Mismatched HR and Power Zones?
#1
climber has-been
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 7,106
Bikes: Scott Addict R1, Felt Z1
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3427 Post(s)
Liked 3,564 Times
in
1,790 Posts
Mismatched HR and Power Zones?
Is it reasonable to expect that correct heart rate and power zones ought to roughly match up?
I've been looking at my activity for the last 2 weeks, and it looks like the zone 3+ power times don't match up with the zone 3+ heart rate times.
Zone 3+ Activity:
Heart rate: 40.2%
Power: 51.4%
I figure that my heart rate zones are correct, and power zones are set off of FTP, so would it make sense to increase FTP? Yes, I know the standard is to do an FTP test, but I really don't like doing those (does anyone?).
I've been looking at my activity for the last 2 weeks, and it looks like the zone 3+ power times don't match up with the zone 3+ heart rate times.
Zone 3+ Activity:
Heart rate: 40.2%
Power: 51.4%
I figure that my heart rate zones are correct, and power zones are set off of FTP, so would it make sense to increase FTP? Yes, I know the standard is to do an FTP test, but I really don't like doing those (does anyone?).
#2
• —
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Land of Pleasant Living
Posts: 12,233
Bikes: Shmikes
Mentioned: 59 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10167 Post(s)
Liked 5,860 Times
in
3,154 Posts
Mine only match up in the most approximate way. The main reason for the mismatch, as I understand it, is that the HR-power relationship is modified by fitness and unless one is continually and accurately adjusting one's FTP, the power zones are "wrong."
Are you pegging your HR zones to threshold HR or something else?
Are you pegging your HR zones to threshold HR or something else?
#3
climber has-been
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 7,106
Bikes: Scott Addict R1, Felt Z1
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3427 Post(s)
Liked 3,564 Times
in
1,790 Posts
Mine only match up in the most approximate way. The main reason for the mismatch, as I understand it, is that the HR-power relationship is modified by fitness and unless one is continually and accurately adjusting one's FTP, the power zones are "wrong."
Are you pegging your HR zones to threshold HR or something else?
Are you pegging your HR zones to threshold HR or something else?
I did bump up the HR zone 2-3 line four beats, because the default low zone 3 felt super easy. That barely changed the match-up.
I increased threshold power by 5 watts, which did improve the match-up by a few percent.
#4
Senior Member
Is it reasonable to expect that correct heart rate and power zones ought to roughly match up?
I've been looking at my activity for the last 2 weeks, and it looks like the zone 3+ power times don't match up with the zone 3+ heart rate times.
Zone 3+ Activity:
Heart rate: 40.2%
Power: 51.4%
I've been looking at my activity for the last 2 weeks, and it looks like the zone 3+ power times don't match up with the zone 3+ heart rate times.
Zone 3+ Activity:
Heart rate: 40.2%
Power: 51.4%
#5
• —
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Land of Pleasant Living
Posts: 12,233
Bikes: Shmikes
Mentioned: 59 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10167 Post(s)
Liked 5,860 Times
in
3,154 Posts
Yes, I'm setting HR zones on threshold HR, using the auto-calculation built into Training Peaks.
I did bump up the HR zone 2-3 line four beats, because the default low zone 3 felt super easy. That barely changed the match-up.
I increased threshold power by 5 watts, which did improve the match-up by a few percent.
I did bump up the HR zone 2-3 line four beats, because the default low zone 3 felt super easy. That barely changed the match-up.
I increased threshold power by 5 watts, which did improve the match-up by a few percent.
intervals.icu generates a time-in-HR-zone-based estimate of TSS for each workout, derived from a regression of the last few months of data from rides with both HR and power measurements. My HR number is often off by a few points, but the r-value for the model is .97 at the moment, so my zones can't be too far off.
#6
climber has-been
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 7,106
Bikes: Scott Addict R1, Felt Z1
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3427 Post(s)
Liked 3,564 Times
in
1,790 Posts
If you take a view over many rides, wouldn't that short power effect be minimal?
#7
Perceptual Dullard
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,417
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 918 Post(s)
Liked 1,151 Times
in
491 Posts
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2021
Posts: 4,083
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2333 Post(s)
Liked 2,097 Times
in
1,314 Posts
My HR and Power zones do not match at all.
Should they?
I'm using GoldenCheetah and 7 Zone Model.
(In practice, I only care about power at LT1 and 5 minute power)
Should they?
I'm using GoldenCheetah and 7 Zone Model.
(In practice, I only care about power at LT1 and 5 minute power)
#9
climber has-been
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 7,106
Bikes: Scott Addict R1, Felt Z1
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3427 Post(s)
Liked 3,564 Times
in
1,790 Posts
I'm using the zone auto-calculations feature in Training Peaks.
Heart rate: Lactate Threshold, Andy Coggan (5 zones)
Power: Threshold Power, Andy Coggan (6 zones)
Today's Training Zones (no laughing at sadly low power, please):
I figure that the 3-and-higher power totals ought to be at least close the the 3-and-higher heart rate totals. But that doesn't appear to be true.
Heart rate: Lactate Threshold, Andy Coggan (5 zones)
Power: Threshold Power, Andy Coggan (6 zones)
Today's Training Zones (no laughing at sadly low power, please):
I figure that the 3-and-higher power totals ought to be at least close the the 3-and-higher heart rate totals. But that doesn't appear to be true.
#10
Perceptual Dullard
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,417
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 918 Post(s)
Liked 1,151 Times
in
491 Posts
I think TP and others have an interest in simplifying things and part of that is making hard bright lines to separate zones or levels. I think that HR doesn't tell you about stroke volume (or cardiac output or mitochrondrial density or A-V O2 diff or metabolic efficiency), so the hard bright lines they propose are just soft fuzzy rules of thumb and approximations that apply, loosely, to their population of interest. Translating between HR zones and power zones is something you need to do if you're talking to a coach (or if you're a coach talking to a client) so you can get on the same page, but for those of us who are self-coached it's less of an issue. That said, I often pace by RPE, and being able to understand what some people think of as "tempo" helped me calibrate my sense of RPE. So I think of HR zones, power zones, and RPE as being ordinal scales: easy maps to easy across all scales, very hard maps to very hard across all scales, and the other zones or levels get kinda allocated in-between, and the Spearman rho is at least in concept how I'd measure agreement. This is my way of saying that Zone 3 in HR doesn't necessarily correspond to Zone 3 in power. Can you tell that I'm an academic?
Likes For RChung:
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,425
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4403 Post(s)
Liked 4,853 Times
in
3,002 Posts
My zones match a lot better using PILLAR (AI based dynamic training app) than they did when I was using TP. I think it's because PILLAR actively tweaks my power zones to match HR zones. I occasionally got messages from TP recommending I adjust my threshold power or HR based on my workouts, but not very often. PILLAR makes these adjustments automatically on a weekly basis.
Likes For PeteHski:
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2021
Posts: 4,083
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2333 Post(s)
Liked 2,097 Times
in
1,314 Posts
The type of terrain could matter due to fast and slow component of VO plus someriders have a high functional reserve capacity (W'). Short punchy hills will have high power and low HR.
I noticed with GoldenCheetah today that it applies today's threshold power to past rides. My FTP was much, much higher pre Covid, which I got in early December. So, my 2022 metrics are historically wacked.
I do know that when I had a coach, he would get annoyed at power surges on hills during say a planned 4-6 hour tempo ride. Told me to get smaller gears, pick a different route, drive to flat terrain, or ride the trainer. My terrain is lumpy, which might explain the HR and Power metrics or I might need a valve job.
I noticed with GoldenCheetah today that it applies today's threshold power to past rides. My FTP was much, much higher pre Covid, which I got in early December. So, my 2022 metrics are historically wacked.
I do know that when I had a coach, he would get annoyed at power surges on hills during say a planned 4-6 hour tempo ride. Told me to get smaller gears, pick a different route, drive to flat terrain, or ride the trainer. My terrain is lumpy, which might explain the HR and Power metrics or I might need a valve job.
#13
Perceptual Dullard
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,417
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 918 Post(s)
Liked 1,151 Times
in
491 Posts
I do know that when I had a coach, he would get annoyed at power surges on hills during say a planned 4-6 hour tempo ride. Told me to get smaller gears, pick a different route, drive to flat terrain, or ride the trainer.
Likes For RChung:
#14
just another gosling
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,533
Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3888 Post(s)
Liked 1,938 Times
in
1,383 Posts
I use TrainingPeaks and just look at my EF (efficiency factor) for continuously Z2 rides. Sure enough, it goes up when I'm healthy and training consistently, down if not. I would expect to see HR at FTP fall, which probably means FTP is too low if your LTHR is correct. I think LTHR is a lot easier to come by as I believe it's just below LT2, easy to find. Though LTHR can vary during a long ride, I'd guess one's FTP would vary also and in the same manner.
IME breathing is the most effective way of quantifying effort on a scale. Next I'd say HR is more accurate on-site as it were, than would be FTP tested a month ago. On long rides, I go by HR and use power as a way to hold my effort steadier.
IME breathing is the most effective way of quantifying effort on a scale. Next I'd say HR is more accurate on-site as it were, than would be FTP tested a month ago. On long rides, I go by HR and use power as a way to hold my effort steadier.
__________________
Results matter
Results matter
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2021
Posts: 4,083
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2333 Post(s)
Liked 2,097 Times
in
1,314 Posts
Likes For GhostRider62:
#16
Perceptual Dullard
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,417
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 918 Post(s)
Liked 1,151 Times
in
491 Posts
Ah, glad you figured it out. I forgot that years ago when I first tried to update that field, it took me a few tries before I realized I had to add a new row with the "+". Whenever you see a little + or -, you have to click that to add or delete a row, you can't just edit an existing row. It's mysterious the first time but once you figure that out, you'll see it works the same way throughout GC.
Likes For RChung: