Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

Wide 27" tires for the year 2022

Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

Wide 27" tires for the year 2022

Old 05-18-22, 08:42 PM
  #1  
truthseeker14
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 118

Bikes: Soma Double Cross DC, Bridgestone T-700 (1985)

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 46 Post(s)
Liked 31 Times in 15 Posts
Wide 27" tires for the year 2022

I know this has been brought up before, but availability probably changes every year, with or without supply chain issues. I'm looking for a wide 27" tire for commuting. I have to hop a number of nasty curbs, and my 27 x 1 1/4" continental tour rides don't seem up to the task. I've seen that Kenda still makes a couple of 1 3/8" wide tires. Anyone know of 27", 38 mm wide tires? A salesman at a LBS thought there might be more 27" tire varieties in the future, but I think he was just speculating.
truthseeker14 is offline  
Old 05-18-22, 08:59 PM
  #2  
dickbandit 
Senior Member
 
dickbandit's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 93

Bikes: 1980 Peugeot PFN-10, 1989 Bridgestone MB-3, 1988 Univega Alpina Uno, 1974 Velosolex Saint Tropez, 1995 Trek 830, 1986 Lotus Odyssey, 1987 Schwinn Mirada, 1987 Raleigh Elkhorn

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 21 Post(s)
Liked 99 Times in 32 Posts
The Swift Tire sand canyon has a stated width of 1 3/8”. Currently available here: https://www.swifttire.com/
dickbandit is offline  
Likes For dickbandit:
Old 05-18-22, 09:22 PM
  #3  
albrt 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 910

Bikes: 1964(?) Frejus Tour de France, 1967(?) Dawes Double Blue, 1979 Trek 710, 1982 Claud Butler Dalesman, 1983 Schwinn Paramount Elite, 2014 Brompton, maybe a couple more

Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 308 Post(s)
Liked 669 Times in 324 Posts
I've tried two types of Kenda 27 x1 3/8 tires, the K40 and the K161. They were fine for the price and provide a decent vintage look, but I did not feel like they provided any riding advantage over a fully inflated 1 1/4 Pasela.
albrt is offline  
Likes For albrt:
Old 05-19-22, 01:53 AM
  #4  
Kabuki12
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 3,405
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 863 Post(s)
Liked 2,226 Times in 1,249 Posts
I have a set of Michelin ProTek tires mounted on 27” x 1 1/4” wienman rims . When fully inflated they check 1.390” with my calipers. They are a bit heavy but ride ok. Any tire that large isn’t going to be light. The Kenda tires that I have tried have failed on me after about a year and these have been on my Mondia for a few years . Granted it is not a bike I ride very often but the tires are still healthy and true, unlike older Kenda tires that I had.

Last edited by Kabuki12; 05-19-22 at 01:58 AM.
Kabuki12 is offline  
Likes For Kabuki12:
Old 05-19-22, 01:57 AM
  #5  
Kabuki12
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 3,405
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 863 Post(s)
Liked 2,226 Times in 1,249 Posts

They barely fit the bike and I had to use the lever release in addition to the hanger release to remove the wheel.
Kabuki12 is offline  
Likes For Kabuki12:
Old 05-19-22, 03:25 AM
  #6  
oneclick 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Posts: 2,890
Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1105 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,311 Times in 775 Posts
The Kenda 184 is 27x1 3/8", I got a few recently from that auction site and put them on bikes and they looked quite big.
oneclick is offline  
Old 05-19-22, 09:43 AM
  #7  
kingsting
Bicycle Repairman
 
kingsting's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: The Land of Three Mile Island
Posts: 685

Bikes: Many

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 27 Post(s)
Liked 32 Times in 18 Posts
Vittoria Zaffiro is the chunkiest 27 x 1-1/4" tire I've ever seen. Fatter than some 38C hybrid tires!
kingsting is offline  
Old 05-19-22, 10:58 AM
  #8  
ClydeClydeson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 1,606
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 581 Post(s)
Liked 921 Times in 518 Posts
Originally Posted by truthseeker14
A salesman at a LBS thought there might be more 27" tire varieties in the future, but I think he was just speculating.
There is approximately ZERO chance of this happening, unless he was referring to their shop having one style today and that they might have two or three styles later in the summer. 27" is an obsolete size and manufacturers are not putting any effort into making new styles beyond what is already available.

All that being said, there are excellent tires available, but they are almost all 27X1-1/4 (approx. 32mm) 0r 1-3/8 (35mm) or narrower.

However, I am a bigger person and I have been using 700x35mm tires for some very demanding riding for many years. Perhaps you need to bring up your tire pressure to deal with whatever obstacles you encounter.

Another option is to switch your rims to the modern standard 700C size, for which there are hundreds of tire choices, and which will give you a couple mm more space for wider tires in your frame and fork. THe swap is relatively easy if your brake pads have room to adjust 4mm down from where they are now. This suggestion might be heresy for vintage bicycle purists (because your bike originally came with 27" wheels, not because 700C wheels wouldn't have been available when the bike was made) but it makes a lot of sense for a bike you are willing to put some effort into and that is destined to be ridden daily and not intended as a showpiece in a collection.
ClydeClydeson is offline  
Old 05-19-22, 07:59 PM
  #9  
truthseeker14
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 118

Bikes: Soma Double Cross DC, Bridgestone T-700 (1985)

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 46 Post(s)
Liked 31 Times in 15 Posts
Originally Posted by ClydeClydeson
Another option is to switch your rims to the modern standard 700C size, for which there are hundreds of tire choices, and which will give you a couple mm more space for wider tires in your frame and fork.
Ha ha. Actually I bought a vintage bike that took 27" tires on purpose. I wanted to go loaded touring on my Soma Doublecross Disk but it only had 24 spokes per wheel and I realized that may not be enough for touring, and I figured for the price of a new wheel set, I could buy a vintage touring bike that had plenty of spokes. And this is what I did. (Bridgestone T-700 from 1985, 40 spokes rear, 36 front). Plus I always loved the classic look of bikes from the 70s and 80s. I could always put fatter 700c tires on my Soma for commuting but the rim is pretty narrow (18 mm, I think). I've heard different opinions on putting fatter tires on narrow rims.
truthseeker14 is offline  
Old 05-19-22, 08:12 PM
  #10  
dddd
Ride, Wrench, Swap, Race
 
dddd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Northern California
Posts: 9,171

Bikes: Cheltenham-Pedersen racer, Boulder F/S Paris-Roubaix, Varsity racer, '52 Christophe, '62 Continental, '92 Merckx, '75 Limongi, '76 Presto, '72 Gitane SC, '71 Schwinn SS, etc.

Mentioned: 132 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1554 Post(s)
Liked 1,274 Times in 846 Posts
I don't know of any 1-3/8" tire that is wider than the Pasela 1-1/4" tire. The cheaper Asian 1-3/8" tires are narrower than the 1-1/4" Pasela.

Michelin I believe makes the widest 27" tires, the 1-1/4" World Tour and ProTek are a bit larger than even the 1-1/4" Pasela.

The 27x1-1/4" Zaffiro isn't quite as wide as the 1-1/4" Pasela.

Old, aged tires can measure considerably wider than new tires, and some models are affected much more than others from years of inflation.
dddd is offline  
Old 05-19-22, 09:08 PM
  #11  
Classtime 
Senior Member
 
Classtime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 4,674

Bikes: 82 Medici, 2011 Richard Sachs, 2011 Milwaukee Road

Mentioned: 54 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1924 Post(s)
Liked 1,954 Times in 1,086 Posts
I had some Swift tires advertised as 35mm but on my rims, they measured 32. (plus they were not round in cross section which bugs me so off they went.)
__________________
I don't do: disks, tubeless, e-shifting, or bead head nymphs.
Classtime is online now  
Old 05-20-22, 12:53 AM
  #12  
dddd
Ride, Wrench, Swap, Race
 
dddd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Northern California
Posts: 9,171

Bikes: Cheltenham-Pedersen racer, Boulder F/S Paris-Roubaix, Varsity racer, '52 Christophe, '62 Continental, '92 Merckx, '75 Limongi, '76 Presto, '72 Gitane SC, '71 Schwinn SS, etc.

Mentioned: 132 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1554 Post(s)
Liked 1,274 Times in 846 Posts
Originally Posted by Classtime
I had some Swift tires advertised as 35mm but on my rims, they measured 32. (plus they were not round in cross section which bugs me so off they went.)
I believe that the Swift 1-3/8" tires have the same casing dimensions as Pasela 1-1/4".

As for the non-round profile, tires tend to be taller/narrower when first mounted, then eventually the height and width nearly reverse, with the width becoming the bigger of the two dimensions.
dddd is offline  
Likes For dddd:
Old 05-20-22, 06:28 AM
  #13  
Classtime 
Senior Member
 
Classtime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 4,674

Bikes: 82 Medici, 2011 Richard Sachs, 2011 Milwaukee Road

Mentioned: 54 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1924 Post(s)
Liked 1,954 Times in 1,086 Posts
The Swift tread pattern being taller in the center made for uneasy cornering. I wish Panaracer made a 27” Gravel King Slick.
__________________
I don't do: disks, tubeless, e-shifting, or bead head nymphs.
Classtime is online now  
Likes For Classtime:
Old 05-20-22, 06:51 AM
  #14  
bikemig 
Senior Member
 
bikemig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Middle Earth (aka IA)
Posts: 20,505

Bikes: A bunch of old bikes and a few new ones

Mentioned: 178 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5877 Post(s)
Liked 3,445 Times in 2,066 Posts
Concur with the others, the michelin pro tek runs wide; they measure 27 x 1 and 3/8 on my rims. Plus they're decent tires.
bikemig is offline  
Old 05-20-22, 07:27 AM
  #15  
ClydeClydeson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 1,606
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 581 Post(s)
Liked 921 Times in 518 Posts
Originally Posted by truthseeker14
Ha ha. Actually I bought a vintage bike that took 27" tires on purpose. I wanted to go loaded touring on my Soma Doublecross Disk but it only had 24 spokes per wheel and I realized that may not be enough for touring, and I figured for the price of a new wheel set, I could buy a vintage touring bike that had plenty of spokes. And this is what I did. (Bridgestone T-700 from 1985, 40 spokes rear, 36 front). Plus I always loved the classic look of bikes from the 70s and 80s. I could always put fatter 700c tires on my Soma for commuting but the rim is pretty narrow (18 mm, I think). I've heard different opinions on putting fatter tires on narrow rims.
There is no inherent disadvantage of 27" wheels apart from lack of tire choices and availability. Just make sure you have a spare tire packed with you on tour because you might not like the selection available at any given shop or town... you can likely find a 27" tire at any shop or even W*lmart or a hardware store, but likely not of the quality you'd want for reliable long distance riding. You've probably come to this conclusion already.

As for the mismatch of narrow rims with wider tires, there are drawbacks but it's 100% fine to do. The main problem is that the profile of the tire will be an exaggerated 'omega' shape - the sidewalls of the tire will stick out much further than the sides of the rim, and this profile may allow pinch flats more easily (esp. if the tire is underinflated), it might have a slightly 'squirmier' feel compared to a better match of tire and rim widths, and at higher speed it will have higher aerodynamic drag than a wheel/tire with less difference in width. It's totally fine to ride, though, if you keep these things in mind.
ClydeClydeson is offline  
Old 05-20-22, 08:23 AM
  #16  
Paul Waque 
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Ontario
Posts: 146

Bikes: Road: 1972 Raleigh Competition,1989 Marinoni, 1990 Limongi. MTN: 1990 GT Team Avalanche, 1991 Rocky Mountain Blizzard, GT Team RTS , Rocky Mountain MSL 50 Element, CCM fat bike

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 33 Post(s)
Liked 80 Times in 49 Posts
Originally Posted by Classtime
The Swift tread pattern being taller in the center made for uneasy cornering. I wish Panaracer made a 27” Gravel King Slick.
I have found the Swift tire to be loose in the corners. I reasoned that off-centre tread blocks are too squishy.


Edit
After more riding, I quite like the tires and feel comfortable cornering with them.

Last edited by Paul Waque; 06-21-23 at 09:24 PM.
Paul Waque is offline  
Likes For Paul Waque:
Old 05-20-22, 09:16 AM
  #17  
bwilli88 
Not lost wanderer.
 
bwilli88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Lititz, Pa
Posts: 3,361

Bikes: In USA; 73 Raleigh Super Course dingle speed, 72 Raleigh Gran Sport SS, 72 Geoffry Butler, 81 Centurion Pro-Tour, 74 Gugie Grandier Sportier

Mentioned: 72 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 885 Post(s)
Liked 979 Times in 514 Posts
I have found that the widest tires for 27" were some that I got from Cambodia made by DRC. They easily measure 38+ mm on 18mm inside dimension rims.
But I really like my Swift Sand Canyons tires on my Raleigh Gran sports
__________________
Cambodia bikes, Bridgestone SRAM 2 speed, 2012 Fuji Stratos...
bwilli88 is offline  
Likes For bwilli88:
Old 05-20-22, 09:33 AM
  #18  
ThermionicScott 
working on my sandal tan
 
ThermionicScott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,625

Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)

Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3868 Post(s)
Liked 2,560 Times in 1,574 Posts
Originally Posted by Classtime
The Swift tread pattern being taller in the center made for uneasy cornering. I wish Panaracer made a 27” Gravel King Slick.
I like how file treads have come back for performance tires, it would be great if they could "trickle down" to other sizes of tires like 27" and 26"x1-3/8". Couldn't be too hard to do, just need the will to do it.
__________________
Originally Posted by chandltp
There's no such thing as too far.. just lack of time
Originally Posted by noglider
People in this forum are not typical.
RUSA #7498

Last edited by ThermionicScott; 05-20-22 at 09:39 AM.
ThermionicScott is offline  
Old 06-20-23, 11:50 AM
  #19  
truthseeker14
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 118

Bikes: Soma Double Cross DC, Bridgestone T-700 (1985)

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 46 Post(s)
Liked 31 Times in 15 Posts
Originally Posted by dddd
Michelin I believe makes the widest 27" tires, the 1-1/4" World Tour and ProTek are a bit larger than even the 1-1/4" Pasela.
Concur about the Michelin Protek 27 x 1-1/4" tires. Just installed, and fully inflated, they measure a tad wider than 1-3/8" or 35 mm. My 27 x 1-1/4" Continental TourRides that the Michelins replaced measured about 29 mm.
truthseeker14 is offline  
Old 06-20-23, 05:14 PM
  #20  
John E
feros ferio
 
John E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: www.ci.encinitas.ca.us
Posts: 21,765

Bikes: 1959 Capo Modell Campagnolo; 1960 Capo Sieger (2); 1962 Carlton Franco Suisse; 1970 Peugeot UO-8; 1982 Bianchi Campione d'Italia; 1988 Schwinn Project KOM-10;

Mentioned: 44 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1384 Post(s)
Liked 1,294 Times in 819 Posts
Originally Posted by kingsting
Vittoria Zaffiro is the chunkiest 27 x 1-1/4" tire I've ever seen. Fatter than some 38C hybrid tires!
You raise a valid point, that many tires differ in real dimensions from their callouts.
__________________
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
John E is offline  
Old 06-20-23, 05:58 PM
  #21  
RiddleOfSteel
Master Parts Rearranger
 
RiddleOfSteel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Portlandia's Kuiper Belt, OR
Posts: 4,680

Bikes: 1982 Trek 720 - 1985 Trek 620 - 1984 Trek 620 - 1980 Trek 510 - Other luminaries past and present

Mentioned: 221 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1553 Post(s)
Liked 2,006 Times in 984 Posts
I have Swift 27x1 3/8" tan walls--lovely looking tires. Ride is nice--haven't ridden them enough to see how they handle at the limit, but no squirreliness thus far. They do run small, certainly on 27x1 rims (Champions). Price is great, too. I know Continental used to make a Grand Sport in 27" of some sort. Their very recent website redesign is complete and utter garbage for navigating and seeking information, so I don't know what's available there.
RiddleOfSteel is offline  
Old 06-21-23, 04:52 AM
  #22  
Road Fan
Senior Member
 
Road Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,853

Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8

Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1851 Post(s)
Liked 654 Times in 498 Posts
Originally Posted by dddd
I don't know of any 1-3/8" tire that is wider than the Pasela 1-1/4" tire. The cheaper Asian 1-3/8" tires are narrower than the 1-1/4" Pasela.

Michelin I believe makes the widest 27" tires, the 1-1/4" World Tour and ProTek are a bit larger than even the 1-1/4" Pasela.

The 27x1-1/4" Zaffiro isn't quite as wide as the 1-1/4" Pasela.

Old, aged tires can measure considerably wider than new tires, and some models are affected much more than others from years of inflation.
How wide is the Swifttire 27 x 1 ⅜" tire? That should be a fairly direct comparison to the Pasela 27 x 1 ¼" tire, 32 mm for the narrower one 35 mm for the wider one. The cross-section is 19% bigger in theory, if the casing thicknesses are the same. If that is borne out in the real tires, comparing on the same rims, there should be significant difference in cush between these two sizes.
Road Fan is offline  
Old 06-21-23, 05:38 AM
  #23  
Road Fan
Senior Member
 
Road Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,853

Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8

Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1851 Post(s)
Liked 654 Times in 498 Posts
Originally Posted by RiddleOfSteel
I have Swift 27x1 3/8" tan walls--lovely looking tires. Ride is nice--haven't ridden them enough to see how they handle at the limit, but no squirreliness thus far. They do run small, certainly on 27x1 rims (Champions). Price is great, too. I know Continental used to make a Grand Sport in 27" of some sort. Their very recent website redesign is complete and utter garbage for navigating and seeking information, so I don't know what's available there.
Those are the old Wolber/Super Champion Modelle 58? I have a set of those, 23 mm outside width and 16.7 mm inside width. For the similar Ukai rims there are similar dimensions. If you have a rim which actually has a 25.4 mm inner width (I wonder this because your description of the rim is actually very vague.

If you really mean you have a common-variety 27 x 1 ¼ rim without hooked beads, ok. Then the inner width will be around 17 mm. This will be the case because rims marked as such (27 x 1 ¼") are spares replacements for old Raleigh, Peug, Motobecane, and many other old, common models.

Why is this significant? If you are trying to say something significant about compatibility of the 27 x 1 ⅜" tire with a rim which measures 25.4 mm inner width, the difference is 25.4-16.7 = 8.7 mm. That can be looked (just an estimation here) as an 8.7 mm increase in installed circumference and hence a corresponding increase in air volume. That would suggest there is a significant additional improvement in ride quality.
Road Fan is offline  
Old 06-21-23, 11:43 AM
  #24  
RiddleOfSteel
Master Parts Rearranger
 
RiddleOfSteel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Portlandia's Kuiper Belt, OR
Posts: 4,680

Bikes: 1982 Trek 720 - 1985 Trek 620 - 1984 Trek 620 - 1980 Trek 510 - Other luminaries past and present

Mentioned: 221 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1553 Post(s)
Liked 2,006 Times in 984 Posts
Originally Posted by Road Fan
Those are the old Wolber/Super Champion Modelle 58? I have a set of those, 23 mm outside width and 16.7 mm inside width. For the similar Ukai rims there are similar dimensions. If you have a rim which actually has a 25.4 mm inner width (I wonder this because your description of the rim is actually very vague.

If you really mean you have a common-variety 27 x 1 ¼ rim without hooked beads, ok. Then the inner width will be around 17 mm. This will be the case because rims marked as such (27 x 1 ¼") are spares replacements for old Raleigh, Peug, Motobecane, and many other old, common models.

Why is this significant? If you are trying to say something significant about compatibility of the 27 x 1 ⅜" tire with a rim which measures 25.4 mm inner width, the difference is 25.4-16.7 = 8.7 mm. That can be looked (just an estimation here) as an 8.7 mm increase in installed circumference and hence a corresponding increase in air volume. That would suggest there is a significant additional improvement in ride quality.
And at what pressure? Can't forget the pressure, front and rear--if they differ!

I am a bit amused that all of a sudden, true, measured-with-caliper width is now a concern. Before, this sort of discussion would have gone on as it has and that would be the end of it. But you're gunnin' for some actual data, and you have quoted the one guy that literally has--for himself!--created a tire width chart that lists a tires bead-to-bead width when laid flat, with that tire's resulting inflated on varying rim widths due to the fact that manufacturers, over the decades, have not only wildly varied in the nominal-versus-actual tire widths, but also have not stated on what kind of rim these tires were measured (or not!) from. Why this isn't done is beyond me, especially by the Germans/Continental. This "BWF" (Bead Width while laid Flat) Chart of mine has been really helpful in predicting fitment and selecting tires, especially if clearances are tight.

Sadly for you and for all of us, I have not done so with the Swift Sand Canyons. My impression, taking them out of the box, was that they were narrow for something that claimed 35mm width. Pasela folding bead 700x32s have a BWF of 73.5mm, which translates to about 29mm on a traditional rim (MA2 etc) at 65-75 PSI. The Sand Canyon 35mm / 1 3/8" tires were about that wide, and came to about 30mm when on the rim. The rims the Sand Canyons are on are Wolber Super Champion Model 58 27x1 1/4s (from the catalog!), which came with and are still on my 1985 Schwinn Voyaguer SP. I have not measured the external rim width, but these aren't the big, wide 27" rims I've normally seen. Pretty svelte in comparison, so I'd guess somewhere around 22-23mm wide externally. The bike is at my storage unit, buried behind a number of other bikes. I've been meaning to make a trip out there, so I'll bring a pump and calipers. I think it would be valuable information as well. I won't be taking the tire off, but can extrapolate its BWF etc via tire pressure, inflated width, and external rim width. Stay tuned!
RiddleOfSteel is offline  
Old 06-22-23, 12:51 AM
  #25  
RiddleOfSteel
Master Parts Rearranger
 
RiddleOfSteel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Portlandia's Kuiper Belt, OR
Posts: 4,680

Bikes: 1982 Trek 720 - 1985 Trek 620 - 1984 Trek 620 - 1980 Trek 510 - Other luminaries past and present

Mentioned: 221 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1553 Post(s)
Liked 2,006 Times in 984 Posts
Ok, Road Fan I got some numbers for ya. Rims are 23.5mm external. Tire, at 69 PSI, is 31mm wide. This means its bead-to-bead width is right around 75mm. On a "standard" rim of 19-20mm external width, this would be a 29.0-29.5mm wide tire at the same pressure. A bit off of the claimed 35mm, in most any case, IMO.
RiddleOfSteel is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.