Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > General Cycling Discussion
Reload this Page >

Carbon Fiber vs Aluminum and Designated Use riders

Search
Notices
General Cycling Discussion Have a cycling related question or comment that doesn't fit in one of the other specialty forums? Drop on in and post in here! When possible, please select the forum above that most fits your post!

Carbon Fiber vs Aluminum and Designated Use riders

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-07-21, 08:13 AM
  #26  
bruce19
Senior Member
 
bruce19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Lebanon (Liberty Hill), CT
Posts: 8,473

Bikes: CAAD 12, MASI Gran Criterium S, Colnago World Cup CX & Guru steel

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1743 Post(s)
Liked 1,281 Times in 740 Posts
Originally Posted by GlennR;22088533
Life is short, buy the bike of your dreams and ride the crap out of it.

[url
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cBWAHSlWQGI[/url]
I will be 75 in June. This is kind of where I'm at too.
bruce19 is offline  
Likes For bruce19:
Old 06-07-21, 08:34 AM
  #27  
rosefarts
With a mighty wind
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 2,591
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1087 Post(s)
Liked 862 Times in 490 Posts
So you’re on medication that drops your blood pressure and can make you light headed. And this has caused a wreck at least once. Also, wrecks aren’t infrequent enough for you that you are considering a bike based on crashing it.

Thats insane.

It was about 12 years ago that I last wrecked. Unless racing, you really shouldn’t taste the ground. Even in racing, there are strategies to avoid it.

We aren’t talking about foot and shoulder dabs on mountain bike.

I think a three wheeled recumbent is your best/only option until you get this worked out.

FWIW, my mil got concussed at about your age and 5 years later still deals with TBI. Memory loss, balance, sleeping, concentration.

Don’t sweat the frame, worry about your body.
rosefarts is online now  
Likes For rosefarts:
Old 06-07-21, 10:48 AM
  #28  
Phil_gretz
Zip tie Karen
 
Phil_gretz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Fair Oaks Ranch, TX
Posts: 7,004

Bikes: '13 Motobecane Fantom29 HT, '16 Motobecane Turino Pro Disc, '18 Velobuild VB-R-022, '21 Tsunami SNM-100

Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1465 Post(s)
Liked 1,542 Times in 806 Posts
Originally Posted by rosefarts
So you’re on medication that drops your blood pressure and can make you light headed. And this has caused a wreck at least once. Also, wrecks aren’t infrequent enough for you that you are considering a bike based on crashing it.

Thats insane...I think a three wheeled recumbent is your best/only option until you get this worked out...
This was my immediate thought also. I didn't have the guts to come out and say it. You did. Bravo.
Phil_gretz is offline  
Old 06-07-21, 10:51 AM
  #29  
icemilkcoffee 
Senior Member
 
icemilkcoffee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,394
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1561 Post(s)
Liked 1,734 Times in 974 Posts
Every aluminum bike on the market today, has a CF fork. You will not find one without a CF fork unless you are shopping department store level bikes. So if you really think carbon fiber is all that dangerous, then you need to turn back the clock 30 years and buy yourself a pure aluminum bike with Al frame and fork.

BTW I echo the other poster that riding TT aero bars on an MUP is a bad idea. Whether the bike is aluminum or carbon is not the issue here.
icemilkcoffee is offline  
Old 06-07-21, 11:25 AM
  #30  
blacknbluebikes 
Senior Member
 
blacknbluebikes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: NJ, USA
Posts: 1,282

Bikes: two blacks, a blue and a white.

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 445 Post(s)
Liked 847 Times in 410 Posts
In a crash, it's rarely the bike that hurts you. Does happen, so do winning lottery tickets and lightning strikes, but... probably not you, not ever.
blacknbluebikes is offline  
Old 06-07-21, 11:56 AM
  #31  
Maelochs
Senior Member
 
Maelochs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,489

Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE

Mentioned: 144 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7652 Post(s)
Liked 3,473 Times in 1,834 Posts
Originally Posted by cubewheels
I agree with you. I deal with poor odds, riding in a high population density city with very poor quality roads. I've been hit by motorcycle courier several times in just one year, half of the time, I was stopped at the intersection in daytime with lights on! They were distracted by the phone GPS everytime!
Not to judge (much) but after the first impact, I would make darn sure I was never in the impact zone.
Originally Posted by cubewheels
A few collisions were with cars when they turned into the bike lane right next to me.
I did daily commuting and utility riding for a decade-and-a-half in what was, at the time, the most deadly cycling city in the lower 48. Again, not to be too judgmental, but how much pain does it take to wake you up? I learned really early how to not get hit by cars--- and this was in a city where the cars would sometimes aim at you and think it was funny.

"Operator error" sounds harsh when someone is nursing a broken body and a broken bike, but if the same accident happens twice, it isn't an accident, it's operator error.
Originally Posted by cubewheels
Many riders I see here don't take chances with their carbon bikes riding them around the city.
Odd, in all the cities in which I have ridden, I have never seen that. When commuters do use a commuter bike it is because it is hard to put sturdy racks and heavy loads on lightweight CF bikes---or because they park in high-crime areas and use throwaway bikers, which I don't recommend, but if you live on a college campus, I guess it makes sense.

Lot so f folks commute on CF bikes. I have read the accounts of posters here. I just did it a few days ago because I found my working bike had a flat and I didn't have time to swap in a new tube. (Riders do drive to rural areas to ride, but not to save their CF bikes---but because they want to ride fast and/or in groups which is not convenient in urban environments.)

Here is the key, which others have mentions:

DON'T FREAKING CRASH.

As @rosefarts puts it,
Originally Posted by rosefarts
..... wrecks aren’t infrequent enough for you that you are considering a bike based on crashing it.

Thats insane. ......Unless racing, you really shouldn’t taste the ground.
The idea that riding a bicycle involves frequent crashes is fine .... send me your particulars and I will take out a large life-insurance policy on you.

Seriously, why crash? Riding a bike is Not that hard, and even riding in dense traffic is not That hard. I have been riding in traffic since I was eight years old. And I have ridden in some hellaciously bad traffic. learn how----PLEASE. Much joy as I might get from teasing you here, I sincerely don't want to hear about how you became a statistic in a thread on A&S.

To repeat---YOU SHOULD NOT CRASH. You shouldn't fall over, ride off the shoulder, get hit, get squeezed off the road ... You should develop sufficient situational awareness that you can tell when a car is coming, and basically judge the speed and direction, and act appropriately. It is not hard to do. if it were we'd lose a lot more than 1,000 riders per year.

And yes, there is always the unexpected and the uncontrollable---but as some say, "Chance favors the prepared." Somehow in more than fifty years of riding in traffic I can count on the fingers of one hand the times I have been hit of forced off the road where I was not at fault to some degree. Head up, eyes open, so you can get home.

You should adjust your medication so that you don't pass out whether riding or not

Imagine how some family will feel if you fell in front of them and they ran you over. You could scar those people for life, because you didn't learn how to ride and/or didn't want to accept your physical limitations. That is selfish, and in fact suicidal. Don't do that.

As for the fictions about frame material .... it's all BS and we all know it. Any impact severe enough to shatter CF into lethally sharp shards has already messed you up. And I have gotten hurt from hitting undamaged, unbroken bike parts--crashing onto metal is not somehow safer or better than crashing onto high-tech composite. Hitting a chain ring will gash you no matter what the frame is made of. Anyone care to compile a list of riders killed by CF shards? We'll wait.

The takeaway here is ---STOP CRASHING. If you think steel is somehow safer, buy steel. There are some beautiful steel bikes out there. Shoot, buy a bamboo bike. Ride in peace and joy. But if you think one sort of bike is safer than another in a crash, you are not well mentally. It isn't the bike, it's the pavement which hurts. Stay off the pavement. Stay On the bike---whatever it is made of.

Last edited by Maelochs; 06-07-21 at 12:07 PM.
Maelochs is offline  
Likes For Maelochs:
Old 06-07-21, 12:09 PM
  #32  
Eric F 
Habitual User
 
Eric F's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Altadena, CA
Posts: 7,982

Bikes: 2023 Niner RLT 9 RDO, 2018 Trek Procaliber 9.9 RSL, 2018 Storck Fascenario.3 Platinum, 2003 Time VX Special Pro, 2001 Colnago VIP, 1999 Trek 9900 singlespeed, 1977 Nishiki ONP

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4944 Post(s)
Liked 8,085 Times in 3,825 Posts
Originally Posted by AlmostTrick
If CF isn't any more fragile or likely to fail than metal, why all the "Is this scratch/nick/scrape/whatever on my CF bike safe to ride?" threads on BF?
Because a shocking amount of people will believe unfounded statements by those who are willfully ignorant, or have an agenda.
__________________
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
Eric F is online now  
Likes For Eric F:
Old 06-07-21, 12:23 PM
  #33  
Eric F 
Habitual User
 
Eric F's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Altadena, CA
Posts: 7,982

Bikes: 2023 Niner RLT 9 RDO, 2018 Trek Procaliber 9.9 RSL, 2018 Storck Fascenario.3 Platinum, 2003 Time VX Special Pro, 2001 Colnago VIP, 1999 Trek 9900 singlespeed, 1977 Nishiki ONP

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4944 Post(s)
Liked 8,085 Times in 3,825 Posts
Originally Posted by terrymorse
The one weakness of carbon fiber is it doesn't like to be crushed or dented. If you expect to be smashing your frame against rocks, then pick aluminum.
In my experience with aluminum-framed MTBs, they were a lot more delicate to impacts to the sides of tubes than any of my CF bikes. One was a crushed and cracked seat stay after tipping over in a singletrack rock garden. The other was a crushed top tube against a tree in another-low speed incident. The CF MTBs that followed proved to be a lot more resistant to the battering and abuse.
__________________
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
Eric F is online now  
Likes For Eric F:
Old 06-07-21, 12:26 PM
  #34  
Rolla
Guest
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Posts: 2,888
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1346 Post(s)
Liked 3,270 Times in 1,439 Posts
Originally Posted by icemilkcoffee
Every aluminum bike on the market today, has a CF fork. You will not find one without a CF fork unless you are shopping department store level bikes.
That's not even remotely true. I can think of ten off the top of my head: Kona Dew, Dew Plus, Dew Deluxe, Coco; Specialized Sirrrus 1.0, Sirrus X 2.0,; Trek FX 1 Stagger, FX 2 Disc; Giant Escape, Escape 3.
Rolla is offline  
Old 06-07-21, 12:33 PM
  #35  
Eric F 
Habitual User
 
Eric F's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Altadena, CA
Posts: 7,982

Bikes: 2023 Niner RLT 9 RDO, 2018 Trek Procaliber 9.9 RSL, 2018 Storck Fascenario.3 Platinum, 2003 Time VX Special Pro, 2001 Colnago VIP, 1999 Trek 9900 singlespeed, 1977 Nishiki ONP

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4944 Post(s)
Liked 8,085 Times in 3,825 Posts
Originally Posted by wolfchild
The aluminum frame bend and deformed, while carbon frame shattered and failed catastrophically...I'll stick with aluminum and steel.
Actually, no it didn't. In the test of the CF frame, you could hear popping noises that got increasingly frequent until the moment of complete failure. That's the popping of individual CF strands in the material matrix. This is a slow failure, and is the nature of CF material. The ultimate failure point for CF was SIGNIFICANTLY higher than aluminum, yet somehow you think it's a safer choice? I don't follow that logic at all.
__________________
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions

Last edited by Eric F; 06-07-21 at 02:45 PM.
Eric F is online now  
Likes For Eric F:
Old 06-07-21, 12:39 PM
  #36  
RJM
I'm doing it wrong.
 
RJM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,875

Bikes: Rivendell Appaloosa, Rivendell Frank Jones Sr., Trek Fuel EX9, Kona Jake the Snake CR, Niner Sir9

Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9742 Post(s)
Liked 2,812 Times in 1,664 Posts
I was riding a Trek Emonda SL6 in a group ride and suffered a crash. A rider in front of me hit the rear wheel of the rider in front of him, he went down and I went over him and completely wiped out. The only thing broke on my bike were my wheels, which were nice aluminum wheels made by November bicycle with Hed Belgium rims and White Industries hubs. Great wheelset right up until the crash. The Hed rims got very beat up and dented, but I was able to finish the ride even though the front braking suffered. No issues with the frame or other components which I rode for a couple more years and then sold to a friend and she is still riding it today. I was impressed with the carbon frame for surviving that crash and that was a lightweight "climbing" frame from Trek.

Since then I've gone through a few mountain bikes - one aluminum, one carbon, and one steel. The only one that broke was the aluminum one at the chainstay which had to be replace under warranty. It was a Kona Hei Hei.

My experience has been that carbon is a really great material for a bike frame depending on how it was made and who made it and that aluminum is not any more able to withstand a wreck than carbon....and steel rules.
RJM is offline  
Old 06-07-21, 01:03 PM
  #37  
Rolla
Guest
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Posts: 2,888
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1346 Post(s)
Liked 3,270 Times in 1,439 Posts
Originally Posted by RJM
... and steel rules.
QFT.
Rolla is offline  
Old 06-07-21, 03:29 PM
  #38  
icemilkcoffee 
Senior Member
 
icemilkcoffee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,394
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1561 Post(s)
Liked 1,734 Times in 974 Posts
Originally Posted by Rolla
That's not even remotely true. I can think of ten off the top of my head: Kona Dew, Dew Plus, Dew Deluxe, Coco; Specialized Sirrrus 1.0, Sirrus X 2.0,; Trek FX 1 Stagger, FX 2 Disc; Giant Escape, Escape 3.
Note that all the bikes you've listed are all hybrid type bikes. When it comes to road bikes, what I said is true- all aluminum bikes come with carbon forks.
icemilkcoffee is offline  
Old 06-07-21, 03:45 PM
  #39  
rosefarts
With a mighty wind
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 2,591
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1087 Post(s)
Liked 862 Times in 490 Posts
Originally Posted by icemilkcoffee
Note that all the bikes you've listed are all hybrid type bikes. When it comes to road bikes, what I said is true- all aluminum bikes come with carbon forks.
There are so many boutique frame builders that you really can’t say this.

Certainly in 2021 you can buy a steel frame with steel fork with all the modern features. You can even get that steel fork with a carbon steerer tube. I’m sure there is some goofball aluminum builder out there too.

I think an accurate statement might be if you changed it to “major brand aluminum frame sold at a shop” thereby excluding the custom stuff and the department store stuff. In this case, it might be true.
rosefarts is online now  
Old 06-07-21, 03:50 PM
  #40  
Rolla
Guest
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Posts: 2,888
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1346 Post(s)
Liked 3,270 Times in 1,439 Posts
Originally Posted by icemilkcoffee
Note that all the bikes you've listed are all hybrid type bikes. When it comes to road bikes, what I said is true- all aluminum bikes come with carbon forks.
LOL. I was wondering how you were going to try to squirm your way out of your ludicrous claim that "every aluminum bike on the market today has a CF fork."

Of course, you're even wrong about road bikes, but don't let that stop you.
Rolla is offline  
Old 06-07-21, 04:02 PM
  #41  
icemilkcoffee 
Senior Member
 
icemilkcoffee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,394
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1561 Post(s)
Liked 1,734 Times in 974 Posts
Originally Posted by Rolla
LOL. I was wondering how you were going to try to squirm your way out of your ludicrous claim that "every aluminum bike on the market today has a CF fork."
But the OP was inquiring about road bikes.

Originally Posted by Rolla
Of course, you're even wrong about road bikes, but don't let that stop you.
Do you understand the concept of 'the exception proves the rule'? If you had to go to great lengths to find an exception to some rule, that means that rule generally holds.
There are 1000's of makes and models of bikes in the world. Of course you can find a few exceptions to every rule. But the point is, if you just look at the bikes that are reasonably mainstream here in the US, without going to obscurities and esoterica, all the aluminum framed road bikes have carbon forks.
icemilkcoffee is offline  
Likes For icemilkcoffee:
Old 06-07-21, 04:14 PM
  #42  
Eric F 
Habitual User
 
Eric F's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Altadena, CA
Posts: 7,982

Bikes: 2023 Niner RLT 9 RDO, 2018 Trek Procaliber 9.9 RSL, 2018 Storck Fascenario.3 Platinum, 2003 Time VX Special Pro, 2001 Colnago VIP, 1999 Trek 9900 singlespeed, 1977 Nishiki ONP

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4944 Post(s)
Liked 8,085 Times in 3,825 Posts
Originally Posted by Rolla
LOL. I was wondering how you were going to try to squirm your way out of your ludicrous claim that "every aluminum bike on the market today has a CF fork."

Of course, you're even wrong about road bikes, but don't let that stop you.
You're nit-picking semantics for no gain. Even if he's only 99% right, the point is still valid. CF has PROVEN itself to be a reliable, durable, high-performance material for frames and forks (and lots of other bike parts) for decades, and a metal fork on a metal frame road bike has become more of an exception than the standard....and that's not a new thing.
__________________
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
Eric F is online now  
Likes For Eric F:
Old 06-07-21, 04:19 PM
  #43  
Rolla
Guest
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Posts: 2,888
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1346 Post(s)
Liked 3,270 Times in 1,439 Posts
Originally Posted by icemilkcoffee
If you had to go to great lengths to find an exception to some rule, that means that rule generally holds.
I didn't go to any lengths. I looked at the bikes my shop sells and named ten that didn't fit your original claim.

Originally Posted by icemilkcoffee
if you just look at the bikes that are reasonably mainstream
This is rich. First it was EVERY aluminum bike. Then it was every aluminum ROAD bike. Now it's every REASONABLY MAINSTREAM aluminum road bike.

Keep whittling it down and you'll eventually be right.
Rolla is offline  
Old 06-07-21, 04:24 PM
  #44  
Rolla
Guest
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Posts: 2,888
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1346 Post(s)
Liked 3,270 Times in 1,439 Posts
Originally Posted by Eric F
You're nit-picking semantics for no gain. Even if he's only 99% right, the point is still valid. CF has PROVEN itself to be a reliable, durable, high-performance material for frames and forks (and lots of other bike parts) for decades, and a metal fork on a metal frame road bike has become more of an exception than the standard....and that's not a new thing.
I'm sure he appreciates your defense, but

a) That's not what semantics means.
b) I'm not arguing that carbon isn't a good material, I'm just disproving his erroneous statement that "every aluminum bike on the market has a carbon fork."
c) If he wasn't wrong, he wouldn't keep moving the goalposts.
Rolla is offline  
Old 06-07-21, 04:41 PM
  #45  
Eric F 
Habitual User
 
Eric F's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Altadena, CA
Posts: 7,982

Bikes: 2023 Niner RLT 9 RDO, 2018 Trek Procaliber 9.9 RSL, 2018 Storck Fascenario.3 Platinum, 2003 Time VX Special Pro, 2001 Colnago VIP, 1999 Trek 9900 singlespeed, 1977 Nishiki ONP

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4944 Post(s)
Liked 8,085 Times in 3,825 Posts
Originally Posted by Rolla
I'm sure he appreciates your defense, but

a) That's not what semantics means.
b) I'm not arguing that carbon isn't a good material, I'm just disproving his erroneous statement that "every aluminum bike on the market has a carbon fork."
c) If he wasn't wrong, he wouldn't keep moving the goalposts.
Does proving that he over-stated his position a little change anything? Nope. He still didn't miss by much, and the intent of his point is still 100% valid.
__________________
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
Eric F is online now  
Likes For Eric F:
Old 06-07-21, 04:47 PM
  #46  
spelger
Senior Member
 
spelger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: reno, nv
Posts: 2,299

Bikes: yes, i have one

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1137 Post(s)
Liked 1,182 Times in 687 Posts
Originally Posted by Phil_gretz
Quoting:

"My
usual route is the bike path..."

and

"...while
laid out on my aerobars."

What the heck? Why in the world would you be riding aero bars on a multi use path? Are you time trialing?
The most recent MUP that opened near me is about 5 miles long and usually i am the only one riding on it so i often am on the aero bars. what is not to like? very smooth and cars are about 20-30 feet away moving at about 70MPH. there are 2 1/2 intersections that i need to go through.
spelger is offline  
Old 06-07-21, 04:52 PM
  #47  
spelger
Senior Member
 
spelger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: reno, nv
Posts: 2,299

Bikes: yes, i have one

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1137 Post(s)
Liked 1,182 Times in 687 Posts
Originally Posted by Maelochs
Not to judge (much) but after the first impact, I would make darn sure I was never in the impact zone. I did daily commuting and utility riding for a decade-and-a-half in what was, at the time, the most deadly cycling city in the lower 48. Again, not to be too judgmental, but how much pain does it take to wake you up? I learned really early how to not get hit by cars--- and this was in a city where the cars would sometimes aim at you and think it was funny.

"Operator error" sounds harsh when someone is nursing a broken body and a broken bike, but if the same accident happens twice, it isn't an accident, it's operator error. Odd, in all the cities in which I have ridden, I have never seen that. When commuters do use a commuter bike it is because it is hard to put sturdy racks and heavy loads on lightweight CF bikes---or because they park in high-crime areas and use throwaway bikers, which I don't recommend, but if you live on a college campus, I guess it makes sense.

Lot so f folks commute on CF bikes. I have read the accounts of posters here. I just did it a few days ago because I found my working bike had a flat and I didn't have time to swap in a new tube. (Riders do drive to rural areas to ride, but not to save their CF bikes---but because they want to ride fast and/or in groups which is not convenient in urban environments.)

Here is the key, which others have mentions:

DON'T FREAKING CRASH.

As @rosefarts puts it, The idea that riding a bicycle involves frequent crashes is fine .... send me your particulars and I will take out a large life-insurance policy on you.

Seriously, why crash? Riding a bike is Not that hard, and even riding in dense traffic is not That hard. I have been riding in traffic since I was eight years old. And I have ridden in some hellaciously bad traffic. learn how----PLEASE. Much joy as I might get from teasing you here, I sincerely don't want to hear about how you became a statistic in a thread on A&S.

To repeat---YOU SHOULD NOT CRASH. You shouldn't fall over, ride off the shoulder, get hit, get squeezed off the road ... You should develop sufficient situational awareness that you can tell when a car is coming, and basically judge the speed and direction, and act appropriately. It is not hard to do. if it were we'd lose a lot more than 1,000 riders per year.

And yes, there is always the unexpected and the uncontrollable---but as some say, "Chance favors the prepared." Somehow in more than fifty years of riding in traffic I can count on the fingers of one hand the times I have been hit of forced off the road where I was not at fault to some degree. Head up, eyes open, so you can get home.

You should adjust your medication so that you don't pass out whether riding or not

Imagine how some family will feel if you fell in front of them and they ran you over. You could scar those people for life, because you didn't learn how to ride and/or didn't want to accept your physical limitations. That is selfish, and in fact suicidal. Don't do that.

As for the fictions about frame material .... it's all BS and we all know it. Any impact severe enough to shatter CF into lethally sharp shards has already messed you up. And I have gotten hurt from hitting undamaged, unbroken bike parts--crashing onto metal is not somehow safer or better than crashing onto high-tech composite. Hitting a chain ring will gash you no matter what the frame is made of. Anyone care to compile a list of riders killed by CF shards? We'll wait.

The takeaway here is ---STOP CRASHING. If you think steel is somehow safer, buy steel. There are some beautiful steel bikes out there. Shoot, buy a bamboo bike. Ride in peace and joy. But if you think one sort of bike is safer than another in a crash, you are not well mentally. It isn't the bike, it's the pavement which hurts. Stay off the pavement. Stay On the bike---whatever it is made of.
let's not be too hard on the guy, ever been to manila?
spelger is offline  
Likes For spelger:
Old 06-07-21, 05:16 PM
  #48  
Rolla
Guest
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Posts: 2,888
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1346 Post(s)
Liked 3,270 Times in 1,439 Posts
Originally Posted by Eric F
Does proving that he over-stated his position a little change anything? Nope. He still didn't miss by much, and the intent of his point is still 100% valid.
Who needs integrity, as long as you make your point, right? Keep fighting the good fight for exaggeration and inaccuracy.
Rolla is offline  
Old 06-08-21, 08:24 AM
  #49  
Cpn_Dunsel
Senior Member
 
Cpn_Dunsel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Posts: 168
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 124 Post(s)
Liked 134 Times in 61 Posts
Originally Posted by Rolla
QFT.

Steel is real ....

... heavy.
Cpn_Dunsel is offline  
Likes For Cpn_Dunsel:
Old 06-08-21, 08:44 AM
  #50  
Paul Barnard
For The Fun of It
 
Paul Barnard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Louisissippi Coast
Posts: 5,852

Bikes: Lynskey GR300, Lynskey Backroad, Litespeed T6, Lynskey MT29, Burley Duet

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2135 Post(s)
Liked 1,646 Times in 828 Posts
My bicycles are made from neither beer cans nor fishing poles.
Paul Barnard is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.