Fixed gear alteration
#1
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2022
Posts: 3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Fixed gear alteration
Experts, grateful for advice re: gears. I have a bike with fixed gears to run around town. Currently set up as 44 tooth chain ring and 18 tooth freewheel cog which is just to light a push. Is the easiest option to fit a 16tooth freewheel cog to get a bit more pressure on the pedal?
Thanks,
T
Thanks,
T
#2
I am potato.
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 3,073
Bikes: Only precision built, custom high performance elitist machines of the highest caliber. 🍆
Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1764 Post(s)
Liked 1,578 Times
in
910 Posts
You would go faster/farther for the same turn of the pedals. You would also lose a bit of hill climbing ease.
What is your cadence? A moderate/higher cadence at speed is usually preferable to a slow grind.
What is your cadence? A moderate/higher cadence at speed is usually preferable to a slow grind.
__________________
I shouldn't have to "make myself more visible;" Drivers should just stop running people over.
Car dependency is a tax.
I shouldn't have to "make myself more visible;" Drivers should just stop running people over.
Car dependency is a tax.
#4
Cheerfully low end
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 1,965
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 642 Post(s)
Liked 1,040 Times
in
663 Posts
The rear axle will shift back 1/4” if you reduce the total tooth count by two. Is there room for that?
If that would be an issue, another option might be a 42 chainring and 16 tooth cog which is still more gear inches than you run currently but, with the removal of one chain link, should put the rear axle about in the current position.
Otto
If that would be an issue, another option might be a 42 chainring and 16 tooth cog which is still more gear inches than you run currently but, with the removal of one chain link, should put the rear axle about in the current position.
Otto
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Nor-Cal
Posts: 3,767
Bikes: lots
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1958 Post(s)
Liked 2,932 Times
in
1,489 Posts
You don't have a fixed gear.
Likes For cxwrench:
#6
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Mississauga/Toronto, Ontario canada
Posts: 8,721
Bikes: I have 3 singlespeed/fixed gear bikes
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4227 Post(s)
Liked 2,488 Times
in
1,286 Posts
Experts, grateful for advice re: gears. I have a bike with fixed gears to run around town. Currently set up as 44 tooth chain ring and 18 tooth freewheel cog which is just to light a push. Is the easiest option to fit a 16tooth freewheel cog to get a bit more pressure on the pedal?
Thanks,
T
Thanks,
T
Likes For alcjphil:
#8
Senior Member
By swapping out the 16T rear cog with an 18T you'll increase your speed by about 13% at the same cadence. But it will require about 13% more effort for headwinds and hill climbing. I'd probably opt for a 17T sprocket for 70 gear inches. This will provide over 6% more speed, But will require less effort then the 18T sprocket would.
If you feel you can deal with a headwind with a 16T sprocket (approx. 74 gear inches) then go for it. I use my 38T chainring w/18T rear cog (55 gear inches) for some headwind and hills on my 3 x 7 speed bike. Of course that would not work on a single speed bike...Too slow the rest of the time. At 65 years old riding perhaps 3 - 5 hours per week, I could live with the 44/18T gearset (66 gear inches) that came with your bike. I'd be willing to sacrifice a bit of speed to have a low enough gear to be comfortable with headwinds and hills.
If you feel you can deal with a headwind with a 16T sprocket (approx. 74 gear inches) then go for it. I use my 38T chainring w/18T rear cog (55 gear inches) for some headwind and hills on my 3 x 7 speed bike. Of course that would not work on a single speed bike...Too slow the rest of the time. At 65 years old riding perhaps 3 - 5 hours per week, I could live with the 44/18T gearset (66 gear inches) that came with your bike. I'd be willing to sacrifice a bit of speed to have a low enough gear to be comfortable with headwinds and hills.
Last edited by xroadcharlie; 09-04-22 at 06:42 PM.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 962
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 497 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 622 Times
in
346 Posts
Yup. Getting cadence up to a much more desirable 90 rpm would give 29% more speed vs 13% when switching from 18 to 16. You go to higher gears when you are spinning out the existing gears. And a taller gear, by itself, will not make you faster. Putting out more power makes you faster.
Likes For worra:
#11
Full Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Chicago
Posts: 309
Bikes: nothing to brag about
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 130 Post(s)
Liked 206 Times
in
116 Posts
You won't be able to test this on your bike, which is why I'm commenting. Keep the larger gear; you'll be glad you have it when there' a hill.
#12
Cheerfully low end
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 1,965
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 642 Post(s)
Liked 1,040 Times
in
663 Posts
This is worth repeating (a second time), with some data. I've been riding a long time and have a naturally lazy cadence, 60 or 70, and haven't felt that it was a horrible thing because I don't strain and am not trying for speed records. I don't ride single speed and I do have a computer on my bike, so I started playing with gearing to see what changes in cadence would do in real life. What I have generally found is that when I feel like I'm in a good place I intentionally shift down a gear anyway just to see what happens. What happens is that my speed jumps UP a couple of MPH! Which was totally unexpected. This happens very consistently! As a result, I am trying to crank a bit faster, get a bit less less lazy. I can't say that it's more work, but keeping up that cranking speed requires some attention because it's against my natural tendency.
You won't be able to test this on your bike, which is why I'm commenting. Keep the larger gear; you'll be glad you have it when there' a hill.
You won't be able to test this on your bike, which is why I'm commenting. Keep the larger gear; you'll be glad you have it when there' a hill.
The internal power requirement of pedaling is an increasing function of cadence and the published data from Formenti’s group appears to increase as the cube of cadence.
Still, the difference between 70 rpm and 90 rpm is only like 0.3W/kg and in many, but not all, riding situations it makes for faster riding.
Otto
#13
Rhapsodic Laviathan
Hmm... my cruiser has a 44/17 and it doesn't seem to climb as well as my SS with 48/16... at least not as fast. And it has a 650b wheel on the back.
#14
Senior Member
I understand why a high cadence might be the best option when max power levels are required, Like making that burst of speed to the finish line in an important race, or climbing a hill fast, But for those of us who are more interested in the shear pleasure biking for adventure and moderate excersize who have no intention of generating the high power an athletic racer attains, a cadence in the 60 to 70 rpm is perfectly acceptable and far more efficient then a high (80 - 90 rpm) cadence.
That said, I would probably keep the gears the same on the ops bike because a 60 - 75 rpm cadence is the speed range I would be most comfortable in on the mostly flat land where I live.
At low to moderate power levels, a 60 - 70 rpm cadence doesn't put any unusual strain on our muscles or knees. It is not grinding. Sometimes while pedaling against some wind at moderate intensity with my 55 gear inch cogs on my comfort bike, I am perfectly satisfied with a cadence of about 60 rpm. It was both very enjoyable and provides good excersize for a 65 year old man.
At times when I'm feeling more energetic and increased my intensity a notch, about 70 rpm just feels right. I have seen many younger and more athletic riders cruising at about the same cadence.
That said, I would probably keep the gears the same on the ops bike because a 60 - 75 rpm cadence is the speed range I would be most comfortable in on the mostly flat land where I live.
At low to moderate power levels, a 60 - 70 rpm cadence doesn't put any unusual strain on our muscles or knees. It is not grinding. Sometimes while pedaling against some wind at moderate intensity with my 55 gear inch cogs on my comfort bike, I am perfectly satisfied with a cadence of about 60 rpm. It was both very enjoyable and provides good excersize for a 65 year old man.
At times when I'm feeling more energetic and increased my intensity a notch, about 70 rpm just feels right. I have seen many younger and more athletic riders cruising at about the same cadence.
Last edited by xroadcharlie; 09-10-22 at 09:56 AM.
Likes For xroadcharlie: