specialized sirrus vs trek fx geometry
05-16-22, 07:39 AM
#1
Full Member
Thread Starter
specialized sirrus vs trek fx geometry
people that have ridden both the sirrus and fx bikes, which is more upright and longer reach ?
i have the fx bike, but sometimes feel , cramped and is a bit lower stack feeling, i 'm 6 feet , size large bike
i have the fx bike, but sometimes feel , cramped and is a bit lower stack feeling, i 'm 6 feet , size large bike
05-16-22, 07:50 AM
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: SE Wisconsin
Posts: 1,851
Bikes: Lemond '01 Maillot Jaune, Lemond '02 Victoire, Lemond '03 Poprad, Lemond '03 Wayzata DB conv(Poprad), '79 AcerMex Windsor Carrera Professional(pur new), '88 GT Tequesta(pur new), '01 Bianchi Grizzly, 1993 Trek 970 DB conv, Trek 8900 DB conv
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 759 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 810 Times
in
471 Posts
You might do a search on on "Sirrus Comp geometry" or "Trek (some prefix)FX geometry" or "Trek FX(some suffix) geometry" and look at the effective top tube lengths, or stack and reach measurements if they are reported.
Trek data is readily available. Specialized data is out there, but more sporadic. The numbers (objective) comparing to what you have is a better estimate than someone's (of some height) random ride of some model of some year (subjective) estimate of how things "felt".
05-16-22, 07:53 AM
#3
Full Member
Thread Starter
You really need to narrow things down a bit as there have been lots of "fx" models from the 7.1-7.9fx series and the newer fx2, fx3...series. Toss in the WSD versions and you have an additional set of top tube lengths. Sirrus has had many versions too.
You might do a search on on "Sirrus Comp geometry" or "Trek (some prefix)FX geometry" or "Trek FX(some suffix) geometry" and look at the effective top tube lengths, or stack and reach measurements if they are reported.
Trek data is readily available. Specialized data is out there, but more sporadic. The numbers (objective) comparing to what you have is a better estimate than someone's (of some height) random ride of some model of some year (subjective) estimate of how things "felt".
You might do a search on on "Sirrus Comp geometry" or "Trek (some prefix)FX geometry" or "Trek FX(some suffix) geometry" and look at the effective top tube lengths, or stack and reach measurements if they are reported.
Trek data is readily available. Specialized data is out there, but more sporadic. The numbers (objective) comparing to what you have is a better estimate than someone's (of some height) random ride of some model of some year (subjective) estimate of how things "felt".
sirrus 3.0 compared to trek fx3
