Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational)
Reload this Page >

Continental Terra Speed 700Cx40 Tires

Notices
Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational) This has to be the most physically intense sport ever invented. It's high speed bicycle racing on a short off road course or riding the off pavement rides on gravel like : "Unbound Gravel". We also have a dedicated Racing forum for the Cyclocross Hard Core Racers.

Continental Terra Speed 700Cx40 Tires

Old 06-30-22, 11:18 AM
  #1  
Clipped_in
Rubber side down
Thread Starter
 
Clipped_in's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Teh Quickie Mart
Posts: 1,769

Bikes: are fun! :-)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Liked 225 Times in 105 Posts
Continental Terra Speed 700Cx40 Tires

Has anyone been riding the Conti Terra Speed 700Cx40 Tires? The online reviews are very good except for the durability. Wondering if anyone here has real-life use experience you can comment on?
Clipped_in is offline  
Old 06-30-22, 11:48 AM
  #2  
chas58
Senior Member
 
chas58's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 4,863

Bikes: too many of all kinds

Mentioned: 35 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1147 Post(s)
Liked 415 Times in 335 Posts
Hate to be that guy, but did you search here?

Mine probably lasted 600 miles in the rear. Can't say it's noticeably faster, but other than wear it was good. There are a lot of alternatives if you aren't mesmerised by numbers. I've used Ramblers, Original G-one allround, GK-SS. other than wear, they are pretty similar. In dry weather I use 36mm GP5000, and that is a crazy fast tire.
chas58 is offline  
Old 06-30-22, 12:51 PM
  #3  
Barrettscv 
Have bike, will travel
 
Barrettscv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Lake Geneva, WI
Posts: 12,392

Bikes: Ridley Helium SLX, Canyon Endurance SL, De Rosa Professional, Eddy Merckx Corsa Extra, Schwinn Paramount (1 painted, 1 chrome), Peugeot PX10, Serotta Nova X, Simoncini Cyclocross Special, Raleigh Roker, Pedal Force CG2 and CX2

Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 910 Post(s)
Liked 288 Times in 158 Posts
Originally Posted by chas58
Hate to be that guy, but did you search here?

Mine probably lasted 600 miles in the rear. Can't say it's noticeably faster, but other than wear it was good. There are a lot of alternatives if you aren't mesmerised by numbers. I've used Ramblers, Original G-one allround, GK-SS. other than wear, they are pretty similar. In dry weather I use 36mm GP5000, and that is a crazy fast tire.
700x36 GP5000? link please.
__________________
When I ride my bike I feel free and happy and strong. I'm liberated from the usual nonsense of day to day life. Solid, dependable, silent, my bike is my horse, my fighter jet, my island, my friend. Together we will conquer that hill and thereafter the world.
Barrettscv is offline  
Old 06-30-22, 01:49 PM
  #4  
sean.hwy
Senior Member
 
sean.hwy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: San Jose
Posts: 1,022

Bikes: Blur / Ibis Hakka MX / team machince alr2 / topstone 1

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 424 Post(s)
Liked 272 Times in 200 Posts
Originally Posted by Barrettscv
700x36 GP5000? link please.
typo probably meant 32mm
sean.hwy is offline  
Old 06-30-22, 02:22 PM
  #5  
mstateglfr 
Sunshine
 
mstateglfr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,535

Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo

Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10901 Post(s)
Liked 7,390 Times in 4,148 Posts
Originally Posted by Barrettscv
700x36 GP5000? link please.
Originally Posted by sean.hwy
typo probably meant 32mm
He uses 32mm GP5k on 29mm internal rims and they plump up to 36mm.
mstateglfr is offline  
Old 07-01-22, 07:00 AM
  #6  
sal
Newbie
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: West Michigan
Posts: 51

Bikes: Cannondale Sport Road 500, Motobecane Boris X5 fatbike Cannondale Synapse Carbon 3, Cannondale Topstone

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Liked 10 Times in 5 Posts
I've had the Terra Speed for over 2000 miles. Predominantly on gravel rail trails. I looked at them a couple weeks ago and see no reason not to keep rolling them.
sal is offline  
Old 07-01-22, 09:54 AM
  #7  
chas58
Senior Member
 
chas58's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 4,863

Bikes: too many of all kinds

Mentioned: 35 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1147 Post(s)
Liked 415 Times in 335 Posts
Originally Posted by Barrettscv
700x36 GP5000? link please.
yah, I'm pushing the boundaries, but I put the 32mm version on a 29 internal rim, and it measures a bit over 36mm. Its all I ride now in summer/fall (unless its wet and/or rough). It is a lot faster than all my other gravel tires - yet I can handle our summer gravel with ease. It's the best of both worlds and just amazing. Doing 25-30mph in a pace line on the crap asphalt we have around here at 35-40psi - these tires are a lot faster than the guys running 25mm versions of the same tire. Yet, on my way home I can just blast down any gravel road I want with no worries.

I couldn't be happier.
chas58 is offline  
Old 07-01-22, 09:57 AM
  #8  
chas58
Senior Member
 
chas58's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 4,863

Bikes: too many of all kinds

Mentioned: 35 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1147 Post(s)
Liked 415 Times in 335 Posts
Originally Posted by sal
I've had the Terra Speed for over 2000 miles. Predominantly on gravel rail trails. I looked at them a couple weeks ago and see no reason not to keep rolling them.
I suspect the rolling surface and the power output play a huge role in tire wear.

600 miles on mixed hard surfaces (for me, broken chip seal and hard pack dirt) at 200-1000 watts kills the tread life. At 0 watts, they still look fine on the same surfaces. I suspect that running them on softer gravel surfaces would help a lot too.
chas58 is offline  
Old 07-01-22, 07:40 PM
  #9  
t2p
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2022
Location: USA - Southwest PA
Posts: 2,980

Bikes: Cannondale - Gary Fisher - Giant - Litespeed - Schwinn Paramount - Schwinn (lugged steel) - Trek OCLV

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1358 Post(s)
Liked 1,803 Times in 1,038 Posts


have 700x35 Terra Speed on one bike (pictured)

they appear to run a bit 'small' - 700x35 might be closer to 700x33 *** (?) - so the 700x40 might be around 700x38 (?)

( *** installed on Maddux DC 3.0 hybrid rim with tubes )

The 700x35 Terra Speed (folding, black wall) weighs around 365 g ; the tread part of the tire is not as thick as I hoped - but so far so good

The tire rolls very well on hard surfaces - better than I anticipated given the low-profile knobs

did some dirt road and light trail riding - tire performed fairly well ... 700x40 would prob be better than the 700x35 for these applications

Last edited by t2p; 07-01-22 at 07:46 PM.
t2p is offline  
Old 07-02-22, 11:05 PM
  #10  
Noahma
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Thornton, Colorado
Posts: 129

Bikes: 2022 Orbea Orca M20Team, 2017 Orbea Avant M40, 2019 Trek Checkpoint ALR

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 37 Post(s)
Liked 15 Times in 13 Posts
I loved them, but man they burned through the tread in 600 miles for me. mostly trails, some road.
Noahma is offline  
Old 07-05-22, 07:59 AM
  #11  
Rides4Beer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: VA
Posts: 1,437

Bikes: SuperSix Evo | Revolt

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 733 Post(s)
Liked 815 Times in 414 Posts
As mentioned, great tires, but won't last long, that's the tradeoff for a fast gravel tire. I get about 5-600 miles out of a set, but I'm 185lbs and put down pretty good power.

Just put a set on, I can mount them by hand, and they inflate with a floor pump (don't even have to partially seat the bead, they just pump right up), probably the easiest tubeless tires I've mounted.

Rides4Beer is offline  
Old 07-05-22, 04:11 PM
  #12  
pipeliner
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Posts: 142
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 43 Post(s)
Liked 72 Times in 40 Posts
Had a set, one tire separated in the middle of the tread at only 400 mi or so. Only tires that have done that to me.
pipeliner is offline  
Old 07-06-22, 08:53 PM
  #13  
Koyote
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 7,765
Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6882 Post(s)
Liked 10,872 Times in 4,637 Posts
Originally Posted by chas58
I suspect the rolling surface and the power output play a huge role in tire wear.
Originally Posted by Rides4Beer
As mentioned, great tires, but won't last long, that's the tradeoff for a fast gravel tire. I get about 5-600 miles out of a set, but I'm 185lbs and put down pretty good power.
How does power output accelerate tire wear? Sincere question, as I've never considered this before. It seems to me that greater power output means rolling faster, and I don't see how that (alone) accelerates wear. It's not as if anyone's doing burnouts on a bicycle.
Koyote is offline  
Old 07-09-22, 06:57 PM
  #14  
saperry42usa
Newbie
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Posts: 19
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Sounds like those are good tires. Do they come in 650bx40?
saperry42usa is offline  
Old 07-10-22, 04:09 PM
  #15  
Rides4Beer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: VA
Posts: 1,437

Bikes: SuperSix Evo | Revolt

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 733 Post(s)
Liked 815 Times in 414 Posts
Originally Posted by Koyote
How does power output accelerate tire wear? Sincere question, as I've never considered this before. It seems to me that greater power output means rolling faster, and I don't see how that (alone) accelerates wear. It's not as if anyone's doing burnouts on a bicycle.
More power and speed = more friction, which makes them wear faster. Just like driving a car like grandma versus driving it hard all the time. I was doing 28-30mph in a group ride last week on them (pavement), that's gonna add some wear compared to just riding around easy.
Rides4Beer is offline  
Old 07-10-22, 04:20 PM
  #16  
Koyote
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 7,765
Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6882 Post(s)
Liked 10,872 Times in 4,637 Posts
Originally Posted by Rides4Beer
More power and speed = more friction, which makes them wear faster. Just like driving a car like grandma versus driving it hard all the time. I was doing 28-30mph in a group ride last week on them (pavement), that's gonna add some wear compared to just riding around easy.
I'm not sure your analogy holds up. Driving a car aggressively (burnouts, drifting around corners) will obviously wear out tires faster, but riding a road bike faster involves no such additional tire wear. And while higher-speed driving creates more heat and friction on auto tires, I'm not convinced that cycling speeds are anywhere near high enough to create such an effect.
Koyote is offline  
Old 07-11-22, 06:53 AM
  #17  
chas58
Senior Member
 
chas58's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 4,863

Bikes: too many of all kinds

Mentioned: 35 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1147 Post(s)
Liked 415 Times in 335 Posts
Originally Posted by Koyote
How does power output accelerate tire wear? Sincere question, as I've never considered this before. It seems to me that greater power output means rolling faster, and I don't see how that (alone) accelerates wear. It's not as if anyone's doing burnouts on a bicycle.
Does my ability to explain make it more or less real? Or do real life examples help more?

On the terraspeed,
0 watts input over 1000 miles = zero wear.
0-1000 watts input, means tire is worn out after ~600 miles.

Doesn't that tell you everything you need to know?

Want more:
I get 1/2 the tread life out of my tandem (rear), with 2x power output.
I get 1/2 the tread life out of my light powered commuter ebike, with 2x power output.

If I just leave the tire on the front alone, I get dry rot before I get tread wear.
chas58 is offline  
Old 07-11-22, 07:00 AM
  #18  
Koyote
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 7,765
Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6882 Post(s)
Liked 10,872 Times in 4,637 Posts
Originally Posted by chas58
On the terraspeed,
0 watts input over 1000 miles = zero wear.
0-1000 watts input, means tire is worn out after ~600 miles.

Doesn't that tell you everything you need to know?
How do you ride a tire for 1000 miles at zero watts?


Originally Posted by chas58
Want more:
I get 1/2 the tread life out of my tandem (rear), with 2x power output.
I get 1/2 the tread life out of my light powered commuter ebike, with 2x power output.

If I just leave the tire on the front alone, I get dry rot before I get tread wear.
You are ignoring the other obvious differences between tandems and singles and between ebikes and acoustic bikes. And you still have given no reason why more power would accelerate tire wear. (Note that a mere assertion is not a theory.)
Koyote is offline  
Old 07-11-22, 04:08 PM
  #19  
ThermionicScott 
working on my sandal tan
 
ThermionicScott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,625

Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)

Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3868 Post(s)
Liked 2,560 Times in 1,574 Posts
Originally Posted by Koyote
I'm not sure your analogy holds up. Driving a car aggressively (burnouts, drifting around corners) will obviously wear out tires faster, but riding a road bike faster involves no such additional tire wear. And while higher-speed driving creates more heat and friction on auto tires, I'm not convinced that cycling speeds are anywhere near high enough to create such an effect.
Rear wheels propel the bike forward by friction between the tire and ground. Just because you don't feel your rear tire slipping on the ground doesn't mean that the rubber isn't being scraped away by drive forces. That's why rear tires tend to square off and wear out faster than fronts, and lots of climbing accelerates the effect. Seems reasonable to intuit that applying more power (especially suddenly rather than smoothly) would lead to quicker wear.
__________________
Originally Posted by chandltp
There's no such thing as too far.. just lack of time
Originally Posted by noglider
People in this forum are not typical.
RUSA #7498
ThermionicScott is offline  
Likes For ThermionicScott:
Old 07-11-22, 04:17 PM
  #20  
Koyote
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 7,765
Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6882 Post(s)
Liked 10,872 Times in 4,637 Posts
Originally Posted by ThermionicScott
Rear wheels propel the bike forward by friction between the tire and ground. Just because you don't feel your rear tire slipping on the ground doesn't mean that the rubber isn't being scraped away by drive forces. That's why rear tires tend to square off and wear out faster than fronts, and lots of climbing accelerates the effect. Seems reasonable to intuit that applying more power (especially suddenly rather than smoothly) would lead to quicker wear.
The more rapid wear on a rear tire is due to the fact that it supports most of the total system mass. And when climbing, even more weight is shifted to the rear wheel. By the same token, chas58 's claim that the rear tire on his tandem wears twice as fast due to 2x power is likely incorrect; it wears faster because it is carrying much more weight.

Last edited by Koyote; 07-11-22 at 04:33 PM.
Koyote is offline  
Old 07-11-22, 04:41 PM
  #21  
ThermionicScott 
working on my sandal tan
 
ThermionicScott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,625

Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)

Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3868 Post(s)
Liked 2,560 Times in 1,574 Posts
Originally Posted by Koyote
The more rapid wear on a rear tire is due to the fact that it supports most of the total system mass. And when climbing, even more weight is shifted to the rear wheel. By the same token, chas58 's claim that the rear tire on his tandem wears twice as fast due to 2x power is likely incorrect; it wears faster because it is carrying much more weight.
Nah, weight balance isn't enough to explain why the tires wear differently. You could front-load a bike to make the weight balance 50/50 and the rear tire will still square off (which fronts don't do, or at least never have for me) and wear out faster.
__________________
Originally Posted by chandltp
There's no such thing as too far.. just lack of time
Originally Posted by noglider
People in this forum are not typical.
RUSA #7498

Last edited by ThermionicScott; 07-11-22 at 04:44 PM.
ThermionicScott is offline  
Likes For ThermionicScott:
Old 07-11-22, 04:58 PM
  #22  
Koyote
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 7,765
Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6882 Post(s)
Liked 10,872 Times in 4,637 Posts
Originally Posted by ThermionicScott
Nah, weight balance isn't enough to explain why the tires wear differently. You could front-load a bike to make the weight balance 50/50 and the rear tire will still square off (which fronts don't do, or at least never have for me) and wear out faster.
Unless you've actually done that, you're just speculating.

There is actual logic behind my argument, since it is indisputable that the rear tire supports well over 50% of the system weight; your (and chas58 's) argument is pure speculation, since neither of you have offered any evidence that power output causes tire wear. (And logic works against your argument, since cycling -- aside from a few track disciplines and the odd TT launch -- doesn't generally involve rapid starts. Even most road races start rather sedately, in my experience, and power is then applied once the wheels are already rolling at a good pace.)

I reckon that rear tires might wear a bit faster due to deceleration, since the rearward weight bias (and many riders' tendency to overuse the rear brake) might cause more skids and near-skids.

Last edited by Koyote; 07-11-22 at 05:03 PM.
Koyote is offline  
Old 07-11-22, 05:21 PM
  #23  
ThermionicScott 
working on my sandal tan
 
ThermionicScott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,625

Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)

Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3868 Post(s)
Liked 2,560 Times in 1,574 Posts
Originally Posted by Koyote
Unless you've actually done that, you're just speculating.

There is actual logic behind my argument, since it is indisputable that the rear tire supports well over 50% of the system weight; your (and chas58 's) argument is pure speculation, since neither of you have offered any evidence that power output causes tire wear. (And logic works against your argument, since cycling -- aside from a few track disciplines and the odd TT launch -- doesn't generally involve rapid starts. Even most road races start rather sedately, in my experience, and power is then applied once the wheels are already rolling at a good pace.)
If tire wear were strictly due to load, it should be in proportion to the load. A road bike is usually, what, 40% in front and 60% in rear? Have you ever worn through the tread of a tire that stayed on the front its whole life?

A rear tire doesn't need to be slipping/skidding for the rubber to wear off due to abrasion, I'm confident that it happens to some extent whenever you apply additional power to accelerate. A front tire, on the other hand, just rolls on the ground unless you're in the process of crashing...
__________________
Originally Posted by chandltp
There's no such thing as too far.. just lack of time
Originally Posted by noglider
People in this forum are not typical.
RUSA #7498
ThermionicScott is offline  
Old 07-11-22, 05:28 PM
  #24  
chas58
Senior Member
 
chas58's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 4,863

Bikes: too many of all kinds

Mentioned: 35 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1147 Post(s)
Liked 415 Times in 335 Posts
Originally Posted by Koyote
Unless you've actually done that, you're just speculating.

There is actual logic behind my argument, since it is indisputable that the rear tire supports well over 50% of the system weight; your (and chas58 's) argument is pure speculation, since neither of you have offered any evidence that power output causes tire wear. (And logic works against your argument, since cycling -- aside from a few track disciplines and the odd TT launch -- doesn't generally involve rapid starts. Even most road races start rather sedately, in my experience, and power is then applied once the wheels are already rolling at a good pace.)

I reckon that rear tires might wear a bit faster due to deceleration, since the rearward weight bias (and many riders' tendency to overuse the rear brake) might cause more skids and near-skids.
Funny man. I'll take sincere questions, but if you are just here to troll and argue, I'm out... CYA,,,
chas58 is offline  
Old 07-11-22, 05:36 PM
  #25  
chas58
Senior Member
 
chas58's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 4,863

Bikes: too many of all kinds

Mentioned: 35 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1147 Post(s)
Liked 415 Times in 335 Posts
Originally Posted by ThermionicScott
If tire wear were strictly due to load, it should be in proportion to the load. A road bike is usually, what, 40% in front and 60% in rear? Have you ever worn through the tread of a tire that stayed on the front its whole life?

A rear tire doesn't need to be slipping/skidding for the rubber to wear off due to abrasion, I'm confident that it happens to some extent whenever you apply additional power to accelerate. A front tire, on the other hand, just rolls on the ground unless you're in the process of crashing...
True. The torque to the rear tire does apply some deformation and extra wear - most evident on treaded tires, but happens to all of them. I've done some fairly fast riding on mountain bike tires on pavement, and the tread squirm is very evident.

The weigh argument is less relevant. With my tandem, I still get no wear on the front, in spite of the extra load. My ebike is the basically the same weight as my road bike, just with 2x the power output. And yeah, the weigh balance of my road bike is more like 45/55, so weight isn't the overwhelming factor.
chas58 is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.