Best wheel option for old race frame?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Best wheel option for old race frame?
I have an old race frame, Reynolds 531 British made. Zero braze ons and made for 27” wheels. My goal is to see how light of a build I can do, just for fun. What’s my best option, 27” wheels or 700c with long reach brakes? Thanks
__________________
Semper fi
Semper fi
Likes For sloar:
#2
Thread derailleur
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Glendora, CA
Posts: 587
Bikes: Merlin Extralight '94 & Cannondale Supersix '15
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 335 Post(s)
Liked 405 Times
in
240 Posts
Tubular wheelsets will result in your lightest option. Sounds like you're building it around a heavyish touring frameset.
So you're starting with a fairly severe handicap. I like the project - don't get me wrong - but it could get costly.
So you're starting with a fairly severe handicap. I like the project - don't get me wrong - but it could get costly.
#3
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Its a race frame, very tight geometry with no braze ons or eyelets.
__________________
Semper fi
Semper fi
Likes For sloar:
Likes For P!N20:
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Fairplay Co
Posts: 9,582
Bikes: Current 79 Nishiki Custum Sport, Jeunet 620, notable previous bikes P.K. Ripper loop tail, Kawahara Laser Lite, Paramount Track full chrome, Raliegh Internatioanl, Motobecan Super Mirage. 59 Crown royak 3 speed
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 786 Post(s)
Liked 1,706 Times
in
620 Posts
Not the best but if you want light a vintage set of Mavic CXP 10 clinchers are some of the lightest you can get with a set of these setup with light tires and single speed setup . I Have got my old Nishiki down to a lean 22-23lbs and it's a big bike with some dorkage and lower end frame set.
https://velobase.com/ViewComponent.a...fdfe5&Enum=107
The 40+ year old lower end Nishiki still looks and rides great.
https://velobase.com/ViewComponent.a...fdfe5&Enum=107
The 40+ year old lower end Nishiki still looks and rides great.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Bloomington, IN
Posts: 2,936
Bikes: Paramount, Faggin, Ochsner, Ciocc, Basso
Mentioned: 114 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1283 Post(s)
Liked 1,835 Times
in
1,109 Posts
sloar,
I can get you where it is pretty darned close to light weight with good handling. I currently have on hand a set of LP18 27" X1" rims and a set of 27X1 tires that should have it running true to original. These are NOS and 32* rims they just need the hubs to lace them up. Perhaps some Campy 32 record hubs? Got you covered there also. I would have to do some calculations and order some spokes but it would be worth the trip to Bloomington to get you set up. Smiles, MH (812-336-3283)
I can get you where it is pretty darned close to light weight with good handling. I currently have on hand a set of LP18 27" X1" rims and a set of 27X1 tires that should have it running true to original. These are NOS and 32* rims they just need the hubs to lace them up. Perhaps some Campy 32 record hubs? Got you covered there also. I would have to do some calculations and order some spokes but it would be worth the trip to Bloomington to get you set up. Smiles, MH (812-336-3283)
#8
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,532
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10897 Post(s)
Liked 7,384 Times
in
4,144 Posts
700c with long reach brakes for sure.
27" wheelsets that are light and good quality really arent common for a reason. And lightweight narrow 27" tires really arent common for a reason.
700c was the size for lightweight and quality wheelsets as well as lightweight and quality tires.
Also, the TRP957 brake has a reach of 57mm and weighs less than current generation Shimano 105 r7000 caliper brakes.
27" wheelsets that are light and good quality really arent common for a reason. And lightweight narrow 27" tires really arent common for a reason.
700c was the size for lightweight and quality wheelsets as well as lightweight and quality tires.
Also, the TRP957 brake has a reach of 57mm and weighs less than current generation Shimano 105 r7000 caliper brakes.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 13,551
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4194 Post(s)
Liked 2,911 Times
in
1,780 Posts
700c with long reach brakes for sure.
27" wheelsets that are light and good quality really arent common for a reason. And lightweight narrow 27" tires really arent common for a reason.
700c was the size for lightweight and quality wheelsets as well as lightweight and quality tires.
Also, the TRP957 brake has a reach of 57mm and weighs less than current generation Shimano 105 r7000 caliper brakes.
27" wheelsets that are light and good quality really arent common for a reason. And lightweight narrow 27" tires really arent common for a reason.
700c was the size for lightweight and quality wheelsets as well as lightweight and quality tires.
Also, the TRP957 brake has a reach of 57mm and weighs less than current generation Shimano 105 r7000 caliper brakes.
#10
framebuilder
You want to get a pair of tubular wheels. Any clincher rim is heavier because the arms that come up from the box section of the rim to hold the tire bead adds weight. And makes the tire less compliant - which translates into being less comfortable and more likely to get pinch flats. Before the later part of the 70's all good bikes used tubulars. 27" wheels/tires were big and heavy and clunky by comparison.
The lightest 700c clincher rims weighed over 400 grams each. Mavic came out with the 1st ones around 1976? There are many classic era tubular rims that weigh less than 300 grams each. If you bike is older than 1975, it would have come with tubular wheels.
The good news is that nice tubular wheels are inexpensive because the demand is for clinchers. Tubulars are like stick shift cars, they work great but people without any experience using them don't want them.
The lightest 700c clincher rims weighed over 400 grams each. Mavic came out with the 1st ones around 1976? There are many classic era tubular rims that weigh less than 300 grams each. If you bike is older than 1975, it would have come with tubular wheels.
The good news is that nice tubular wheels are inexpensive because the demand is for clinchers. Tubulars are like stick shift cars, they work great but people without any experience using them don't want them.
Likes For Doug Fattic:
#11
Dedicated Detritus Dodger
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Fairfax, California
Posts: 485
Bikes: Some mighty fine ones at that!
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 191 Post(s)
Liked 603 Times
in
247 Posts
Likes For bargo68:
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 20,320
Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3449 Post(s)
Liked 2,800 Times
in
1,974 Posts
I have some narrow Super Champion Gentleman rims 27", but they are still 430 grams.. light 27" tires? decades ago there were.
"Tight geometry" to me means that 700c will work, regular reach brakes?
"Tight geometry" to me means that 700c will work, regular reach brakes?
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,825
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 128 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4741 Post(s)
Liked 3,860 Times
in
2,509 Posts
Question for Doug Fattic and cycling historians - weren't 27" tubular wheels and tires made for the British market in small amounts so those with 27" wheel frames could race and time trial? No, I am not suggesting setting up a bike now to do that. I'd be willing to own and ride a museum worthy frame, but not risk my life to museum worthy rubber (and finding 27" tubulars that old that are museum worthy - good luck!)
Likes For 79pmooney:
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 20,320
Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3449 Post(s)
Liked 2,800 Times
in
1,974 Posts
would have to retrograde to EX or original DA to fit 700c
#16
Senior Member
Thread Starter
I tried 700c with regular calipers and they were too short. That’s why I’m asking for opinions, looks like 700’s with long reach calipers are my best choice.
__________________
Semper fi
Semper fi
#17
Thread derailleur
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Glendora, CA
Posts: 587
Bikes: Merlin Extralight '94 & Cannondale Supersix '15
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 335 Post(s)
Liked 405 Times
in
240 Posts
Your Panaracer 27" tires weigh 320 grams each. Adding a tube and rimstrip put another 100 grams on there.
The lightest rims (27" vs 700c/tubular) increase the differential more. We're talking a rotating weight of 200 grams more for each wheel.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 20,320
Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3449 Post(s)
Liked 2,800 Times
in
1,974 Posts
Myself, being hyper concerned by aesthetics, get a different frame set.
#19
Senior Member
Thread Starter
It’s a very cool Knight frame. I definitely want to keep it and build it up. I guess what I used were more of a short reach caliper.
__________________
Semper fi
Semper fi
#20
framebuilder
Question for Doug Fattic and cycling historians - weren't 27" tubular wheels and tires made for the British market in small amounts so those with 27" wheel frames could race and time trial? No, I am not suggesting setting up a bike now to do that. I'd be willing to own and ride a museum worthy frame, but not risk my life to museum worthy rubber (and finding 27" tubulars that old that are museum worthy - good luck!)
I started riding tubulars in 1966/67. We even toured on them until the late 70's when lightweight 700C clinchers with Mavic rims and Michelin tires becomes available. 27 X 1 1/4" tires were heavy by comparison. I don't remember any light ones before the mid 70's but that doesn't mean they didn't exist.
When I went to the XB3 bicycle factory in Kharkov (a major Ukrainian city few people ever heard of until recently) in 2000. I was surprised they designated their tubular racing bike as having 27" wheels. Yes written just like that - 27".
#21
Shifting is fun!
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: South Holland, NL
Posts: 11,001
Bikes: Yes, please.
Mentioned: 276 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2182 Post(s)
Liked 4,523 Times
in
1,742 Posts
As demonstrated by a well-known fellow member:
#22
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,625
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3868 Post(s)
Liked 2,560 Times
in
1,574 Posts
Question for Doug Fattic and cycling historians - weren't 27" tubular wheels and tires made for the British market in small amounts so those with 27" wheel frames could race and time trial? No, I am not suggesting setting up a bike now to do that. I'd be willing to own and ride a museum worthy frame, but not risk my life to museum worthy rubber (and finding 27" tubulars that old that are museum worthy - good luck!)
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Jose (Willow Glen) Ca
Posts: 9,848
Bikes: Kirk Custom JK Special, '84 Team Miyata,(dura ace old school) 80?? SR Semi-Pro 600 Arabesque
Mentioned: 104 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2302 Post(s)
Liked 2,736 Times
in
1,497 Posts
my vote is for tubular.... think something like mavic gel 330 if you are not to heavy (i have set best ride ever even with just ok tubies...but I am too heavy for them....PM if interested)
__________________
Life is too short not to ride the best bike you have, as much as you can
(looking for Torpado Super light frame/fork or for Raleigh International frame fork 58cm)
Life is too short not to ride the best bike you have, as much as you can
(looking for Torpado Super light frame/fork or for Raleigh International frame fork 58cm)
#24
multimodal commuter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NJ, NYC, LI
Posts: 19,852
Bikes: 1940s Fothergill, 1959 Allegro Special, 1963? Claud Butler Olympic Sprint, Lambert 'Clubman', 1974 Fuji "the Ace", 1976 Holdsworth 650b conversion rando bike, 1983 Trek 720 tourer, 1984 Counterpoint Opus II, 1993 Basso Gap, 2010 Downtube 8h, and...
Mentioned: 584 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1908 Post(s)
Liked 574 Times
in
339 Posts
They also call them "sprints." But for sure some people called tubular wheels 27” wheels/tires. The original spec sheet and receipt for my 1954 Drysdale, written out and signed by Alvin himself, specified 27" Vianzone (sic!) rims... meaning tubulars.
__________________
www.rhmsaddles.com.
www.rhmsaddles.com.
#25
Bianchi Goddess
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Shady Pines Retirement Fort Wayne, In
Posts: 29,716
Bikes: Too many to list here check my signature.
Mentioned: 191 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2910 Post(s)
Liked 2,830 Times
in
1,457 Posts
How old is your bike? BITD (think sixties and seventies) in Britain "racing bikes" came with 27 x 1 1/4, but bikes that were actually raced used "sprints and tubs" from The Continent, which were 700C. The introduction of lightweight Mavic rims and Michelin's Elan high-pressure clinchers, in '75 or so, made it possible to ride to the race on your clinchers and then replace them with your racing wheels without having to adjust the brake reach.
As demonstrated by a well-known fellow member:
As demonstrated by a well-known fellow member:
__________________
“One morning you wake up, the girl is gone, the bikes are gone, all that's left behind is a pair of old tires and a tube of tubular glue, all squeezed out"
Sugar "Kane" Kowalczyk
“One morning you wake up, the girl is gone, the bikes are gone, all that's left behind is a pair of old tires and a tube of tubular glue, all squeezed out"
Sugar "Kane" Kowalczyk