Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Electronics, Lighting, & Gadgets
Reload this Page >

SP-Connect vs Quad Lock

Search
Notices
Electronics, Lighting, & Gadgets HRM, GPS, MP3, HID. Whether it's got an acronym or not, here's where you'll find discussions on all sorts of tools, toys and gadgets.

SP-Connect vs Quad Lock

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-25-23, 07:19 PM
  #1  
mschwett 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2021
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 2,035

Bikes: addict, aethos, creo, vanmoof, sirrus, public ...

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1273 Post(s)
Liked 1,392 Times in 710 Posts
SP-Connect vs Quad Lock

any real world / long-term experiences with sp-connect (the new one) and quad lock?

i've been using quad lock for my bar mounts for a few years, and they've been great. easy to attach/remove, super sturdy, the cases are a little bulky but decent looking. however, i really didn't love the look of the mount on the bike, particularly the big lever.

i printed a couple alpinist cockpit -> SP connect adaptors this week, and gave one a try today. it worked very well. seems rock solid. my only complaint so far is that it's a little harder to attach, doesn't quite pop in immediately the way quad lock does. that may be muscle memory or it may be the design, which has generally smaller engagement surfaces and no tapering.

the mount, though, is much more svelte! my adapter weighs 5g before the bolt and nut, which are stainless for now but titanium ones are in the mail. the adapter comes with M6 hardware, which really seems like overkill so my current version is using M5. i'm rotating the mount surface another 3 degrees and down a few MM for the next version, get it a tiny bit closer to the stem.










here's the quad lock version it replaced. one other advantage for quad-lock, potentially, is that the interface goes in 90 degree clicks, allowing landscape mounting and thus an anti-rotation design to the interface between the mount hardware and the bike mount. sp-connect's bike-side mount is fully symmetrical, nothing to lock into position for rotation other than the head of the m6 bolt. i added a thin layer of conformal tape between the mount and the adapter, so it's not going anywhere, but still....



__________________
mschwett is offline  
Old 03-02-23, 07:58 PM
  #2  
pixjnr
Newbie
 
Join Date: Feb 2023
Posts: 9
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Been using quadlock for a while now. Never had an issue with disconnect from bumpy bike ride. Not worth the risk to have your expensive phone not secured correctly. Interesting to hear about another brand in the market though!
pixjnr is offline  
Old 03-02-23, 11:28 PM
  #3  
mschwett 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2021
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 2,035

Bikes: addict, aethos, creo, vanmoof, sirrus, public ...

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1273 Post(s)
Liked 1,392 Times in 710 Posts
Originally Posted by pixjnr
Been using quadlock for a while now. Never had an issue with disconnect from bumpy bike ride. Not worth the risk to have your expensive phone not secured correctly. Interesting to hear about another brand in the market though!
sp-connect seems just as secure. it doesn’t have the locking lever, but it would have to rotate 90 degrees to come out. about 200 miles on it and no worries. the case and mount are certainly sleeker.
__________________
mschwett is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.