SUVs more dangerous?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 4,355
Mentioned: 90 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8084 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 14 Times
in
13 Posts
SUVs more dangerous?
This article claims SUVs are more dangerous because of their higher hoods and heavier weight, and that increases in pedestrian deaths are statistically linked to increasing popularity of SUVs. Do you agree? I have generally found most truck drivers to be very conscientious drivers when it comes to pedestrians and cyclists, but of course there are those who drive by and rev the motor. Are you intimidated by SUVs? If their popularity grows enough, would it deter you from LCF? Do large vehicles deter people more from biking/walking in general than car traffic?
https://www.cnet.com/roadshow/news/s...deaths-report/
https://www.cnet.com/roadshow/news/s...deaths-report/
#3
Full Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 212
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Liked 33 Times
in
20 Posts
As a regular driver of large vehicles, I can say that when it comes to vehicle vs cyclist, SUV's can be more dangerous. Sitting up higher gives the driver a better, less obstructed view of the road ahead and can allow the driver to see the cyclist in time to avoid an accident. But in the chance that a collision between a SUV and a cyclist occurs, the SUV is going to do much more damage to the cyclist compared to a smaller car. Even full size cars sit lower to the ground and could cause the cyclist to go over the hood while an SUV, with higher ground clearance, taller hood and bumper profiles, would likely cause the cyclist to take the full impact on the body and potentially go under the front of the vehicle.
So are SUV's more dangerous to cyclist? They can be. But keep in mind that full size trucks and vans are just as dangerous and while there arent as many privately owned trucks/vans, they are commonplace on our roads due to construction and repair service companies.
So are SUV's more dangerous to cyclist? They can be. But keep in mind that full size trucks and vans are just as dangerous and while there arent as many privately owned trucks/vans, they are commonplace on our roads due to construction and repair service companies.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Down Under
Posts: 1,936
Bikes: A steel framed 26" off road tourer from a manufacturer who thinks they are cool. Giant Anthem. Trek 720 Multiroad pub bike. 10 kids bikes all under 20". Assorted waifs and unfinished projects.
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1188 Post(s)
Liked 1,154 Times
in
640 Posts
SUVs should be renamed UBRs , Urban Battering Rams. Most here in Australia never see off road, unless you count pulling up on the footpath (sidewalk) outside a school or building site. Making the urbanite feel like they're rough and ready for anything, just like they saw in the TV advertising. Plus there's the "up high can see" argument which used to work until 25% of the cars are SUVs and bugger the person behind you...
#5
Prefers Cicero
This article claims SUVs are more dangerous because of their higher hoods and heavier weight, and that increases in pedestrian deaths are statistically linked to increasing popularity of SUVs. Do you agree? I have generally found most truck drivers to be very conscientious drivers when it comes to pedestrians and cyclists, but of course there are those who drive by and rev the motor. Are you intimidated by SUVs? If their popularity grows enough, would it deter you from LCF? Do large vehicles deter people more from biking/walking in general than car traffic?
https://www.cnet.com/roadshow/news/s...deaths-report/
https://www.cnet.com/roadshow/news/s...deaths-report/
Last edited by cooker; 07-04-18 at 05:20 PM.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 4,077
Bikes: Velo Orange Piolet
Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2228 Post(s)
Liked 2,011 Times
in
972 Posts
Didn't read it, but SUVs don't handle well and rollover a lot because they have a high center of gravity and (generally) crap cornering suspension and tires. It's been that way since "SUV"s were invented became a general purpose vehicle in the 1980s. They're simply not "driver's" cars, but they sell well and drivers don't know their limitations.
#7
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 4,355
Mentioned: 90 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8084 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 14 Times
in
13 Posts
Didn't read it, but SUVs don't handle well and rollover a lot because they have a high center of gravity and (generally) crap cornering suspension and tires. It's been that way since "SUV"s were invented became a general purpose vehicle in the 1980s. They're simply not "driver's" cars, but they sell well and drivers don't know their limitations.
#9
Banned
SUVs are just yesterday's station wagons that were popular then, and SUVs are just as popular now, plus the mini van era is long over.
#10
Occam's Rotor
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 7,248
Mentioned: 61 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2366 Post(s)
Liked 2,331 Times
in
1,164 Posts
I fear pickup trucks even more than FUVs.
#12
Senior Member
SUVs are more dangerous because they are classified as trucks, not cars, and as such, do not have to meet the same kind of safety requirements that cars do. And then people do silly things to them, like lift them, which puts bumpers higher than standard, resulting in more damage done in an accident if they hit someone else. Being heavier, they brake worse, have more kinetic energy when in motion, and handle worse. It all adds up to being more dangerous. Driving an SUV for safety is like saying, "Screw your safety, as long as I'm safe." -- it's a declaration of "me first, f*** the rest of you." As a cyclist, I don't really mind them, but on many other levels, they are annoying. If they are being used as automobiles, they should have to conform to automobile regulation.