Back in the Day, was it normal to have +3" of saddle to handlebar drop?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Davis CA
Posts: 3,959
Bikes: Surly Cross-Check, '85 Giant road bike (unrecogizable fixed-gear conversion
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
3 Posts
Back in the Day, was it normal to have +3" of saddle to handlebar drop?
I have two old road frames. One is a bit small for me (56cm) and the other is bit large for me (60cm)
One each one, with my seat raised to the proper Lemond Formula-based height, and the stem raised up to the minimum insertion point, I still have about 3" of drop on each bike.
I'm not surprised the 56cm Miyata has that much drop, but the other bike in an old Medici touring frame.
I know for a fact the larger frame is not too small for me. It's larger than the 58cm Surly Crosscheck that fits me perfectly. On that bike, I have 1" of drop.
One each one, with my seat raised to the proper Lemond Formula-based height, and the stem raised up to the minimum insertion point, I still have about 3" of drop on each bike.
I'm not surprised the 56cm Miyata has that much drop, but the other bike in an old Medici touring frame.
I know for a fact the larger frame is not too small for me. It's larger than the 58cm Surly Crosscheck that fits me perfectly. On that bike, I have 1" of drop.
#2
Dropped
Doesn't make much sense to me. Do you have profile photos of both bikes as currently set up? Are the stems the same length above min insertion? Do either have negative rise? The Medici might have a higher BB, but 6 centimeters worth? Higher BB would raise the top tube anyway...sure it's not a TT funny bike?
#3
Dropped
Okay, I just clicked on your sig links. Is that how they are currently set up? Not the best views to compare, but it appears the Medici stem clamp is about level with your saddle?
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: vermont
Posts: 3,081
Bikes: Many
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
10 Posts
Drop seems to go in and out of fashion depending on who is designing and spec'ing the bikes. I remember MTB's having 3" of drop in '90 or so.
#5
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Davis CA
Posts: 3,959
Bikes: Surly Cross-Check, '85 Giant road bike (unrecogizable fixed-gear conversion
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
3 Posts
I was just spending some time re-fitting my old road bikes with traditional quill stems. So the pics are very out of date. Yes, if I use a stem adapter and use a threadless stem flipped up, then I can have my bars nearly level with the saddle. But since my quill stems are fairly short, I was thinking they would work since the bars would be lower, but closer.
I also wonder if it could be something with my geometry. I have pretty long legs, so I jack my saddle up pretty high. But on the Medici frame, my standover clearance is pretty much zero. My long legs make my torso short, but I also have pretty long arms.
I'm hoping the bike feels OK when I go out and ride it like this. I haven't ridden either of my old frames in a while.
I also wonder if it could be something with my geometry. I have pretty long legs, so I jack my saddle up pretty high. But on the Medici frame, my standover clearance is pretty much zero. My long legs make my torso short, but I also have pretty long arms.
I'm hoping the bike feels OK when I go out and ride it like this. I haven't ridden either of my old frames in a while.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 2,067
Bikes: 84 Pinarello Trevisio, 86 Guerciotti SLX, 96 Specialized Stumpjumper, 2010 Surly Cross Check, 88 Centurion Prestige, 73 Raleigh Sports, GT Force, Bridgestone MB4
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 278 Post(s)
Liked 71 Times
in
56 Posts
Saddle to bar drop is not a fashion statement, it is in fact the result of fitting for performance vs fitting for comfort.
It does seem like a lot of people suddenly think they need to jack the handlebars up higher than the saddle but the fact is that 3 to 4 inches of drop are entirely normal and common on a bike set up for and designed for road racing and for many people, including me, is more comfortable. I could not imagine riding a bike with the bars even with the saddle or higher, that must be awfully uncomfortable with all that seat pressure not to mention horribly inefficient not only from aerodynamics but also from the point of human physiology.
It does seem like a lot of people suddenly think they need to jack the handlebars up higher than the saddle but the fact is that 3 to 4 inches of drop are entirely normal and common on a bike set up for and designed for road racing and for many people, including me, is more comfortable. I could not imagine riding a bike with the bars even with the saddle or higher, that must be awfully uncomfortable with all that seat pressure not to mention horribly inefficient not only from aerodynamics but also from the point of human physiology.
#7
Señor Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hardy, VA
Posts: 17,923
Bikes: Mostly English - predominantly Raleighs
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1491 Post(s)
Liked 1,090 Times
in
638 Posts
Back in the day (1970's), the drop was not as extreme as it is today - either for competitive, or recreational riding. For competitive riding, 3" of drop was well within the normal range. For recreational riding - not so much.
__________________
In search of what to search for.
In search of what to search for.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Boulder County, CO
Posts: 4,394
Bikes: '80 Masi Gran Criterium, '12 Trek Madone, early '60s Frejus track
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 514 Post(s)
Liked 448 Times
in
337 Posts
On stock frames, the generality is that riders with long legs (and short torsos) need to show a lot of seat post. Riders with long arms can tolerate a lower handlebar because they can reach down farther.
Your bikes certainly don't look radical. The Surly setup actually looks a lot like the way I set up my Raleigh International in the early 1970s, but my arms and legs are long. We who are built this way have always set up our bikes like this.
Your bikes certainly don't look radical. The Surly setup actually looks a lot like the way I set up my Raleigh International in the early 1970s, but my arms and legs are long. We who are built this way have always set up our bikes like this.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Saskatchewan
Posts: 2,465
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
5 Posts
Back in the day 3 inches was a big drop for recreational riding. 2 inches was more the norm.
I see lots of old steeds with 3+ inches of drop. To me, it looks funny as I rode those bikes when they were new (and rode with others of course) and 2- 2 1/2 inches was all anyone ran before moving on to a bigger frame.
Time and fashions change. But the bend in your spine doesn't. If I had to choose between two vintage bikes for a century tomorrow I would pick the 2 inch drop over the 3 inch drop every time.
I see lots of old steeds with 3+ inches of drop. To me, it looks funny as I rode those bikes when they were new (and rode with others of course) and 2- 2 1/2 inches was all anyone ran before moving on to a bigger frame.
Time and fashions change. But the bend in your spine doesn't. If I had to choose between two vintage bikes for a century tomorrow I would pick the 2 inch drop over the 3 inch drop every time.
#10
Thrifty Bill
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Mountains of Western NC
Posts: 23,525
Bikes: 86 Katakura Silk, 87 Prologue X2, 88 Cimarron LE, 1975 Sekai 4000 Professional, 73 Paramount, plus more
Mentioned: 96 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1236 Post(s)
Liked 964 Times
in
628 Posts
+1 Back in the day (1970s), riders tended to be put on bigger frames. So if anything, much less seat post was exposed. So in the 1970s, I was put onto a 61cm frame (24 inch). I now ride a 56cm (22 inch). By any measure, a two inch difference in frame size is a lot. Needless to say, I had very little seat post showing at all on the 61cm frame. So on that bike, even if I had the stem down as low as it would go, seat was just about level with handlebars.
#11
Full Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 253
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 34 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 22 Times
in
12 Posts
Lemond, in his book, recommended 2-3 inches. A lot depends on your height, torso length, arm length and comfort level. Most folks (not all) seem to find that as they get older they can not ride as comfortably for long distances with the same drop they used when they were younger.
#12
Dropped
Okay, try taking your argument to a cyclotourist. We're not all trying to shave 5 seconds off our training loop time, TYVM.
Likes For JunkYardBike:
#13
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Davis CA
Posts: 3,959
Bikes: Surly Cross-Check, '85 Giant road bike (unrecogizable fixed-gear conversion
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
3 Posts
I'm figuring I'll try it with a lower, shorter stem and see how that feels. I also put on shorter reach bars with shallower drops.
#14
Dropped
I'm still confused how you have an equal saddle to bar drop on both frames if your saddle to pedal distance and stem height above the headset are the same.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 20,305
Mentioned: 130 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3464 Post(s)
Liked 2,829 Times
in
1,995 Posts
Lemond, in his book, recommended 2-3 inches. A lot depends on your height, torso length, arm length and comfort level. Most folks (not all) seem to find that as they get older they can not ride as comfortably for long distances with the same drop they used when they were younger.
How the original poster got where he states is beyond new math, something else is different. Dyna Drive pedals?
#16
FBoD Member at Large
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Woodbury, MN
Posts: 6,094
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 30 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
7 Posts
+1 Back in the day (1970s), riders tended to be put on bigger frames. So if anything, much less seat post was exposed. So in the 1970s, I was put onto a 61cm frame (24 inch). I now ride a 56cm (22 inch). By any measure, a two inch difference in frame size is a lot. Needless to say, I had very little seat post showing at all on the 61cm frame. So on that bike, even if I had the stem down as low as it would go, seat was just about level with handlebars.
#17
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Davis CA
Posts: 3,959
Bikes: Surly Cross-Check, '85 Giant road bike (unrecogizable fixed-gear conversion
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
3 Posts
On the Miyata, I may have the seat lower since I use it with platform pedals as opposed to clipless and it has a more slack geometry.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 11,128
Bikes: 1986 Alan Record Carbonio, 1985 Vitus Plus Carbone 7, 1984 Peugeot PSV, 1972 Line Seeker, 1986(est.) Medici Aerodynamic (Project), 1985(est.) Peugeot PY10FC
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 150 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 34 Times
in
27 Posts
I have a pretty big drop between my saddle and stem, compared to most,
............but certainly not the worst that I've seen in this forum. Even I, sometimes start wondering if I have it all wrong on my bike when I see my own pics of it, but the thing is, I feel very comfortable with the amount of drop I have been riding with since the 80's despite the big gap of non-bicycle riding years in between. One thing I notice is my ability to avoid weighting the bars too much even at the lowest position. There seems to be some muscle memory in my body to support the weight of my upper body, using muscles in my torso. I think seemed to have retained this ability because I also ride sport motorcycles with low bars. in the intervening years when I stopped riding bicycles for a while. It also must help that my body proportions are of long legs and arms and whortish torso. Maybe my case explains why some bikes are set up with saddles and stems that look almost impossible different in height for some people.
Chombi
............but certainly not the worst that I've seen in this forum. Even I, sometimes start wondering if I have it all wrong on my bike when I see my own pics of it, but the thing is, I feel very comfortable with the amount of drop I have been riding with since the 80's despite the big gap of non-bicycle riding years in between. One thing I notice is my ability to avoid weighting the bars too much even at the lowest position. There seems to be some muscle memory in my body to support the weight of my upper body, using muscles in my torso. I think seemed to have retained this ability because I also ride sport motorcycles with low bars. in the intervening years when I stopped riding bicycles for a while. It also must help that my body proportions are of long legs and arms and whortish torso. Maybe my case explains why some bikes are set up with saddles and stems that look almost impossible different in height for some people.
Chombi
Last edited by Chombi; 05-24-10 at 12:11 PM.
#19
Dropped
So, there are additional factors we've not discussed. Do you generally ride the tops or the drops? I have to say, those are fairly deep drops (at least they look it on a small frame - Cinelli 64s?). Do you ride the hoods much, because if so...ouch!
But I think you hit the nail on the head in your comments: ride what's comfortable for you and what keeps you riding.
But I think you hit the nail on the head in your comments: ride what's comfortable for you and what keeps you riding.
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 11,128
Bikes: 1986 Alan Record Carbonio, 1985 Vitus Plus Carbone 7, 1984 Peugeot PSV, 1972 Line Seeker, 1986(est.) Medici Aerodynamic (Project), 1985(est.) Peugeot PY10FC
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 150 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 34 Times
in
27 Posts
So, there are additional factors we've not discussed. Do you generally ride the tops or the drops? I have to say, those are fairly deep drops (at least they look it on a small frame - Cinelli 64s?). Do you ride the hoods much, because if so...ouch!
But I think you hit the nail on the head in your comments: ride what's comfortable for you and what keeps you riding.
But I think you hit the nail on the head in your comments: ride what's comfortable for you and what keeps you riding.
Chombi
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 2,067
Bikes: 84 Pinarello Trevisio, 86 Guerciotti SLX, 96 Specialized Stumpjumper, 2010 Surly Cross Check, 88 Centurion Prestige, 73 Raleigh Sports, GT Force, Bridgestone MB4
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 278 Post(s)
Liked 71 Times
in
56 Posts
I like a lot of drop, I am entirely comfortable on this bike:
or this one:
and several others I have. I could not imagine ever having the bars up even to the saddle, that must be horribly uncomfortable to do that?
Of course from all of you guys with the handle bars jacked way up something like this would be perfections I suppose:
I bet this guy (bike came from an estate sale) died from hemorrhoids as a result of bicycleseatstuffedinass syndrome with all of the weight on his posterior.
or this one:
and several others I have. I could not imagine ever having the bars up even to the saddle, that must be horribly uncomfortable to do that?
Of course from all of you guys with the handle bars jacked way up something like this would be perfections I suppose:
I bet this guy (bike came from an estate sale) died from hemorrhoids as a result of bicycleseatstuffedinass syndrome with all of the weight on his posterior.
Last edited by Loose Chain; 05-24-10 at 02:25 PM.
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 4,466
Bikes: many
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 16 Times
in
13 Posts
Saddle to bar drop is not a fashion statement, it is in fact the result of fitting for performance vs fitting for comfort.
It does seem like a lot of people suddenly think they need to jack the handlebars up higher than the saddle but the fact is that 3 to 4 inches of drop are entirely normal and common on a bike set up for and designed for road racing and for many people, including me, is more comfortable. I could not imagine riding a bike with the bars even with the saddle or higher, that must be awfully uncomfortable with all that seat pressure not to mention horribly inefficient not only from aerodynamics but also from the point of human physiology.
It does seem like a lot of people suddenly think they need to jack the handlebars up higher than the saddle but the fact is that 3 to 4 inches of drop are entirely normal and common on a bike set up for and designed for road racing and for many people, including me, is more comfortable. I could not imagine riding a bike with the bars even with the saddle or higher, that must be awfully uncomfortable with all that seat pressure not to mention horribly inefficient not only from aerodynamics but also from the point of human physiology.
#23
Dropped
Well, I've done metric and imperial centuries on bikes with level bars and saddles, and my hands, wrists, shoulders, neck and back weren't sore at all afterwards? And cyclotourists prefer bars level with or higher than the saddle? Must be comfortable to many?
#24
Rustbelt Rider
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Canton, OH
Posts: 9,104
Bikes: 1990 Trek 1420 - 1978 Raleigh Professional - 1973 Schwinn Collegiate - 1974 Schwinn Suburban
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 261 Post(s)
Liked 372 Times
in
177 Posts
Saddle to bar drop is not a fashion statement, it is in fact the result of fitting for performance vs fitting for comfort.
It does seem like a lot of people suddenly think they need to jack the handlebars up higher than the saddle but the fact is that 3 to 4 inches of drop are entirely normal and common on a bike set up for and designed for road racing and for many people, including me, is more comfortable. I could not imagine riding a bike with the bars even with the saddle or higher, that must be awfully uncomfortable with all that seat pressure not to mention horribly inefficient not only from aerodynamics but also from the point of human physiology.
It does seem like a lot of people suddenly think they need to jack the handlebars up higher than the saddle but the fact is that 3 to 4 inches of drop are entirely normal and common on a bike set up for and designed for road racing and for many people, including me, is more comfortable. I could not imagine riding a bike with the bars even with the saddle or higher, that must be awfully uncomfortable with all that seat pressure not to mention horribly inefficient not only from aerodynamics but also from the point of human physiology.
__________________
|^^^^^^^^^^^^^^| ||
|......GO.BROWNS........| ||'|";, ___.
|_..._..._______===|=||_|__|..., ] -
"(@)'(@)"""''"**|(@)(@)*****''(@)
|^^^^^^^^^^^^^^| ||
|......GO.BROWNS........| ||'|";, ___.
|_..._..._______===|=||_|__|..., ] -
"(@)'(@)"""''"**|(@)(@)*****''(@)
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 4,466
Bikes: many
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 16 Times
in
13 Posts
We are all different and there is a reason seatposts and stems are adjustable.
My bikes have drops in the 3-5" range. That's what works for me.
For those who advocate substantially higher stems, remember that part of fit and riding performance is weight distribution. The higher the stem, the more weight on your butt.
Now, what I don't get are the pics of bikes I see with the stem substantially above the seat and Brooks saddles pointing up towards the sky. Literally, I doubt I could ride a bike set up that way.
BTW, each and everyone of you should devote a 10 minutes everyday to progressive stretching. It will do wonders for all of those sore backs and necks you complain about.
My bikes have drops in the 3-5" range. That's what works for me.
For those who advocate substantially higher stems, remember that part of fit and riding performance is weight distribution. The higher the stem, the more weight on your butt.
Now, what I don't get are the pics of bikes I see with the stem substantially above the seat and Brooks saddles pointing up towards the sky. Literally, I doubt I could ride a bike set up that way.
BTW, each and everyone of you should devote a 10 minutes everyday to progressive stretching. It will do wonders for all of those sore backs and necks you complain about.