Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Framebuilders
Reload this Page >

Another thread about mounting disc brakes to a frame...

Notices
Framebuilders Thinking about a custom frame? Lugged vs Fillet Brazed. Different Frame materials? Newvex or Pacenti Lugs? why get a custom Road, Mountain, or Track Frame? Got a question about framebuilding? Lets discuss framebuilding at it's finest.

Another thread about mounting disc brakes to a frame...

Old 05-11-20, 12:29 PM
  #26  
unterhausen
Randomhead
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,364
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,664 Times in 2,497 Posts
I agree with getting a custom. Maybe do one at a time, wife's bike first. Doing this conversion is a pretty radical modification on these bikes and a bit of an experiment. You may find that you don't like the result. At least with the new bikes, it's a known quantity
unterhausen is offline  
Old 05-11-20, 05:04 PM
  #27  
Nomad2
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Sydney AUS
Posts: 95
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 27 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 9 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by duanedr
If the weight, fit and ride are what I wanted, I wouldn't worry about whether it's 853 or not. It wouldn't have a discernable effect on the ride - especially with our new fat tires. Also, speculating a bit, my limited experience with 853 is that it's too hard (as in material hardness) for efficient post weld machining. 853 ST and HT's are difficult to quickly/easily ream and it wears out tools faster. If this is the case, your current bike might only be 853 in the DT/TT (I'm guessing here but...seems likely).

It looks like the XR is made from 725 which is a similarly high end heat treated tubeset. The XR would be a full upgrade from your current bike including braze-ons, wheel fitment, headtube size and fork. It's any easy choice for me - aside from the $$.

I'm less sure what to tell your wife about the paint! :-) You could have a painter put some accents on it for relatively little $.
The stays on my bike aren't 853. Apart from the colour, the thing that worries me about the Norco is the press-fit bottom bracket.
Nomad2 is offline  
Old 05-11-20, 05:08 PM
  #28  
Nomad2
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Sydney AUS
Posts: 95
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 27 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 9 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by squirtdad
any thoughts about just having the framebuilder do a custom frame? how much cost differential would that be from the conversion. and theoretically the result would be better and more integrated and to purpose

I have had some discussions with a well known framebuilder who has done a lot of pioneering work with disc on road bikes. He noted that to meet his safety standards, especially the forks he has to build stronger and his disc frames are are heavier. disc vs caliper is all up to planned usage
From what I can see as the cost of a custom frame locally (at the more affordable end) it would be getting toward double the cost to get a custom frame from scratch.
Nomad2 is offline  
Old 05-11-20, 05:19 PM
  #29  
Nomad2
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Sydney AUS
Posts: 95
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 27 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 9 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by unterhausen
I agree with getting a custom. Maybe do one at a time, wife's bike first. Doing this conversion is a pretty radical modification on these bikes and a bit of an experiment. You may find that you don't like the result. At least with the new bikes, it's a known quantity
We've pretty much abandoned the idea of modifying my wife's bike as it's not worth it. Might look at other frames such as the Curve GXR steel or maybe a Shand Stoater if she wants a particular colour! Cost wise would still be less than a custom frame. Mine I'll think about for a while. I still enjoy the ride as is, and there's always the risk the modification would stuff it up. Although I do find the lack of braking power for emergency situation a bit of a worry in traffic, particularly now I'm used to disc brakes on the mtb. Perhaps for now I might look at trialling v-brakes with a travel agent and see how that goes.
Nomad2 is offline  
Old 05-23-22, 04:18 PM
  #30  
Nomad2
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Sydney AUS
Posts: 95
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 27 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 9 Times in 6 Posts
I just realized how I'd left this thread and thought I'd update it. We found a great frame builder in the end and have gone ahead and had my wife's bike modified. Well, it's more a case of a new bike with a modified/re-purposed frame. The wife is very happy with the result. Except now the bike lives in the house, can't possibly go in the shed!!!! The builder managed to keep the existing geometry. There was one minor tweak made in that the new fork was made with a custom crown which enabled better tyre clearance without altering the geometry. Enables a 35mm tyre where previously could only fit a 28 or perhaps 30mm but only just. Both the fork and the rear drop-outs are now thru-axle and the build included GRX-800 2 X componentry and hand-build wheels.
My bike is in getting worked on now. The frame modifications and new fork are done and it will soon go off for painting. Mine was a little more complicated apparently as the seat stays needed to be removed and modified to make room for the disc caliper...
Nomad2 is offline  
Likes For Nomad2:
Old 05-23-22, 08:05 PM
  #31  
Andrew R Stewart 
Senior Member
 
Andrew R Stewart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,003

Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4172 Post(s)
Liked 3,792 Times in 2,271 Posts
Thanks for the follow up. Andy
__________________
AndrewRStewart
Andrew R Stewart is offline  
Likes For Andrew R Stewart:
Old 06-01-22, 12:48 PM
  #32  
shelgame
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 106
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
Liked 89 Times in 46 Posts
Originally Posted by Nomad2
Has anyone got any further comment on the suitability of a 1" steerer for a fork with disc brake mounts? Remember this is for a bike that will be going touring.
I'm certainly not a professional framebuilder, but this sounds like simple BS (or maybe fear, or just up-selling) to me.

What difference does the steerer size make in how the braking forces are applied to the wheel? Unless the disk allows for much higher braking forces (only if your rim brakes are so weak they can't lockup the wheel), then the forces at the steerer are the same regardless of brake type.
shelgame is offline  
Old 06-02-22, 08:06 AM
  #33  
unterhausen
Randomhead
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,364
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,664 Times in 2,497 Posts
Steerers flex quite a bit. Disc brakes are going to make them flex more. That's why the mountain bike industry has gone to tapered steerers. If it's you that's potentially getting sued, you can sell whatever ill-advised designs you like. Good luck finding anyone involved in the industry to testify that it was a good idea, nobody thinks that. I noticed that Crust, the last bastion of 1" disc brake forks, is now selling a bike with a tapered steerer.
unterhausen is offline  
Old 06-02-22, 02:09 PM
  #34  
pwyg
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 55
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 5 Posts
Originally Posted by Nomad2
I apologize for starting another thread on disc brake frame conversions but I was just hoping for some comment on the feasibility of two frames for conversion. My wife and I have steel bikes we used for Audax riding, general road riding and touring. We have recently spent more time mountain biking and both find the braking on our road bikes frustrating and are looking to upgrade them anyway. We got some feedback from a local frame builder but was interested in any comments others might have on the forum.

My bike is a Fuji World 2004. It has a Reynolds 853 main triangle. I was told the problematic part for a conversion is the rear dropout. To remove the wheel you pull it forward. I was told they could be cut off and replaced by welding in new ones (possibly through-axle). The current fork is carbon/alloy and would need to be replaced. There are a few options around for 1 1/8” steerer in carbon. The nearest to what I have (just from looking at it) is a Ritchey adventure fork but I imagine small differences in the geometry of the fork can make a bit of difference to the ride?

My wife’s bike was a Bioracer shipped out from Europe back in 1998. I don’t have specifics on this one. It’s made from Columbus steel, with a steel fork, had a horrid paint job which delaminated after a few years and had to be re-coated. That said, my wife did PBP on it and plenty of cycle touring. The frame builder I spoke to pointed out his issue with this frame was the front end which has the old style steerer and stem. The fork would need to be replaced and he was not willing to make up a new one as in his opinion discs should not be fitted to a fork with a steerer less of than 1 1/8”. Any thoughts on this? He also said it would not be worth replacing the head tube.

Thanks in advance for any feedback you might have.

1” is fine and better than 1 1/8 since mundane and hard impacts with a 1” steer tube will not crumple the down and top tubes like a 1 1/8 can with a steel steer tube. 1 1/8 steel steer tubes focus too much impact energy into the front end of a bike. There is history on this that happened with the .883 steer tubes Schwinn went to back in the day and that was a beefed up 1” steer tube. Second if you want to convert to through axle a bit of creative manufacturing can convert existing drop outs to be through axle without drop out replacement.

Last edited by unterhausen; 06-03-22 at 03:24 AM. Reason: fixed the quote tag
pwyg is offline  
Old 06-02-22, 03:27 PM
  #35  
Andrew R Stewart 
Senior Member
 
Andrew R Stewart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,003

Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4172 Post(s)
Liked 3,792 Times in 2,271 Posts
pwyg- If you think using a 1" steerer will prevent main frame damage in a frontal impact I think you will find yourself wrong. The Schwinns used a .833" stem, not steerer. As much of what we know of the US made Schwinn product design was based on left over WWII tooling (some paid for by the government) and by the grades of steels commonly available back then. Schwinn did do a good thing and choose a steerer with a thicker wall to help off set the low strength grade of steels they usually used.

As to converting horizontally slotted drop outs to a through axle without replacing the drop outs- Sure one could. The adaptor/conversion part would likely be specific to each brand and model of drop out and also need to accommodate the various stay attachment shapes and such. Fine to one off if your time is not expensive. Please keep us in the loop of your efforts on this. Most here enjoy seeing others' cool creations, even if some will also shake their heads at the results Andy
__________________
AndrewRStewart
Andrew R Stewart is offline  
Old 06-03-22, 03:25 AM
  #36  
unterhausen
Randomhead
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,364
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,664 Times in 2,497 Posts
If we are going to talk about history of steerers, people used to be so afraid their steerers would break that they put broom handles inside. I assume there was some reason for that. I'd rather this not turn into another bad advice thread, particularly since the OP already got what he wanted.
unterhausen is offline  
Likes For unterhausen:
Old 06-03-22, 07:29 AM
  #37  
shelgame
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 106
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
Liked 89 Times in 46 Posts
Originally Posted by unterhausen
Steerers flex quite a bit. Disc brakes are going to make them flex more. That's why the mountain bike industry has gone to tapered steerers. If it's you that's potentially getting sued, you can sell whatever ill-advised designs you like. Good luck finding anyone involved in the industry to testify that it was a good idea, nobody thinks that. I noticed that Crust, the last bastion of 1" disc brake forks, is now selling a bike with a tapered steerer.
Sorry, but how exactly does a disk brake make the steerer flex more? Unless your saying that disk brakes have more stopping power than rim brakes?

Flex the fork blades more? Definitely.
More flex at the crown? Sure, since the forces have to go thru the crown with a disk setup, and are applied directly to the crown in the case of a caliper brake. But, the steer tube and headset are above that.

A tapered steerer is definitely stronger/stiffer. And, the bearing should last longer being larger. If you're building a new bike, for sure use the latest/best. But, I just don't see a larger steerer being a necessity brought on by disk brakes.

Glad the OP got what he wanted.
shelgame is offline  
Likes For shelgame:
Old 06-03-22, 10:34 AM
  #38  
unterhausen
Randomhead
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,364
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,664 Times in 2,497 Posts
Where do you think the forces go? They definitely apply a bending moment to the steerer. That's why there is an upper headset bearing. The lower headset bearing will not support a moment, it takes both upper and lower headset bearings to do that. A rim brake is generating a force right there at the lower headset bearing, and the moment arm is much shorter. Draw a free body diagram.
unterhausen is offline  
Likes For unterhausen:
Old 06-03-22, 04:48 PM
  #39  
bulgie 
blahblahblah chrome moly
 
bulgie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,980
Mentioned: 92 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1163 Post(s)
Liked 2,542 Times in 1,065 Posts
Originally Posted by unterhausen
Where do you think the forces go? They definitely apply a bending moment to the steerer. That's why there is an upper headset bearing. The lower headset bearing will not support a moment, it takes both upper and lower headset bearings to do that. A rim brake is generating a force right there at the lower headset bearing, and the moment arm is much shorter. Draw a free body diagram.
When the wheel is locked up (skidding) we can look at the fork and wheel as one rigid body applying a moment to the steerer. The force is applied at the ground and the lever is the length from the ground to the lower headset race. This is the same for rim and disk brakes. The force on the blades is much higher with disk as we know, but the distance from the axle to the disk attach point is so much shorter that we get the same moment up at the steerer.

I'm not advocating for smaller steerers, just saying the brake type doesn't matter. A larger steerer is equally sensible for any type of brake, if stiffer is what you want.

Oh and of course this analysis assumes the rim brake can lock up the front wheel, not always true. But at any given level of braking, steerer flex will be the same. So a stiffer steerer makes sense to whatever degree the disk brake allows stronger braking. If your rim can lock up the front wheel (or eject you over the bars), then the steerer doesn't care which brake. I locked up my front wheel countless times on my old MTB with 1" steerer, but dirt gives lower grip, so the force was not so high. It's difficult but still do-able on pavement, with some fairly extreme body english to not endo. Or on a tandem, which can never endo as far as I know.

Seems to me, tapered steerers for road bikes were only to allow low-density materials (e.g. aluminum) and/or straighter paths for the fibers in CFRP, from steerer to blades at the crown race. I can't imagine a use case for a 1-1/2" steerer in steel, other than triplet tandem maybe. The triplet we made at Santana in the '70s rode and braked OK with a 1" steerer, but I shudder at the thought (no pun intended) — what were they thinking? "OS" steerers definitely existed back then (and back to the 1800s) but Santana was too lazy to tool up for it, until a few years later when 1-1/4" headsets came out.

Mark B
bulgie is offline  
Likes For bulgie:
Old 06-04-22, 04:57 AM
  #40  
unterhausen
Randomhead
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,364
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,664 Times in 2,497 Posts
I don't think that tapered steerers are particularly useful on road bikes. But they have taken over on everything but steel. And it seems like the 1 1/4 taper is less common than 1 1/2. With a steel fork, I see no reason to use a tapered head tube. People like to have options though, and there are a lot more carbon options with tapered head tubes.
unterhausen is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.