Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Touring
Reload this Page >

36h vs. 32h wheelsets

Notices
Touring Have a dream to ride a bike across your state, across the country, or around the world? Self-contained or fully supported? Trade ideas, adventures, and more in our bicycle touring forum.

36h vs. 32h wheelsets

Old 08-01-21, 04:29 PM
  #26  
Tourist in MSN
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 8,448

Bikes: 1961 Ideor, 1966 Perfekt 3 Speed AB Hub, 1994 Bridgestone MB-6, 2006 Airnimal Joey, 2009 Thorn Sherpa, 2013 Thorn Nomad MkII, 2015 VO Pass Hunter, 2017 Lynskey Backroad, 2017 Raleigh Gran Prix, 1980s Bianchi Mixte on a trainer. Others are now gone.

Mentioned: 38 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2337 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 582 Times in 478 Posts
Originally Posted by Rick View Post
When I went to build stronger wheels after the botched job done by the bicycle shop on my new custom bicycle, I looked for the Andra 30 or 40 at the time but didn't know how to order them. When I did my sons bike I had an account with bike 24. The wall thickness on those Andra rims is quite thick. If I ever need new rims again on my bike I will use the Andra 40s if available.
My Rohloff bike is a Thorn Nomad Mk II. SJS in the UK is the only retail outlet for Thorns. I ordered the frame and fork from them, also ordered the rims and some other parts from them. They sell complete bikes, but I used to work in a bike shop, I build my own wheels, etc. So, I chose to build up the bike myself. And I bought my Rohloff hub from Bike24 in Germany. It is a good thing that Rohloff manuals are on the internet, as when you order a Rohloff from a retailer in Germany, you get the German documentation, which I can't read.
Tourist in MSN is offline  
Old 08-01-21, 06:53 PM
  #27  
Rick
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 810
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 343 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 188 Times in 124 Posts

My Rohloff bike is a Thorn Nomad Mk II. SJS in the UK is the only retail outlet for Thorns. I ordered the frame and fork from them, also ordered the rims and some other parts from them. They sell complete bikes, but I used to work in a bike shop, I build my own wheels, etc. So, I chose to build up the bike myself. And I bought my Rohloff hub from Bike24 in Germany. It is a good thing that Rohloff manuals are on the internet, as when you order a Rohloff from a retailer in Germany, you get the German documentation, which I can't read.
I ordered my Co-Motion Pangea Rohloff late November 2013. I received it in March 2014. I ordered all the frame options and the light package. I also ordered the sloped down tube and the fork stays for the Schmidt Son SL alternator hub. The shop used spokes and rims that didn't allow for a good spoke line between the rim and Rohloff hub. I used Sapim spokes and Velocity Psycho rims. The Psycho's are a box style rim and around as heavy as the Ryde Andra rims. I had the wheels out a few weeks ago and the true has not changed. I don't ride on the dirt much but the desert roads are full of cracks.

Last edited by Rick; 08-01-21 at 06:57 PM.
Rick is offline  
Old 08-02-21, 05:32 AM
  #28  
Tourist in MSN
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 8,448

Bikes: 1961 Ideor, 1966 Perfekt 3 Speed AB Hub, 1994 Bridgestone MB-6, 2006 Airnimal Joey, 2009 Thorn Sherpa, 2013 Thorn Nomad MkII, 2015 VO Pass Hunter, 2017 Lynskey Backroad, 2017 Raleigh Gran Prix, 1980s Bianchi Mixte on a trainer. Others are now gone.

Mentioned: 38 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2337 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 582 Times in 478 Posts
Originally Posted by Rick View Post


I ordered my Co-Motion Pangea Rohloff late November 2013. I received it in March 2014. I ordered all the frame options and the light package. I also ordered the sloped down tube and the fork stays for the Schmidt Son SL alternator hub. The shop used spokes and rims that didn't allow for a good spoke line between the rim and Rohloff hub. I used Sapim spokes and Velocity Psycho rims. The Psycho's are a box style rim and around as heavy as the Ryde Andra rims. I had the wheels out a few weeks ago and the true has not changed. I don't ride on the dirt much but the desert roads are full of cracks.
I built up my Thorn Nomad Mk II about a half year before you ordered your Pangea.

I considered the Pangea frame and fork, but I bought the Nomad frame and fork, mostly due to lower price. I had previously bought a used Thorn Sherpa frame and was very happy with that bike so I had high confidence in Thorn. Later I tried using my Nomad on a mountain bike trip, bought a low end Rockshox suspension fork for it, as that frame was designed to work with a 100mm suspension fork or the solid fork that came with it. Thus, although I did not plan on the suspension fork when I bought the frame, it became a plus that I could use that fork for a trip later. That would not have happened if I bought the Pangea.

And I have had my Nomad on some pretty bad roads. When you see something in the road that is smaller than a tennis ball, you do not bother steering around it, that says something about the road.



And with the suspension fork, below. This trip was day tripping from campsites that we were car camping at.



I find it a bit humorous that I bought the Nomad Mk II, in part because it was available with S&S couplers from the factory. And later took advantage of the ability to use a suspension fork. But in the past year they came out with a new model, the Nomad Mk III, that does not offer the S&S couplers or the correct geometry for the suspension fork. Thus if I was buying today, I would likely have gone with the Pangea over the Thorn. They dropped the optional S&S and ability to use suspension fork due to lack of interest, thus I appear to be an unusual buyer.

If you are not aware, Rohloff now provides flange support rings with new hubs to support the flanges if you crack a flange, the rings support the flange and allows your trip to continue. They suggest adding the rings if you rebuild the wheel. I went ahead and added them although I was not actually rebuilding the wheel, in my case I only removed half the spoke nipples so I could slide the rings on. But I built up the wheels in the first place so I knew what I was doing. If you do not know how to build a wheel, this would not be the one to learn on.
Tourist in MSN is offline  
Old 08-02-21, 01:11 PM
  #29  
Rick
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 810
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 343 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 188 Times in 124 Posts
If you are not aware, Rohloff now provides flange support rings with new hubs to support the flanges if you crack a flange, the rings support the flange and allows your trip to continue. They suggest adding the rings if you rebuild the wheel. I went ahead and added them although I was not actually rebuilding the wheel, in my case I only removed half the spoke nipples so I could slide the rings on. But I built up the wheels in the first place so I knew what I was doing. If you do not know how to build a wheel, this would not be the one to learn on.
I have seen the flange support rings and considered them. I believe part of the reason for the flange support rings is the large diameter flanges on the Rohloff hubs make it harder to build a strong wheel. The angle of the spokes from the hub to the rim is more acute. I examined everything on my new bicycle and noticed right away the wheel build was like amateur night. The bent part of the spokes did not make contact with the flange which made a large gap instead of the spoke digging into the flange. The spokes didn't make a straight line on there way to the rim either. My solution was the Psycho rims and the Sapim spokes. The wide box style rim and Sapim's ball joint style spoke heads allowed the spokes to be straight and their bend allowed the spoke to sit against the hub flange. I was able to properly stress the wheel and achieve really even spoke tension. Rohloff makes a very high quality well engineered product. They do what they can to keep their good name and through no fault of their own people without the proper skill set sometimes muck things up.
Rick is offline  
Old 08-02-21, 01:35 PM
  #30  
Tourist in MSN
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 8,448

Bikes: 1961 Ideor, 1966 Perfekt 3 Speed AB Hub, 1994 Bridgestone MB-6, 2006 Airnimal Joey, 2009 Thorn Sherpa, 2013 Thorn Nomad MkII, 2015 VO Pass Hunter, 2017 Lynskey Backroad, 2017 Raleigh Gran Prix, 1980s Bianchi Mixte on a trainer. Others are now gone.

Mentioned: 38 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2337 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 582 Times in 478 Posts
Originally Posted by Rick View Post
I have seen the flange support rings and considered them. I believe part of the reason for the flange support rings is the large diameter flanges on the Rohloff hubs make it harder to build a strong wheel. The angle of the spokes from the hub to the rim is more acute. ....
If you research Rohloff hub failures, there are lots of cases cited on the internet where a spoke came out of the flange from a cracked flange. And then you are kind of screwed because the wheel will not true missing a spoke with the wide angles. It is my understanding that the issue is not so much the angles, but that Rohloff makes the hub shells from a process other than forging. Maybe I have that wrong, I am relying on memory from what I read years ago.

I used Sapim nipples even though I had a rim drilled for Rohloff, for the reason you cite.
Tourist in MSN is offline  
Old 08-02-21, 01:51 PM
  #31  
Rick
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 810
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 343 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 188 Times in 124 Posts
If you research Rohloff hub failures, there are lots of cases cited on the internet where a spoke came out of the flange from a cracked flange. And then you are kind of screwed because the wheel will not true missing a spoke with the wide angles. It is my understanding that the issue is not so much the angles, but that Rohloff makes the hub shells from a process other than forging. Maybe I have that wrong, I am relying on memory from what I read years ago.

I used Sapim nipples even though I had a rim drilled for Rohloff, for the reason you cite.
Thanks for the info: I will investigate this subject further.
Rick is offline  
Old 08-03-21, 07:26 AM
  #32  
IPassGas
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 236

Bikes: Schwinn, Nishiki, Santana, Trek, Rodriguez

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 115 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 51 Times in 35 Posts
Originally Posted by Rick View Post
I have seen the flange support rings and considered them. I believe part of the reason for the flange support rings is the large diameter flanges on the Rohloff hubs make it harder to build a strong wheel. The angle of the spokes from the hub to the rim is more acute. I examined everything on my new bicycle and noticed right away the wheel build was like amateur night. The bent part of the spokes did not make contact with the flange which made a large gap instead of the spoke digging into the flange. The spokes didn't make a straight line on there way to the rim either. My solution was the Psycho rims and the Sapim spokes. The wide box style rim and Sapim's ball joint style spoke heads allowed the spokes to be straight and their bend allowed the spoke to sit against the hub flange. I was able to properly stress the wheel and achieve really even spoke tension. Rohloff makes a very high quality well engineered product. They do what they can to keep their good name and through no fault of their own people without the proper skill set sometimes muck things up.
US wheel builders do not know how to build wheels for Rohloff and they are reluctant to contact European shops to learn. Especially for 26" rim and less so for 700, the large Rohloff flange is best with angled spoke drillings in the rim. From Ryde specifications (see their brochure), Andra rims are drilled 8 deg radially and 2 deg axially. If you use a spoke length calculator that gives angles as well as lengths (e.g. freespoke), the Andra drillings match with Rohloff well. The spoke line at the nipple end is straight. This and polyax nipples are ideal. I learned this the hard way, 3 bad rear wheels, I gave up on US bike shops and built the wheels myself. After 5000 miles of heavily loaded touring, the wheels stay true and at tension. The flange support rings are a good thing.
IPassGas is offline  
Likes For IPassGas:
Old 08-03-21, 09:19 AM
  #33  
Rick
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 810
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 343 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 188 Times in 124 Posts
US wheel builders do not know how to build wheels for Rohloff and they are reluctant to contact European shops to learn. Especially for 26" rim and less so for 700, the large Rohloff flange is best with angled spoke drillings in the rim. From Ryde specifications (see their brochure), Andra rims are drilled 8 deg radially and 2 deg axially. If you use a spoke length calculator that gives angles as well as lengths (e.g. freespoke), the Andra drillings match with Rohloff well. The spoke line at the nipple end is straight. This and Polyax nipples are ideal. I learned this the hard way, 3 bad rear wheels, I gave up on US bike shops and built the wheels myself. After 5000 miles of heavily loaded touring, the wheels stay true and at tension. The flange support rings are a good thing.
The rims that came on my touring bicycle had the holes almost perfectly aligned down the center of the rim. The j bend on the spoke was a poor match for the flange. I replaced them with the Psycho rims that are a wide box style rim and there is a noticeable right and left space between the drillings. I used the Sapim spokes with Polyax nipples. I did this 7 years ago and the wheels are in the same condition as when I rebuilt them. I have had to rebuild or build new wheels for every bicycle I have ever purchased.
Rick is offline  
Old 08-03-21, 10:04 AM
  #34  
Tourist in MSN
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 8,448

Bikes: 1961 Ideor, 1966 Perfekt 3 Speed AB Hub, 1994 Bridgestone MB-6, 2006 Airnimal Joey, 2009 Thorn Sherpa, 2013 Thorn Nomad MkII, 2015 VO Pass Hunter, 2017 Lynskey Backroad, 2017 Raleigh Gran Prix, 1980s Bianchi Mixte on a trainer. Others are now gone.

Mentioned: 38 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2337 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 582 Times in 478 Posts
Originally Posted by Rick View Post
The rims that came on my touring bicycle had the holes almost perfectly aligned down the center of the rim. The j bend on the spoke was a poor match for the flange. I replaced them with the Psycho rims that are a wide box style rim and there is a noticeable right and left space between the drillings. I used the Sapim spokes with Polyax nipples. I did this 7 years ago and the wheels are in the same condition as when I rebuilt them. I have had to rebuild or build new wheels for every bicycle I have ever purchased.
I have only bought two complete new bikes in my life, the wheels were fine. But having worked as a bike mechanic and having some strong opinions on what I wanted, I chose to build up most of my bikes.

I used Wheelsmith spokes, I usually have used those on my other wheels. But as I noted above, I used the Sapim nipples because they are more forgiving if the angle is off.

If you consider adding the support rings, I did one side at a time, loosened and removed half the nipples so that I could drop the rings onto the hub but I did not even remove the spokes from the hub. And after seating the ring on the hub, retentioned the spokes on that side before I did the second side.

Did not take long at all. I set the hub on an empty bucket to provide a stable horizontal support for the wheel.

First photo, I am holding the spokes up so that I can drop the ring onto the hub.



Second photo, the ring is on the hub but I have not yet laced the spokes. Thus, the spokes are not at correct angles or cross pattern yet.



I had a few drops of oil drip out of the hub when the hub was horizontal, so if you do this, be prepared for a few drops of oil to drop onto whatever is under the hub.

Rohloff does not recommend adding the rings to all hubs, they only specifically recommend adding them when you rebuild the wheel. But some of my trips have had me quite far from help with a heavily loaded bike, so I chose to add the rings when I learned they existed. If I did not use this bike for heavy touring in remote areas, I probably would not have added the rings.

Tourist in MSN is offline  
Old 08-03-21, 12:17 PM
  #35  
veloz
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 246
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 68 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 25 Times in 22 Posts
If you go with Dyads, 32 should be fine. OPs maybe not so much. Id prefer 36 rear either way. I did 32 on my A23s and rear is cracked at a spoke hole. Still runs true! That wheel saw a lot of loaded tour and off-road so no surprise. Velocity wheels get my vote every time.
veloz is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information -

Copyright 2021 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.