A cyclist passed me while I was turning L at intersection.
#51
Senior Member
You have to be a little more predictable than that. What you can do better is make what you're doing predictable and clear so YOU can keep yourself safe. What other people are doing doesn't really matter. If I'm heading down a hill to catch a green and don't see you signal, I'm assuming you're going straight. Really, the dude shouldn't have had room
As a cyclist, avoid the dual purpose lane, signal, and use better lane positioning. You should go left most to make a left and right most to make a right. If you're waiting for a green, signal after the light changes then go.
As a cyclist, avoid the dual purpose lane, signal, and use better lane positioning. You should go left most to make a left and right most to make a right. If you're waiting for a green, signal after the light changes then go.
Likes For y2zipper:
#52
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,098 Times
in
5,054 Posts
You have to be a little more predictable than that. What you can do better is make what you're doing predictable and clear so YOU can keep yourself safe. What other people are doing doesn't really matter. If I'm heading down a hill to catch a green and don't see you signal, I'm assuming you're going straight. Really, the dude shouldn't have had room
As a cyclist, avoid the dual purpose lane, signal, and use better lane positioning. You should go left most to make a left and right most to make a right. If you're waiting for a green, signal after the light changes then go.
As a cyclist, avoid the dual purpose lane, signal, and use better lane positioning. You should go left most to make a left and right most to make a right. If you're waiting for a green, signal after the light changes then go.
I might, under those circumstances, be on the left side of the dual purpose lane, but I'd definitely throw a signal if I did.
I don't know where this imaginary rule that no one should ever pass a cyclist in an intersection is coming from, but if anyone is assuming that other drivers or cyclists are going to follow it, they're begging for trouble.
Long story short, we can disagree whether the passing cyclist had the "right" to pass, but that's meaningless. What's important is that making it appear that you're going straight will make it extremely likely that someone is going to pass on your left in one sort of vehicle or another.
Last edited by livedarklions; 05-02-21 at 05:56 AM.
#53
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280
Bikes: Nashbar Road
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times
in
228 Posts
For those still concerned about FRAP, it doesn't apply when preparing to turn left. Neither legally nor as a practical matter, the latter being more important as LDL mentioned.
Likes For wphamilton:
#54
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,098 Times
in
5,054 Posts
Which is why I think lane position is more critical in intersections than almost anywhere else. I prefer starting from the left part, turning left, or at least in the center. The precise plan really depends on what's coming after the turn.
For those still concerned about FRAP, it doesn't apply when preparing to turn left. Neither legally nor as a practical matter, the latter being more important as LDL mentioned.
For those still concerned about FRAP, it doesn't apply when preparing to turn left. Neither legally nor as a practical matter, the latter being more important as LDL mentioned.
#55
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Location: New York
Posts: 6
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
1 Post
I would say you should have been far enough to the left in that lane that they couldn't pass you on the left without entering the left only lane. That would have been indication enough for me.
#57
QR-disc must die!!!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Shenandoah Valley, Northern Virginia.
Posts: 703
Bikes: '99 Trek 520, '20 Kona Sutra (FOR SALE 48cm), '21 Simon-Bikes mini-velo and a chromoly-framed folding bicycle with drop-bars and V-brakes, that rolls even while folded.
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 397 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 199 Times
in
147 Posts
I did it - I got the signal to change! The next time I came to this intersection, again, there weren't any cars to trigger the sensor. This time though, I moved to the center of the lane and rolled up to where my crankset was even with the stop line. There are no cuts in the pavement so, I don't know where the sensor is. But this did it! I'm exceptionally happy about it.
Thanks to all for your input on this thread.
Thanks to all for your input on this thread.
Likes For Nyah:
#58
Senior Member
If I was in this situation, I would place my bike on the left third of the lane and then while turning left I would move back to the right part of the lane. Because this lane is also for going straight, you also need to consider cars going straight and if you stay on the right you can put yourself in trouble in the middle of the intersection.
In the Netherlands bikes need to keep as far right on the road as safely possible. Except when turning left, then the appropriate place is right against the middle of the road (in the case of two lanes with two-way traffic), such that you block other traffic from overtaking you in your lane. I am sure the US would have similar rules.
In the Netherlands bikes need to keep as far right on the road as safely possible. Except when turning left, then the appropriate place is right against the middle of the road (in the case of two lanes with two-way traffic), such that you block other traffic from overtaking you in your lane. I am sure the US would have similar rules.
Likes For mr_pedro:
#59
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,098 Times
in
5,054 Posts
If I was in this situation, I would place my bike on the left third of the lane and then while turning left I would move back to the right part of the lane. Because this lane is also for going straight, you also need to consider cars going straight and if you stay on the right you can put yourself in trouble in the middle of the intersection.
In the Netherlands bikes need to keep as far right on the road as safely possible. Except when turning left, then the appropriate place is right against the middle of the road (in the case of two lanes with two-way traffic), such that you block other traffic from overtaking you in your lane. I am sure the US would have similar rules.
In the Netherlands bikes need to keep as far right on the road as safely possible. Except when turning left, then the appropriate place is right against the middle of the road (in the case of two lanes with two-way traffic), such that you block other traffic from overtaking you in your lane. I am sure the US would have similar rules.
I'm not really sympathetic to OP here, I can understand the weird positioning because of the light trigger, but don't get why a left turn wasn't signalled.
#60
Airplanes, bikes, beer.
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Off the front
Posts: 763
Bikes: Road bikes, mountain bikes, a cx bike, a gravel bike…
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 398 Post(s)
Liked 788 Times
in
339 Posts
This thread is dumb. If the OP would just HTFU and pedal a little harder he would make it through the light while it’s still green, and not get shame-passed on the left by UcantTouchThis on his fat (double meaning?) bike.
#61
Junior Member
From your initial description. Were you in the right tire track, or the left tire track? I ask, because. If you were in the right tire track. The other cyclist could have thought you were just slow to start. But if you were in the left tire track, they should not have passed you.
Likes For Chistophe516:
#63
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,098 Times
in
5,054 Posts
Says who? That doesn't appear to be a law anywhere I know. No one in this thread has been able to produce one, just statements that they think it's unreasonable.
My answer is the opposite of yours, it doesn't matter if the passing rider had a "right," passing in an intersection is so common, you need to be prepared for it.
If you're riding and assume no one is going to pass you in an intersection regardless of whether you fail to signal or where you're positioned in the lane, then you're asking for trouble.
Likes For livedarklions:
#64
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,259
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4245 Post(s)
Liked 1,349 Times
in
936 Posts
It's likely the lanes leading to intersection had solid lines (indicating no passing) but cyclists are often allowed to pass when cars are not.
Passing in intersections is more risky.
Anyway, the original question was if the passing cyclist had a "right" to pass.
The answer to that is clearly "no". No one has a "right" to pass and the passing vehicle doesn't have the "right of way" either.
You may only pass when it's safe to do so.
And, as many people have said, the OP chose a poor lane position and didn't signal.
The passing cyclist was putting too much trust in knowing what the cyclist in the intersection would do.
The reasons a careful driver wouldn't pass in this situation apply to cyclists (even if cyclists have somewhat more latitude).
In any case, given that the OP has no way of keeping others from passing him, it's really on him to take care (which he appeared to do).
Passing in intersections is more risky.
Anyway, the original question was if the passing cyclist had a "right" to pass.
The answer to that is clearly "no". No one has a "right" to pass and the passing vehicle doesn't have the "right of way" either.
You may only pass when it's safe to do so.
And, as many people have said, the OP chose a poor lane position and didn't signal.
The passing cyclist was putting too much trust in knowing what the cyclist in the intersection would do.
The reasons a careful driver wouldn't pass in this situation apply to cyclists (even if cyclists have somewhat more latitude).
In any case, given that the OP has no way of keeping others from passing him, it's really on him to take care (which he appeared to do).
Last edited by njkayaker; 05-18-21 at 07:28 AM.
#65
Banned.
No passing OR lane changes in intersection. If something had happened and this ended up in court it would be 100% on the guy passing.
#66
genec
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times
in
3,158 Posts
Here in Jax, nearly all stop lights have an imprint that is easily seen where the sensors for the light are; I never have a problem actuating them, and I always sit over top the center wire (dead center of the lane). We don't have them in the bike lanes as shown here, so I always take the lane at lights.
https://youtu.be/Ilt4Pt4dk-Y
https://youtu.be/Ilt4Pt4dk-Y
The ability of sensors to detect cyclists varies greatly all over the US, and even in some cities... For a long time I lived in an area that only had two ways in and out, due to canyons blocking all other access. One way I could go (north) almost always worked just fine, and would sense the bike. The other area (west) never worked... didn't even work for motorcycles (I discussed this with a biker while waiting at the same light with him).
Now the north light didn't always work properly... but I submitted both lights to the street division and after several months was informed that the sensors had been calibrated. The west light never worked for me. Period. The north light was a camera mounted system and if I had a high enough contrast, and rode centered in the lane, I could get it to work every time. (I commuted this way daily)
Now note, this is in the same town, within about a 2 mile area. So bottom line... your town, your neighborhood may have sensors that work... but that just ain't the case across America. (and there is scant effort to make it so.)
#67
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,098 Times
in
5,054 Posts
Doubtful. For 100% liability, the OP would have to prove that it was unreasonable to pass in that intersection even though there is no law specifically forbidding it and also that OP was not negligent in taking a left hand turn without signaling and checking to make sure the lane was clear for the turn. In a contributory negligence jurisdiction (and there are still a few states and DC in this category), any negligence on the part of OP would bar him from collecting from the passing bicyclist. Most states are comparative negligence, and it's probable that OP's award would be reduced by some percentage for the failure to signal and check.
I think there's a fundamental misconception here that passing a cyclist in an intersection is per se negligence or otherwise illegal (again, anyone want to actually produce a law forbidding it?). Judging by how many cars actually pass me in an intersection on any given ride where there's traffic, I really don't think that's a common view.
#68
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,259
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4245 Post(s)
Liked 1,349 Times
in
936 Posts
Cyclists are often allowed to pass where cars are not. So, it's somewhat ambiguous for this case. (I'd tend to err on the side of caution and say agree it's illegal.)
But, given it's illegal for drivers, it seems prudent to consider that it might not be a good idea to do it as a cyclist.
What's odd is there are some people who think it's just fine and even get mad if it's suggested it's not a good idea.
But, given it's illegal for drivers, it seems prudent to consider that it might not be a good idea to do it as a cyclist.
What's odd is there are some people who think it's just fine and even get mad if it's suggested it's not a good idea.
#69
Banned.
Doubtful. For 100% liability, the OP would have to prove that it was unreasonable to pass in that intersection even though there is no law specifically forbidding it and also that OP was not negligent in taking a left hand turn without signaling and checking to make sure the lane was clear for the turn. In a contributory negligence jurisdiction (and there are still a few states and DC in this category), any negligence on the part of OP would bar him from collecting from the passing bicyclist. Most states are comparative negligence, and it's probable that OP's award would be reduced by some percentage for the failure to signal and check.
I think there's a fundamental misconception here that passing a cyclist in an intersection is per se negligence or otherwise illegal (again, anyone want to actually produce a law forbidding it?). Judging by how many cars actually pass me in an intersection on any given ride where there's traffic, I really don't think that's a common view.
I think there's a fundamental misconception here that passing a cyclist in an intersection is per se negligence or otherwise illegal (again, anyone want to actually produce a law forbidding it?). Judging by how many cars actually pass me in an intersection on any given ride where there's traffic, I really don't think that's a common view.
#70
Banned.
Cyclists are often allowed to pass where cars are not. So, it's somewhat ambiguous for this case. (I'd tend to err on the side of caution and say agree it's illegal.)
But, given it's illegal for drivers, it seems prudent to consider that it might not be a good idea to do it as a cyclist.
What's odd is there are some people who think it's just fine and even get mad if it's suggested it's not a good idea.
But, given it's illegal for drivers, it seems prudent to consider that it might not be a good idea to do it as a cyclist.
What's odd is there are some people who think it's just fine and even get mad if it's suggested it's not a good idea.
#71
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,259
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4245 Post(s)
Liked 1,349 Times
in
936 Posts
In many states, cyclists are legally allowed to pass in no-passing zones (there is often an explicit law that allows them to pass within the lane) and it's not necessarily dangerous for them to do so.
So, "illegal for cars to pass" does not mean "illegal for cyclists to pass".
I've said that it's risky to do multiple times.
Last edited by njkayaker; 05-18-21 at 12:27 PM.
#72
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,098 Times
in
5,054 Posts
Yes, if I'm taking the full lane. It's quite clear from the OP that he was not doing so--he was on the right side of the middle lane intending to take a left turn, positioning that made no sense if signaling intentions.. It's why I'm always going to take the lane to avoid a right hook at an intersection where a right turn is possible or if I'm taking a left turn. Even in NH, those are FRAP exceptions.
If you watch urban intersections, cyclists pass each other all the time. I think it's absurd to pretend this is some sort of general taboo, and if you do that IRL, don't expect anyone else to be on the same page.
#73
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Lynchburg, Virginia
Posts: 76
Bikes: Novara Safari
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I would have moved to the left of lane so a vehicle going straight could safely pass. I also move to the left when going straight in a straight/right lane as well.