Crank arm covers?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: NW Ohio
Posts: 1,142
Bikes: 1983 Univega Super Strada, 1986 Panasonic DX5000, 1984 Fuji Team 85 Univega Gran Turismo, 1984 Lotus Unique, 1987 Centurion Expert, 1987 Centurion Ironman Master,
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 677 Post(s)
Liked 459 Times
in
182 Posts
Crank arm covers?
I just noticed that both my 1987 Ironmen are missing the crank arm dust covers.
Are these hard to find and are they all threaded the same?
Are these hard to find and are they all threaded the same?
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Alta California
Posts: 14,244
Mentioned: 415 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3803 Post(s)
Liked 3,324 Times
in
2,170 Posts
-----
their thread matches that of the removal threads on the arm
the "standard" is 22.0mm
however, there is also the 23.0mm employed by SPECTA (T.A.) and the 23.35mm employed by Verot (Stronglight)
-----
their thread matches that of the removal threads on the arm
the "standard" is 22.0mm
however, there is also the 23.0mm employed by SPECTA (T.A.) and the 23.35mm employed by Verot (Stronglight)
-----
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Fredericksburg, Va
Posts: 9,579
Bikes: '65 Frejus TDF, '73 Bottecchia Giro d'Italia, '83 Colnago Superissimo, '84 Trek 610, '84 Trek 760, '88 Pinarello Veneto, '88 De Rosa Pro, '89 Pinarello Montello, '94 Burley Duet, 97 Specialized RockHopper, 2010 Langster, Tern Link D8
Mentioned: 73 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1607 Post(s)
Liked 2,214 Times
in
1,103 Posts
__________________
Bikes don't stand alone. They are two tired.
Bikes don't stand alone. They are two tired.
Likes For SJX426:
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,385
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1557 Post(s)
Liked 1,732 Times
in
972 Posts
You can find some generic crank caps/ dust covers on Ebay. They might not look good on some cranksets though. The Shimano FC6400 crank for example comes with these chromed caps which have slightly sloping contours to match the crank contours, and generic caps would not look good in this instance.
#5
Observational Theorist
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: Baltimore
Posts: 71
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26 Post(s)
Liked 20 Times
in
16 Posts
You'll have to specifically ask for them, cuz they're not something that will be on display on the sales floor.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Menomonee Falls, WI
Posts: 1,832
Bikes: 1984 Schwinn Supersport, 1988 Trek 400T, 1977 Trek TX900, 1982 Bianchi Champione del Mondo, 1978 Raleigh Supercourse, 1986 Trek 400 Elance, 1991 Waterford PDG OS Paramount, 1971 Schwinn Sports Tourer, 1985 Trek 670
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 603 Post(s)
Liked 1,062 Times
in
534 Posts
eBay, lots of options.
Tim
Tim
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 4,475
Mentioned: 102 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1636 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 824 Times
in
533 Posts
Yup!,....They were the first thing my brother and I used to toss away after getting a new bike or crankset in the 80's, along with dork discs and the CPSC required reflectors. Now I wish I didn't just dump them, as they now cost surprisingly lot of money (Even some of the chintzy plastic ones), for what they are....
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 20,305
Mentioned: 130 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3464 Post(s)
Liked 2,827 Times
in
1,995 Posts
Cinellis and Raleigh Internationals should have crank dust caps. Everything else, not.
#9
señor miembro
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Pac NW
Posts: 6,602
Bikes: '70s - '80s Campagnolo
Mentioned: 92 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3870 Post(s)
Liked 6,461 Times
in
3,194 Posts
Some bikes/cranks absolutely need them, like all my mid-late '80s Campy. Some can take take 'em or leave 'em. Others look a lil more badass without 'em.
.
.
#10
Randomhead
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,387
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,687 Times
in
2,510 Posts
They were kind of a pain so most people left them off. That means I have a collection of pristine Campagnolo covers.
#11
Full Member
Join Date: Jun 2021
Location: Barboursville, Va
Posts: 278
Bikes: N+1
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 94 Post(s)
Liked 419 Times
in
159 Posts
These stronglight ones are easy to get on and off, sturdy, and look great. They are staying till the cranks break
These… not so much. Had to bend a paper clip into a tool to remove and install them.
These are waiting for the next time my campy cranks come off for bottom bracket service.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2021
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 1,432
Bikes: You had me at rusty and Italian!!
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 566 Post(s)
Liked 1,045 Times
in
541 Posts
I’m a fan of the caps since I think it looks cleaner. I haven’t had much luck finding them and when I do they seem ridiculously priced for what they are.
#13
blahblahblah chrome moly
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,985
Mentioned: 92 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1172 Post(s)
Liked 2,567 Times
in
1,072 Posts
The one-key release is of course intended to replace the separate extractor tool, but they also made a LH threaded tool. For people who lost their one-key release whatzit maybe? Who knows. Looks just like the iconic Campy crank extractor, except with sort of "hash marks" machined into the wrench faces to indicate the LH thread. (I don't think hash marks is the correct term, what do machinists and machine designers call those?) The LH threaded nuts on my acetylene regulator, hoses etc have the same markings, so I think it might be an interntional standard.
I have one (the extractor tool, not the one-key), but I have never used it. I was not a fan of Campagnolo during those years so I never had one of those cranks on any of my bikes.
The LH thread for a one-key release is an interesting idea with some merit, but decades of experience show us that RH threads also work fine, so LH is definitely not needed there. And there are costs and risks involved with using LH threads, so they're best avoided where not needed. Just another one of Campy's questionable design decisions from back then.
Mark B
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Peoria, IL
Posts: 4,469
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1827 Post(s)
Liked 3,367 Times
in
1,573 Posts
although I think the Campy Mexico crank on my Olmo deserves to keep the dustcap too....
I'd say that there was an expectation that a "work" bike, whether a bike being flogged in crit races or a bike being used for commuting, etc., wouldn't bother with the dust caps. Bikes that exist to look marvelous should keep the dustcaps.
My Hetchins has the dustcaps too.
Steve in Peoria
Likes For steelbikeguy:
#15
Full Member
Join Date: Jun 2021
Location: Barboursville, Va
Posts: 278
Bikes: N+1
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 94 Post(s)
Liked 419 Times
in
159 Posts
Have you checked those Campy one-key release whatzits for "handedness"? I don't know what years, but they did make them in left-hand-thread, obviously to fit cranks that were also made with LH threads there.
The one-key release is of course intended to replace the separate extractor tool, but they also made a LH threaded tool. For people who lost their one-key release whatzit maybe? Who knows. Looks just like the iconic Campy crank extractor, except with sort of "hash marks" machined into the wrench faces to indicate the LH thread. (I don't think hash marks is the correct term, what do machinists and machine designers call those?) The LH threaded nuts on my acetylene regulator, hoses etc have the same markings, so I think it might be an interntional standard.
I have one (the extractor tool, not the one-key), but I have never used it. I was not a fan of Campagnolo during those years so I never had one of those cranks on any of my bikes.
The LH thread for a one-key release is an interesting idea with some merit, but decades of experience show us that RH threads also work fine, so LH is definitely not needed there. And there are costs and risks involved with using LH threads, so they're best avoided where not needed. Just another one of Campy's questionable design decisions from back then.
Mark B
The one-key release is of course intended to replace the separate extractor tool, but they also made a LH threaded tool. For people who lost their one-key release whatzit maybe? Who knows. Looks just like the iconic Campy crank extractor, except with sort of "hash marks" machined into the wrench faces to indicate the LH thread. (I don't think hash marks is the correct term, what do machinists and machine designers call those?) The LH threaded nuts on my acetylene regulator, hoses etc have the same markings, so I think it might be an interntional standard.
I have one (the extractor tool, not the one-key), but I have never used it. I was not a fan of Campagnolo during those years so I never had one of those cranks on any of my bikes.
The LH thread for a one-key release is an interesting idea with some merit, but decades of experience show us that RH threads also work fine, so LH is definitely not needed there. And there are costs and risks involved with using LH threads, so they're best avoided where not needed. Just another one of Campy's questionable design decisions from back then.
Mark B
#16
blahblahblah chrome moly
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,985
Mentioned: 92 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1172 Post(s)
Liked 2,567 Times
in
1,072 Posts