How Much New is Too Much for You?
#1
Guest
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2020
Posts: 2,888
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1346 Post(s)
Liked 3,270 Times
in
1,439 Posts
How Much New is Too Much for You?
Deleted
Last edited by Rolla; 09-26-22 at 03:29 PM.
Likes For Rolla:
Likes For Jeff Neese:
#3
Grupetto Bob
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Seattle-ish
Posts: 6,184
Bikes: Bikey McBike Face
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2566 Post(s)
Liked 5,599 Times
in
2,906 Posts
I draw the line at e-bikes. YMMV
__________________
Road 🚴🏾♂️ & Mountain 🚵🏾♂️
Road 🚴🏾♂️ & Mountain 🚵🏾♂️
Likes For rsbob:
#4
señor miembro
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Pac NW
Posts: 6,602
Bikes: '70s - '80s Campagnolo
Mentioned: 92 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3869 Post(s)
Liked 6,457 Times
in
3,193 Posts
what old-school stuff do you remain devoted to?
Likes For SurferRosa:
#5
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,605
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10947 Post(s)
Liked 7,473 Times
in
4,181 Posts
- I dont think I will have carbon rims anytime soon. Its lmnot like I am against them, I just don't feel the need as my 1 disc brake bike is my gravel bike so the quality aluminum rims on that will be fine for years.
- I don't see electronic shifting hitting my bikes soon. Only 1 can support it my gravel bike, and the 2x11 wide range drivetrain works perfectly as is. Again, no motivation.
I do wonder what I will do in a handful of years because I love my steel frames, but I also love my Ultegra level shifting. Once what I have is nearing the end of life...do I go to Microshift or some hack Amazon ltwoo style brand that is still making 11sp mechanical for rim brakes?
- I don't see electronic shifting hitting my bikes soon. Only 1 can support it my gravel bike, and the 2x11 wide range drivetrain works perfectly as is. Again, no motivation.
I do wonder what I will do in a handful of years because I love my steel frames, but I also love my Ultegra level shifting. Once what I have is nearing the end of life...do I go to Microshift or some hack Amazon ltwoo style brand that is still making 11sp mechanical for rim brakes?
Likes For mstateglfr:
#6
Full Member
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 201
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 77 Post(s)
Liked 88 Times
in
57 Posts
I love the new stuff, gears, bars, seats, wheels, tires, pedals, materials, helmets, clothing, suspension, eletronic shifting,, all the gadgets. Most gains today are minuscule but still positive and healthy for our sport. Think how boring our sport would be if we all bought Black Trek Cruzers, . Like they say, Old enough to know better but too young to resist that new stuff.
Likes For N2deep:
#7
Banned.
A fully enclosed/sealed drivetrain would be nice but the tech doesn't exist yet. I don't mean just IGH but also fully enclosed power transmissions. No more exposed chain / drive shaft, perhaps, not even a chain.
The mainstream drivetrain tech that is fully exposed to the elements is just ridiculous in the 21st century. It discourages all-weather riding and a major inconvenience to daily commuters.
I think the weight weenies are to blame in this messed up priorities when they only make up a tiny minority of the riding populace. Don't mind a bit heavier bike as long as I can ride it in any weather without having to fiddle with it every time I get caught in few hours of heavy rain. And to be honest, I like actually like riding in the rain, any weather, even windy.
Just man-up, get faster, beat your buddies with training instead of counting on reducing your bike's weight.
The mainstream drivetrain tech that is fully exposed to the elements is just ridiculous in the 21st century. It discourages all-weather riding and a major inconvenience to daily commuters.
I think the weight weenies are to blame in this messed up priorities when they only make up a tiny minority of the riding populace. Don't mind a bit heavier bike as long as I can ride it in any weather without having to fiddle with it every time I get caught in few hours of heavy rain. And to be honest, I like actually like riding in the rain, any weather, even windy.
Just man-up, get faster, beat your buddies with training instead of counting on reducing your bike's weight.
Likes For qwaalodge:
#9
Guest
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2020
Posts: 2,888
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1346 Post(s)
Liked 3,270 Times
in
1,439 Posts
Likes For Rolla:
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Elevation 666m Edmonton Canada
Posts: 2,475
Bikes: 2013 Custom SA5w / Rohloff Tourster
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1233 Post(s)
Liked 318 Times
in
245 Posts
I still haven't had threadless, clip anything, tubeless, carbon frame or any other carbon part I haven't made myself.
Likes For GamblerGORD53:
#11
Dirty Heathen
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: MC-778, 6250 fsw
Posts: 2,182
Bikes: 1997 Cannondale, 1976 Bridgestone, 1998 SoftRide, 1989 Klein, 1989 Black Lightning #0033
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 889 Post(s)
Liked 906 Times
in
534 Posts
New tech is great; Racing Improves the Breed, as it were.
However, BF acts like the top-flite bikes are the only ones that exist, and the mfgrs are going to force us all to buy $10,000 super bikes.
Right now, you can get almost any combination of drivetrain, tire size, bar shape, frame style, and price point you can think of. Heck, even BikesDirect has, like 100 different models, and they’re not exactly an industry innovator.
Not everyone has the same cycling needs, wants or preferences; except at BikeForums, where “If I don’t need it, it’s Stupid!”
GTFO with that noise.
However, BF acts like the top-flite bikes are the only ones that exist, and the mfgrs are going to force us all to buy $10,000 super bikes.
Right now, you can get almost any combination of drivetrain, tire size, bar shape, frame style, and price point you can think of. Heck, even BikesDirect has, like 100 different models, and they’re not exactly an industry innovator.
Not everyone has the same cycling needs, wants or preferences; except at BikeForums, where “If I don’t need it, it’s Stupid!”
GTFO with that noise.
#12
Grupetto Bob
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Seattle-ish
Posts: 6,184
Bikes: Bikey McBike Face
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2566 Post(s)
Liked 5,599 Times
in
2,906 Posts
I think the weight weenies are to blame in this messed up priorities when they only make up a tiny minority of the riding populace. Don't mind a bit heavier bike as long as I can ride it in any weather without having to fiddle with it every time I get caught in few hours of heavy rain. And to be honest, I like actually like riding in the rain, any weather, even windy.
Just man-up, get faster, beat your buddies with training instead of counting on reducing your bike's weight.
Only my opinion, I could be wrong. Have a good life.
__________________
Road 🚴🏾♂️ & Mountain 🚵🏾♂️
Road 🚴🏾♂️ & Mountain 🚵🏾♂️
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 3,834
Bikes: Trek Domane SL6 Gen 3, Soma Fog Cutter, Focus Mares AL, Detroit Bikes Sparrow FG, Volae Team, Nimbus MUni
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 892 Post(s)
Liked 2,052 Times
in
1,074 Posts
I'm neither an early adopter nor a Luddite. When things become affordable and are proven by time, I'll jump on.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,760
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1109 Post(s)
Liked 1,200 Times
in
760 Posts
If I could never have anything but indexed 8 speed steel bike, I'd be perfectly happy - I am with the one I own. 6 0r 7 speed friction? Maybe, but I haven't ridden it in several decades so can't really tell if it would suit my needs and fancy.
BUT. I also love my titanium and CF 10 speeds, and now am really enjoying my big lifetime splurge - a titanium, AXS / Etap gravel bike with hydro discs (which replaced an old 9-speed bar-end shifter aluminum cross bike that I was also very happy with).
I don't enjoy any of these bikes - or the technology that they have - any more than any other. They're all great.
I enjoy the hell out of both old and new technology. I kind of pity people who are stuck, whether it be with old stuff, or the latest.
BUT. I also love my titanium and CF 10 speeds, and now am really enjoying my big lifetime splurge - a titanium, AXS / Etap gravel bike with hydro discs (which replaced an old 9-speed bar-end shifter aluminum cross bike that I was also very happy with).
I don't enjoy any of these bikes - or the technology that they have - any more than any other. They're all great.
I enjoy the hell out of both old and new technology. I kind of pity people who are stuck, whether it be with old stuff, or the latest.
Likes For Camilo:
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Mich
Posts: 7,354
Bikes: RSO E-tire dropper fixie brifter
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Liked 2,945 Times
in
1,906 Posts
the newest that I will never get used to is the modern price.
__________________
-Oh Hey!
-Oh Hey!
#16
Galveston County Texas
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: In The Wind
Posts: 33,221
Bikes: 02 GTO, 2011 Magnum
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1349 Post(s)
Liked 1,243 Times
in
621 Posts
"A fully enclosed/sealed drivetrain would be nice but the tech doesn't exist yet. I don't mean just IGH but also fully enclosed power transmissions. No more exposed chain / drive shaft, perhaps, not even a chain."
Had one on a Honda 300 Dream. So difficult to adjust.
Had one on a Honda 300 Dream. So difficult to adjust.
__________________
Fred "The Real Fred"
Fred "The Real Fred"
#17
Full Member
Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 425
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 167 Post(s)
Liked 291 Times
in
163 Posts
I'm all for new tech that makes a positive difference to my cycling.
Carbon frames/forks = major positive difference to me for racing.
Electronic Groupset = mostly minor but on occasion significant positive difference. (In general riding, no difference really albeit nice, but in sprints, especially when racing, it has helped me change more smoothly and faster).
Disc brakes = positive difference. They absolutely stop better but the downside is maintenance; they need more attention. I have 2 road bikes, one disc and one calliper SRAM Red with very good pads. very good stopping power, still no match for disc if really honest. I like both but for fast descents, wet weather etc, disc all the time now. On my MTB, an absolute must.
Carbon wheels = major positive. I used to break my rims back in the old days eventually. I haven't broken a carbon rim and I have thrashed my wheels on cobbles and gravel.
Tubeless = positive difference to my MTB, saved many punctures, but on my road bikes no. Not a convert for road.
Power meters = positive difference; I am a convert to how they help achieve training goals vs how it used to be back in the 80's/90's when I last raced.
Strava = positive difference. I only discovered it two and a half years ago! In conjunction with Training Peaks for logging my rides and data, I like the training motivation it can offer; I do chase those KOM's, especially those with Pro's leading them - they mean diddly squat but help in the moment to push that bit harder.
Carbon frames/forks = major positive difference to me for racing.
Electronic Groupset = mostly minor but on occasion significant positive difference. (In general riding, no difference really albeit nice, but in sprints, especially when racing, it has helped me change more smoothly and faster).
Disc brakes = positive difference. They absolutely stop better but the downside is maintenance; they need more attention. I have 2 road bikes, one disc and one calliper SRAM Red with very good pads. very good stopping power, still no match for disc if really honest. I like both but for fast descents, wet weather etc, disc all the time now. On my MTB, an absolute must.
Carbon wheels = major positive. I used to break my rims back in the old days eventually. I haven't broken a carbon rim and I have thrashed my wheels on cobbles and gravel.
Tubeless = positive difference to my MTB, saved many punctures, but on my road bikes no. Not a convert for road.
Power meters = positive difference; I am a convert to how they help achieve training goals vs how it used to be back in the 80's/90's when I last raced.
Strava = positive difference. I only discovered it two and a half years ago! In conjunction with Training Peaks for logging my rides and data, I like the training motivation it can offer; I do chase those KOM's, especially those with Pro's leading them - they mean diddly squat but help in the moment to push that bit harder.
Last edited by AlgarveCycling; 04-06-22 at 06:14 AM. Reason: Add tubeless
Likes For AlgarveCycling:
#18
Senior Member
Likes For HTupolev:
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Scotland
Posts: 503
Bikes: Way too many
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 895 Post(s)
Liked 605 Times
in
362 Posts
I love new tech, anything that makes things easier, more reliable or more fun is a good thing!
Where I draw the line is cost or reliability/practicality. I'm not going to pay twice as much for something new as something that's fine unless there's a compelling reason. I'm also wary about things that need better maintenance like carbon frames (aluminum does me fine) or electronic shifting (because I've seen a few of my cycling friends getting stuck on a long ride where the shifting just fails and they need to ride home in whatever gear they are in. I get that a mechanical one could fail too but that's often easier to bodge back together at the roadside).
Where I draw the line is cost or reliability/practicality. I'm not going to pay twice as much for something new as something that's fine unless there's a compelling reason. I'm also wary about things that need better maintenance like carbon frames (aluminum does me fine) or electronic shifting (because I've seen a few of my cycling friends getting stuck on a long ride where the shifting just fails and they need to ride home in whatever gear they are in. I get that a mechanical one could fail too but that's often easier to bodge back together at the roadside).
Likes For Herzlos:
#20
Banned.
There's no question the fully enclosed system is going to be heavier than fully exposed derailleur systems. But it's going to be extremely beneficial to commuters and E-bikes. Like I've said, the vast majority of riders around the world would appreciate more having a bike that only required very light maintenance in one year of all weather riding than being faster than the rest.
Riders who can choose to avoid riding in the rain and have plenty of time to fiddling with their bikes is actually the minority in the global cycling populace. The needs of the few is apparently more important than actually making the right product for the majority. It's just messed up. Way more messed up than the automobile industry.
Likes For qwaalodge:
Likes For CrimsonEclipse:
#22
Banned.
Manufacturers have tried making fully enclosed drivetrains. But they always give it up. My guess is the tech has exceeded the "tolerable weights" acceptable to weight weenies.
But why not develop the product further to sell to the non-weight weenie market, particularly commuters, and to the rest of the riders who doesn't care about speed and just want a bike that is easy to maintain? One might argue traditional open-drive bikes are easy to maintain. But unless you work part time only, is retired with lots of disposable income and free time on your hand, then it's actually bothersome enough.
It's like the majority group of riders don't exist to the manufacturers so what they do is just make junk-quality version of their weight-weenie open derailleur drives.
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 3,439
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 872 Post(s)
Liked 2,270 Times
in
1,272 Posts
Yea , I’m stuck in the seventies. Last time I visited my favorite bike shop to get a chain replaced on my Medici , the guy asked if I wanted to try some new tangled modern bike they just got in. I politely said “no thanks”. To be honest I’m afraid I would never get back on my steel bikes, and I’m happy where I am. Happiness is bliss!
Likes For Kabuki12:
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 727
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 365 Post(s)
Liked 418 Times
in
247 Posts
My reluctance is more based on having to learn new maintenance tasks than any distaste for new tech per se. I don't get much practice on bike maintenance because I only work on my own bikes, so learning to deal with new tech takes a while and sometimes makes it necessary to buy new tools.
I must say, though, that working on disk brakes (mechanical), even given the learning curve, was a cr*p-ton easier than dealing with canti brakes, even though I've worked on them for decades. For my location and riding style disks aren't needed on a road bike, but if tire clearance (or fenders) is a concern, for heavier bikes (tandem, loaded touring) and MTB, I think disks definitely are better for those applications.
I do like bikes that look like bikes, and not something out of Buck Rogers, but that's more esthetics than tech, though the esthetics are (sometimes) driven by tech.
I must say, though, that working on disk brakes (mechanical), even given the learning curve, was a cr*p-ton easier than dealing with canti brakes, even though I've worked on them for decades. For my location and riding style disks aren't needed on a road bike, but if tire clearance (or fenders) is a concern, for heavier bikes (tandem, loaded touring) and MTB, I think disks definitely are better for those applications.
I do like bikes that look like bikes, and not something out of Buck Rogers, but that's more esthetics than tech, though the esthetics are (sometimes) driven by tech.