Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

Well, I bought it. Mystery Raleigh SBDU: SB#7269

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

Well, I bought it. Mystery Raleigh SBDU: SB#7269

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-30-23, 05:57 PM
  #1  
Piff 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Piff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,466
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 799 Post(s)
Liked 750 Times in 409 Posts
Well, I bought it. Mystery Raleigh SBDU: SB#7269

About a week ago I saw a raleigh for sale on my local craigslist. The photos were poor, and at first glance I thought it was one of those Raleigh Team USA bikes with 555 or 531 tubing.

A fairly common bike. Good rider, but nothing I was really looking for. And I actually wasn't looking to buy anything at all unless it was something a bit different and for a good price. But, there were some stickers on the Raleigh that really caught my eye:






A quick look in person sealed the deal that this was, in fact, a SBDU frame. Serial number 7269, so a later production.




Haven't been able to find any information about this SBDU apart from this catalog page. Look at the bottom right picture, the custom framesets. Link: https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-r_crbgMHv...25282%2529.jpg



Talking with the previous owner, he said that he had a client that was french and an avid cyclist. The frenchman purchased the Raleigh back in the day, and then promised that the bike would be handed over to him when the guy passed.

According to the guy, it has been kept ever since in the garage with a blanket on top of it. He didn't want to sell it, but his wife and daughter told him that he shouldn't be riding this kind of bike anymore (not cool). We settled on $350 for it

It definitely hasn't been taken care of, there's plenty of grime, grease, dirt, and a few flakes of paint coming off of the rear brake bridge that will need to be investigated. I think the frame warrants a full soak in oxalic acid and then a good spray of rust-inhibitor, there's some evidence of it being put away wet.

I am very excited to get working on it, but the bike wil have to wait. My graduate research is coming to a close within the next 3-4 months and needs a lot of attention. So, getting to work on and then ride this bike will be a graduation gift to myself and from my girlfriend, she even threw a $100 towards the purchase.

I will update the thread as work is done, but it will be quite the wait!! My long term intentions are to build a new wheelset for it, figure out the perfect cockpit (after 10 years of this hobby, only in the last year have I worked out my frame size), and do minor weight weenie stuff like maybe a carbon fiber seatpost if it takes a 27.2mm post.

Current setup:
Frame: SBDU 753r
Rims: Saturae HC19
Hubs: Shimano 6207
Cranks: Shimano 600 triple (6206)
Pedals: Shimano 600
Rear Shifter/Derailleur: Shimano 105
Front Shifter/Derailleur: Shimano 600
Brakes: Shimano 600 single pivot, 39-49mm (6208)
Bottom Bracket: ?
Headset: Shimano 600
Stem: Cinelli
Handlebars: Cinelli Campione del mondo (66-42)
Seapost: SR Laprade
Saddle: Brooks B17 competition








Last edited by Piff; 03-30-23 at 06:57 PM.
Piff is offline  
Old 03-30-23, 06:06 PM
  #2  
P!N20
Senior Member
 
P!N20's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Wurundjeri Country
Posts: 2,469
Mentioned: 32 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1079 Post(s)
Liked 1,898 Times in 931 Posts
Fantastic!

Originally Posted by Piff
and do minor weight weenie stuff like maybe a carbon fiber seatpost if it takes a 27.2mm post.
For the love of Merckx, please don't.
P!N20 is offline  
Old 03-30-23, 06:08 PM
  #3  
icemilkcoffee 
Senior Member
 
icemilkcoffee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,388
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1557 Post(s)
Liked 1,733 Times in 973 Posts
A steal at $350!! This one will clean up very well!
icemilkcoffee is offline  
Likes For icemilkcoffee:
Old 03-30-23, 06:14 PM
  #4  
Piff 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Piff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,466
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 799 Post(s)
Liked 750 Times in 409 Posts
Originally Posted by P!N20

For the love of Merckx, please don't.
I do have a nice, lightweight, aluminium seatpost in 27.2mm as well...but I've always wondered about how much truth there is to CF seatposts improving comfort
Piff is offline  
Likes For Piff:
Old 04-07-23, 08:56 PM
  #5  
Piff 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Piff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,466
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 799 Post(s)
Liked 750 Times in 409 Posts
Minor update: The frame is bare!



Took some time today to indulge in getting the frame bare, wiping off the worst of the grime, and finally getting to check out how the frame looks on the inside. So far, great news! No significant rust damage that I can see. And nothing seized That was my greatest worry, this bike can't have been worked on in decades.

Here's a pic inside of the bottom bracket. I was a bit surprised to find the fixed cup threads were a little rough considering how much love and praise is heaped upon the SBDU workshop.




But, I can't really fault them, the rest of the bike is perfect. Looking up tubing information online, I'm pretty sure the butting profile for this 753r tubeset is:

Top tube: 0.71/0.56
Down tube: 0.81/0.56
Seat tube: 0.71/0.56
Head tube: 0.91
Fork blades: 1.02/0.56
Seatstays: 0.56
Chainstays: 0.61

This is markedly thicker than when 753 first came onto the scene. Those tubes were both thinner in diameter and walls, making for frames as light as ~1600g. I haven't weighed mine, but I would guess it probably hovers around 1750g. Fork is probably somewhere between 630g-670g. All in all the frameset is probably around 5.5 pounds or less, which ain't bad for a mid 80s steel frame. I'm really hoping it doesn't shimmy like some lightweight bikes do, but we'll see. Even if it's a thicker version of 753, it's still very thin tubing.

Measurements are what you would expect. ISO headset, english bottom bracket, 126mm OLD dropouts, 27.2mm seatpost. Front tire clearance has loads, probably 32mm or even higher. Rear tire clearance is tight, 25mm fits fine but 28mm might be cutting it close at the chainstays.

While taking the bike apart there were some casualties of time. The fixed cup is fairly worn, but I wasn't planning on using the bottom bracket anyways. Surprisingly the spindle and other cup looks fine? Also, the headset is shot, needs to be replaced. Haven't taken a look yet at the hubs but I'm worried they might be goners too.

In my first post I wrote up the 'current setup' of the bike. After giving it some thought, I think I've mostly figured out how I want to spec the bike.

Planned Setup:
Rims: Saturae HC19
Hubs: Shimano 6207 (if they survived)
Freewheel: Shimano 600 13-24
Cranks: Dimension 110/74
Chainrings: 49/38/28
Pedals: KKT quill + toe clips
Rear Derailleur: Suntour Vx GT or Tiagra 9 speed
Front Derailleur: Suntour Cyclone II
Shifters: Not sure, but friction downtube.
Brakes: Shimano 600 single pivot, 39-49mm (6208)
Bottom Bracket: ?? Need to research proper spindle length for 6207 cranks
Headset: ?? Need to purchase
Stem: Nitto Dynamic II
Handlebars: ?? Unsure. I have some Nitto 135 randonneur bars in backup, but the ramps may be a bit long on this bike for proper fit.
Seapost: Specialized Pave w/ zertz (got it for $10 bucks at the bike co-op!)
Saddle: Specialized Oura
Accessories:
Zefal HPX pump
Nitto M18
Sackville small trunk bag
Small topeak saddle bag


Some of you may scoff at weighing the bike down with a rack and bag, but I'm planning on making this my ride-all-day bike so it needs storage for food, water, tools, clothes, pump, light, wallet/phone, etc. I hate carrying stuff on my back in a jersey.


Some more close up pictures of the bike below!


Serial number stamped onto the fork.



On the rear brake bridge there's some flaking paint. You can see where I lightly sanded down to the metal to see how bad the rust is. It's surface, not bad at all. However, there are plenty of small places all over the frame with spot rust or paint bubbles and it makes me want to get the frame repainted given the thinness of the tubing.



For better or worse, the steerer threading is not keyed. The shimano 600 headset dug into the threads, but I chased them with a steel headset lockring and they're working fine now.



This (slightly underexposed) picture is of the fastback stays. The seatstays connect directly to the pinch bolt rather than the top tube or seat lug. The way raleigh was able to do this was by fashioning double taper seatstays. Narrow-----------wider-----------narrow.





So that's the first step done! Stripped the frame, noted what needs replacing, what parts need TLC, issues with the frame, etc. The bike could be finished somewhat quickly...but I'm really trying to avoid not spending too much time on the bike. Now that's it's broken down I can put it away in storage, it previously was taking up room in the living room of my and my girlfriend's small apartment. Out of sight and out of mind until I can work on it w/o guilt!


Last edited by Piff; 04-07-23 at 09:02 PM.
Piff is offline  
Old 04-07-23, 10:00 PM
  #6  
mhespenheide 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Burien WA
Posts: 510

Bikes: Cannondale Synapse, LeMond Victoire, Bianchi Campione d'Italia, Kona Hei Hei, Ritchey Ultra, Schwinn "Paramount" PDG, '83 Trek 640

Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 267 Post(s)
Liked 324 Times in 210 Posts
I hope it's not a derail, but can anyone say what kind of lugs those are on the headtube? I have a Mercian with ones that look similar to those.
mhespenheide is offline  
Old 04-07-23, 10:08 PM
  #7  
Fahrenheit531 
52psi
 
Fahrenheit531's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 4,015

Bikes: Schwinn Volare ('78); Raleigh Competition GS ('79)

Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 790 Post(s)
Liked 802 Times in 391 Posts
That is an almost obscenely cool frame.
__________________
A race bike in any era is a highly personal choice that at its "best" balances the requirements of fit, weight, handling, durability and cost tempered by the willingness to toss it and oneself down the pavement at considerable speed. ~Bandera
Fahrenheit531 is offline  
Likes For Fahrenheit531:
Old 04-07-23, 10:56 PM
  #8  
icemilkcoffee 
Senior Member
 
icemilkcoffee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,388
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1557 Post(s)
Liked 1,733 Times in 973 Posts
On the contrary I think the BB shell was finished very well- look at how perfectly they notched the chain stays and seat tube to follow the curvature of the BB shell exactly.
Anyways- if you're building up with 6207 cranks, why not just have the complete Shimano 6200 groupset? It's a good looking groupset, and you have the option of going either friction or indexed, and the option of running either aero or non-aero brake levers.
icemilkcoffee is offline  
Likes For icemilkcoffee:
Old 04-07-23, 11:19 PM
  #9  
Piff 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Piff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,466
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 799 Post(s)
Liked 750 Times in 409 Posts
Originally Posted by mhespenheide
I hope it's not a derail, but can anyone say what kind of lugs those are on the headtube? I have a Mercian with ones that look similar to those.
Prugnat 62D.

Originally Posted by Fahrenheit531
That is an almost obscenely cool frame.
Ty I am obscenely excited to ride it!

Originally Posted by icemilkcoffee
On the contrary I think the BB shell was finished very well- look at how perfectly they notched the chain stays and seat tube to follow the curvature of the BB shell exactly.
Anyways- if you're building up with 6207 cranks, why not just have the complete Shimano 6200 groupset? It's a good looking groupset, and you have the option of going either friction or indexed, and the option of running either aero or non-aero brake levers.
It is very well finished inside, I agree, leagues better than my old Miyata 1200, but the last few turns of the cup get rough even after chasing all the threads. Prior to chasing there were multiple spots along the threading that were rough. But you're right, I was missing the forest for the trees.

I could do the full 6200 groupset...but I'm not really a restorer guy. And since this isn't a team bike or anything, just a custom frame some guy bought in the 80s and built up with a mishmash of 6200 and 105, there's nothing really to retore back towards. I admit I'm awfully close to having a full groupset, all that's left to source is a rear derailleur, brake levers, and a seatpost if it's long enough. At the same time I'm a grad student and am on a student budget.
Piff is offline  
Likes For Piff:
Old 04-07-23, 11:30 PM
  #10  
AdventureManCO 
The Huffmeister
 
AdventureManCO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: The Le Grande HQ
Posts: 2,734

Bikes: '79 Trek 938, '86 Jim Merz Allez SE, '90 Miyata 1000, '68 PX-10, '80 PXN-10, '73 Super Course, '87 Guerciotti, '83 Trek 600, '80 Huffy Le Grande

Mentioned: 45 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1225 Post(s)
Liked 3,535 Times in 1,407 Posts
Originally Posted by Piff
Minor update: The frame is bare!




It took me 250 posts for what took you 5. You have my respect
AdventureManCO is offline  
Likes For AdventureManCO:
Old 04-08-23, 02:05 AM
  #11  
alexihnen 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 655
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 189 Post(s)
Liked 473 Times in 200 Posts
Nice bike!


alexihnen is offline  
Likes For alexihnen:
Old 04-08-23, 02:27 AM
  #12  
georges1
Steel is real
 
georges1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Not far from Paris
Posts: 1,941

Bikes: 1992Giant Tourer,1992MeridaAlbon,1996Scapin,1998KonaKilaueua,1993Peugeot Prestige,1991RaleighTeamZ(to be upgraded),1998 Jamis Dragon,1992CTWallis(to be built),1998VettaTeam(to be built),1995Coppi(to be built),1993Grandis(to be built)

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 667 Post(s)
Liked 967 Times in 641 Posts
very nice find and a 753 frame is just the icing on the cake
georges1 is offline  
Likes For georges1:
Old 04-08-23, 05:18 AM
  #13  
cs1
Senior Member
 
cs1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Clev Oh
Posts: 7,091

Bikes: Specialized, Schwinn

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 225 Post(s)
Liked 24 Times in 22 Posts
Originally Posted by Piff
I do have a nice, lightweight, aluminium seatpost in 27.2mm as well...but I've always wondered about how much truth there is to CF seatposts improving comfort
Typically, 753 tubing used a 27.4 seapost. I would check first. If you use a 27.2 and clamp it down, you might crack the lug. Don't ask me how I know.
cs1 is offline  
Likes For cs1:
Old 04-08-23, 09:57 AM
  #14  
Piff 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Piff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,466
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 799 Post(s)
Liked 750 Times in 409 Posts
Originally Posted by alexihnen
Nice bike!
Thanks
And I thought it was that one too at first, but they're slightly different. Some frame details are off, like the fast back stays. That catalog page must be from one year prior or something.

Originally Posted by cs1
Typically, 753 tubing used a 27.4 seapost. I would check first. If you use a 27.2 and clamp it down, you might crack the lug. Don't ask me how I know.
There's a great blog run by a huge Raleigh fan where they've accumulated tons of info specifically on 753 frames built by the SBDU workshop. They wrote up a blogpost about seat posts (or pins, as they like to call them), and I feel confident that it's truly 27.2. Thanks for the warning, though, would be a shame to wreck a frame like this from such a mistake. https://raleigh-sb4059.com/2017/02/0...seat-pin-size/


They've also got a whole video specifically about SBDU bikes built with fastback stays. Here if anyone's curious:
Piff is offline  
Likes For Piff:
Old 04-08-23, 03:23 PM
  #15  
unworthy1
Stop reading my posts!
 
unworthy1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 12,577
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1442 Post(s)
Liked 1,059 Times in 784 Posts
you did well and good to buy this, congrats.
Hope the build goes smoothly and please continue to provides updates so we can be jealous, uh...admire!
unworthy1 is offline  
Likes For unworthy1:
Old 04-08-23, 04:55 PM
  #16  
Piff 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Piff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,466
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 799 Post(s)
Liked 750 Times in 409 Posts
One final post before I put the bike away for a few months. I have a backup 126mm wheelset that should fit the bike perfectly. It fit my last 126mm OLD bike, so why is it that when the wheel is installed does it look like it's dished incorrectly...about 2mm pulled to the left.

Pop it out, replace with the wheelset that came with the bike. Perfectly in the middle.

Out comes the tape measurer, and the rear dropouts are NOT 126mm. Rather, ~128mm or so.

Well, that's strange. The serial number places this frame at 1985 when 126mm hubs were king. My thoughts on why the frame isn't 126mm:

1. Original owner saw the future and knew that 130mm hubs were on the way so they stipulated the custom frame to have inbetween hub spacing? According to who sold it to me, he was supposedly french, not a japanese board member of Shimano who knew that 8 speed dura ace would define the new road bike hub spacing for decades to come.
2. Crashed? Even if the bike had been crashed and the OLD altered, the original hub's spacers would assumedly be setup for 126mm. And yet the hub slips into the ~128mm dropouts perfectly, while my 126mm wheelset sits loosely. And I see zero signs of stress anywhere on the stays/bottom bracket.
3. Altered after purhasing? Only likely option to my mind. But why would the original hub be setup for the in-between spacing rather than 126mm? I suppose the guy could have altered the hub with a new axle and spacers afterwards, but if they went to the bother of cold setting the frame you'd think they would have replaced the wheel with a 130mm hub at that point rather than messing about with their old hub.


The bike tracked straight when I rode it. The original wheelset looks perfectly straight too, dead center. Any thoughts to my hypotheses?
Piff is offline  
Old 04-08-23, 05:04 PM
  #17  
merziac
Senior Member
 
merziac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: PDX
Posts: 13,034

Bikes: Merz x 5 + Specialized Merz Allez x 2, Strawberry/Newlands/DiNucci/Ti x3, Gordon, Fuso/Moulton x2, Bornstein, Paisley,1958-74 Paramounts x3, 3rensho, 74 Moto TC, 73-78 Raleigh Pro's x5, Marinoni x2, 1960 Cinelli SC, 1980 Bianchi SC, PX-10 X 2

Mentioned: 267 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4510 Post(s)
Liked 6,377 Times in 3,667 Posts
Originally Posted by Piff
One final post before I put the bike away for a few months. I have a backup 126mm wheelset that should fit the bike perfectly. It fit my last 126mm OLD bike, so why is it that when the wheel is installed does it look like it's dished incorrectly...about 2mm pulled to the left.

Pop it out, replace with the wheelset that came with the bike. Perfectly in the middle.

Out comes the tape measurer, and the rear dropouts are NOT 126mm. Rather, ~128mm or so.

Well, that's strange. The serial number places this frame at 1985 when 126mm hubs were king. My thoughts on why the frame isn't 126mm:

1. Original owner saw the future and knew that 130mm hubs were on the way so they stipulated the custom frame to have inbetween hub spacing? According to who sold it to me, he was supposedly french, not a japanese board member of Shimano who knew that 8 speed dura ace would define the new road bike hub spacing for decades to come.
2. Crashed? Even if the bike had been crashed and the OLD altered, the original hub's spacers would assumedly be setup for 126mm. And yet the hub slips into the ~128mm dropouts perfectly, while my 126mm wheelset sits loosely. And I see zero signs of stress anywhere on the stays/bottom bracket.
3. Altered after purhasing? Only likely option to my mind. But why would the original hub be setup for the in-between spacing rather than 126mm? I suppose the guy could have altered the hub with a new axle and spacers afterwards, but if they went to the bother of cold setting the frame you'd think they would have replaced the wheel with a 130mm hub at that point rather than messing about with their old hub.


The bike tracked straight when I rode it. The original wheelset looks perfectly straight too, dead center. Any thoughts to my hypotheses?
Did you string the frame?

It may pull to one side under load with wheel clamped in.

Wheel dish and or uneven washer spacing off side to side?
merziac is offline  
Old 04-08-23, 05:09 PM
  #18  
Piff 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Piff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,466
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 799 Post(s)
Liked 750 Times in 409 Posts
Originally Posted by merziac
Did you string the frame?

It may pull to one side under load with wheel clamped in.

Wheel dish and or uneven washer spacing off side to side?
Haven't strung the frame yet, was planning to tonight. I know for a fact my 126mm wheelset is correctly set up in terms of dish/spacers. No clue about the wheelset that came with the bike, but it really does fit the 128mm dropouts perfectly.
Piff is offline  
Old 04-08-23, 05:13 PM
  #19  
merziac
Senior Member
 
merziac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: PDX
Posts: 13,034

Bikes: Merz x 5 + Specialized Merz Allez x 2, Strawberry/Newlands/DiNucci/Ti x3, Gordon, Fuso/Moulton x2, Bornstein, Paisley,1958-74 Paramounts x3, 3rensho, 74 Moto TC, 73-78 Raleigh Pro's x5, Marinoni x2, 1960 Cinelli SC, 1980 Bianchi SC, PX-10 X 2

Mentioned: 267 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4510 Post(s)
Liked 6,377 Times in 3,667 Posts
Originally Posted by Piff
I've always wondered about how much truth there is to CF seatposts improving comfort
I have confirmed this on both alu frames I have, newer Fuji's, one with crabon fork front and rear, one just front, crabon SP on both made a huge difference and I am highly allergic to alumabuzz so....
merziac is offline  
Old 04-08-23, 05:15 PM
  #20  
merziac
Senior Member
 
merziac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: PDX
Posts: 13,034

Bikes: Merz x 5 + Specialized Merz Allez x 2, Strawberry/Newlands/DiNucci/Ti x3, Gordon, Fuso/Moulton x2, Bornstein, Paisley,1958-74 Paramounts x3, 3rensho, 74 Moto TC, 73-78 Raleigh Pro's x5, Marinoni x2, 1960 Cinelli SC, 1980 Bianchi SC, PX-10 X 2

Mentioned: 267 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4510 Post(s)
Liked 6,377 Times in 3,667 Posts
Originally Posted by Piff
Haven't strung the frame yet, was planning to tonight. I know for a fact my 126mm wheelset is correctly set up in terms of dish/spacers. No clue about the wheelset that came with the bike, but it really does fit the 128mm dropouts perfectly.
Maybe string with and without wheel too?

And also congrats by the way, been following along closely for most of this, your odyssey has added these to the traditional Ti versions too for me now, tx a lot.

Last edited by merziac; 04-08-23 at 05:20 PM.
merziac is offline  
Old 04-08-23, 05:35 PM
  #21  
Piff 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Piff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,466
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 799 Post(s)
Liked 750 Times in 409 Posts
Originally Posted by merziac
I have confirmed this on both alu frames I have, newer Fuji's, one with crabon fork front and rear, one just front, crabon SP on both made a huge difference and I am highly allergic to alumabuzz so....
Originally Posted by merziac
Maybe string with and without wheel too?

And also congrats by the way, been following along closely for most of this, your odyssey has added these to the traditional Ti versions too for me now, tx a lot.
Thanks I'm surprised as anyone else a 753 SBDU frame popped up in sleepy San Luis Obispo. Good luck finding one And that's nice to hear about the seatpost improving the ride, I'm really hoping there is a difference.

Just strung it-- alignment is perfect, nary a millimeter of distortion.
Piff is offline  
Old 04-11-23, 05:47 PM
  #22  
cs1
Senior Member
 
cs1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Clev Oh
Posts: 7,091

Bikes: Specialized, Schwinn

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 225 Post(s)
Liked 24 Times in 22 Posts
Originally Posted by Piff
Thanks
And I thought it was that one too at first, but they're slightly different. Some frame details are off, like the fast back stays. That catalog page must be from one year prior or something.



There's a great blog run by a huge Raleigh fan where they've accumulated tons of info specifically on 753 frames built by the SBDU workshop. They wrote up a blogpost about seat posts (or pins, as they like to call them), and I feel confident that it's truly 27.2. Thanks for the warning, though, would be a shame to wreck a frame like this from such a mistake. https://raleigh-sb4059.com/2017/02/0...seat-pin-size/


They've also got a whole video specifically about SBDU bikes built with fastback stays. Here if anyone's curious:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bk_f8SpEW3w
The way I heard it was, 753 was basically heat treated 531. Because it was stronger, Reynolds could recuce the tubing thickness. Hence, the I.D. became smaller because the tubing was thinner.
cs1 is offline  
Old 04-11-23, 09:42 PM
  #23  
Piff 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Piff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,466
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 799 Post(s)
Liked 750 Times in 409 Posts
Originally Posted by cs1
The way I heard it was, 753 was basically heat treated 531. Because it was stronger, Reynolds could recuce the tubing thickness. Hence, the I.D. became smaller because the tubing was thinner.
It is stronger, and it was thinner, but by the time 753r came around it no longer was as a rule the super thin tubing that gained 753 notoriety for being so lightweight. 753r (the tubing my bike is made out of) is no thinner than 531 professional. 753t is however just as thin as the original 753, as thin as 0.3mm in some places.

There's tons of reading on that blog I linked above about 753/753r/753t and SBDU frames in general. My frame definitely only takes a 27.2mm post, I can't imagine it fitting anything larger.
Piff is offline  
Old 04-11-23, 10:54 PM
  #24  
Hondo6
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Location: SW Florida, USA
Posts: 1,284

Bikes: Yes

Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 549 Post(s)
Liked 668 Times in 463 Posts
I noticed above that you were trying to find the spindle length for your existing FC-6206. Here's the Shimano EV for that crank:

https://si.shimano.com/en/pdfs/ev/FC...6207-0650I.pdf

Per Shimano, that crankset used the BB-6207. In the triple config, Shimano specified the D-3SS spindle.

Shimano quotes the length of that spindle as 121.5mm. A second source agrees, and further indicates that 3SS spindles are asymmetric, 32/52/37.5.

Based on a quick eBay check, square taper cartridge BBs in 121.5mm are still available for around $20 in that spindle length. Can't say whether those are properly asymmetric or not, but for that price one might be worth a try. Finding a BB-6207 in good shape with the spindle you need might be difficult and may well cost more.

Best of luck. Nice find.
Hondo6 is offline  
Likes For Hondo6:
Old 04-12-23, 12:35 AM
  #25  
Piff 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Piff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,466
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 799 Post(s)
Liked 750 Times in 409 Posts
Originally Posted by Hondo6
I noticed above that you were trying to find the spindle length for your existing FC-6206. Here's the Shimano EV for that crank:

https://si.shimano.com/en/pdfs/ev/FC...6207-0650I.pdf

Per Shimano, that crankset used the BB-6207. In the triple config, Shimano specified the D-3SS spindle.

Shimano quotes the length of that spindle as 121.5mm. A second source agrees, and further indicates that 3SS spindles are asymmetric, 32/52/37.5.

Based on a quick eBay check, square taper cartridge BBs in 121.5mm are still available for around $20 in that spindle length. Can't say whether those are properly asymmetric or not, but for that price one might be worth a try. Finding a BB-6207 in good shape with the spindle you need might be difficult and may well cost more.

Best of luck. Nice find.
Thank you! The bike came with a 116mm spindle installed, matching the documentation you linked. Oddly, ebay seems to be awash with 116mm spindles. Amazingly enough, there is a replacement on Amazon...one can only guess to the quality of the steel used however:

https://www.amazon.com/Sunlite-Botto...ustomerReviews
Piff is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.