Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > General Cycling Discussion
Reload this Page >

7-11 - Comparing different Nexus IGHs

Notices
General Cycling Discussion Have a cycling related question or comment that doesn't fit in one of the other specialty forums? Drop on in and post in here! When possible, please select the forum above that most fits your post!

7-11 - Comparing different Nexus IGHs

Old 06-28-22, 08:41 PM
  #1  
keraba2
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2021
Posts: 29
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
7-11 - Comparing different Nexus IGHs

I have 3 bikes with Shimano IGHs: a 3 speed in an Italian road bike, a 7 speed in a steel commuter and an 11 speed in a carbon racing bike. This post is to describe how the latter 2 compare in performance. I made this comparison because I've read over and over that things like bike weight and tire width doesn't matter, and that IGHs have a negligible cost. This test will show that there's a huge difference /between/ IGHs!


This will be a short, amateurish comparison. I don't have a bike treadmill and power meter pedals. All I have is the hill in my neighborhood, and a Fitbit.


With that, here's some data:





In each case, I descend the hill and then ride back. I attempt to exert myself the same amount each climb.


The first descent is on the 7 speed. It hits a peak of 15mph. Climbing back, it hits a peak of 10.33mph with a consistent heart rate of 150. I /think/ the wheel size that I climbed with was 48.8".


The second descent is on the 11 speed. It hits a peak of 17.9mph, a significant difference. Climbing back, it hits 12.2mph, again, a significant difference, and interestingly my heart rate goes from 150 to 130! Not sure if this is a Fitbit mistake. I /think/ the wheel size that I climbed with was 58".


My conclusions: First, the 11 speed (and its bike) somehow has a much lower resistance just coasting (downhill). Maybe this is due to the 11 speed having oil lubrication while the 7 speed is grease, but the racing bike's skinny wheels (1" vs 1.5") could also be contributing. (I made sure the 1.5" wheels were pumped up hard.)


Second, between the resistance of the 7 speed and its weight (30# vs 21#), it has a /much/ higher effort to propel it uphill. The 11 speed has such a low effort to propel uphill that I could use a larger wheel. I don't plan on listening any more when people say that things like weight and tire width don't matter (much). These are 20% differences, and they compound each other!


Anyways, enjoy.
keraba2 is offline  
Old 06-29-22, 12:11 AM
  #2  
koala logs
Banned.
 
Join Date: May 2022
Posts: 674
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 347 Post(s)
Liked 170 Times in 140 Posts
Originally Posted by keraba2
I /think/ the wheel size that I climbed with was 48.8".
That's a very huge wheel size!

koala logs is offline  
Likes For koala logs:
Old 06-29-22, 08:34 AM
  #3  
ClydeClydeson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 1,606
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 581 Post(s)
Liked 921 Times in 518 Posts
Good effort, but meaningless. Using two completely different bikes means you can't know if the speed difference was because of the IGHs or because of some other factor (bike weight, tire rolling resistance, chain drag, aerodynamic differences from different rider positions, etc). Your conclusion that different IGHs are different in performance is not unlikely, but you have certainly not proved it. The difference in coasting speed is a clue - the gear mechanism of an IGH is not activated by coasting, so you are only rolling on the outer bearings like in any other hub, so the difference in coasting speed is almost definitely due to other causes. Whatever drag was causing the 7sp bike to be slower that is not in the IGH will also cause it to be slower when pedalling.
ClydeClydeson is offline  
Old 06-29-22, 09:33 AM
  #4  
base2 
I am potato.
 
base2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 3,104

Bikes: Only precision built, custom high performance elitist machines of the highest caliber. 🍆

Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1782 Post(s)
Liked 1,620 Times in 926 Posts
^^^

Agreed. What he said.

All IGH's have some cost. But, so do all the other types & styles of drivetrain as well. I've never known any of my IGH's to make a meaningful difference over my conventional derailleur drivetrains. Well, any difference I could locate specifically to the hub once properly broken in. There is just too many variables to account.

It's not like any difference between bikes couldn't be made up elsewhere. Like switching to tubeless, getting good tires, or (gasp!) doing both, for example.

Oil bathed IGH's seem to do best, IMO. It's not hard to squirt in a bunch of Phil's Tenacious & hold it in the hub by packing the cap with marine grease. But, I don't know that this isn't simply placebo effect either since I do all my own maintenance.

My Nexus 7 Dahon "feels" slowest of all. But it's on a 20 inch folder, with Marathon tires, driven by a Schlumpf drive in overdrive most times. My Pugeot with the same hub & Rene Herse 26x1.75 tires is a completely different experience than that of the Dahon. It offers every bit same experience as any drop bar bike "should" give. Apples to apples: It's not the hub. It's the bike.

Maybe my experience suffers from sample bias. Who knows?

Good luck learning the in's & outs of the scientific method.
__________________
I shouldn't have to "make myself more visible;" Drivers should just stop running people over.

Car dependency is a tax.
base2 is offline  
Likes For base2:
Old 06-29-22, 10:11 AM
  #5  
keraba2
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2021
Posts: 29
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
"you have certainly not proved it"

I didn't claim that I did, troll.

"the gear mechanism of an IGH is not activated by coasting"

A dragging clutch, particularly soaked in grease, would absolutely cause this.
keraba2 is offline  
Old 06-29-22, 11:27 AM
  #6  
base2 
I am potato.
 
base2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 3,104

Bikes: Only precision built, custom high performance elitist machines of the highest caliber. 🍆

Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1782 Post(s)
Liked 1,620 Times in 926 Posts
Oh, ok.
That's how this thread is going to be.






__________________
I shouldn't have to "make myself more visible;" Drivers should just stop running people over.

Car dependency is a tax.
base2 is offline  
Old 06-29-22, 12:23 PM
  #7  
OldTryGuy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: SW Fl.
Posts: 5,611

Bikes: Day6 Semi Recumbent "FIREBALL", 1981 Custom Touring Paramount, 1983 Road Paramount, 2013 Giant Propel Advanced SL3, 2018 Specialized Red Roubaix Expert mech., 2002 Magna 7sp hybrid, 1976 Bassett Racing 45sp Cruiser

Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1065 Post(s)
Liked 779 Times in 502 Posts
Originally Posted by base2
^^^

Agreed. What he said.

All IGH's have some cost. But, so do all the other types & styles of drivetrain as well. I've never known any of my IGH's to make a meaningful difference over my conventional derailleur drivetrains. Well, any difference I could locate specifically to the hub once properly broken in. There is just too many variables to account.

It's not like any difference between bikes couldn't be made up elsewhere. Like switching to tubeless, getting good tires, or (gasp!) doing both, for example.

Oil bathed IGH's seem to do best, IMO. It's not hard to squirt in a bunch of Phil's Tenacious & hold it in the hub by packing the cap with marine grease. But, I don't know that this isn't simply placebo effect either since I do all my own maintenance.

My Nexus 7 Dahon "feels" slowest of all. But it's on a 20 inch folder, with Marathon tires, driven by a Schlumpf drive in overdrive most times. My Pugeot with the same hub & Rene Herse 26x1.75 tires is a completely different experience than that of the Dahon. It offers every bit same experience as any drop bar bike "should" give. Apples to apples: It's not the hub. It's the bike.

Maybe my experience suffers from sample bias. Who knows?

Good luck learning the in's & outs of the scientific method.
My 7spd rides like I'm going uphill in both directions. I've also read comments that the 7spd is INDEED the worse hub
OldTryGuy is offline  
Old 06-29-22, 06:33 PM
  #8  
Rick
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,415
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 612 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 387 Times in 270 Posts
I purchased a Belt driven Rohloff equipped bicycle in 2013. I recently purchased a belt drive ebike with a Enviolo IGH to pull my Carla Cargo Trailer. I have read and commented about added friction but really am not concerned about it. I like my belt drive bicycles and am not interested in chain driven bicycles anymore.
Rick is offline  
Old 07-04-22, 08:46 AM
  #9  
ClydeClydeson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 1,606
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 581 Post(s)
Liked 921 Times in 518 Posts
People with any amount of self awareness would be trying to improve themselves. It must be nice not having that burden.
ClydeClydeson is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.