Not so Fast– 700x25c NOT Faster than 23s afterall...
#176
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Walnut Creek, CA
Posts: 2,668
Bikes: 2023 Canyon Aeoroad CF SL, 2015 Trek Emonda SLR, 2002 Litespeed Classic, 2005 Bianchi Pista, Some BikesDirect MTB I never ride.
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 647 Post(s)
Liked 136 Times
in
89 Posts
Look, there's no way that a normal rider could tell the difference between a 23 or a 25 rolling resistance if they are the same make and model of tire. Rolling resistance is the least of the drag on a bike. Shaving the hair off of your legs is immediately detectable if you have a lot of leg hair. But you sure can't tell about 23 and 25's.
#177
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Walnut Creek, CA
Posts: 2,668
Bikes: 2023 Canyon Aeoroad CF SL, 2015 Trek Emonda SLR, 2002 Litespeed Classic, 2005 Bianchi Pista, Some BikesDirect MTB I never ride.
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 647 Post(s)
Liked 136 Times
in
89 Posts
#178
Voice of the Industry
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 12,572
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1188 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
8 Posts
That's actually incorrect. "Bulk" air drag is by far and away the most impactful determinant to aerodynamics, but tire rolling resistance is second (a distant second). We did a lab experiment on this when I was in college, and though I only very vaguely remember the results, but rolling resistance in tires is a factor, albeit small compared to the overall profile of rider and bike.
#179
Senior Member
Thread Starter
That's actually incorrect. "Bulk" air drag is by far and away the most impactful determinant to aerodynamics, but tire rolling resistance is second (a distant second). We did a lab experiment on this when I was in college, and though I only very vaguely remember the results, but rolling resistance in tires is a factor, albeit small compared to the overall profile of rider and bike.
#180
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Walnut Creek, CA
Posts: 2,668
Bikes: 2023 Canyon Aeoroad CF SL, 2015 Trek Emonda SLR, 2002 Litespeed Classic, 2005 Bianchi Pista, Some BikesDirect MTB I never ride.
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 647 Post(s)
Liked 136 Times
in
89 Posts
#181
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times
in
6,054 Posts
The current view of many makes tables like this way passé but, skeptical or not of the latest performance/comfort philosophy/science, pretty much amounting to having your cake and eating it too, the table data exceeds mfg's recommendations. I just got a Rubino 28 in the mail yesterday the psi min/max imprinted on the rubber is 70 to 100. 108 isn't going to blow the bead off my rims but it is funny to not believe one set of facts while at the same time disregarding tire-maker facts...
#182
Voice of the Industry
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 12,572
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1188 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
8 Posts
Another factor we probably might consider is that the body position needed to reduce the air drag of the body -- to the extent that achieving and maintaining it may be assisted by the comfort and security of having a wider tire at a lower pressure on the front -- may more than offset the aerodynamic drag of going with the bigger tire. For example, moving forward on the saddle and rotating the hips forward with the elbows up by the bars, as is possible using clip-ons, puts more dead body weight over the front tire where the ride can be a lot rougher than sitting over the back tire with your legs displacing a lot of your body weight.
Last edited by Campag4life; 05-08-18 at 03:45 PM.
#183
Voice of the Industry
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 12,572
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1188 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
8 Posts
The current view of many makes tables like this way passé but, skeptical or not of the latest performance/comfort philosophy/science, pretty much amounting to having your cake and eating it too, the table data exceeds mfg's recommendations. I just got a Rubino 28 in the mail yesterday the psi min/max imprinted on the rubber is 70 to 100. 108 isn't going to blow the bead off my rims but it is funny to not believe one set of facts while at the same time disregarding tire-maker facts...
#184
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Table exceeds mfrg' recommendations? How? The table is pretty accurate by and large. But as footnoted, a starting point. The smoother the road surface, wider tires can be run at slightly higher pressure because their benefit of lower pressure without flatting isn't as necessary on smoother road surfaces.
#185
Senior Member
Thread Starter
From Cycling Weekly article on Schwalbe’s recommended tyre pressure table...
...And, whatever your preference, tyre pressure should always lie within the maximum and minimum inflation recommendations marked on the tyre sidewall.
#187
Senior Member
Thread Starter
#188
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,629
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3871 Post(s)
Liked 2,568 Times
in
1,579 Posts
#189
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Melbourne, Oz
Posts: 9,545
Bikes: https://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=152015&p=1404231
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1528 Post(s)
Liked 718 Times
in
510 Posts
Tyre manufacturer's pressure recommendations can be safely ignored; the safety margin is close to 100%, depending on the bead interface with the rim - ie, it generally takes twice the max pressure to blow the tyre off, and nobody's going anywhere near that. As far as the tyres are concerned, all you need to think about is pinch flats and squirm, versus bouncing down the road.
Now, what rim manufacturers say OTOH, is disregarded at your peril.
....And regarding the question of whether discussing differences in rolling resistance is akin to counting how many angels fit on the head of a pin, perhaps it might be relevant to consider whether it's worth the bother of riding on the white line. I suppose as you go faster, it's a smaller percentage of total drag, but I've found under 30km/h it can be worth an extra gear, depending on the quality of the bitumen.
....And regarding the question of whether discussing differences in rolling resistance is akin to counting how many angels fit on the head of a pin, perhaps it might be relevant to consider whether it's worth the bother of riding on the white line. I suppose as you go faster, it's a smaller percentage of total drag, but I've found under 30km/h it can be worth an extra gear, depending on the quality of the bitumen.
#190
Senior Member
Thread Starter
My guess is that any table that's been printed prior to 2015 based on recent discussions about rolling resistance, tire widths and psi... and, knowing OEM rims have gone from a standard of 17 to 19 -- probably can be at least mentally adjusted knowing that 23s nowadays are more like 25s, etc.
In practice though based my recent sojourn into the land of 28s-- it's not that much wider than my 25s but it's noticeably taller, despite supposedly having a supple casing as evidence by the 100 psi max pressure (my 25s have a max pressure of 130). And yet, the recent move to wider rims is to get wider not taller tires,
All of which leads me to believe anyone buying a new bike with the expectation of benefiting from wider tires probably should make sure the OEM rim width is >19 or all they'll be accomplishing is eliminating a risk that they may not have with 25s--i.e., a risk of pinch flats.
#191
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280
Bikes: Nashbar Road
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times
in
228 Posts
People who say you can't tell the difference between 23's and 25's should speak for themselves and likely need a few more decades experience with bikes.
For some of us the difference is immediately apparent.
If you can't feel the difference when the volume of the tire increases 18% then your tire pressure is wrong or perhaps your helmet is too tight.
-Tim-
For some of us the difference is immediately apparent.
If you can't feel the difference when the volume of the tire increases 18% then your tire pressure is wrong or perhaps your helmet is too tight.
-Tim-
#192
Senior Member
Thread Starter
For example, if you've got the cash to spend on an >$3K Trek Domane SL6 you get...
Rims Wheels[/i], Bontrager Paradigm Tubeless Ready
...and, if you look that up you get: 6061 alloy rim 23mm outer, 19.5mm inner width, 3 pawl hub Compatible with Shimano 10/11 speed, SRAM 10/11 freehubs
Rims Wheels[/i], Bontrager Paradigm Tubeless Ready
...and, if you look that up you get: 6061 alloy rim 23mm outer, 19.5mm inner width, 3 pawl hub Compatible with Shimano 10/11 speed, SRAM 10/11 freehubs
#193
Senior Member
Thread Starter
This could be the future--e.g., Felt's VR4 at $3K but on sale maybe... OEM is Zipp 30 Course Disc Brake Clincher Alloy 28H Tubeless Ready ... which gets you-- a 21mm internal channel and right or wrong, they clearly got the message-- that's what you want your 28s mounted on. And, the bike isn't black! Trek better get up to speed for 2019
Likes For McBTC:
#195
Senior Member
Thread Starter
#197
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,629
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3871 Post(s)
Liked 2,568 Times
in
1,579 Posts
I don't know what you think magically happened in 2015, but I cheerfully ignore tire pressure markings with parts much MUCH older than 2015. And so do a lot of others.
#198
Senior Member
The real world, best case scenario for tire size in relation to speed matters most in racing by top tier athletes/cyclists. And 25c has become the commonplace tire size it seems as rims have gotten wider.
Personally , 25c at 100psi and 28c at 90psi allow me the comfort to enjoy road cycling, in the real world conditions they roll on.
Personally , 25c at 100psi and 28c at 90psi allow me the comfort to enjoy road cycling, in the real world conditions they roll on.
#199
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: San Leandro
Posts: 2,900
Bikes: Eddy Merckx Corsa Extra, Basso Loto, Pinarello Stelvio, Redline Cyclocross
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 336 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
1 Post
That's actually incorrect. "Bulk" air drag is by far and away the most impactful determinant to aerodynamics, but tire rolling resistance is second (a distant second). We did a lab experiment on this when I was in college, and though I only very vaguely remember the results, but rolling resistance in tires is a factor, albeit small compared to the overall profile of rider and bike.
#200
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times
in
6,054 Posts
This could be the future--e.g., Felt's VR4 at $3K but on sale maybe... OEM is Zipp 30 Course Disc Brake Clincher Alloy 28H Tubeless Ready ... which gets you-- a 21mm internal channel and right or wrong, they clearly got the message-- that's what you want your 28s mounted on. And, the bike isn't black! Trek better get up to speed for 2019