Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Which Single-sided Power meter?

Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Which Single-sided Power meter?

Old 05-22-21, 08:23 PM
  #26  
NoWhammies
Senior Member
 
NoWhammies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 1,993

Bikes: Argon 18 Gallium, BH G7, Rocky Mountain Instinct C70

Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 800 Post(s)
Liked 512 Times in 306 Posts
Happy 4iiii camper over here.
NoWhammies is offline  
Old 05-22-21, 09:33 PM
  #27  
Barry2 
LR÷P=HR
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 2,160

Bikes: 1981 Holdsworth Special, 1993 C-dale MT3000 & 1996 F700CAD3, 2018 Cervelo R3 & 2022 R5, JustGo Runt, Ridley Oval, Kickr Bike 8-)

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 862 Post(s)
Liked 1,194 Times in 687 Posts
Originally Posted by Doomrider74
(I'm not expecting to number match with the Kickr).
modern Power Meters are extremely accurate.
I went with the Stages due to better temp compensation.

My coach claimed my Wahoo Kickr Bike and my outdoor road bike with Stages dual were reading differently.

So I borrowed a pair of Garmin Vector 3’s and did a comparison.

rode Wahoo Kickr Bike with Vectors and compared the built in PM with the Vectors.
Rode my outdoor Bike with Stages dual and Vectors.

All three were within 3% (vector end 3% higher in both tests)

So yes……. Expect them to read the same!

Barry
Barry2 is offline  
Old 05-22-21, 10:10 PM
  #28  
Doomrider74
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2021
Posts: 277
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 141 Post(s)
Liked 100 Times in 55 Posts
Originally Posted by Barry2
modern Power Meters are extremely accurate.
I went with the Stages due to better temp compensation.

My coach claimed my Wahoo Kickr Bike and my outdoor road bike with Stages dual were reading differently.

So I borrowed a pair of Garmin Vector 3’s and did a comparison.

rode Wahoo Kickr Bike with Vectors and compared the built in PM with the Vectors.
Rode my outdoor Bike with Stages dual and Vectors.

All three were within 3% (vector end 3% higher in both tests)

So yes……. Expect them to read the same!

Barry
Presumably though a single sided crank arm power meter won't necessarily agree with the Kickr PM purely because it has to average across both legs, which aren't always equal. I'm pretty certain my left left is weaker than my right, so I won't expect it to read exactly the same as the Kickr.
Doomrider74 is offline  
Old 05-22-21, 10:31 PM
  #29  
RChung
Perceptual Dullard
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,410
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 914 Post(s)
Liked 1,130 Times in 487 Posts
Originally Posted by Barry2
So yes……. Expect them to read the same!
This is from here, which was a 2017 check on power meters out in the hands of actual riders. Since this was done a few years ago, there weren't many pedal power meters in the study. Nonetheless, while you may expect them to read the same, you really actually have to check to know for sure.


RChung is offline  
Old 05-22-21, 10:35 PM
  #30  
Doomrider74
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2021
Posts: 277
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 141 Post(s)
Liked 100 Times in 55 Posts
Originally Posted by RChung
This is from here, which was a 2017 check on power meters out in the hands of actual riders. Since this was done a few years ago, there weren't many pedal power meters in the study. Nonetheless, while you may expect them to read the same, you really actually have to check to know for sure.


If I'm reading that correctly, it doesn't look too complimentary towards the Stages power meters, which seem to have a much wider range of deviation.
Doomrider74 is offline  
Old 05-22-21, 10:46 PM
  #31  
Seattle Forrest
Senior Member
 
Seattle Forrest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times in 6,054 Posts
Originally Posted by RChung
This is from here, which was a 2017 check on power meters out in the hands of actual riders. Since this was done a few years ago, there weren't many pedal power meters in the study. Nonetheless, while you may expect them to read the same, you really actually have to check to know for sure.


I have a guy telling me power is impossible to measure on a bike.
Seattle Forrest is offline  
Old 05-23-21, 08:28 AM
  #32  
RChung
Perceptual Dullard
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,410
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 914 Post(s)
Liked 1,130 Times in 487 Posts
Originally Posted by Doomrider74
If I'm reading that correctly, it doesn't look too complimentary towards the Stages power meters, which seem to have a much wider range of deviation.
You're reading that correctly.

To be fair, back when that study was done, I think the Stages may have been the only power meter in that study that was left-side only, so another way to look at these would be a single-sided power meter compared to a bunch of devices that read total power generated from both sides.
Originally Posted by Seattle Forrest
I have a guy telling me power is impossible to measure on a bike.
I feel your pain. I have guys telling me it's impossible to measure aerodynamic and rolling drag on a bike.

Last edited by RChung; 05-23-21 at 08:32 AM.
RChung is offline  
Old 05-23-21, 08:55 AM
  #33  
Barry2 
LR÷P=HR
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 2,160

Bikes: 1981 Holdsworth Special, 1993 C-dale MT3000 & 1996 F700CAD3, 2018 Cervelo R3 & 2022 R5, JustGo Runt, Ridley Oval, Kickr Bike 8-)

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 862 Post(s)
Liked 1,194 Times in 687 Posts
Regarding my PM, I’m a lot more interested in precision than accuracy.
A lot of people believe precision/accuracy are the same.

200 lb Man jumps on a bathroom scale 3 times
250.0001 lb
250.0003 lb
250.0002 lb

That scale is not accurate, but it sure is precise.

I’ll take precision numbers over accurate, after all I don’t want to compare to others, I just need to compare to my prior measurements.

Barry
Barry2 is offline  
Old 05-23-21, 09:14 AM
  #34  
RChung
Perceptual Dullard
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,410
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 914 Post(s)
Liked 1,130 Times in 487 Posts
Originally Posted by Barry2
Regarding my PM, I’m a lot more interested in precision than accuracy.
A lot of people believe precision/accuracy are the same.

200 lb Man jumps on a bathroom scale 3 times
250.0001 lb
250.0003 lb
250.0002 lb

That scale is not accurate, but it sure is precise.

I’ll take precision numbers over accurate, after all I don’t want to compare to others, I just need to compare to my prior measurements.

Barry
You know what's precise? A wristwatch. You'll get very precise numbers over time, and it's a lot cheaper than a power meter.
RChung is offline  
Likes For RChung:
Old 05-23-21, 09:29 AM
  #35  
Barry2 
LR÷P=HR
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 2,160

Bikes: 1981 Holdsworth Special, 1993 C-dale MT3000 & 1996 F700CAD3, 2018 Cervelo R3 & 2022 R5, JustGo Runt, Ridley Oval, Kickr Bike 8-)

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 862 Post(s)
Liked 1,194 Times in 687 Posts
Originally Posted by RChung
You know what's precise? A wristwatch. You'll get very precise numbers over time, and it's a lot cheaper than a power meter.
Sorry… but in my part of the world we have changing wind speed and direction.
But each to their own

Barry
Barry2 is offline  
Old 05-23-21, 01:05 PM
  #36  
colnago62
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 2,433
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 741 Post(s)
Liked 412 Times in 230 Posts
Originally Posted by RChung
You know what's precise? A wristwatch. You'll get very precise numbers over time, and it's a lot cheaper than a power meter.
lots of riders at the velodrome don’t use a power meter. A stopwatch and heart rate monitor tell them everything they need to know.
colnago62 is offline  
Old 05-23-21, 01:08 PM
  #37  
Doomrider74
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2021
Posts: 277
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 141 Post(s)
Liked 100 Times in 55 Posts
Originally Posted by colnago62
lots of riders at the velodrome don’t use a power meter. A stopwatch and heart rate monitor tell them everything they need to know.
I'm sure that's fine indoors on the velodrome, but aren't there too many variables outdoors to make that a reliable source of data?
Doomrider74 is offline  
Old 05-23-21, 01:55 PM
  #38  
RChung
Perceptual Dullard
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,410
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 914 Post(s)
Liked 1,130 Times in 487 Posts
Originally Posted by Barry2
Sorry… but in my part of the world we have changing wind speed and direction.
But each to their own

Barry
Oh, so you *do* care about accuracy, and not just precision.
RChung is offline  
Likes For RChung:
Old 05-23-21, 02:31 PM
  #39  
colnago62
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 2,433
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 741 Post(s)
Liked 412 Times in 230 Posts
Originally Posted by Doomrider74
I'm sure that's fine indoors on the velodrome, but aren't there too many variables outdoors to make that a reliable source of data?
Yes, outdoors does create some issues. Around here, I train late evening. The wind usually has died down and the velodrome is still holding heat.
colnago62 is offline  
Old 05-23-21, 02:46 PM
  #40  
Barry2 
LR÷P=HR
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 2,160

Bikes: 1981 Holdsworth Special, 1993 C-dale MT3000 & 1996 F700CAD3, 2018 Cervelo R3 & 2022 R5, JustGo Runt, Ridley Oval, Kickr Bike 8-)

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 862 Post(s)
Liked 1,194 Times in 687 Posts
Originally Posted by RChung
Oh, so you *do* care about accuracy, and not just precision.
Barry2 is offline  
Old 05-24-21, 12:13 AM
  #41  
Doomrider74
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2021
Posts: 277
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 141 Post(s)
Liked 100 Times in 55 Posts
Ive just watched the Shane Llama lab test where he discovers the Stages Left-sided PM doubled is more accurate than the LR combined. Interesting. No such issues with the 4iiii, apparently.
Doomrider74 is offline  
Old 05-24-21, 08:06 AM
  #42  
RChung
Perceptual Dullard
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,410
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 914 Post(s)
Liked 1,130 Times in 487 Posts
Originally Posted by Doomrider74
Ive just watched the Shane Llama lab test where he discovers the Stages Left-sided PM doubled is more accurate than the LR combined. Interesting. No such issues with the 4iiii, apparently.
The problem is with the right side crank, not the left -- more precisely, the problem is with the right side Shimano DuraAce, Ultegra, and 105 cranks. More more precisely, it's with putting a strain gage on the right side Shimano DuraAce, Ultegra, and 105 crank arms. SRAM, FSA, Rotor, and other right side crank arms appear to be okay, as are crank spiders.

But you said you had a 105 crank set. So that's why I said *if* you wanted a left-side-only crank arm power meter, you should probably consider that a non-upgradeable purchase, and don't think about possibly buying the right side crank in the future "as an upgrade." It wouldn't be.

Last edited by RChung; 05-24-21 at 08:14 AM.
RChung is offline  
Likes For RChung:
Old 05-24-21, 09:49 AM
  #43  
Doomrider74
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2021
Posts: 277
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 141 Post(s)
Liked 100 Times in 55 Posts
Originally Posted by RChung
The problem is with the right side crank, not the left -- more precisely, the problem is with the right side Shimano DuraAce, Ultegra, and 105 cranks. More more precisely, it's with putting a strain gage on the right side Shimano DuraAce, Ultegra, and 105 crank arms. SRAM, FSA, Rotor, and other right side crank arms appear to be okay, as are crank spiders.

But you said you had a 105 crank set. So that's why I said *if* you wanted a left-side-only crank arm power meter, you should probably consider that a non-upgradeable purchase, and don't think about possibly buying the right side crank in the future "as an upgrade." It wouldn't be.
Understood, thanks. As you say, it doesn't seem worth the money. My only reservation is that my left leg is weaker than my right, so I'd expect the numbers to be lower when compared to Zwift. However, could I use that to my advantage? Would having a left sided only PM help me even out the imbalance? If nothing else, it might help me mentally, by forcing me to lead with my left more. Is that a possibility?

Last edited by Doomrider74; 05-24-21 at 10:20 AM.
Doomrider74 is offline  
Old 05-24-21, 10:44 AM
  #44  
bobin
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 48
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 30 Post(s)
Liked 2 Times in 1 Post
One arm vs dual sided power meter

I want to get a power meter for outdoor rides. Any reason to spend more for a double sided crank when I can just get a new/used one arm Stages/Precision?
bobin is offline  
Old 05-24-21, 10:46 AM
  #45  
smashndash
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 1,410

Bikes: 2017 Specialized Allez Sprint Comp

Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 850 Post(s)
Liked 344 Times in 247 Posts
Leg imbalances exist. They also aren't constant. Depending on your current power output and fatigue level, your imbalance might change. This can make maintaining a certain power level by feel difficult.

That's about it.
smashndash is offline  
Likes For smashndash:
Old 05-24-21, 11:10 AM
  #46  
RChung
Perceptual Dullard
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,410
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 914 Post(s)
Liked 1,130 Times in 487 Posts
Originally Posted by Doomrider74
Understood, thanks. As you say, it doesn't seem worth the money. My only reservation is that my left leg is weaker than my right, so I'd expect the numbers to be lower when compared to Zwift. However, could I use that to my advantage? Would having a left sided only PM help me even out the imbalance? If nothing else, it might help me mentally, by forcing me to lead with my left more. Is that a possibility?
I suppose it's a possibility, but a lot depends on why your left is weaker: some things may be correctable, others may not be. I have a friend who's a cycling coach, pretty well known, who had to have his lower left leg amputated after a cycling accident. After a long and arduous recovery, he was able to *exceed* his pre-amputation FTP although his L/R balance was, obviously, unbalanced. There is no way he can "pedal circles" or "pull up" or "scrape the bottom of the stroke": he'd yank his prosthesis off his stump if he tried any of that. All he can do is stomp with it, so he stomps down as hard as he can, and he only pays attention to his total combined one-and-a-half-leg power. Below the knee amputation, so maybe one-and-two-thirds. A dozen or so years ago, I had a very unpleasant experience with sciatica, and my right leg went dead. I'd already had several years of power data so I didn't need separate L/R data to tell me that my right leg was dead and my pedaling was asymmetric -- my total power dropped and I couldn't control my right foot. Over the course of six or nine months I slowly recovered, and I was able to match my power from before. I wasn't specifically concentrating on strengthening my right leg, I was just riding and walking and trying to get back to where I was. I have no idea whether my L/R power production is symmetric now, and I don't care. All I care about is whether I can achieve my goals with as many legs as I have available.

In a deep sense, if you can go faster and/or achieve your goals, do you really care if it was because of your left leg rather than your entire aerobic system, however it is bilaterally allocated? (I don't have an answer for that -- I think it will vary by individual).
RChung is offline  
Likes For RChung:
Old 05-24-21, 11:15 AM
  #47  
Doomrider74
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2021
Posts: 277
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 141 Post(s)
Liked 100 Times in 55 Posts
You may want to look at my current thread, which is about exactly the same thing. It might be of use.
Doomrider74 is offline  
Likes For Doomrider74:
Old 05-24-21, 11:33 AM
  #48  
Doomrider74
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2021
Posts: 277
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 141 Post(s)
Liked 100 Times in 55 Posts
Originally Posted by RChung
I suppose it's a possibility, but a lot depends on why your left is weaker: some things may be correctable, others may not be. I have a friend who's a cycling coach, pretty well known, who had to have his lower left leg amputated after a cycling accident. After a long and arduous recovery, he was able to *exceed* his pre-amputation FTP although his L/R balance was, obviously, unbalanced. There is no way he can "pedal circles" or "pull up" or "scrape the bottom of the stroke": he'd yank his prosthesis off his stump if he tried any of that. All he can do is stomp with it, so he stomps down as hard as he can, and he only pays attention to his total combined one-and-a-half-leg power. Below the knee amputation, so maybe one-and-two-thirds. A dozen or so years ago, I had a very unpleasant experience with sciatica, and my right leg went dead. I'd already had several years of power data so I didn't need separate L/R data to tell me that my right leg was dead and my pedaling was asymmetric -- my total power dropped and I couldn't control my right foot. Over the course of six or nine months I slowly recovered, and I was able to match my power from before. I wasn't specifically concentrating on strengthening my right leg, I was just riding and walking and trying to get back to where I was. I have no idea whether my L/R power production is symmetric now, and I don't care. All I care about is whether I can achieve my goals with as many legs as I have available.

In a deep sense, if you can go faster and/or achieve your goals, do you really care if it was because of your left leg rather than your entire aerobic system, however it is bilaterally allocated? (I don't have an answer for that -- I think it will vary by individual).
Makes sense. With me, I'm naturally right foot dominant so there's no physical injury to deal with, but there is a mental bias that convinces me to rely on my right when the power needs to be put down.
Doomrider74 is offline  
Old 05-24-21, 08:01 PM
  #49  
Seattle Forrest
Senior Member
 
Seattle Forrest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times in 6,054 Posts
Originally Posted by Barry2
Regarding my PM, I’m a lot more interested in precision than accuracy.
A lot of people believe precision/accuracy are the same.

200 lb Man jumps on a bathroom scale 3 times
250.0001 lb
250.0003 lb
250.0002 lb

That scale is not accurate, but it sure is precise.

I’ll take precision numbers over accurate, after all I don’t want to compare to others, I just need to compare to my prior measurements.

Barry
Can you give me an example of accurate but not precise?
Seattle Forrest is offline  
Old 05-24-21, 08:05 PM
  #50  
asgelle
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 4,519
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1031 Post(s)
Liked 450 Times in 264 Posts
Originally Posted by Seattle Forrest
Can you give me an example of accurate but not precise?
Today’s date is 2021.
asgelle is online now  
Likes For asgelle:

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.