12-42T vs 11-46T
#1
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2022
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
12-42T vs 11-46T
I purchased a Sirrus x 2.0 about a week ago and now I’m wondering if it was the right choice. I like the fact that it’s a 1x and I’ve already changed the tires from 42mm to 32mm in the hopes if gaining some speed and lowering resistance but I’m not sure if I’ve gained too much speed and need more gears. I took it for a ride after the tire change and for the most part the top gear (8 speed) was enough but a couple of times I would have shifted up if there were more gears. The bike was designed as an 8 speed with 42mm tires so was that change too much?
The other bike I was looking at was the Trek FX3 (10 speed) that already comes with 32mm tires. It has a 11-46T cassette vs 12-42T on the Sirrus but I’m not sure how those numbers translate to the real world. Both bikes come with a 40T chainring. My question is… would the FX3 be noticeably harder to pedal in the top gear (11T) vs the Sirrus in top gear (12T)? On paper, it seems like an insignificant difference. If I hear that it’s a noticeable difference I may exchange the Sirrus for the FX3. Obviously, the Trek has more range but it’s mostly on the low end (46 vs 42) as opposed to the high end (11 vs 12). Does one tooth make that much of a difference?
Also, in general, is one of these bikes more highly regarded than the other?
The other bike I was looking at was the Trek FX3 (10 speed) that already comes with 32mm tires. It has a 11-46T cassette vs 12-42T on the Sirrus but I’m not sure how those numbers translate to the real world. Both bikes come with a 40T chainring. My question is… would the FX3 be noticeably harder to pedal in the top gear (11T) vs the Sirrus in top gear (12T)? On paper, it seems like an insignificant difference. If I hear that it’s a noticeable difference I may exchange the Sirrus for the FX3. Obviously, the Trek has more range but it’s mostly on the low end (46 vs 42) as opposed to the high end (11 vs 12). Does one tooth make that much of a difference?
Also, in general, is one of these bikes more highly regarded than the other?
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 2,032
Bikes: addict, aethos, creo, vanmoof, sirrus, public ...
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1273 Post(s)
Liked 1,384 Times
in
708 Posts
I purchased a Sirrus x 2.0 about a week ago and now I’m wondering if it was the right choice. I like the fact that it’s a 1x and I’ve already changed the tires from 42mm to 32mm in the hopes if gaining some speed and lowering resistance but I’m not sure if I’ve gained too much speed and need more gears. I took it for a ride after the tire change and for the most part the top gear (8 speed) was enough but a couple of times I would have shifted up if there were more gears. The bike was designed as an 8 speed with 42mm tires so was that change too much?
The other bike I was looking at was the Trek FX3 (10 speed) that already comes with 32mm tires. It has a 11-46T cassette vs 12-42T on the Sirrus but I’m not sure how those numbers translate to the real world. Both bikes come with a 40T chainring. My question is… would the FX3 be noticeably harder to pedal in the top gear (11T) vs the Sirrus in top gear (12T)? On paper, it seems like an insignificant difference. If I hear that it’s a noticeable difference I may exchange the Sirrus for the FX3. Obviously, the Trek has more range but it’s mostly on the low end (46 vs 42) as opposed to the high end (11 vs 12). Does one tooth make that much of a difference?
Also, in general, is one of these bikes more highly regarded than the other?
The other bike I was looking at was the Trek FX3 (10 speed) that already comes with 32mm tires. It has a 11-46T cassette vs 12-42T on the Sirrus but I’m not sure how those numbers translate to the real world. Both bikes come with a 40T chainring. My question is… would the FX3 be noticeably harder to pedal in the top gear (11T) vs the Sirrus in top gear (12T)? On paper, it seems like an insignificant difference. If I hear that it’s a noticeable difference I may exchange the Sirrus for the FX3. Obviously, the Trek has more range but it’s mostly on the low end (46 vs 42) as opposed to the high end (11 vs 12). Does one tooth make that much of a difference?
Also, in general, is one of these bikes more highly regarded than the other?
if you don’t need the hill climbing low end, easiest this is to swap to a bigger chainring. may also require a longer chain but overall very straightforward.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2022
Location: Missoula MT
Posts: 1,764
Bikes: Handsome xoxo, Serotta atx, Canyon Endurace CF8
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 904 Post(s)
Liked 1,883 Times
in
843 Posts
the difference between a 40x11 and 40x12 with a 32mm tire is at 90 rpms the 11 tooth you will be going 26mph and the 12 24mph and on the 42 vs 46 at 60rpms you would be going 4mph with the 46 vs 5mph with the 42. as far as speed goes the 42mm would give you 1mph faster at 90 rpm vs the 32mm 25 vs 24 so not a lot of difference. I run a 40x11-42 8speed on a converted mountain bike and works fine for general riding around. I run 26x2.3 tires on it. I also have a 1x11 with 11-42 and 42 chain ring and it is a lot nicer for general riding.
Last edited by jadmt; 09-14-22 at 10:56 AM.
#4
OM boy
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Goleta CA
Posts: 4,355
Bikes: a bunch
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 507 Post(s)
Liked 634 Times
in
432 Posts
I purchased a Sirrus x 2.0 about a week ago and now I’m wondering if it was the right choice. I like the fact that it’s a 1x and I’ve already changed the tires from 42mm to 32mm in the hopes if gaining some speed and lowering resistance but I’m not sure if I’ve gained too much speed and need more gears. I took it for a ride after the tire change and for the most part the top gear (8 speed) was enough but a couple of times I would have shifted up if there were more gears. The bike was designed as an 8 speed with 42mm tires so was that change too much?
The other bike I was looking at was the Trek FX3 (10 speed) that already comes with 32mm tires. It has a 11-46T cassette vs 12-42T on the Sirrus but I’m not sure how those numbers translate to the real world. Both bikes come with a 40T chainring. My question is… would the FX3 be noticeably harder to pedal in the top gear (11T) vs the Sirrus in top gear (12T)? On paper, it seems like an insignificant difference. If I hear that it’s a noticeable difference I may exchange the Sirrus for the FX3. Obviously, the Trek has more range but it’s mostly on the low end (46 vs 42) as opposed to the high end (11 vs 12). Does one tooth make that much of a difference?
Also, in general, is one of these bikes more highly regarded than the other?
The other bike I was looking at was the Trek FX3 (10 speed) that already comes with 32mm tires. It has a 11-46T cassette vs 12-42T on the Sirrus but I’m not sure how those numbers translate to the real world. Both bikes come with a 40T chainring. My question is… would the FX3 be noticeably harder to pedal in the top gear (11T) vs the Sirrus in top gear (12T)? On paper, it seems like an insignificant difference. If I hear that it’s a noticeable difference I may exchange the Sirrus for the FX3. Obviously, the Trek has more range but it’s mostly on the low end (46 vs 42) as opposed to the high end (11 vs 12). Does one tooth make that much of a difference?
Also, in general, is one of these bikes more highly regarded than the other?
Here's a URL to an Online Gear Calculator, you can put in however many chainrings (front rings) on a bike, and then select the 'cog range' with the number of cogs/gears and range in the rear. You wouldn't have much 8 spd selectin, but you can individually move each 'cog' to the matching position of whatever your bike's cassette cogs are (number of teeth on each cog). You need to determine that.
You then put in the Wheel/Tire size to match. For '700C' you would use the '28' wheel size.
The resulting chart gives the various resulting 'gear ratio' of each combination of front ring and rear cog. You can choose between metric and English. The chart can be adjusted for 'cadence' rpm (how quickly you turn the cranks), which then varies the resulting kph/mph.
For 50+ years I've been drilled and stuck in 'gears inches' (Englsh/mph), not 'development' (metric/kph), so that's what I relate to.
The key is to match the gear ratio with what you perceive to be the type of riding you do with them. For example, I use my 50ring with either 16 or 17 a lot, for just rolling down the road. That's 78 to 83 ish gear inches. If I want to push hard, I might go some gears higher, to 15 or 14, but they commensurately become harder to turn. I would use a much lower gear for steep hills like a 34-21 or 24, which would be a gear range of 43 to 38 gear inches.
Put in your current gearing numbers, compare to what you actually uses them for, and then you can make some decision on what to change, add, or maybe vary in your use of gears.
Higher cadences put less load on the muscles for each pedal stroke, but put increasingly greater load on your cardio/heart...
A 'Higher' gear like 11 vs 12 cog, using the same chainring size, doesn't really mean you'll be able to go faster at any point, or be able to hold that speed - that's all determined by the 'motor's fitness and power - that being you.
... there is a 'compare' button, which allows you to put 2 different gear sets next to each other and compare.
Ride On
Yuri
#5
With a mighty wind
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 2,583
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1086 Post(s)
Liked 858 Times
in
487 Posts
1x is quite simple and clean. Works great and looks good.
But for 8 speeds the jumps between gears is pretty huge. Or you have to sacrifice the high and low end for a smoother ride. Both of these are too wide range to be really excellent. 11 and 12 (13?) speed cassettes are finally making 1x a great option.
Expect the 12-42 to overall ride nicer on flatter roads but you won’t have nearly the gearing on steep up or down.
Expect to struggle to find a happy gear on the 11-46.
For this type of bike, I don’t know if it matters. Pick the one that you find more comfortable or fun.
But for 8 speeds the jumps between gears is pretty huge. Or you have to sacrifice the high and low end for a smoother ride. Both of these are too wide range to be really excellent. 11 and 12 (13?) speed cassettes are finally making 1x a great option.
Expect the 12-42 to overall ride nicer on flatter roads but you won’t have nearly the gearing on steep up or down.
Expect to struggle to find a happy gear on the 11-46.
For this type of bike, I don’t know if it matters. Pick the one that you find more comfortable or fun.
Likes For rosefarts:
#6
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,098 Times
in
5,054 Posts
People's legs vary a lot, so even though there's an objective mathematical answer how the 40x12 compares to the 40x11, the subjective "is it noticeable" is something people can only answer for themselves. mschwett is dead on with the math, but if you don't know how comfortable you'd be pushing the 12t, the comparison of 10% harder doesn't really mean anything. Honestly, I don't think there's any substitute for trying things for yourself.
Likes For livedarklions:
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Washington State
Posts: 1,345
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 377 Post(s)
Liked 221 Times
in
121 Posts
My FX Sport 6 came with an 11-42 cassette and I've since swapped it out for a Garbaruk 11-46 cassette.. Those 4 extra teeth make a huge difference for me on climbs. I am 57 and can use all the help I can get when climbing and I am very happy I made the swap..
The garbaruk cassette has the exact same gearing except for the final gear which bumps it from a 42 to a 46..
I notice no difference whatsoever on flats but a huge difference on climbs when using the 46..
The garbaruk cassette has the exact same gearing except for the final gear which bumps it from a 42 to a 46..
I notice no difference whatsoever on flats but a huge difference on climbs when using the 46..
Last edited by raqball; 09-14-22 at 11:21 AM.
Likes For raqball:
#8
climber has-been
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 7,091
Bikes: Scott Addict R1, Felt Z1
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3417 Post(s)
Liked 3,547 Times
in
1,784 Posts
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Mission Viejo
Posts: 5,801
Bikes: 1986 Cannondale SR400 (Flat bar commuter), 1988 Cannondale Criterium XTR, 1992 Serotta T-Max, 1995 Trek 970
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1943 Post(s)
Liked 2,164 Times
in
1,323 Posts
That Microshift 8 speed 12-42 (12-15-18-21-24-28-34-42) has pretty brutal gapping.
That 12-15 gap is a 25% increase at the top end. Even the 34-42 is less of a jump.
Most 9 or 10 speed wide range cassettes (11-42) will still have a 2t jump from 11t to 13t. More than I’d like, but still better than what you have.
Your Sirrus is running an Advent 9 rear derailleur. You could swap out the cassette for a 9 speed 11-42 and the 8 speed shifter for an Advent 9. Not the most fun thing to do with a new bike, but unless you can live with an 11-34 8 speed cassette, I don’t see another way to get more speed and fix that gap.
John
That 12-15 gap is a 25% increase at the top end. Even the 34-42 is less of a jump.
Most 9 or 10 speed wide range cassettes (11-42) will still have a 2t jump from 11t to 13t. More than I’d like, but still better than what you have.
Your Sirrus is running an Advent 9 rear derailleur. You could swap out the cassette for a 9 speed 11-42 and the 8 speed shifter for an Advent 9. Not the most fun thing to do with a new bike, but unless you can live with an 11-34 8 speed cassette, I don’t see another way to get more speed and fix that gap.
John
#11
Drip, Drip.
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Southern Ontario
Posts: 1,575
Bikes: Trek Verve E bike, Felt Doctrine 4 XC, Opus Horizon Apex 1
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1034 Post(s)
Liked 193 Times
in
163 Posts
its a really strange way to determine bike choice... changing to thinner tires is stranger still.
#12
OM boy
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Goleta CA
Posts: 4,355
Bikes: a bunch
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 507 Post(s)
Liked 634 Times
in
432 Posts
1x is quite simple and clean. Works great and looks good.
But for 8 speeds the jumps between gears is pretty huge. Or you have to sacrifice the high and low end for a smoother ride. Both of these are too wide range to be really excellent. 11 and 12 (13?) speed cassettes are finally making 1x a great option.
Expect the 12-42 to overall ride nicer on flatter roads but you won’t have nearly the gearing on steep up or down.
Expect to struggle to find a happy gear on the 11-46.
For this type of bike, I don’t know if it matters. Pick the one that you find more comfortable or fun.
But for 8 speeds the jumps between gears is pretty huge. Or you have to sacrifice the high and low end for a smoother ride. Both of these are too wide range to be really excellent. 11 and 12 (13?) speed cassettes are finally making 1x a great option.
Expect the 12-42 to overall ride nicer on flatter roads but you won’t have nearly the gearing on steep up or down.
Expect to struggle to find a happy gear on the 11-46.
For this type of bike, I don’t know if it matters. Pick the one that you find more comfortable or fun.
Totally right about struggling to find a 'happy gear'. But then many riders don;t even grok the concept of 'happy gear'. For many it's a very rare experience and when it happens for just a few minutes, trying to replicate that isn;t understood... When they're actually 'spinning' a gear, they quickly find that they're not riding smoothly and breathing hard, so they shift to the next higher gear, which for just a very short while seems 'nice', 'smooth'. But in a 1/4 to 1/2 mi. the effort increases again and they bog down, so just slow down until it becomes 'comfortable again. Many don't realize that to go faster you have to either pedal faster or push harder, or ideally both. And they don;t know that there are happy gears available, but just not on their bikes with very wide gearing jumps.
... no, 1x does have it's short comings, even on 11 spd, unless you're willing to give up the 'Hi' or 'low' ends or lose something in the middle. But that's the huge spectrum of cycling, and that's OK.
People's legs vary a lot, so even though there's an objective mathematical answer how the 40x12 compares to the 40x11, the subjective "is it noticeable" is something people can only answer for themselves. mschwett is dead on with the math, but if you don't know how comfortable you'd be pushing the 12t, the comparison of 10% harder doesn't really mean anything. Honestly, I don't think there's any substitute for trying things for yourself.
We each 'Have To DO The Math' in real life for it to have some real meaning. Hence the disconnect on discussing what's 'good' or 'bad' or 'best'.
That Microshift 8 speed 12-42 (12-15-18-21-24-28-34-42) has pretty brutal gapping.
That 12-15 gap is a 25% increase at the top end. Even the 34-42 is less of a jump.
Most 9 or 10 speed wide range cassettes (11-42) will still have a 2t jump from 11t to 13t. More than I’d like, but still better than what you have.
Your Sirrus is running an Advent 9 rear derailleur. You could swap out the cassette for a 9 speed 11-42 and the 8 speed shifter for an Advent 9. Not the most fun thing to do with a new bike, but unless you can live with an 11-34 8 speed cassette, I don’t see another way to get more speed and fix that gap.
John
That 12-15 gap is a 25% increase at the top end. Even the 34-42 is less of a jump.
Most 9 or 10 speed wide range cassettes (11-42) will still have a 2t jump from 11t to 13t. More than I’d like, but still better than what you have.
Your Sirrus is running an Advent 9 rear derailleur. You could swap out the cassette for a 9 speed 11-42 and the 8 speed shifter for an Advent 9. Not the most fun thing to do with a new bike, but unless you can live with an 11-34 8 speed cassette, I don’t see another way to get more speed and fix that gap.
John
But that doesn't 'fix' the problem in between. AS you note those 2 tooth jumps into the high teens cogs is better, but still very much compromise - to get a nice range of 'happy gears'.
OP - you also 'created' some of the issues you seem to be mulling over. Going from a 42 width to 32 width tire changes the 'effective wheel size' - the 32 is smaller in circumference and so in the same gear, at the same pedal cadence, you will go effectively slower. An option is to go back to a 40 or 42 tire which is just a 'faster' tire? Is this definitive? No, it's something, but only if you try it and find it so.
Whatever gear you choose, the only way to go 'faster' is to pedal faster.
Ride On
Yuri
EDIT : IE , not FYI... LOL!
Last edited by cyclezen; 09-14-22 at 06:25 PM.
Likes For cyclezen:
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,481
Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE
Mentioned: 144 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7649 Post(s)
Liked 3,465 Times
in
1,831 Posts
The speed iof the bike has zero to do with how many cogs it has on the cassette (the stack of gears on the rear wheel) and very little to do with the width of the tire.
A wider tire will be heavier and a little slower, and if you are riding over 20 mph Slightly less aerodynamic .... but matching wheel width to tire width makes more difference, I have read, than the actual width of the tire.
What determines speed is gearing and effort.
I have several bikes with 11-tooth high gears (the smallest cog (gear) in the cassette) and I usually don't sin so fat I really need it. My Raleigh has a 12-28, and I find it takes the same effort go go the same speed, I am just spinning a little faster instead of pushing a little harder.
Unless you are spinning 100+ rpm, 11 or 12 teeth is not likely the limiting factor.
I am going to do the web research later (it is dinner time) but it seems the FX3 might be more road-oriented. Also, with 10 cogs in the cassette, you can cover a wider range or gears (11-46) without having bigger jumps .... so the FX3 Might be more rideable (depends on how you ride.)
Yeah the FX3 is more of a flatbar road/hybrid, meaning it is set up for road Riding not road racing, with a little more comfort and the ability to carry some gear (https://www.trekbikes.com/us/en_US/b...-disc/p/28474/) This link isn't current, but whatever ... you should be posting the links to help us understand, right?
The Sirrus (https://www.specialized.com/us/en/si...=271452-171181) is more of a flatbar gravel/adventure bike, made for comfy cruising on good pavement and decent performance (not racing) on bad pavement, packed earth, gravel, etc.---more of an all-around bike. Not a great choice for someone who did most of his/her time on pavement, IMO.
Both are decent enough bikes--I would for sure ride either one---but each is designed for very different uses and styles of riding.
If you ride mostly on pavement with a little dirt, the FX seems a better choice. I would use it as a commuter, grocery/work/rain/ rough pavement bike, and if there was clearance for slightly wider tires, i would chuck on a set of 38s or something and attack gravel with joy and eagerness.
The Sirrus would be an urban commuter, where you were always riding over broken pavement, construction debris, hopping curbs and traffic furniture as cars squeezed to aside, forced to ride over cracks and holes because there as no safe space away from the ruined edge of the road ... and also relaxing weekend gravel treks.
How do you ride and how do you like to ride?
A wider tire will be heavier and a little slower, and if you are riding over 20 mph Slightly less aerodynamic .... but matching wheel width to tire width makes more difference, I have read, than the actual width of the tire.
What determines speed is gearing and effort.
I have several bikes with 11-tooth high gears (the smallest cog (gear) in the cassette) and I usually don't sin so fat I really need it. My Raleigh has a 12-28, and I find it takes the same effort go go the same speed, I am just spinning a little faster instead of pushing a little harder.
Unless you are spinning 100+ rpm, 11 or 12 teeth is not likely the limiting factor.
I am going to do the web research later (it is dinner time) but it seems the FX3 might be more road-oriented. Also, with 10 cogs in the cassette, you can cover a wider range or gears (11-46) without having bigger jumps .... so the FX3 Might be more rideable (depends on how you ride.)
Yeah the FX3 is more of a flatbar road/hybrid, meaning it is set up for road Riding not road racing, with a little more comfort and the ability to carry some gear (https://www.trekbikes.com/us/en_US/b...-disc/p/28474/) This link isn't current, but whatever ... you should be posting the links to help us understand, right?
The Sirrus (https://www.specialized.com/us/en/si...=271452-171181) is more of a flatbar gravel/adventure bike, made for comfy cruising on good pavement and decent performance (not racing) on bad pavement, packed earth, gravel, etc.---more of an all-around bike. Not a great choice for someone who did most of his/her time on pavement, IMO.
Both are decent enough bikes--I would for sure ride either one---but each is designed for very different uses and styles of riding.
If you ride mostly on pavement with a little dirt, the FX seems a better choice. I would use it as a commuter, grocery/work/rain/ rough pavement bike, and if there was clearance for slightly wider tires, i would chuck on a set of 38s or something and attack gravel with joy and eagerness.
The Sirrus would be an urban commuter, where you were always riding over broken pavement, construction debris, hopping curbs and traffic furniture as cars squeezed to aside, forced to ride over cracks and holes because there as no safe space away from the ruined edge of the road ... and also relaxing weekend gravel treks.
How do you ride and how do you like to ride?
Likes For Maelochs:
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 978
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 504 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 637 Times
in
355 Posts
I purchased a Sirrus x 2.0 about a week ago and now I’m wondering if it was the right choice. I like the fact that it’s a 1x and I’ve already changed the tires from 42mm to 32mm in the hopes if gaining some speed and lowering resistance but I’m not sure if I’ve gained too much speed and need more gears. I took it for a ride after the tire change and for the most part the top gear (8 speed) was enough but a couple of times I would have shifted up if there were more gears. The bike was designed as an 8 speed with 42mm tires so was that change too much?
The other bike I was looking at was the Trek FX3 (10 speed) that already comes with 32mm tires. It has a 11-46T cassette vs 12-42T on the Sirrus but I’m not sure how those numbers translate to the real world. Both bikes come with a 40T chainring. My question is… would the FX3 be noticeably harder to pedal in the top gear (11T) vs the Sirrus in top gear (12T)? On paper, it seems like an insignificant difference. If I hear that it’s a noticeable difference I may exchange the Sirrus for the FX3. Obviously, the Trek has more range but it’s mostly on the low end (46 vs 42) as opposed to the high end (11 vs 12). Does one tooth make that much of a difference?
Also, in general, is one of these bikes more highly regarded than the other?
The other bike I was looking at was the Trek FX3 (10 speed) that already comes with 32mm tires. It has a 11-46T cassette vs 12-42T on the Sirrus but I’m not sure how those numbers translate to the real world. Both bikes come with a 40T chainring. My question is… would the FX3 be noticeably harder to pedal in the top gear (11T) vs the Sirrus in top gear (12T)? On paper, it seems like an insignificant difference. If I hear that it’s a noticeable difference I may exchange the Sirrus for the FX3. Obviously, the Trek has more range but it’s mostly on the low end (46 vs 42) as opposed to the high end (11 vs 12). Does one tooth make that much of a difference?
Also, in general, is one of these bikes more highly regarded than the other?
Likes For KerryIrons:
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Posts: 5,921
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1815 Post(s)
Liked 1,693 Times
in
974 Posts
I purchased a Sirrus x 2.0 about a week ago and now I’m wondering if it was the right choice. I like the fact that it’s a 1x and I’ve already changed the tires from 42mm to 32mm in the hopes if gaining some speed and lowering resistance but I’m not sure if I’ve gained too much speed and need more gears. I took it for a ride after the tire change and for the most part the top gear (8 speed) was enough but a couple of times I would have shifted up if there were more gears. The bike was designed as an 8 speed with 42mm tires so was that change too much?
The other bike I was looking at was the Trek FX3 (10 speed) that already comes with 32mm tires. It has a 11-46T cassette vs 12-42T on the Sirrus but I’m not sure how those numbers translate to the real world. Both bikes come with a 40T chainring. My question is… would the FX3 be noticeably harder to pedal in the top gear (11T) vs the Sirrus in top gear (12T)? On paper, it seems like an insignificant difference. If I hear that it’s a noticeable difference I may exchange the Sirrus for the FX3. Obviously, the Trek has more range but it’s mostly on the low end (46 vs 42) as opposed to the high end (11 vs 12). Does one tooth make that much of a difference?
Also, in general, is one of these bikes more highly regarded than the other?
The other bike I was looking at was the Trek FX3 (10 speed) that already comes with 32mm tires. It has a 11-46T cassette vs 12-42T on the Sirrus but I’m not sure how those numbers translate to the real world. Both bikes come with a 40T chainring. My question is… would the FX3 be noticeably harder to pedal in the top gear (11T) vs the Sirrus in top gear (12T)? On paper, it seems like an insignificant difference. If I hear that it’s a noticeable difference I may exchange the Sirrus for the FX3. Obviously, the Trek has more range but it’s mostly on the low end (46 vs 42) as opposed to the high end (11 vs 12). Does one tooth make that much of a difference?
Also, in general, is one of these bikes more highly regarded than the other?
Last edited by alcjphil; 09-15-22 at 04:56 PM.
Likes For alcjphil:
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,481
Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE
Mentioned: 144 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7649 Post(s)
Liked 3,465 Times
in
1,831 Posts
A bike is a tool. A person who wants to ride needs to decide how s/he wants to ride ... what the job is .... which determines the best tool.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,381
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4388 Post(s)
Liked 4,828 Times
in
2,984 Posts
I purchased a Sirrus x 2.0 about a week ago and now I’m wondering if it was the right choice. I like the fact that it’s a 1x and I’ve already changed the tires from 42mm to 32mm in the hopes if gaining some speed and lowering resistance but I’m not sure if I’ve gained too much speed and need more gears. I took it for a ride after the tire change and for the most part the top gear (8 speed) was enough but a couple of times I would have shifted up if there were more gears. The bike was designed as an 8 speed with 42mm tires so was that change too much?
The other bike I was looking at was the Trek FX3 (10 speed) that already comes with 32mm tires. It has a 11-46T cassette vs 12-42T on the Sirrus but I’m not sure how those numbers translate to the real world. Both bikes come with a 40T chainring. My question is… would the FX3 be noticeably harder to pedal in the top gear (11T) vs the Sirrus in top gear (12T)? On paper, it seems like an insignificant difference. If I hear that it’s a noticeable difference I may exchange the Sirrus for the FX3. Obviously, the Trek has more range but it’s mostly on the low end (46 vs 42) as opposed to the high end (11 vs 12). Does one tooth make that much of a difference?
Also, in general, is one of these bikes more highly regarded than the other?
The other bike I was looking at was the Trek FX3 (10 speed) that already comes with 32mm tires. It has a 11-46T cassette vs 12-42T on the Sirrus but I’m not sure how those numbers translate to the real world. Both bikes come with a 40T chainring. My question is… would the FX3 be noticeably harder to pedal in the top gear (11T) vs the Sirrus in top gear (12T)? On paper, it seems like an insignificant difference. If I hear that it’s a noticeable difference I may exchange the Sirrus for the FX3. Obviously, the Trek has more range but it’s mostly on the low end (46 vs 42) as opposed to the high end (11 vs 12). Does one tooth make that much of a difference?
Also, in general, is one of these bikes more highly regarded than the other?
#18
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2022
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Thanks for the responses. A lot of great information even if some of it went over my head. If it wasn’t abundantly clear by my first post, I’m a total noob.
I returned the bike yesterday. With increasing doubts about my choice and time left in my return window it was the right decision.
My original goal was to upgrade my current bike, which is a Raleigh Rimrock that I got when I was in high school. I’m 41 now. My bike is old, heavy and well past its best before date so I decide to upgrade and hastily bought the Sirrus x 2.0. As I said earlier, I was also looking at the FX3 which I think I actually preferred but was $300 more in my area. I thought I could make a few changes to the Sirrus to mimic the FX3 and save some cash. That was the logic behind my decision as flawed as it may have been.
Most of the time I imagine I’ll be on relatively flat, paved surfaces like paved biking trails, roads, biking lanes etc. Maybe over grassy areas and gravel/ dirt walking type trails but not that often. My rides are relatively short compared to some of you but are usually 20 miles/ 30 km. I’d like to start to go further so I think that means riding on the roads in rural areas but I’m really anti getting run over. I’m also looking for a bike that’s future proof and something I can grow into. I’m not necessarily looking to go as fast as I can but I’d like to be efficient.
I think I’m looking for a bike that’s closer to the road bike end of the bike spectrum. In my mind (see paragraph 1) that means skinny tires but realize that’s not necessarily the case. I understand there are drawbacks to a 1x drivetrain but I think that’s the direction I want to go. I do agree that 8 speeds aren’t enough and I was often thinking it would be nice to have a gear between gears so I’m probably looking at a 1x10 or even better 1x11.
Should I still be looking at the FX3 or maybe something higher up the FX food chain? Or something else entirely? I’m back at square one.
I returned the bike yesterday. With increasing doubts about my choice and time left in my return window it was the right decision.
My original goal was to upgrade my current bike, which is a Raleigh Rimrock that I got when I was in high school. I’m 41 now. My bike is old, heavy and well past its best before date so I decide to upgrade and hastily bought the Sirrus x 2.0. As I said earlier, I was also looking at the FX3 which I think I actually preferred but was $300 more in my area. I thought I could make a few changes to the Sirrus to mimic the FX3 and save some cash. That was the logic behind my decision as flawed as it may have been.
Most of the time I imagine I’ll be on relatively flat, paved surfaces like paved biking trails, roads, biking lanes etc. Maybe over grassy areas and gravel/ dirt walking type trails but not that often. My rides are relatively short compared to some of you but are usually 20 miles/ 30 km. I’d like to start to go further so I think that means riding on the roads in rural areas but I’m really anti getting run over. I’m also looking for a bike that’s future proof and something I can grow into. I’m not necessarily looking to go as fast as I can but I’d like to be efficient.
I think I’m looking for a bike that’s closer to the road bike end of the bike spectrum. In my mind (see paragraph 1) that means skinny tires but realize that’s not necessarily the case. I understand there are drawbacks to a 1x drivetrain but I think that’s the direction I want to go. I do agree that 8 speeds aren’t enough and I was often thinking it would be nice to have a gear between gears so I’m probably looking at a 1x10 or even better 1x11.
Should I still be looking at the FX3 or maybe something higher up the FX food chain? Or something else entirely? I’m back at square one.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: North Central Wisconsin
Posts: 4,621
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2975 Post(s)
Liked 1,180 Times
in
770 Posts
You didn't specifically mention it, but it sounds like you want to stick with flat bars?
This is as close as you will get to a road bike that doesn't have road bike bars. I used to have one. It's a great bike. I had no problem keeping up with my friends on group rides averaging 20-22 mph.
https://www.giant-bicycles.com/us/bi...-bikes/fitness
This is as close as you will get to a road bike that doesn't have road bike bars. I used to have one. It's a great bike. I had no problem keeping up with my friends on group rides averaging 20-22 mph.
https://www.giant-bicycles.com/us/bi...-bikes/fitness
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Washington State
Posts: 1,345
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 377 Post(s)
Liked 221 Times
in
121 Posts
Thanks for the responses. A lot of great information even if some of it went over my head. If it wasn’t abundantly clear by my first post, I’m a total noob.
I returned the bike yesterday. With increasing doubts about my choice and time left in my return window it was the right decision.
My original goal was to upgrade my current bike, which is a Raleigh Rimrock that I got when I was in high school. I’m 41 now. My bike is old, heavy and well past its best before date so I decide to upgrade and hastily bought the Sirrus x 2.0. As I said earlier, I was also looking at the FX3 which I think I actually preferred but was $300 more in my area. I thought I could make a few changes to the Sirrus to mimic the FX3 and save some cash. That was the logic behind my decision as flawed as it may have been.
Most of the time I imagine I’ll be on relatively flat, paved surfaces like paved biking trails, roads, biking lanes etc. Maybe over grassy areas and gravel/ dirt walking type trails but not that often. My rides are relatively short compared to some of you but are usually 20 miles/ 30 km. I’d like to start to go further so I think that means riding on the roads in rural areas but I’m really anti getting run over. I’m also looking for a bike that’s future proof and something I can grow into. I’m not necessarily looking to go as fast as I can but I’d like to be efficient.
I think I’m looking for a bike that’s closer to the road bike end of the bike spectrum. In my mind (see paragraph 1) that means skinny tires but realize that’s not necessarily the case. I understand there are drawbacks to a 1x drivetrain but I think that’s the direction I want to go. I do agree that 8 speeds aren’t enough and I was often thinking it would be nice to have a gear between gears so I’m probably looking at a 1x10 or even better 1x11.
Should I still be looking at the FX3 or maybe something higher up the FX food chain? Or something else entirely? I’m back at square one.
I returned the bike yesterday. With increasing doubts about my choice and time left in my return window it was the right decision.
My original goal was to upgrade my current bike, which is a Raleigh Rimrock that I got when I was in high school. I’m 41 now. My bike is old, heavy and well past its best before date so I decide to upgrade and hastily bought the Sirrus x 2.0. As I said earlier, I was also looking at the FX3 which I think I actually preferred but was $300 more in my area. I thought I could make a few changes to the Sirrus to mimic the FX3 and save some cash. That was the logic behind my decision as flawed as it may have been.
Most of the time I imagine I’ll be on relatively flat, paved surfaces like paved biking trails, roads, biking lanes etc. Maybe over grassy areas and gravel/ dirt walking type trails but not that often. My rides are relatively short compared to some of you but are usually 20 miles/ 30 km. I’d like to start to go further so I think that means riding on the roads in rural areas but I’m really anti getting run over. I’m also looking for a bike that’s future proof and something I can grow into. I’m not necessarily looking to go as fast as I can but I’d like to be efficient.
I think I’m looking for a bike that’s closer to the road bike end of the bike spectrum. In my mind (see paragraph 1) that means skinny tires but realize that’s not necessarily the case. I understand there are drawbacks to a 1x drivetrain but I think that’s the direction I want to go. I do agree that 8 speeds aren’t enough and I was often thinking it would be nice to have a gear between gears so I’m probably looking at a 1x10 or even better 1x11.
Should I still be looking at the FX3 or maybe something higher up the FX food chain? Or something else entirely? I’m back at square one.
As far as getting run over by cars goes, use lights even in the day. Most lights will have a daytime flash mode that helps get the attention of drivers. Also, be aware of your surroundings. Right hooks are common so before entering an intersection check your rear and anticipate what the driver might do so you are ready for it. Another issue I face is people exiting drives from malls, gas stations, shopping centers etc. A lot of the times they pull right out in front you so again, just be aware and prepared to react for what drivers might do..
I don't have a recommendation for bike but I've had the following brands over the years and have always been happy with them. Trek, Specialized, BMC, Giant.
Good luck!
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Norman, Oklahoma
Posts: 5,395
Bikes: Too many to list
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1765 Post(s)
Liked 1,124 Times
in
746 Posts
What dealership let’s you simply return a bike after demo’ing it for days and taking it on long rides , even changing out the tires?
I can understand swapping it for a different model, but to give a person a refund and let them go home and evaluate their lifes choices When they hand you back a used bike now seems unfair to the dealer
OP, Why don’t you look into a road bike If you want to go fast
I can understand swapping it for a different model, but to give a person a refund and let them go home and evaluate their lifes choices When they hand you back a used bike now seems unfair to the dealer
OP, Why don’t you look into a road bike If you want to go fast
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: North Central Wisconsin
Posts: 4,621
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2975 Post(s)
Liked 1,180 Times
in
770 Posts
Interesting you ask that question. My boss at work recently bought a Specialized Sirrus 2.0 and after riding it a few days a week for a month he returned it and got a full refund. He returned it because he didn't like the way it fit him. He then went to a Specialized dealer in a different town and bought a Specialized Roll.
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Washington State
Posts: 1,345
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 377 Post(s)
Liked 221 Times
in
121 Posts
What dealership let’s you simply return a bike after demo’ing it for days and taking it on long rides , even changing out the tires?
I can understand swapping it for a different model, but to give a person a refund and let them go home and evaluate their lifes choices When they hand you back a used bike now seems unfair to the dealer
I can understand swapping it for a different model, but to give a person a refund and let them go home and evaluate their lifes choices When they hand you back a used bike now seems unfair to the dealer
When I purchased my 2023 FX Sport 6 it was from a Trek Corporate store. After getting the bike I went back in to shop for a new saddle and to change out the tires. They offered to swap the saddle and tires for free to comparably priced gear. I wanted upgrades so they gave me credit for the price of the items and I simply paid the difference for the upgrade. For instance, they gave me $99 for the saddle and I swapped it for a $150 saddle. I paid the $50 difference.. This was 3 weeks after getting the bike.
Last edited by raqball; 09-16-22 at 09:41 AM.
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Mission Viejo
Posts: 5,801
Bikes: 1986 Cannondale SR400 (Flat bar commuter), 1988 Cannondale Criterium XTR, 1992 Serotta T-Max, 1995 Trek 970
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1943 Post(s)
Liked 2,164 Times
in
1,323 Posts
If you are thinking of taking your Sirrus back, you need really need to look at the gearing of your current bike and any replacement.
This is a nice gear inch/speed calculator that will give you speeds at various cadences.
https://www.machars.net/bikecalc.htm
It does you no good to swap out a bike without a clue as to the difference of new vs. old gearing.
It is equally important to assess if a 1x is really that important. If you can only exchange your Sirrus for another Specialized, and you don't want to spend more, you can get the 2x8 model with a 46/30 and ride in the 46 all day long unless you have a climb that won't work with a 46-32 gear. If you go with a 1x, keep in mind that you are only gaining 1t, high end, regardless of the number of cogs in the cassette. That may or may not be enough for the cadence you want to ride.
John
This is a nice gear inch/speed calculator that will give you speeds at various cadences.
https://www.machars.net/bikecalc.htm
It does you no good to swap out a bike without a clue as to the difference of new vs. old gearing.
It is equally important to assess if a 1x is really that important. If you can only exchange your Sirrus for another Specialized, and you don't want to spend more, you can get the 2x8 model with a 46/30 and ride in the 46 all day long unless you have a climb that won't work with a 46-32 gear. If you go with a 1x, keep in mind that you are only gaining 1t, high end, regardless of the number of cogs in the cassette. That may or may not be enough for the cadence you want to ride.
John