Davidson New to me
#1
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2021
Location: South Louisiana
Posts: 373
Bikes: '71 Raleigh Inter, '98 Tommasini, '83 Trek 500, 83 Trek 720 '
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 118 Post(s)
Liked 199 Times
in
110 Posts
Davidson New to me
I thought i would reach out to the Hive and show my recent acquisition, it would seem the previous owner a long standing cyclist had the bike for 15 or so years maybe longer,
It so new to me i haven't done any investigation, other then the little bit of reading i did about these frames prior to getting the bike.
Any information on how to investigate would be appreciated, the previous owner got the bike used and was told it was a custom build when made, so i have no idea on what tubing was used,
it has some nice equipment on it, Super Record long cage RD, and a campy triple front chain set.
I'm looking forward to give it a wash then a once over and if the tires look ok a short ride to see what it rides like...
Gary
It so new to me i haven't done any investigation, other then the little bit of reading i did about these frames prior to getting the bike.
Any information on how to investigate would be appreciated, the previous owner got the bike used and was told it was a custom build when made, so i have no idea on what tubing was used,
it has some nice equipment on it, Super Record long cage RD, and a campy triple front chain set.
I'm looking forward to give it a wash then a once over and if the tires look ok a short ride to see what it rides like...
Gary
Likes For Gary12000:
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Point Reyes Station, California
Posts: 4,525
Bikes: Indeed!
Mentioned: 92 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1506 Post(s)
Liked 3,460 Times
in
1,129 Posts
Lucky you!
Seat post diameter may give us some indication of tubing used. @bulgie should be along soon to shed some light on this mystery.
Brent
Seat post diameter may give us some indication of tubing used. @bulgie should be along soon to shed some light on this mystery.
Brent
#3
2k miles from the midwest
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Washington
Posts: 1,964
Bikes: ~'75 Colin Laing, '80s Schwinn SuperSport 650b, ex-Backroads ti project...
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 525 Post(s)
Liked 931 Times
in
446 Posts
Whoa! A Super Record-Rally rear derailleur. Not something you see everyday.
Likes For Dylansbob:
#4
señor miembro
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Pac NW
Posts: 6,597
Bikes: '70s - '80s Campagnolo
Mentioned: 92 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3860 Post(s)
Liked 6,450 Times
in
3,190 Posts
Great score in a beautiful color. Tall frame. Bill Davidson is still making bicycles in Seattle. The year of your bike would be around '79, give or take.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 4,471
Mentioned: 102 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1635 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 823 Times
in
532 Posts
I have a Davidson that's supposed to have been a 1983 custom build.
I believe the custom builds were called their "Signature" line.
Excellent build quality from Bill Davidson. The lugwork and paint (Imron?) On it looks flawless.
No tubing decals on the bike, but I suspect it could be Columbus SL
#6
ambulatory senior
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Peoria Il
Posts: 5,998
Bikes: Austro Daimler modified by Gugie! Raleigh Professional and lots of other bikes.
Mentioned: 76 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1954 Post(s)
Liked 3,657 Times
in
1,677 Posts
Damn is that nice. I love the rear mech and fenders. A real civilized bicycle!!!
Likes For 52telecaster:
#7
Full Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: North Seattle
Posts: 387
Bikes: Davidson ’81
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 120 Post(s)
Liked 229 Times
in
121 Posts
Yours is close to the same vintage as mine. I bought it a couple years ago from the original owner who said it was built c. 1980.
Last edited by C9H13N; 03-28-22 at 03:01 PM.
Likes For C9H13N:
#8
WGB
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Niagara Region
Posts: 2,912
Bikes: Panasonic PT-4500
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1794 Post(s)
Liked 2,328 Times
in
1,375 Posts
I like the 13-36 rear with a 54/36 front. No more guessing what your maximum capacity is!
#10
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2021
Location: South Louisiana
Posts: 373
Bikes: '71 Raleigh Inter, '98 Tommasini, '83 Trek 500, 83 Trek 720 '
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 118 Post(s)
Liked 199 Times
in
110 Posts
C9H13H,
You got the long cage RD also..that dark blue is a nice color... the build looks very similar style wise, i actually have a matching painted silca pump also, but the hand grip is cracked...
You got the long cage RD also..that dark blue is a nice color... the build looks very similar style wise, i actually have a matching painted silca pump also, but the hand grip is cracked...
#11
blahblahblah chrome moly
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,984
Mentioned: 92 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1172 Post(s)
Liked 2,566 Times
in
1,072 Posts
@bulgie should be along soon to shed some light on this mystery.
The lugs are the first version of Henry James (Folson), cast in USA.
I think Bill used some Reynolds 531 back then, but by the time I got there and for some little while previous, he'd been using mostly Columbus. The steerer tube is the easiest one to ID, just take the fender off and see if there are raised helical reinfocements (sometimes called rifling). If there, it means Columbus. If the bore is smooth then I'd expect 531. If you take the fork out, you should be able to see either a Columbus dove stamped in, or the words Reynolds Butted in all-caps. Sometimes paint obscures the stamps, which are shallow.
If you positively ID the steerer, it doesn't necessarily mean the rest of the tubes are the same brand, he did mix'n'match a little, but more often I'd say the steerer does match the drapes er I mean the frame tubes.
If the fork blades are the older Reynolds "skinny oval" (about 29x16mm) then they're definitely Reynolds, Columbus didn't make blades in that oval that I know of. I think narrow oval 531 blades are very unlikely though, they were unfashionable by then. The fatter oval (about 28x20mm) was made by both companies, so that doesn't help. Their blade shape is very subtly different, hard to tell after paint. Some will tell you they're different ovals, but they both fit in the same crowns.
Another place you might be able ID by eye is the chainstays. If the stays are fluted, i.e. indents for the tire clearance, then those are relatively easy to ID as either 531 or Col., for those in the know. (R flutes and C flutes look quite different.) It's harder if they're round-oval-round — I can still tell an R from a C in person, but the difference is subtle, hard to see in a photo, and impossible to teach over the internet.
Looking inside the bottom bracket will tell you if the tubes are SLX/SPX, but I don't think Davidson used much of that — I don't remember any. Very unlikely on this vintage anyway.
Not all his frames were custom back then, he also made small batches that were sold thru REI. There are no distinguishing differences, no serial numbers or sales records, don't bother asking! The batch-built frames were just as good though, no corner-cutting that I'm aware of. Later he came out with "price point" frames with model names like Challenge, Discovery, Impulse and others that were less expensive, made with Tange tubes. That's when the custom bikes started to become known as Signature. Before that, all frames got the sig decal whether custom or not.
I realize none of this really matters. I seem to like spewing out all the facts I know, whether or not it makes any difference. Ride it and enjoy!
Mark B
Last edited by bulgie; 03-28-22 at 06:37 PM.
Likes For bulgie:
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Olympic Peninsula, WA
Posts: 645
Bikes: '8? Ciocc Mockba 80, '82 Ron Cooper, '84 Allez, '86 Tommasini Racing, '86? Klein Quantum, '87 Ciocc Designer 84, '95 Trek 5500, '98 Litespeed Classic, '98 S-Works Mtb
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 226 Post(s)
Liked 309 Times
in
122 Posts
#13
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2021
Location: South Louisiana
Posts: 373
Bikes: '71 Raleigh Inter, '98 Tommasini, '83 Trek 500, 83 Trek 720 '
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 118 Post(s)
Liked 199 Times
in
110 Posts
Interesting facts
I started there in '84, and I agree with SurferRosa that this one is about a '79.
The lugs are the first version of Henry James (Folson), cast in USA.
I think Bill used some Reynolds 531 back then, but by the time I got there and for some little while previous, he'd been using mostly Columbus. The steerer tube is the easiest one to ID, just take the fender off and see if there are raised helical reinfocements (sometimes called rifling). If there, it means Columbus. If the bore is smooth then I'd expect 531. If you take the fork out, you should be able to see either a Columbus dove stamped in, or the words Reynolds Butted in all-caps. Sometimes paint obscures the stamps, which are shallow.
If you positively ID the steerer, it doesn't necessarily mean the rest of the tubes are the same brand, he did mix'n'match a little, but more often I'd say the steerer does match the drapes er I mean the frame tubes.
If the fork blades are the older Reynolds "skinny oval" (about 29x16mm) then they're definitely Reynolds, Columbus didn't make blades in that oval that I know of. I think narrow oval 531 blades are very unlikely though, they were unfashionable by then. The fatter oval (about 28x20mm) was made by both companies, so that doesn't help. Their blade shape is very subtly different, hard to tell after paint. Some will tell you they're different ovals, but they both fit in the same crowns.
Another place you might be able ID by eye is the chainstays. If the stays are fluted, i.e. indents for the tire clearance, then those are relatively easy to ID as either 531 or Col., for those in the know If they're round-oval-round, I can still tell an R from a C in person but the difference is subtle, hard to see in a photo, and impossible to teach over the internet.
Looking inside the bottom bracket will tell you if the tubes are SLX/SPX, but I don't think Davidson used much of that — I don't remember any. Very unlikely on this vintage anyway.
Not all his frames were custom back then, he also made small batches that were sold thru REI. There are no distinguishing differences, no serial numbers or sales records, don't bother asking! The batch-built frames were just as good though, no corner-cutting that I'm aware of. Later he came out with "price point" frames with model names like Challenge, Discovery, Impulse and others that were less expensive, made with Tange tubes. That's when the custom bikes started to become known as Signature. Before that, all frames got the sig decal whether custom or not.
I realize none of this really matters. I seem to like spewing out all the facts I know, whether or not it makes any difference. Ride it and enjoy!
Mark B
The lugs are the first version of Henry James (Folson), cast in USA.
I think Bill used some Reynolds 531 back then, but by the time I got there and for some little while previous, he'd been using mostly Columbus. The steerer tube is the easiest one to ID, just take the fender off and see if there are raised helical reinfocements (sometimes called rifling). If there, it means Columbus. If the bore is smooth then I'd expect 531. If you take the fork out, you should be able to see either a Columbus dove stamped in, or the words Reynolds Butted in all-caps. Sometimes paint obscures the stamps, which are shallow.
If you positively ID the steerer, it doesn't necessarily mean the rest of the tubes are the same brand, he did mix'n'match a little, but more often I'd say the steerer does match the drapes er I mean the frame tubes.
If the fork blades are the older Reynolds "skinny oval" (about 29x16mm) then they're definitely Reynolds, Columbus didn't make blades in that oval that I know of. I think narrow oval 531 blades are very unlikely though, they were unfashionable by then. The fatter oval (about 28x20mm) was made by both companies, so that doesn't help. Their blade shape is very subtly different, hard to tell after paint. Some will tell you they're different ovals, but they both fit in the same crowns.
Another place you might be able ID by eye is the chainstays. If the stays are fluted, i.e. indents for the tire clearance, then those are relatively easy to ID as either 531 or Col., for those in the know If they're round-oval-round, I can still tell an R from a C in person but the difference is subtle, hard to see in a photo, and impossible to teach over the internet.
Looking inside the bottom bracket will tell you if the tubes are SLX/SPX, but I don't think Davidson used much of that — I don't remember any. Very unlikely on this vintage anyway.
Not all his frames were custom back then, he also made small batches that were sold thru REI. There are no distinguishing differences, no serial numbers or sales records, don't bother asking! The batch-built frames were just as good though, no corner-cutting that I'm aware of. Later he came out with "price point" frames with model names like Challenge, Discovery, Impulse and others that were less expensive, made with Tange tubes. That's when the custom bikes started to become known as Signature. Before that, all frames got the sig decal whether custom or not.
I realize none of this really matters. I seem to like spewing out all the facts I know, whether or not it makes any difference. Ride it and enjoy!
Mark B
Likes For Gary12000:
#14
señor miembro
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Pac NW
Posts: 6,597
Bikes: '70s - '80s Campagnolo
Mentioned: 92 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3860 Post(s)
Liked 6,450 Times
in
3,190 Posts