Why is my gym stationary bike so hard at such low watts?
#1
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2021
Posts: 4
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Why is my gym stationary bike so hard at such low watts?
I would say im in pretty decent shape usually running 40 miles per week. I have been having a lot of hip issues lately so I have resorted to the indoor bike to help with that. Today, for instance, I was pushing only around 110-115 watts at resistance around 5 and let me tell you it wasn't necessarily hard but it defiiently was not easy either. My rpm generally was around low 90s. Am I really that out of shape aerobically to only being pushing low 100s of watts for a max of around 20-30 min???
#2
Senior Member
I wouldn't put much stock in a stationary bike power readout. Your riding position probably isn't optimal either. As long as you get your heart rate up and work your legs hard you've accomplished something. I put my bike on either a magnetic or hydraulic resistance trainer I the winter, when it's too nasty to ride. The resistance feels like climbing all the time. I end up with a low cadence, high torque ride. I've got no power reading, so I go by heart rate.
#3
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,613
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10956 Post(s)
Liked 7,486 Times
in
4,187 Posts
Cycling is a different type of aerobic conditioning than running or swimming. I can ride 100mi and stand on every climb, but tell me to run a 5k and I will accuse you of war crimes.
Low 90s RPM is a good quick general cadence, so if thats what you are producing for power at low 90s, then yeah its probably a conditioning thing.
...or a high use gym bike isnt calibrated accurately. crazy thought.
Low 90s RPM is a good quick general cadence, so if thats what you are producing for power at low 90s, then yeah its probably a conditioning thing.
...or a high use gym bike isnt calibrated accurately. crazy thought.
#4
Klaatu..Verata..Necktie?
Join Date: May 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 17,960
Bikes: Litespeed Ultimate, Ultegra; Canyon Endurace, 105; Battaglin MAX, Chorus; Bianchi 928 Veloce; Ritchey Road Logic, Dura Ace; Cannondale R500 RX100; Schwinn Circuit, Sante; Lotus Supreme, Dura Ace
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10424 Post(s)
Liked 11,896 Times
in
6,094 Posts
I find it really difficult to continue to put out power on a stationary trainer without something like Zwift. Multiple winters, I started out with the promise of keeping in shape by using the trainer, but I'd find it excruciating trying to keep my HR over 120bpm. By contrast, on the road I had difficulty keeping my HR DOWN TO 120. I could barely make it to 40 minutes, and then only by blasting rock and roll with a fast beat, and at the end of the time I was more mentally exhausted than physically,.
__________________
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."
"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."
"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,424
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4399 Post(s)
Liked 4,846 Times
in
2,999 Posts
Cycling is a different type of aerobic conditioning than running or swimming. I can ride 100mi and stand on every climb, but tell me to run a 5k and I will accuse you of war crimes.
Low 90s RPM is a good quick general cadence, so if thats what you are producing for power at low 90s, then yeah its probably a conditioning thing.
...or a high use gym bike isnt calibrated accurately. crazy thought.
Low 90s RPM is a good quick general cadence, so if thats what you are producing for power at low 90s, then yeah its probably a conditioning thing.
...or a high use gym bike isnt calibrated accurately. crazy thought.
Cycling and running are oddly very different and fitness doesn't seem to cross over as much as your would intuitively expect.
#6
Senior Member
How many watts do you think you should be producing vs what the trainer is showing?
Likes For BlazingPedals:
#7
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2021
Posts: 4
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I would like to assume around 150-160 watts at the amount of effort I am putting in on that resistance, but since everyone is clarifying that running and cycling are quite different aerobically, I may just not be fit enough for the bike just yet.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur
Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times
in
1,417 Posts
What indoor bike is it? Does it have a means of calibrating the power meter?
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,874
Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8
Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1856 Post(s)
Liked 664 Times
in
506 Posts
I would say im in pretty decent shape usually running 40 miles per week. I have been having a lot of hip issues lately so I have resorted to the indoor bike to help with that. Today, for instance, I was pushing only around 110-115 watts at resistance around 5 and let me tell you it wasn't necessarily hard but it defiiently was not easy either. My rpm generally was around low 90s. Am I really that out of shape aerobically to only being pushing low 100s of watts for a max of around 20-30 min???
Maybe it needs to be adjusted, repaired, or overhauled.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,874
Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8
Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1856 Post(s)
Liked 664 Times
in
506 Posts
I would say im in pretty decent shape usually running 40 miles per week. I have been having a lot of hip issues lately so I have resorted to the indoor bike to help with that. Today, for instance, I was pushing only around 110-115 watts at resistance around 5 and let me tell you it wasn't necessarily hard but it defiiently was not easy either. My rpm generally was around low 90s. Am I really that out of shape aerobically to only being pushing low 100s of watts for a max of around 20-30 min???
Maybe it needs to be adjusted, repaired, or overhauled. How does it make drag?
#11
Le Crocodile
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Santa Barbara Calif.
Posts: 1,873
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 370 Post(s)
Liked 787 Times
in
311 Posts
I think that your expectation of performance (watts) is unrealistic at this time.
If you ride a bicycle with a PM, you will see VERY quickly that the watts you have expected to produce don't materialize in reality. The "internet" is rife with inflated power numbers, and this muddies the waters on any kind of realistic expectations.
If you can average 130 watts (as a newish cyclist) on a relatively flat course over the span of an hour, then you are doing just fine, and are fitter than most cyclists that you will encounter.
If you ride a bicycle with a PM, you will see VERY quickly that the watts you have expected to produce don't materialize in reality. The "internet" is rife with inflated power numbers, and this muddies the waters on any kind of realistic expectations.
If you can average 130 watts (as a newish cyclist) on a relatively flat course over the span of an hour, then you are doing just fine, and are fitter than most cyclists that you will encounter.
Likes For Erzulis Boat:
#13
Newbie racer
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 3,406
Bikes: Propel, red is faster
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1575 Post(s)
Liked 1,569 Times
in
974 Posts
40 mpw running, I'd simply say "it's an exercise bike". They just aren't accurate.
You're likely stronger. 40mpw I'd suspect someone after a single week of riding a bike could do some solid power. While running doesn't translate immediately or directly, it does translate more than 100w or so. So, maybe go by HR instead for that bike and just take the workouts on it "as is".
Maybe it is only reading half the power from one side or something. Dunno.
You're likely stronger. 40mpw I'd suspect someone after a single week of riding a bike could do some solid power. While running doesn't translate immediately or directly, it does translate more than 100w or so. So, maybe go by HR instead for that bike and just take the workouts on it "as is".
Maybe it is only reading half the power from one side or something. Dunno.
#14
Meet me at spin class!!!!
I find spin class very difficult too and I'm taking class for over a dozen years now. I'm in decent shape and relatively strong.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,424
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4399 Post(s)
Liked 4,846 Times
in
2,999 Posts
I think that's a very realistic expectation for someone with your general fitness, regularly running 40 miles per week. I agree with those suggesting the trainer is out of spec.
#16
serious cyclist
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Austin
Posts: 21,147
Bikes: S1, R2, P2
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9334 Post(s)
Liked 3,679 Times
in
2,026 Posts
Given how easily I’ve gotten gym bikes to show over a kw (my highest power on a real bike is ~750), I would pay literally zero attention to the number it shows.
#17
Randomhead
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,396
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,696 Times
in
2,517 Posts
Unless you want to spend money on it, for example putting a real power meter on it, I would just ignore the numbers and ride at a wattage that allows you to do the workout you want.
I feel like my trainer is too difficult to pedal for the wattage it's reading, but it could be just that my condition isn't great.
I feel like my trainer is too difficult to pedal for the wattage it's reading, but it could be just that my condition isn't great.
#18
Full Member
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: Ellay
Posts: 340
Bikes: 2002 Eddy Merckx Team SC Resto-Mod; 2019 Ibis Hakka MX; 2017 Spot Brand Ajax Belt Drive
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 169 Post(s)
Liked 192 Times
in
121 Posts
Basically what everyone else said: the power reading on the gym bike is likely inaccurate (possibly even wildly inaccurate), and you are probably not quite as bike fit as you expected.