1953 Post(s)
Liked 3,633 Times
in
1,670 Posts
I put an aluminum alloy crank, stem, bars, seatpost and dual pivot brakes on an old triumph/Raleigh three speed. I even laced 590 cr18s to it and while it worked really well, it didn't make the bike super light. I have a supercourse set up as a three speed that kicks it's butt. They are both useful however.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Honey
Classic & Vintage
9
09-10-12 04:14 AM
fmt_biker
Classic & Vintage
27
12-14-10 05:19 AM