Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Tandem Cycling
Reload this Page >

Thudbuster ST vs LT

Notices
Tandem Cycling A bicycle built for two. Want to find out more about this wonderful world of tandems? Check out this forum to talk with other tandem enthusiasts. Captains and stokers welcome!

Thudbuster ST vs LT

Old 09-23-14, 10:37 AM
  #1  
Doggus
half man - half sheep
Thread Starter
 
Doggus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Big Mineral arm - Lake Texoma (Pottsboro, Tx)
Posts: 2,469
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thudbuster ST vs LT

It's a long story but we're getting back into tandem'ing. We used to use a Thudbuster ST. We've since lost that seat post so I need to pick up another. Is it worth it go with the long travel version for a heavier stoker (220-230lbs)? It's quite possible that with continued cycling that 220-230 could become 160-170 like it used to be but I'm not counting my chickens, and that won't be for a LONG time.
Doggus is offline  
Old 09-23-14, 01:44 PM
  #2  
fietsbob
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NW,Oregon Coast
Posts: 43,598

Bikes: 8

Mentioned: 197 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7607 Post(s)
Liked 1,355 Times in 862 Posts
Had a Long one on my Bike friday Buy .. since the spring elastomer is in 2 sections you could fine tune the spring rate-elatomer density as the situation changes

Purple is the most dense , black, Blue and grey less so and you can mix them + there is the long preload bolt running through them to adjust.

the ST also has a number of different densities you have to look at the number molded in . its like a clock dial .. 3,5,7,9

long travel does require the post extension be sufficiently Long enough.. cane creek site gives the Numbers.

Last edited by fietsbob; 09-23-14 at 01:47 PM.
fietsbob is offline  
Old 09-24-14, 07:02 AM
  #3  
Paul J
Senior Member
 
Paul J's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Upstate South Carolina
Posts: 1,092

Bikes: 1980's Spectrum 10 sp Campagnolo Centaur, 1990 Eddy Merckx 10 sp Campagnolo Centaur, Bushnell Tandem, Co-Motion Speedster Tandem

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 185 Post(s)
Liked 102 Times in 65 Posts
I you are riding on the road you will be fine with the ST. We have an ST on our tandem and it accommodates a good variety of stokers and that weight worked fine using the stiffest insert.
Paul J is offline  
Old 09-24-14, 10:06 PM
  #4  
mwandaw
Half Fast
 
mwandaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Southern California
Posts: 680

Bikes: A road bike and a tandem road bike

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Liked 7 Times in 2 Posts
My wife (and stoker) used an LT for a while. The suspension was very comfortable, but she found herself bouncing so much that she gave it up. Our cadence is typically 80-90, so that might have had something to do with the bouncing. She weighs much less than your stoker, but as fietsbob pointed out, there are a variety of elastomers available.
mwandaw is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MountainCruiser
Tandem Cycling
13
05-08-18 07:32 PM
alias5000
Tandem Cycling
28
09-05-17 08:49 PM
Sprout97
Tandem Cycling
18
01-14-17 05:04 PM
Venturous
Tandem Cycling
15
08-29-10 05:50 PM
tdbmd
Tandem Cycling
9
03-25-10 10:19 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.