Tre Tubi frames; how much are you giving up?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Toledo Ohio
Posts: 1,493
Bikes: 1964 Huffy Sportsman, 1972 Fuji Newest, 1973 Schwinn Super Sport (3), 1982 Trek 412, 1983 Trek 700, 1989 Miyata 1000LT, 1991 Bianchi Boardwalk, plus others
Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 582 Post(s)
Liked 697 Times
in
393 Posts
Tre Tubi frames; how much are you giving up?
All this frame material stuff intrigues me. Kinda silly as I’m an old slow guy anyhow, but I enjoy the technical aspects of it all. Tre Tubi was a generalization, although I do have an Aelle Torpado in the lineup for sometime. It seems that most larger manufacturers have some frames with what is considered “good” tubing for the main triangle and lesser tubing for the rest.
It seems from posts that often owners still praise these bikes with “lesser” steel in the forks and rear triangle. So, if geometry and equipment are the same, how much is given up? I would think that there is more penalty than just a half pound of weight. Thoughts?
It seems from posts that often owners still praise these bikes with “lesser” steel in the forks and rear triangle. So, if geometry and equipment are the same, how much is given up? I would think that there is more penalty than just a half pound of weight. Thoughts?
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: North, Ga.
Posts: 2,401
Bikes: 3Rensho-Aerodynamics, Bernard Hinault Look - 1986 tour winner, Guerciotti, Various Klein's & Panasonic's
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 159 Post(s)
Liked 375 Times
in
162 Posts
I have Tre Tubi , Aelle , 753 framed bikes and everything in between. I am certainly not an expert in any sense of the word. After 40 plus years of riding l do notice some differences.
Manufactures usually pair the component quality to the frame quality to align with a certain price point. The total package may be what I notice. A high quality frame verses a medium quality frame would be hard or impossible for me to feel a difference.
Manufactures usually pair the component quality to the frame quality to align with a certain price point. The total package may be what I notice. A high quality frame verses a medium quality frame would be hard or impossible for me to feel a difference.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8,515
Mentioned: 69 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3241 Post(s)
Liked 2,512 Times
in
1,510 Posts
Added weight is about it. You'll notice more with the saddle, wheelset and tires you put on it.
#4
Edumacator
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Goose Creek, SC
Posts: 6,772
Bikes: '87 Crestdale, '87 Basso Gap, '92 Rossin Performance EL-OS, 1990 VanTuyl, 1980s Losa, 1985 Trek 670, 1982 AD SLE, 1987 PX10, etc...
Mentioned: 59 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2434 Post(s)
Liked 3,107 Times
in
1,957 Posts
Agreed. I have Cromor, Tange 1/2 mix SL, SL mix (the Faggin I think), ELOS, 531 and a 531 mix.
The only frames I notice a palpable difference on are the ELOS and the Cannondale original run.
Plus we don’t know what the stays are...might be some decent stuff back there.
The only frames I notice a palpable difference on are the ELOS and the Cannondale original run.
Plus we don’t know what the stays are...might be some decent stuff back there.
Last edited by jdawginsc; 10-17-22 at 04:08 PM.
#5
weapons-grade bolognium
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Across the street from Chicago
Posts: 6,344
Bikes: Battaglin Cromor, Ciocc Designer 84, Schwinn Superior 1981
Mentioned: 44 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 985 Post(s)
Liked 2,376 Times
in
891 Posts
I had a TreTubi Faggin and it was great! Smooth and lively ride, great geometry. Sold it because it was too small (note long stem, set-back seatpost).
#6
Friendship is Magic
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 22,984
Bikes: old ones
Mentioned: 304 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26382 Post(s)
Liked 10,361 Times
in
7,196 Posts
.
....sometimes, in the larger size frames I ride (59-60-61cm) , I think I notice that there is less overall flex in the rear triangle (so a stiffer frame). But it's not enough to make a universal statement about these frames. Some of them are pretty nice. I have experimented with a number of them, from the offerings by Follis and Bianchi, to some of the one down from the top of the line from Stella, a Bottecchia, a Faggin, and even a three main tubes butted, early Schwinn Voyageur. They all ride well with decent wheels and tires on them.
....sometimes, in the larger size frames I ride (59-60-61cm) , I think I notice that there is less overall flex in the rear triangle (so a stiffer frame). But it's not enough to make a universal statement about these frames. Some of them are pretty nice. I have experimented with a number of them, from the offerings by Follis and Bianchi, to some of the one down from the top of the line from Stella, a Bottecchia, a Faggin, and even a three main tubes butted, early Schwinn Voyageur. They all ride well with decent wheels and tires on them.
__________________
Likes For 3alarmer:
#7
ambulatory senior
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Peoria Il
Posts: 5,998
Bikes: Austro Daimler modified by Gugie! Raleigh Professional and lots of other bikes.
Mentioned: 76 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1954 Post(s)
Liked 3,657 Times
in
1,677 Posts
I have several full 531 and a few main triangle only. I would say between the two that geometry is bigger than the lack of a super light rear triangle. Having said that and because I tour with front panniers only, I prefer full 531 for long trips. It's not a big difference in comfort but being old and slow, I take whatever comforts are allowed.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 3,439
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 872 Post(s)
Liked 2,269 Times
in
1,272 Posts
I have a Tre Tubi ItalVega that seems just fine , I don't have the strength to notice any flex variation as opposed to my full Columbus bikes.
Likes For Kabuki12:
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 13,443
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4224 Post(s)
Liked 2,944 Times
in
1,803 Posts
You can't see the sticker while riding it, right?
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8,515
Mentioned: 69 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3241 Post(s)
Liked 2,512 Times
in
1,510 Posts
Likes For seypat:
#11
Le Crocodile
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Santa Barbara Calif.
Posts: 1,873
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 368 Post(s)
Liked 778 Times
in
311 Posts
Best riding steel bike that I ever owned was a Tretubi Faggin. Granted, it's the sum of the parts, but that ride was magical. I sold it to make room for an SL top of the line Faggin from the same era. Nope, the ride quality was totally inferior on the "fancy" Faggin with the identical components/wheels.
I see a pattern here with the Tretubi Faggins...................................
I see a pattern here with the Tretubi Faggins...................................
Likes For Erzulis Boat:
#12
Friendship is Magic
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 22,984
Bikes: old ones
Mentioned: 304 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26382 Post(s)
Liked 10,361 Times
in
7,196 Posts
Everybody loves pictures. :)
Three Main Tubes Bianchi
Three Main Tubes Voyageur
Three Main Tubes Follis
Three Main Tubes Stella
Three Main Tubes Faggin
__________________
Likes For 3alarmer:
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 14,742
Bikes: Yes
Mentioned: 525 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3230 Post(s)
Liked 3,865 Times
in
1,439 Posts
I'm not even convinced it's always a downgrade. If the full fancy tubing frame was designed with 160 pound riders in mind, it might be a good thing for a heavy rider like me if the fork and stays are a little stiffer.
The trouble is, there's really no way to analyze this even pseudo-scientifically because you have no idea what you've got. With the main triangle I can look up the alloy blend, the wall thickness, the tubing set weight, and pretty much anything else I want to geek out about. With the forks and stays on a tre tubi bike, you usually don't get any clues as to what it is. Whatever was lying around the shop the day they built it? It might even be full 531 or whatever. That's just not promised.
The trouble is, there's really no way to analyze this even pseudo-scientifically because you have no idea what you've got. With the main triangle I can look up the alloy blend, the wall thickness, the tubing set weight, and pretty much anything else I want to geek out about. With the forks and stays on a tre tubi bike, you usually don't get any clues as to what it is. Whatever was lying around the shop the day they built it? It might even be full 531 or whatever. That's just not promised.
__________________
My Bikes
My Bikes
Likes For Andy_K:
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 23,223
Mentioned: 654 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4722 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3,036 Times
in
1,874 Posts
Using lesser grade material in the stays and fork blades is a cost concession to hit a lower price point. The weight penalty is not as much as most people think.
CrMo’s potential weight savings cannot be fully realized in the stays and forks because the frame would be too whippy, with more flex at the bottom bracket and less predictable steering. Stiffness in a round tube is a function of the material’s modulus of elasticity, its outer diameter and its thickness. In the case of CrMo versus1020 hi-tensile, the differences in the modulus of elastic are negligible and the stiffness becomes primarily a function of diameter and wall thickness.
A main triangle can maintain good stiffness, primarily due to the larger diameter tubes. In order to maintain the necessary rigidity, CrMo stays and blades are typically about 80% the thickness of hi-tensile stays. You lose about ½ the potential weight savings of CrMo, to maintain adequate stiffness. This is why designers often substitute lesser grade material in the stays and forks. It saves money without affecting the weight as much.
In some cases. the added stiffness can be desirable, especially with very heavy or powerful riders or in certain types of bicycles, such as a grand touring bicycles which carry heavy loads in addition to the rider.
CrMo’s potential weight savings cannot be fully realized in the stays and forks because the frame would be too whippy, with more flex at the bottom bracket and less predictable steering. Stiffness in a round tube is a function of the material’s modulus of elasticity, its outer diameter and its thickness. In the case of CrMo versus1020 hi-tensile, the differences in the modulus of elastic are negligible and the stiffness becomes primarily a function of diameter and wall thickness.
A main triangle can maintain good stiffness, primarily due to the larger diameter tubes. In order to maintain the necessary rigidity, CrMo stays and blades are typically about 80% the thickness of hi-tensile stays. You lose about ½ the potential weight savings of CrMo, to maintain adequate stiffness. This is why designers often substitute lesser grade material in the stays and forks. It saves money without affecting the weight as much.
In some cases. the added stiffness can be desirable, especially with very heavy or powerful riders or in certain types of bicycles, such as a grand touring bicycles which carry heavy loads in addition to the rider.
Likes For T-Mar:
#15
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Toledo Ohio
Posts: 1,493
Bikes: 1964 Huffy Sportsman, 1972 Fuji Newest, 1973 Schwinn Super Sport (3), 1982 Trek 412, 1983 Trek 700, 1989 Miyata 1000LT, 1991 Bianchi Boardwalk, plus others
Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 582 Post(s)
Liked 697 Times
in
393 Posts
So, is it assumed that the cheaper steel fork and stay tubes will be thicker and stiffer, or do the factories try to somewhat match the properties of the higher grades by not going too thick in some cases? All kinda interesting as many seemingly lesser frames are well praised.
Likes For sd5782:
#16
Extraordinary Magnitude
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Waukesha WI
Posts: 13,642
Bikes: 1978 Trek TX700; 1978/79 Trek 736; 1984 Specialized Stumpjumper Sport; 1984 Schwinn Voyageur SP; 1985 Trek 620; 1985 Trek 720; 1986 Trek 400 Elance; 1987 Schwinn High Sierra; 1990 Miyata 1000LT
Mentioned: 84 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2607 Post(s)
Liked 1,694 Times
in
933 Posts
So, is it assumed that the cheaper steel fork and stay tubes will be thicker and stiffer, or do the factories try to somewhat match the properties of the higher grades by not going too thick in some cases? All kinda interesting as many seemingly lesser frames are well praised.
I look at the Trek catalogs- The 600 series bikes have the main frame of 531 and the fork and stays of other material- CMn or CrMo. Looking at the purposes for those bikes gives you an idea of what the design process was. It wasn't "whatever was leftover in the barn," it wasn't entirely for cutting costs: the alloy used for more strength was often the alloy used for "cutting costs."
__________________
*Recipient of the 2006 Time Magazine "Person Of The Year" Award*
Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!
"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!
"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: Humboldt County, CA
Posts: 832
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 405 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 430 Times
in
286 Posts
A lot of those Columbus "tre-tubi" frames were made with sticker-worthy main tubes, and taper-gauge 4130 stays and fork blades. Often True Temper, Ishiwata, or Tange.
In other words, equal quality, less bread, no bragging rights.
--Shannon
In other words, equal quality, less bread, no bragging rights.
--Shannon
Likes For ShannonM:
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 2,321
Mentioned: 35 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 767 Post(s)
Liked 1,898 Times
in
889 Posts
How much are we giving up?
Too much!
Those extra few ounces aren't just destroying our ride times, hauling all that extra weight may even be shortening our lives. I mean, think about the strain not only on our vascular systems, but also on our mental states, spinning and spinning to propel the excess further and further, only to be crushed at the end of a long ride when we see that we're up a whole twelve seconds or more from the last ride on the top tier bike. Who among us can stomach results like that? A time drop like that can and must only be attributed to the lesser frame, and the dejection is enough to erase any benefit the exercise may have given us. 3,000+ calories and hours burned with nothing but the sad taste of failure sullying our dry, empty mouths. If we didn't drink heavily before, we sure will now, and would only have ourselves to blame.
And don't dare combine a "main tubes only" frameset with those old, terribly slow, dauntingly sluggish Campagnolo derailleurs. Good God No! You'll sweat more. You'll wither faster. Your poor fingers will swell and blister as you throw the levers further just to try and find the next gear, and then you'll cringe and wince at the abominable transitions, thinking "How did I get here? What have I done?!" You'll grunt. You'll curse. You might even cry a little. Kids will point and laugh. And the neighbors, what will they think?
Do yourselves a favor. Just say no to tre-tubi and Campagnolo!
Those extra few ounces aren't just destroying our ride times, hauling all that extra weight may even be shortening our lives. I mean, think about the strain not only on our vascular systems, but also on our mental states, spinning and spinning to propel the excess further and further, only to be crushed at the end of a long ride when we see that we're up a whole twelve seconds or more from the last ride on the top tier bike. Who among us can stomach results like that? A time drop like that can and must only be attributed to the lesser frame, and the dejection is enough to erase any benefit the exercise may have given us. 3,000+ calories and hours burned with nothing but the sad taste of failure sullying our dry, empty mouths. If we didn't drink heavily before, we sure will now, and would only have ourselves to blame.
And don't dare combine a "main tubes only" frameset with those old, terribly slow, dauntingly sluggish Campagnolo derailleurs. Good God No! You'll sweat more. You'll wither faster. Your poor fingers will swell and blister as you throw the levers further just to try and find the next gear, and then you'll cringe and wince at the abominable transitions, thinking "How did I get here? What have I done?!" You'll grunt. You'll curse. You might even cry a little. Kids will point and laugh. And the neighbors, what will they think?
Do yourselves a favor. Just say no to tre-tubi and Campagnolo!
Likes For BFisher:
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 20,305
Mentioned: 130 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3464 Post(s)
Liked 2,827 Times
in
1,995 Posts
Bicycle guide did a shootout of identical geometry frames made with various tube sets.
the budget tube set did too well.
it's the gauge for stiffness when the diameters are the same
the budget tube set did too well.
it's the gauge for stiffness when the diameters are the same
Likes For repechage:
#20
Extraordinary Magnitude
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Waukesha WI
Posts: 13,642
Bikes: 1978 Trek TX700; 1978/79 Trek 736; 1984 Specialized Stumpjumper Sport; 1984 Schwinn Voyageur SP; 1985 Trek 620; 1985 Trek 720; 1986 Trek 400 Elance; 1987 Schwinn High Sierra; 1990 Miyata 1000LT
Mentioned: 84 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2607 Post(s)
Liked 1,694 Times
in
933 Posts
Are you talking about the Bruce Gordon frames- or was there another one?
__________________
*Recipient of the 2006 Time Magazine "Person Of The Year" Award*
Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!
"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!
"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
#21
Full Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Palm Springs, California
Posts: 462
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 206 Post(s)
Liked 460 Times
in
176 Posts
I had that same frameset with the same paint scheme. Great bike. I probably couldn't feel the difference between than and any of my SLX frames.
Likes For krakhaus:
#22
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,604
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10947 Post(s)
Liked 7,473 Times
in
4,181 Posts
So, is it assumed that the cheaper steel fork and stay tubes will be thicker and stiffer, or do the factories try to somewhat match the properties of the higher grades by not going too thick in some cases? All kinda interesting as many seemingly lesser frames are well praised.
Modern 853 tubing comes in all sorts of profiles. Some are the same as 631 tubing and 520 tubing.
My grabel bike has an 853 main triangle and 4130 generic stays. This isn't a cost savings from a tubing perspective though. The stays are shaped(curved) a couple times and 4130 tubing is more easily and consistently manipulated. The thickness of the stays matches higher level branded tubing.
#23
Senior Member
Anyone know- during which years did Columbus employ the triangular tretubi sticker? See Kabuki12's Italvega and (I think) 3Alarmer's Stella above.
__________________
I.C.
I.C.
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 3,439
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 872 Post(s)
Liked 2,269 Times
in
1,272 Posts
The ItalVega is a September 1972 mfg. date.
#25
Senior Member
https://www.habcycles.com/m7.html
Last edited by Hondo6; 10-18-22 at 06:26 AM.
Likes For Hondo6: