Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > General Cycling Discussion
Reload this Page >

Stiffness Does Not Matter

Notices
General Cycling Discussion Have a cycling related question or comment that doesn't fit in one of the other specialty forums? Drop on in and post in here! When possible, please select the forum above that most fits your post!

Stiffness Does Not Matter

Old 08-22-21, 11:38 PM
  #1  
ShannonM
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: Humboldt County, CA
Posts: 848
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 405 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 430 Times in 286 Posts
Stiffness Does Not Matter

There's a meme (in the original sense of the word, a unit of cultural heredity, not the modern stupid-picture-of-a-cat-with-a-stupid-saying-in-white-letters sense,) that has been replicating in the brains of humans who ride bicycles for many, many years... and it's nonsense.

That meme is this:

Flex in the bicycle dissipates some fraction of the force generated by the rider's muscles.

This is simply, physically, not true. The thing that it's describing does not actually happen. Numerous attempts have been made to measure this "power loss." So far as I'm aware, nobody has ever been able to repeatably detect any power loss due to bicycle flex that is above the noise floor of the equipment used to do the measuring.

And, because the meme isn't actually true, this statement is true:

Unless the bicycle and/or its components are so flexible as to have negative effects on handling, alignment, or durability, the stiffness of any part of the bicycle or the bicycle as a whole is utterly irrelevant to the performance of the bicycle.

Stop caring about the stiffness of your frame, cranks, wheels, stem, handlebar, pedals, brake levers, (yes, I've seen stiffness referred to in brake lever reviews,) or any other part of your bicycle with the possible exception of racks. (And even they're not much of an exception... any rack strong enough for the load you're putting on it will be stiff enough for that load... if it wasn't, it'd break.)

Stiffness does not matter.

--Shannon

Last edited by ShannonM; 08-22-21 at 11:44 PM.
ShannonM is offline  
Likes For ShannonM:
Old 08-23-21, 01:54 AM
  #2  
Jax Rhapsody
Rhapsodic Laviathan
 
Jax Rhapsody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Louisville KY
Posts: 1,003

Bikes: Rideable; 83 Schwinn High Sierra. Two cruiser, bmx bike, one other mtb, three road frames, one citybike.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 222 Post(s)
Liked 123 Times in 91 Posts
Wow... nobody... just me? Okay...
Stiffness to a degree does matter. Though how loose versus stiff some things are, is marginal, like most cranks, unless the force exerted on a crank makes it flex, especially the chain rings wobble, then it's stiff enough. I've had bikes with various cranks; never has one not felt stiff.

Stiffness differs depending on what. Brake lever stiffness is probably more about how much give it has at it's hinge point, than how much "flex" the lever byitself has.

I had a bike frame break because a makeshift trailer hitch mounted on the chainstay went in the wheel and broke spokes. The wheel made the frame shake so bad, the downtube broke by the BB. The bike was large and somewhat flexy as it was, just mashing on it, the BB was clearly seen swaying left&right, noticably.

Stiffness can mean many things. Would you not want stiff door hinges on your car, or are sagging doors ya gotta lift and slam okay with you? With bikes there are things you don't want flexing, some people just go overboard, sometimes those people don't even know what they're talking about, and the difference between crank a and crank b's stiffness is so marginal, they mentally exacerbate it with a placebo effect. What's stiffer; a 105 crank, or a Seguino Messenger crank? Maybe the Seguino since it's thicker, but the reality is; it's trivial bullspit on something so slight, nobody really knows the difference just by riding with both, but they think they can tell the difference. Like how some people think they can feel that extra 2hp, swapping out the paper airfilter for a Fram on, in their car.

There's a point where stiffness matters, and a point where it's overhyped for clout and whatever. If your bike isn't acting like it's in a Tex Avery, or United Artist cartoon, it's probably stiff enough.
Jax Rhapsody is offline  
Likes For Jax Rhapsody:
Old 08-23-21, 03:41 AM
  #3  
PeteHski
Senior Member
 
PeteHski's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,174
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4273 Post(s)
Liked 4,710 Times in 2,910 Posts
I agree entirely on the "power loss" thing being a load of BS, especially within the range of flex we are typically talking about in practice.

But that doesn't mean stiffness is not important in several other ways i.e. handling and comfort. A frame with poor torsional stiffness will handle like a soggy couch. Bars that are noticeably flexible will not provide solid support when sprinting hard in the drops or climbing out of the saddle. Too much fore-aft flex at the headset and fork can make braking very unstable (try riding with a slightly loose headset and see how that feels when braking hard on a steep downhill). The best frame designs optimise stiffness in specific load directions i.e. combining high torsional stiffness with relatively low vertical stiffness (e.g. D-shaped seatposts, super thin seat stays) to give both precise handling and a reasonably compliant ride. Wheel stiffness, both lateral and vertical, is also important for handling and comfort.

Stiffness certainly matters a lot, just not in terms of power delivery.
PeteHski is offline  
Likes For PeteHski:
Old 08-23-21, 03:45 AM
  #4  
cb400bill
Forum Moderator
 
cb400bill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Kalamazoo MI
Posts: 21,322

Bikes: Fuji SL2.1 Carbon Di2 Cannondale Synapse Alloy 4 Trek Checkpoint ALR-5 Viscount Aerospace Pro Colnago Classic Rabobank Schwinn Waterford PMount Raleigh C50 Cromoly Hybrid Legnano Tipo Roma Pista

Mentioned: 58 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3059 Post(s)
Liked 6,378 Times in 3,691 Posts
Okay. Thanks.
__________________












cb400bill is offline  
Likes For cb400bill:
Old 08-23-21, 03:48 AM
  #5  
PeteHski
Senior Member
 
PeteHski's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,174
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4273 Post(s)
Liked 4,710 Times in 2,910 Posts
Interesting that you brought up brake levers as an example. I agree, the stiffness of the brake lever is pretty irrelevant given how little force you actually apply to it. But what does matter is the stiffness of the brake caliper at the other end. If the caliper body is too flexible then the brakes will feel mushy.
PeteHski is offline  
Likes For PeteHski:
Old 08-23-21, 04:23 AM
  #6  
OldTryGuy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: SW Fl.
Posts: 5,604

Bikes: Day6 Semi Recumbent "FIREBALL", 1981 Custom Touring Paramount, 1983 Road Paramount, 2013 Giant Propel Advanced SL3, 2018 Specialized Red Roubaix Expert mech., 2002 Magna 7sp hybrid, 1976 Bassett Racing 45sp Cruiser

Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1063 Post(s)
Liked 771 Times in 499 Posts
Me thinks the poster might be lacking in age and experience to make such a statement.
OldTryGuy is offline  
Old 08-23-21, 04:35 AM
  #7  
PeteHski
Senior Member
 
PeteHski's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,174
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4273 Post(s)
Liked 4,710 Times in 2,910 Posts
Originally Posted by OldTryGuy
Me thinks the poster might be lacking in age and experience to make such a statement.
Well I'm fairly confident he/she is not working in engineering mechanical design. But they do have a good point about the gross over-statement of stiffness relating to power transmission. It's just that the thread title is grossly wrong for all the other reasons why stiffness does matter.
PeteHski is offline  
Likes For PeteHski:
Old 08-23-21, 05:12 AM
  #8  
indyfabz
Senior Member
 
indyfabz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 39,055
Mentioned: 210 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18319 Post(s)
Liked 15,288 Times in 7,227 Posts
indyfabz is offline  
Likes For indyfabz:
Old 08-23-21, 05:40 AM
  #9  
shelbyfv
Expired Member
 
shelbyfv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: TN
Posts: 11,456
Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3637 Post(s)
Liked 5,314 Times in 2,700 Posts
OP should contact Trek, Specialized... big money to be made as consultant engineer.
shelbyfv is offline  
Likes For shelbyfv:
Old 08-23-21, 05:49 AM
  #10  
Koyote
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 7,765
Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6882 Post(s)
Liked 10,872 Times in 4,637 Posts
This thread title is like a nice easy pitch right down the middle… But I don’t want to get banned.
Koyote is offline  
Old 08-23-21, 05:52 AM
  #11  
OldTryGuy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: SW Fl.
Posts: 5,604

Bikes: Day6 Semi Recumbent "FIREBALL", 1981 Custom Touring Paramount, 1983 Road Paramount, 2013 Giant Propel Advanced SL3, 2018 Specialized Red Roubaix Expert mech., 2002 Magna 7sp hybrid, 1976 Bassett Racing 45sp Cruiser

Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1063 Post(s)
Liked 771 Times in 499 Posts
Originally Posted by Koyote
This thread title is like a nice easy pitch right down the middle… But I don’t want to get banned.
EVEN STILL, a whiff is possible

Here's a MONDAY MORNING interlude for y'all's perusal


NOTE -- mods can delete if inappropriate

Last edited by OldTryGuy; 08-23-21 at 05:58 AM.
OldTryGuy is offline  
Likes For OldTryGuy:
Old 08-23-21, 05:57 AM
  #12  
Phil_gretz
Zip tie Karen
 
Phil_gretz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Fair Oaks Ranch, TX
Posts: 7,006

Bikes: '13 Motobecane Fantom29 HT, '16 Motobecane Turino Pro Disc, '18 Velobuild VB-R-022, '21 Tsunami SNM-100

Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1465 Post(s)
Liked 1,542 Times in 806 Posts
Originally Posted by ShannonM
Stiffness does not matter.
A $3.6 Billion pharmaceutical market might throw shade on this statement. Just sayin'...
Phil_gretz is offline  
Old 08-23-21, 05:59 AM
  #13  
GhostRider62
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Posts: 4,083
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2332 Post(s)
Liked 2,094 Times in 1,311 Posts
I'm the wrong kind of engineer to make a decent analysis but I have been riding a long time and like everyone, I have my anecdotal observations.

My best climbing bike is a very stiff Pinarello AK61. When I get out of the saddle in the big dog, it just goes. All of my climbing PB are on that bike.

Long and flexible framed recumbents are dogs when it comes to climbing

What I think happens on a flexy bike is the sideward movement puts a moment onto the tires and this frictional loss is not recovered and it is significant. A stiff frame keeps everything nice and straight and tidy. I could be way off base and BQ planing could actually be the golden goose.

Last edited by GhostRider62; 08-24-21 at 04:28 AM.
GhostRider62 is offline  
Likes For GhostRider62:
Old 08-23-21, 06:00 AM
  #14  
OldTryGuy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: SW Fl.
Posts: 5,604

Bikes: Day6 Semi Recumbent "FIREBALL", 1981 Custom Touring Paramount, 1983 Road Paramount, 2013 Giant Propel Advanced SL3, 2018 Specialized Red Roubaix Expert mech., 2002 Magna 7sp hybrid, 1976 Bassett Racing 45sp Cruiser

Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1063 Post(s)
Liked 771 Times in 499 Posts
Originally Posted by Phil_gretz
A $3.6 Billion pharmaceutical market might throw shade on this statement. Just sayin'...
I find that figure hard to --- believe.
OldTryGuy is offline  
Likes For OldTryGuy:
Old 08-23-21, 06:01 AM
  #15  
unterhausen
Randomhead
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,363
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,664 Times in 2,497 Posts
I have a facebook friend that posts half bike stuff and half memes in French
He posted one that used "meme" in both the French and popular culture senses of the word. It took me 7 hours to get the joke.
unterhausen is offline  
Likes For unterhausen:
Old 08-23-21, 06:18 AM
  #16  
freeranger
Senior Member
 
freeranger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 2,579

Bikes: 06 Lemond Reno, 98 GT Timberline mtn.bike

Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 421 Post(s)
Liked 689 Times in 430 Posts
Guess all the fork manufacturers that built a lock-out in their design have wasted their money? I would think the motion of a suspension fork could qualify as "flex".
freeranger is offline  
Old 08-23-21, 06:19 AM
  #17  
Clyde1820
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: USA
Posts: 1,944

Bikes: 1996 Trek 970 ZX Single Track 2x11

Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 610 Post(s)
Liked 558 Times in 423 Posts
Originally Posted by ShannonM
Flex in the bicycle dissipates some fraction of the force generated by the rider's muscles.

This is simply, physically, not true. The thing that it's describing does not actually happen.
Seems hard to believe that if energy X is put out, but a portion (Y) transmits to downward or twisting motion instead of forward motion, that there has to be a loss. Miniscule, perhaps hard to even measure. But, still.

My own experience is with distance running. Absolutely, if energy is expended with, say, overly-exuberant motion of the arms, or sideways movement (no matter how little) of the stride, it can often be felt via the time for the course, the remaining "oomph" one has left as the race progresses, the difficulty experienced on that route, etc. Measurable? Never have "measured" it, as such. Other than paying attention to what aspects of a run and technique seemed to correspond to tanking, having less apparent strength, feeling winded, etc. Ran a couple tens of thousands of miles, back in the day. And flagging results was frequent enough, when technique was off, that we paid attention to those little things. Efficiency, IOW. No substitute for it. Even if not easily measured.
Clyde1820 is offline  
Old 08-23-21, 06:20 AM
  #18  
Phil_gretz
Zip tie Karen
 
Phil_gretz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Fair Oaks Ranch, TX
Posts: 7,006

Bikes: '13 Motobecane Fantom29 HT, '16 Motobecane Turino Pro Disc, '18 Velobuild VB-R-022, '21 Tsunami SNM-100

Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1465 Post(s)
Liked 1,542 Times in 806 Posts
Originally Posted by OldTryGuy
I find that figure hard to --- believe.
Total market value, 2020, from Mordor Intelligence, an investment analysis firm. Projections are a bit droopy out to 2026, though.
Phil_gretz is offline  
Old 08-23-21, 06:28 AM
  #19  
Koyote
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 7,765
Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6882 Post(s)
Liked 10,872 Times in 4,637 Posts
Originally Posted by Phil_gretz
Total market value, 2020, from Mordor Intelligence, an investment analysis firm. Projections are a bit droopy out to 2026, though.
With all of those aging boomers, I'm guessing that sales will stay firm.
Koyote is offline  
Likes For Koyote:
Old 08-23-21, 06:54 AM
  #20  
Hiro11
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,608

Bikes: 2022 Specialized Allez Sprint custom build, 2019 Giant Defy Advanced Pro 0, 2018 Seven Mudhoney Pro custom build, 2017 Raleigh Stuntman, various others

Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 782 Post(s)
Liked 475 Times in 238 Posts
This is a very old debate and OP is not the first person to mention this. To me the debate over stiffness has always been more about feel than "efficiency": a stiff/snappy bike just feels better out of the saddle or through a fast corner to most riders. Also, I've found that modern materials, tires and engineering have changed this debate. It used to be the case that you had to choose between a stiff handling/responsiveness and comfort, all modern bikes now have lots of both.
Hiro11 is offline  
Old 08-23-21, 07:00 AM
  #21  
Metieval
Senior Member
 
Metieval's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,857

Bikes: Road bike, Hybrid, Gravel, Drop bar SS, hard tail MTB

Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1218 Post(s)
Liked 298 Times in 214 Posts
Originally Posted by ShannonM
There's a meme

--Shannon
If you saw a meme , I am guessing it was Facebook, just report it to the FB "fact checkers" and move on.

If the meme was false, I am pretty sure they will flag it as false.

/endsarcasm

Oh btw, stiffness does matter in my world, as it matters to me. To each their own.
Metieval is offline  
Old 08-23-21, 07:00 AM
  #22  
thehammerdog
Senior Member
 
thehammerdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: NWNJ
Posts: 3,704

Bikes: Road bike is a Carbon Bianchi C2C & Grandis (1980's), Gary Fisher Mt Bike, Trek Tandem & Mongoose SS MTB circa 1992.

Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 722 Post(s)
Liked 353 Times in 226 Posts
Originally Posted by ShannonM
There's a meme (in the original sense of the word, a unit of cultural heredity, not the modern stupid-picture-of-a-cat-with-a-stupid-saying-in-white-letters sense,) that has been replicating in the brains of humans who ride bicycles for many, many years... and it's nonsense.

That meme is this:

Flex in the bicycle dissipates some fraction of the force generated by the rider's muscles.

This is simply, physically, not true. The thing that it's describing does not actually happen. Numerous attempts have been made to measure this "power loss." So far as I'm aware, nobody has ever been able to repeatably detect any power loss due to bicycle flex that is above the noise floor of the equipment used to do the measuring.

And, because the meme isn't actually true, this statement is true:

Unless the bicycle and/or its components are so flexible as to have negative effects on handling, alignment, or durability, the stiffness of any part of the bicycle or the bicycle as a whole is utterly irrelevant to the performance of the bicycle.

Stop caring about the stiffness of your frame, cranks, wheels, stem, handlebar, pedals, brake levers, (yes, I've seen stiffness referred to in brake lever reviews,) or any other part of your bicycle with the possible exception of racks. (And even they're not much of an exception... any rack strong enough for the load you're putting on it will be stiff enough for that load... if it wasn't, it'd break.)

Stiffness does not matter.

--Shannon
is that what she said?
doooo
thehammerdog is offline  
Old 08-23-21, 07:13 AM
  #23  
indyfabz
Senior Member
 
indyfabz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 39,055
Mentioned: 210 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18319 Post(s)
Liked 15,288 Times in 7,227 Posts
Originally Posted by OldTryGuy
EVEN STILL, a whiff is possible

Here's a MONDAY MORNING interlude for y'all's perusal

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8bvYpuMol3Q

NOTE -- mods can delete if inappropriate
"Dookie" (the guy at the computer), whose real name is Scott Brooks, was a childhood friend of mine. We grew up a few blocks away from each other and were members of the same swim club. Very funny and talented guy.
indyfabz is offline  
Old 08-23-21, 07:16 AM
  #24  
indyfabz
Senior Member
 
indyfabz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 39,055
Mentioned: 210 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18319 Post(s)
Liked 15,288 Times in 7,227 Posts
Originally Posted by ShannonM
or any other part of your bicycle with the possible exception of racks. (And even they're not much of an exception... any rack strong enough for the load you're putting on it will be stiff enough for that load... if it wasn't, it'd break.)
So if a rack needs to be stiff enough so that it does not break under load then stiffness does matter.

Thanks for confirming.
indyfabz is offline  
Likes For indyfabz:
Old 08-23-21, 07:19 AM
  #25  
Iride01 
I'm good to go!
 
Iride01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,810

Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020

Mentioned: 50 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6100 Post(s)
Liked 4,732 Times in 3,262 Posts
Hard to shoot pool with a rope!
Iride01 is online now  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.