How much difference does a bike make on speed?
#26
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: North Central Wisconsin
Posts: 4,624
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2975 Post(s)
Liked 1,181 Times
in
771 Posts
Sure, you can pedal your sled at an 18mph pace, but surely you're getting more fatigued faster than you would be on a lighter road bike. In that regard, when you factor in distances, I don't think there's really any comparison. Will it make a difference on a 4-5 mile ride? Maybe not. Will it make a difference on a 25-30 mile ride? Almost certainly.
As a bike gets rolling it gets resisted mainly by three forces...Aerodynamics, gravity and tire rolling resistance.
Gravity will only come into play climbing which takes into account the total weight of both bike and rider.
#27
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8,515
Mentioned: 69 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3241 Post(s)
Liked 2,512 Times
in
1,510 Posts
A lot. If going uphill, you want the bike to be light as a feather. If going downhill, you want it to be a boat anchor.You really need the team/support car following you so you can switch bikes as needed.
#28
Perceptual Dullard
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,417
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 918 Post(s)
Liked 1,148 Times
in
490 Posts
If you know about Damon, you know he can do the actual science. Lighter, more aero, lower rolling resistance, bikes can be shown to be "faster" with science, but it doesn't usually require science to determine that they're easier at the same speed.
#29
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 7,877
Mentioned: 38 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6963 Post(s)
Liked 10,961 Times
in
4,687 Posts
People often "feel" faster on newer and lighter bikes because they have that new bike fever -- the adrenaline and excitement. Hell, I've seen it: the guy who shows up on a new bike and is, for the first time, pulling the group and contesting town line sprints. And there's also the subconscious need to confirm the big expenditure by believing that the bike is making the rider faster, rather than vice-versa. And, of course, a lighter bike is generally a little bit faster, ceteris paribus -- but none of us, out on the road, is capable of performing anything close to a real experiment that would quantify the difference.
My friend Damon Rinard says when comparing bikes you can usually think about substituting the word "easier" for "faster." Human beings aren't good as measuring "faster" but our senses are pretty good at measuring "easier."
If you know about Damon, you know he can do the actual science. Lighter, more aero, lower rolling resistance, bikes can be shown to be "faster" with science, but it doesn't usually require science to determine that they're easier at the same speed.
If you know about Damon, you know he can do the actual science. Lighter, more aero, lower rolling resistance, bikes can be shown to be "faster" with science, but it doesn't usually require science to determine that they're easier at the same speed.
Last edited by Koyote; 07-11-22 at 10:41 AM.
#30
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,098 Times
in
5,054 Posts
Yes, but the physical laws which determine the relationship between a bike's weight and it's speed do not vary from rider to rider.
People often "feel" faster on newer and lighter bikes because they have that new bike fever -- the adrenaline and excitement. Hell, I've seen it: the guy who shows up on a new bike and is, for the first time, pulling the group and contesting town line sprints. And there's also the subconscious need to confirm the big expenditure by believing that the bike is making the rider faster, rather than vice-versa. And, of course, a lighter bike is generally a little bit faster, ceteris paribus -- but none of us, out on the road, is capable of performing anything close to a real experiment that would quantify the difference.
People often "feel" faster on newer and lighter bikes because they have that new bike fever -- the adrenaline and excitement. Hell, I've seen it: the guy who shows up on a new bike and is, for the first time, pulling the group and contesting town line sprints. And there's also the subconscious need to confirm the big expenditure by believing that the bike is making the rider faster, rather than vice-versa. And, of course, a lighter bike is generally a little bit faster, ceteris paribus -- but none of us, out on the road, is capable of performing anything close to a real experiment that would quantify the difference.
Honestly, I take the subjective approach primarily because it's literally the only thing I care about since I'm not racing or doing anything where I need truly objective data.
Finally, I'm not sure that individual body geometry doesn't have some weird effects that are hard to quantify. I felt I was a much better climber on my FX3 than I have been on several much lighter bikes. I didn't try to quantify that, but there was something about the geometry that just lended it to stomping on the pedals like a madman.
As always, I will defer to RChung if he says I'm spouting nonsense.
#31
Full Member
I have a 32 pound steel touring bike similar to your Sutra, and I have a 20-pound Bianchi road bike -- not as light or high-tech as the carbon Roubaix, but close compared to the touring bike. At low speeds, the difference in power needed is negligible. I mean, due to rolling resistance, one bike might actually take more than TWICE as much power as the other bike to go 7mph, but if one bike is taking 4 watts and the other 9 watts, who cares? Either bike should seem effortless as this speed. I would not describe the road bike as any "easier." Is there 6 watts there due to lower rolling resistance and lower drag? Maybe, but I can't feel that difference. At low speeds, the road bike will not feel any easier and may actually feel harder simply because it's uncomfortable.
Only at the higher speeds is the difference remarkable. At higher speeds like 30 mph, aerodynamic drag resulting from the effect of riding position on frontal area, and the overall coefficient of drag is by far the biggest difference in terms of the power needed to maintain a certain speed. If you can reduce your frontal area by just one square foot, the needed effort could drop as much as 70 watts. Similarly, an improvement in the Cd by 0.1 could save 70 watts. So get your Lycra on and get in the drops if you want to go fast.
If you enjoy going fast or riding with others who do and are willing to adopt the riding position, the road bike will no doubt be much better suited than the touring bike. If you'd rather sit upright and see what you're riding past and you're not in a hurry, don't sell the Kona.
Only at the higher speeds is the difference remarkable. At higher speeds like 30 mph, aerodynamic drag resulting from the effect of riding position on frontal area, and the overall coefficient of drag is by far the biggest difference in terms of the power needed to maintain a certain speed. If you can reduce your frontal area by just one square foot, the needed effort could drop as much as 70 watts. Similarly, an improvement in the Cd by 0.1 could save 70 watts. So get your Lycra on and get in the drops if you want to go fast.
If you enjoy going fast or riding with others who do and are willing to adopt the riding position, the road bike will no doubt be much better suited than the touring bike. If you'd rather sit upright and see what you're riding past and you're not in a hurry, don't sell the Kona.
#32
Senior Member
So there's a lot of Perfect Scenario science going on here. And in a lab, you guys may be right. I wouldn't know because I've never ridden in a lab environment. But out in the real world where even in "flat" Florida, there are the occasional dip or rise, bad pavement, headwinds, tailwinds, traffic lights, etc., the CF bike will be faster.
My two primary bikes are an all CF Specialized Roubiax and an aluminum Trek Lexa. And in a snapshot moment, on flat ground, they're probably so close as to not be able to tell them apart. But after 30 miles, I can tell you which one is faster.
#33
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,394
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1561 Post(s)
Liked 1,734 Times
in
974 Posts
That is true as far as steady speed is concerned. But first you need to accelerate up to that steady speed. The lighter bike will accelerate up to that steady speed quicker. Unless you ride in a velodrome, this will happen multiple times on your ride with stop lights, dodging people etc.
#34
Senior Member
That is true as far as steady speed is concerned. But first you need to accelerate up to that steady speed. The lighter bike will accelerate up to that steady speed quicker. Unless you ride in a velodrome, this will happen multiple times on your ride with stop lights, dodging people etc.
#35
Perceptual Dullard
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,417
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 918 Post(s)
Liked 1,148 Times
in
490 Posts
That is true as far as steady speed is concerned. But first you need to accelerate up to that steady speed. The lighter bike will accelerate up to that steady speed quicker. Unless you ride in a velodrome, this will happen multiple times on your ride with stop lights, dodging people etc.
As it happens, I went on a 25 mile flat, mostly leisurely, ride (unusual for the SF Bay Area) a few weeks ago. We had lots of turns but not many actual stops where we had to use our brakes. I just calculated how much extra energy would have been saved for a 1 kg decrease in mass: for me, it would have been a bit less than 100 Joules. The total ride was ~700 kJ, over just a bit more than 2 hours. So, on a flat ride, mass does have cost but on this ride 1 kg would have been roughly equivalent to a difference in energy expended of about 1 part in 7000. So not much.
Likes For RChung:
#36
Grupetto Bob
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Seattle-ish
Posts: 6,211
Bikes: Bikey McBike Face
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2579 Post(s)
Liked 5,636 Times
in
2,920 Posts
How much difference does a bike make on speed? Well I have never taken speed and ridden my bike and as far as I know my bike doesn’t take it either, so am not much use to you.
As the others have said, you will be able to accelerate and climb faster.
As the others have said, you will be able to accelerate and climb faster.
__________________
Road 🚴🏾♂️ & Mountain 🚵🏾♂️
Road 🚴🏾♂️ & Mountain 🚵🏾♂️
Likes For rsbob:
#37
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 678
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 790 Post(s)
Liked 348 Times
in
195 Posts
A light bike will only help with speed when going up a decent grade, otherwise it will do zero for you except empty your wallet. Biking is for exercise and getting in shape, which you will get less of with a light bicycle. Look at the routes you usually ride, if they are not full of any challenging hills, then a light bicycle is a waste of money. Where I live it is flat east to west, and from north to south it is an incline, so on some rides if I am going east and west I can have no net elevation change, if I ride north or south I will only have to ride uphill for about half the ride, big deal, I am on the bike to get in shape right? Also look at your weight, if you are big like I am, a bit over 200 pounds, then any bicycle is a very small percentage of the total bike/rider weight, if you are a small person though, and any bike is going to be heavy for you, then dumping cash into a lighter bike might be more worth it. I would stay away from carbon or aluminum though, aluminum maybe if it is used and very cheap, but carbon never, it is garbage. Steel bicycles are the best and always will be. Titanium is garbage too.
#38
climber has-been
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 7,102
Bikes: Scott Addict R1, Felt Z1
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3427 Post(s)
Liked 3,563 Times
in
1,790 Posts
A light bike will only help with speed when going up a decent grade, otherwise it will do zero for you except empty your wallet. Biking is for exercise and getting in shape, which you will get less of with a light bicycle. Look at the routes you usually ride, if they are not full of any challenging hills, then a light bicycle is a waste of money. Where I live it is flat east to west, and from north to south it is an incline, so on some rides if I am going east and west I can have no net elevation change, if I ride north or south I will only have to ride uphill for about half the ride, big deal, I am on the bike to get in shape right? Also look at your weight, if you are big like I am, a bit over 200 pounds, then any bicycle is a very small percentage of the total bike/rider weight, if you are a small person though, and any bike is going to be heavy for you, then dumping cash into a lighter bike might be more worth it. I would stay away from carbon or aluminum though, aluminum maybe if it is used and very cheap, but carbon never, it is garbage. Steel bicycles are the best and always will be. Titanium is garbage too.
#39
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,488
Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE
Mentioned: 144 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7652 Post(s)
Liked 3,473 Times
in
1,834 Posts
Bikes make a Huge difference in speed.
I am so much slower when I don't ride my bike.
I am so much slower when I don't ride my bike.
Likes For Maelochs:
#40
Senior Member
If you change nothing but the bike's weight, then you will only see a minor improvement in overall speed. Most of the resistance you see at 16+ mph will be from aerodynamics. Changing your frontal area and airflow will make more difference than a few pounds one way or the other.
#41
climber has-been
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 7,102
Bikes: Scott Addict R1, Felt Z1
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3427 Post(s)
Liked 3,563 Times
in
1,790 Posts
[QUOTE=BlazingPedals;22573552Most of the resistance you see at 16+ mph will be from aerodynamics.[/QUOTE]
That depends on the grade of the road. Power estimate for 16 mph on a road bike:
Flat road: 98 Watts
1% grade: 156 Watts
3% grade: 272 Watts
5% grade: 388 Watts
That depends on the grade of the road. Power estimate for 16 mph on a road bike:
Flat road: 98 Watts
1% grade: 156 Watts
3% grade: 272 Watts
5% grade: 388 Watts
#42
Full Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Southern California
Posts: 492
Bikes: Historical: Schwinn Speedster; Schwinn Collegiate; 1981 Ross Gran Tour; 1981 Dawes Atlantis; 1991 Specialized Rockhopper. Current: 1987 Ritchey Ultra; 1987 Centurion Ironman Dave Scott Master; 1992 Specialized Stumpjumper FS
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 209 Post(s)
Liked 178 Times
in
111 Posts
My personal test is commuting. Real-world conditions, same route repeatedly on a "hybrid" (90s MTB) with 26" wheels, panniers, and flat bars/bar ends) and a road bike (80's Ironman, slightly better gearing for old legs).
I realize that average speed is affected by city driving, but over time I think it tends to even out. A faster bike should allow you to make more of those lights that are about to turn yellow, etc.
My best speed home, with 560 feet of climbing, has been 14.41 mph, at 41:53, on the hybrid. (My notes say "Good hydration and calories this day.")
My next best speed home, same route, same elevation gain, is on the road bike: 14.19 mph, at 42:39.
Now, most of the other top times belong to the road bike, but there's a time or two hybrid in there as well. My conclusion is that in real-world conditions, for me and my gearing/legs/condition, there's little difference in the 43-45 minute rides that I do.
That being said, I've also ridden the hybrid up GMR/GRR (a long, 22-mile climb up a mountain here in Southern California) twice, and used the road bike this year. Over the first ten miles of the climb, the road bike bested the hybrid by a couple of minutes. So, five pounds of difference between the hybrid and the road bike certainly helps on the climbs. But I couldn't do what I did last year on the hybrid, which was climb 12 miles on the pavement, and take a dirt trail back down. That was a hoot, and it's why I like the hybrid for just going out and riding. Dirt? not much I can't do, so long as it's not highly technical. I can find a lot of nice hardpack and "groomed" trails out here, since we get so little rain. Pavement? A few mph slower, but I don't care as much about road conditions. Need a good fast workout with not so much time? Take the road bike and do 14-15 miles for an hour, depending on the elevation gain.
I realize that average speed is affected by city driving, but over time I think it tends to even out. A faster bike should allow you to make more of those lights that are about to turn yellow, etc.
My best speed home, with 560 feet of climbing, has been 14.41 mph, at 41:53, on the hybrid. (My notes say "Good hydration and calories this day.")
My next best speed home, same route, same elevation gain, is on the road bike: 14.19 mph, at 42:39.
Now, most of the other top times belong to the road bike, but there's a time or two hybrid in there as well. My conclusion is that in real-world conditions, for me and my gearing/legs/condition, there's little difference in the 43-45 minute rides that I do.
That being said, I've also ridden the hybrid up GMR/GRR (a long, 22-mile climb up a mountain here in Southern California) twice, and used the road bike this year. Over the first ten miles of the climb, the road bike bested the hybrid by a couple of minutes. So, five pounds of difference between the hybrid and the road bike certainly helps on the climbs. But I couldn't do what I did last year on the hybrid, which was climb 12 miles on the pavement, and take a dirt trail back down. That was a hoot, and it's why I like the hybrid for just going out and riding. Dirt? not much I can't do, so long as it's not highly technical. I can find a lot of nice hardpack and "groomed" trails out here, since we get so little rain. Pavement? A few mph slower, but I don't care as much about road conditions. Need a good fast workout with not so much time? Take the road bike and do 14-15 miles for an hour, depending on the elevation gain.
#43
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Scotland
Posts: 503
Bikes: Way too many
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 897 Post(s)
Liked 606 Times
in
363 Posts
My 15kg 29er mountain bike feels a lot slower than my 10kg road bike, but I haven't done any direct comparisons to prove it. I suspect the difference is slight.
I did an experiment before with a hybrid bike and road bike and found the speeds were pretty much the same over a 4 mile loop.
I did an experiment before with a hybrid bike and road bike and found the speeds were pretty much the same over a 4 mile loop.
#44
Senior Member
So I have a China-Mart aluminum full suspension MTB bike I weighed at one time and it came in at nearly 40 pounds. My Lexa comes in right around 22-23 pounds, so very nearly half the weight of the China-bomb. I did the same ride not that long ago between the two bikes and was surprised at how close my overall time was. The route was basically an 8 mile loop in my neighborhood. I was less than three minutes faster on the Lexa than on the China-bomb. However, as close as that was, I made the ride back-to-back with only about 5-6 minutes between, and I started on the China-bomb, so by the time I got on the Lexa, fatigue was already a factor. I'm sure that if I were to take a snapshot look at that ride, the max speeds were probably pretty similar, but there is simply no doubt in my mind that in the real world, the racier, the lighter, the faster the bike, the faster overall the ride will be.
#45
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,760
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1109 Post(s)
Liked 1,200 Times
in
760 Posts
Hi everyone, I ride a Kona Sutra steel touring bicycle. Recently, my friend gifted me his old carbon fiber Specialized Roubaix. I pick it up tomorrow. I've never owned a road bike but I'm pretty excited to get my hands on this bike. My bike is a tank and anytime I've lifted a carbon fiber bike, it feels like I could toss them across the parking lot. I'm just curious if you think I will be faster because it's so much lighter?
#46
climber has-been
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 7,102
Bikes: Scott Addict R1, Felt Z1
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3427 Post(s)
Liked 3,563 Times
in
1,790 Posts
Some of the strangers here are quite knowledgeable.
#47
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,760
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1109 Post(s)
Liked 1,200 Times
in
760 Posts
What I meant by my poorly written statement is that we are unknowledgeable about your personal fitness, motivation, the terrain you ride in, the bike's fit, any changes in air resistance on the new bike vs. the old (frame, wheels, tires, position) and other factors that will affect the speed you go. You could just go faster or slower because one bike and your position on it is more aerodynamic regardless of the weight. You might go faster or slower because of better or more properly inflated tires, regardless of the bike weight.
My point, though, was that the best answer to your question is what you experience yourself. Did the lighter bike make you faster, and under what circumstances. if not faster, was it more fun in any way? I was saying that your experience is the only truth in this situation.
Last edited by Camilo; 07-14-22 at 01:36 AM.
#48
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,488
Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE
Mentioned: 144 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7652 Post(s)
Liked 3,473 Times
in
1,834 Posts
which I see as a good thing .....
Likes For Maelochs:
#49
Senior Member
Likes For BlazingPedals:
#50
Full Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Southern California
Posts: 492
Bikes: Historical: Schwinn Speedster; Schwinn Collegiate; 1981 Ross Gran Tour; 1981 Dawes Atlantis; 1991 Specialized Rockhopper. Current: 1987 Ritchey Ultra; 1987 Centurion Ironman Dave Scott Master; 1992 Specialized Stumpjumper FS
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 209 Post(s)
Liked 178 Times
in
111 Posts
I'll take better notes in the future