Bike fit question
#26
Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: France
Posts: 29
Bikes: Vintage Camille Dardenne
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
78 inseam
Thank you all for your replies, I really appreciate the responses.
I have re-measured my inseam, took off all my clothes, went as far as I could with the book, and then got 78 cm. Im thinking now I might have measured my inseam wrong. 78x.883 I got 68.8. So center of BB to top of saddle currently measures 69 on the bike, so I think I will trust the fit and ride for awhile to see how it goes. Thank you kontact, I never thought that I have measured my inseam incorrectly.
I probably do look ridiculous with the 120mm stem he fitted me with, I will try to look into a bigger bike.
Thanks again everyone.
I have re-measured my inseam, took off all my clothes, went as far as I could with the book, and then got 78 cm. Im thinking now I might have measured my inseam wrong. 78x.883 I got 68.8. So center of BB to top of saddle currently measures 69 on the bike, so I think I will trust the fit and ride for awhile to see how it goes. Thank you kontact, I never thought that I have measured my inseam incorrectly.
I probably do look ridiculous with the 120mm stem he fitted me with, I will try to look into a bigger bike.
Thanks again everyone.
cleat position, saddle fore aft, and saddle shape can make a huge difference in my opinion when adjusting saddle height. also take into consideration changing towards shorter cranks like 165mm
good luck with your fitting
#27
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: New Jersry the beautiful Garden State
Posts: 1,920
Bikes: 2007 Ridley Excalibur, 2003 Orbea Orca, 199? Cannondale Headshock MTB hardtail
Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 520 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
10 Posts
Thank you all for your replies, I really appreciate the responses.
I have re-measured my inseam, took off all my clothes, went as far as I could with the book, and then got 78 cm. Im thinking now I might have measured my inseam wrong. 78x.883 I got 68.8. So center of BB to top of saddle currently measures 69 on the bike, so I think I will trust the fit and ride for awhile to see how it goes. Thank you kontact, I never thought that I have measured my inseam incorrectly.
I probably do look ridiculous with the 120mm stem he fitted me with, I will try to look into a bigger bike.
Thanks again everyone.
I have re-measured my inseam, took off all my clothes, went as far as I could with the book, and then got 78 cm. Im thinking now I might have measured my inseam wrong. 78x.883 I got 68.8. So center of BB to top of saddle currently measures 69 on the bike, so I think I will trust the fit and ride for awhile to see how it goes. Thank you kontact, I never thought that I have measured my inseam incorrectly.
I probably do look ridiculous with the 120mm stem he fitted me with, I will try to look into a bigger bike.
Thanks again everyone.
Last edited by ptempel; 03-28-18 at 12:47 PM.
#28
Senior Member
I've had multiple fits from Nate on several bikes. From time to time, I've made a minor adjustment to his numbers for comfort; saddle angle,etc. so it's not always perfect. I have also gone back to him weeks afterwards to handle an item, which he does for no additional charge. He is pretty good about taking care of his customers.
__________________
[insert clever quote here]
[insert clever quote here]
#31
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 68
Bikes: Fat City Monster Fat, BMC Roadmachine, Trek Emonda, Trek 2100, Specialized Rockhopper
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 21 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Take a look at https://www.stevehoggbikefitting.com/bikefit/2011/11/knee-pain/
And https://www.stevehoggbikefitting.com/bikefit/2011/02/seat-height-how-hard-can-it-be/
Interesting reads. Might be helpful for you.
And https://www.stevehoggbikefitting.com/bikefit/2011/02/seat-height-how-hard-can-it-be/
Interesting reads. Might be helpful for you.
#32
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,021
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4376 Post(s)
Liked 1,552 Times
in
1,017 Posts
#34
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,021
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4376 Post(s)
Liked 1,552 Times
in
1,017 Posts
And fitters don't use KOPS. There is no good fit reason to put someone on top of the crank on a road bike.
#35
Le Crocodile
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Santa Barbara Calif.
Posts: 1,873
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 369 Post(s)
Liked 787 Times
in
311 Posts
Thigh length variation doesn't move the saddle forward that much. Fairly large variations in thigh length will only move the seat position by about 1cm IF you are using KOPS.
And fitters don't use KOPS. There is no good fit reason to put someone on top of the crank on a road bike.
And fitters don't use KOPS. There is no good fit reason to put someone on top of the crank on a road bike.
ETA- You also must consider saddle construction and placement of the rails, that particular saddle might have the rail terminate on the rear section farther forward than typical for instance. Also consider the seat post set back. Many variables here.
Last edited by Erzulis Boat; 03-29-18 at 11:13 AM.
#36
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur
Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times
in
1,417 Posts
It looks a little small, but nothing ridiculous.
#37
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,021
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4376 Post(s)
Liked 1,552 Times
in
1,017 Posts
KOPS not withstanding, there still must be a relative position. At least from the pics, I see a proportionally "short" thigh. This brings the saddle forward, unless it's offset by saddle height. I would rather see an optimized leg extension and this also is dependent on power output. I am going to trust the fitter on this one.
ETA- You also must consider saddle construction and placement of the rails, that particular saddle might have the rail terminate on the rear section farther forward than typical for instance. Also consider the seat post set back. Many variables here.
ETA- You also must consider saddle construction and placement of the rails, that particular saddle might have the rail terminate on the rear section farther forward than typical for instance. Also consider the seat post set back. Many variables here.
We can see the saddle and seatpost construction - they aren't dimensionally odd. The seat is clamped toward the rear of the rails on a bike with a steep seat tube angle. It is very far forward, and the rider looks forward when seated.
#40
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,021
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4376 Post(s)
Liked 1,552 Times
in
1,017 Posts
Do you have a bad back that requires you to sit up rather than bend from the waste?
#41
Le Crocodile
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Santa Barbara Calif.
Posts: 1,873
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 369 Post(s)
Liked 787 Times
in
311 Posts
There's no functional reason someone with shorter thighs needs to sit further over the cranks. Set back is about the pelvis and upper body, not where your knee is moving.
We can see the saddle and seatpost construction - they aren't dimensionally odd. The seat is clamped toward the rear of the rails on a bike with a steep seat tube angle. It is very far forward, and the rider looks forward when seated.
We can see the saddle and seatpost construction - they aren't dimensionally odd. The seat is clamped toward the rear of the rails on a bike with a steep seat tube angle. It is very far forward, and the rider looks forward when seated.
I will call my buddy with one of those posts, I can guarantee that it has a setback of at least 20mm.
ETA- What am I smoking? I will wager 40mm plus!
It's the fourth installment of the trilogy. Zilcho usable rail space on the saddle, and set back of the seat post to rival an 80's BMX bike.
And I definitely disagree about the thigh length not being a factor in regards to fore/aft on the saddle relative to the pedal.
Last edited by Erzulis Boat; 03-29-18 at 04:41 PM.
#42
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,021
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4376 Post(s)
Liked 1,552 Times
in
1,017 Posts
Those seat posts are known for their setback issues with some fits. I have one of those saddles at my office, and it measures 85mm to the center of upward rear curve (from rear of saddle), another modern saddle here measures 60mm. A HUGE difference.
I will call my buddy with one of those posts, I can guarantee that it has a setback of at least 20mm.
I will call my buddy with one of those posts, I can guarantee that it has a setback of at least 20mm.
If the saddle is longer from the back to where you sit on it (85mm), that would be a reason to have it mounted further back, not further forward.
Found it: 25mm set back.
https://www.specialized.com/us/en/cg...tpost/p/130709
Last edited by Kontact; 03-29-18 at 04:39 PM.
#43
Le Crocodile
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Santa Barbara Calif.
Posts: 1,873
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 369 Post(s)
Liked 787 Times
in
311 Posts
Standard post set back is 25mm.
If the saddle is longer from the back to where you sit on it (85mm), that would be a reason to have it mounted further back, not further forward.
Found it: 25mm set back.
https://www.specialized.com/us/en/cg...tpost/p/130709
If the saddle is longer from the back to where you sit on it (85mm), that would be a reason to have it mounted further back, not further forward.
Found it: 25mm set back.
https://www.specialized.com/us/en/cg...tpost/p/130709
I will measure a post, 5 will get you 10 that Specialized uses the 25mm callout from post center to front of clamp assembly. I will measure from post center, to assembly pivot bolt (the correct method). I could be wrong, but I think it's merely an issue of appearance. The fitter is right IMO.
#45
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 46
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 35 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
I imagined that, if im riding a smaller frame than what fits me, plus an upright seat tube would cause my saddle to move very back. Instead fitter did the opposite. Is my theory incorrect?
#46
Expired Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: TN
Posts: 11,528
Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3664 Post(s)
Liked 5,411 Times
in
2,749 Posts
It doesn't look like the "clown" bikes we sometimes see here. You do seem pretty scrunched up (technical term.) How far can you comfortably ride it? If you haven't done significant mileage, you might want to start there, get a better idea what, if anything, doesn't suit you.
#47
Full Member
You don't mention how the new fit feels? Isn't that what all this is about? Go ride your bike and see how you feel on it. Give it some time and you will know if it is right for you or not. And if you paid someone to help with this, go ask them your questions. IF asking them in person is uncomfortable send them an email. I'm sure that person will be better able to answer your questions than strangers looking at one picture of you on the bike leaning against the wall.
#48
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,021
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4376 Post(s)
Liked 1,552 Times
in
1,017 Posts
A good fitter determines your set back based on your balancing your body between the cranks, saddle and bars. Generally that means that you create set back for hip angle and upper body balance, then select a stem length that gives you the appropriate reach to the bars from your correct saddle position.
No one here was at your fit session, but your description of your fit does not make it sound like the fitter did anything in particular to determine how far aft you should be sitting. Instead, it sounds passive, like he let you sit where you wanted and then moved the saddle to you. Given that the bike is small for you (but not ridiculous), you should have reach to spare.
I have a bike that I wanted to use a cool old stem, even though it was on the short side. So I pushed my saddle back further than normal for me, and that worked fine because extra set back generally just limits how much you can bend forward. And your small bike makes the same sort of situation possible. Yet you have the opposite.
Sitting too far forward generally puts more weight on your hands and the groin because it rotates your pelvis forward and unloads your hamstrings.
#50
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,021
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4376 Post(s)
Liked 1,552 Times
in
1,017 Posts
From the rear of the saddle to the rail curvature, not where you sit on it. If this distance was shorter, you would have the saddle in the exact same place, but it would appear that it wasn't "all the way to the back" of the rails, or in other words "all the way forward". It's merely appearance.
I will measure a post, 5 will get you 10 that Specialized uses the 25mm callout from post center to front of clamp assembly. I will measure from post center, to assembly pivot bolt (the correct method). I could be wrong, but I think it's merely an issue of appearance. The fitter is right IMO.
I will measure a post, 5 will get you 10 that Specialized uses the 25mm callout from post center to front of clamp assembly. I will measure from post center, to assembly pivot bolt (the correct method). I could be wrong, but I think it's merely an issue of appearance. The fitter is right IMO.