Vintage frame for long torso
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Vintage frame for long torso
Hi all, thanks for reading my Uber nooby newb post. I'm wanting to put together a nice bicycle for myself after being away from riding for many years. I'll use the bike for around town errands, and light commuting. I don't own a car, so for now it will be my primary transportation. I plan to run straight bars, bigger tires, with fenders, a basket, etc. Finding a high-quality vintage frame I can put some love into is the goal. I might even repaint it if needed to achieve classic/elegant style I want.
My main challenge is I have a really long torso. I'm 6'4" but inseam is 33" or so. So on frames I can stand over I end up feeling like I'm way over the front of the bike. On bigger frames where I feel more entered on the bike, the standover is dangerously uncomfortable lol.
Any advice out there? Any particular makers or models I should look for? Or strategy/website for finding one? I live in Portland Oregon, so there seem to be a lot bikes around. Thanks in advance for any help!
My main challenge is I have a really long torso. I'm 6'4" but inseam is 33" or so. So on frames I can stand over I end up feeling like I'm way over the front of the bike. On bigger frames where I feel more entered on the bike, the standover is dangerously uncomfortable lol.
Any advice out there? Any particular makers or models I should look for? Or strategy/website for finding one? I live in Portland Oregon, so there seem to be a lot bikes around. Thanks in advance for any help!
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 4,278
Mentioned: 101 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1542 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 703 Times
in
460 Posts
Early 80's Gitanes had quite long top tubes. I still remember my brother's 1983 Gitane Criterium. having such.......
__________________
72 Line Seeker
83 Davidson Signature
84 Peugeot PSV
84 Peugeot PY10FC
84 Gitane Tour de France.
85 Vitus Plus Carbone 7
86 ALAN Record Carbonio
86 Medici Aerodynamic (Project)
88 Pinarello Montello
89 Bottecchia Professional Chorus SL
95 Trek 5500 OCLV (Project)
72 Line Seeker
83 Davidson Signature
84 Peugeot PSV
84 Peugeot PY10FC
84 Gitane Tour de France.
85 Vitus Plus Carbone 7
86 ALAN Record Carbonio
86 Medici Aerodynamic (Project)
88 Pinarello Montello
89 Bottecchia Professional Chorus SL
95 Trek 5500 OCLV (Project)
#3
The Left Coast, USA
Many '80s road frame I have actually have shorter top tubes that one might expect. I think you would be happier with a vintage mountain bike, like a specialized or trek. You can trick it out to be a great road machine with slicks, fenders, racks, different stem length, trekking bars, etc. They are bombproof and still pretty responsive. My old '90s Trek 7000ZX converted to a tourer is still one of my favorite all day rides.
__________________
There is more to life than simply increasing its speed. - Gandhi
There is more to life than simply increasing its speed. - Gandhi
Likes For FrenchFit:
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Middle Earth (aka IA)
Posts: 20,470
Bikes: A bunch of old bikes and a few new ones
Mentioned: 178 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5863 Post(s)
Liked 3,393 Times
in
2,038 Posts
A vintage mountain bike might work since they typically had a longer top tube than seat tube.
Also I think Puchs were famous for having long top tubes, at least the ones Sears sold as Ted Williams bikes.
Also I think Puchs were famous for having long top tubes, at least the ones Sears sold as Ted Williams bikes.
#6
Hoards Thumbshifters
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Signal Mountain, TN
Posts: 1,164
Bikes: '87 Bruce Gordon Chinook, '08 Jamis Aurora, '86 Trek 560, '97 Mongoose Rockadile, & '91 Trek 750
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 237 Post(s)
Liked 317 Times
in
185 Posts
Lemond
Lemond Bicycles were known to have long top tubes. Road bikes not Propad or Wayzata.
In general look for more racing road bikes as they tend to have longer top tubes. I feel like high end Bianchi's did.
In general look for more racing road bikes as they tend to have longer top tubes. I feel like high end Bianchi's did.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Whittier
Posts: 754
Bikes: 1973 Colnago Super, Litespeed Classic , Automoto , Pinarello Gavia TSX,Eddy Merckx Corsa Extra,Eddy Merckx EMX-5 , 1982 Moser SL, Concorde TSX, Vitus 979 KAS. Diamant SLX,60's Meteor
Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 208 Post(s)
Liked 624 Times
in
248 Posts
Most Italian bike frames came with Longer top tube lengths,The stretched out classic road racing riding position led to the longer top tube. Most of all my Italian frames have this thing in common, I do have a Concorde that has equal length top and down tube sizing.
Of course Criterium frames dont fall under this guideline.
Beater frames are cheap and easy to come by, just measure the 2 lengths, find what you need and you'll be o.k.
Of course Criterium frames dont fall under this guideline.
Beater frames are cheap and easy to come by, just measure the 2 lengths, find what you need and you'll be o.k.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,588
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18043 Post(s)
Liked 4,352 Times
in
3,252 Posts
You really don't need a lot of standover clearance. So, you might just try a 60 to 62cm frame for a few weeks and see how you like it. Sometimes hop off and stand slightly off-centered.
If you find the right frame, they do tend to be longer, but fewer with tall seat tubes, so it can take some hunting to find the right one.
You can do a 26" to 700c conversion (narrow tires), probably abandoning the canti brakes and adding caliper brakes. Perhaps also replacing the fork.
This was my Litespeed frame-up build with a 26" frame (bought as a bare frame) built into a 700c road bike.

A few issues that crop up such as dealing with super-wide chainstays.
You can do a 26" to 700c conversion (narrow tires), probably abandoning the canti brakes and adding caliper brakes. Perhaps also replacing the fork.
This was my Litespeed frame-up build with a 26" frame (bought as a bare frame) built into a 700c road bike.
A few issues that crop up such as dealing with super-wide chainstays.
#9
Ride, Wrench, Swap, Race
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Northern California
Posts: 8,998
Bikes: Cheltenham-Pedersen racer, Boulder F/S Paris-Roubaix, Varsity racer, '52 Christophe, '62 Continental, '92 Merckx, '75 Limongi, '76 Presto, '72 Gitane SC, '71 Schwinn SS, etc.
Mentioned: 131 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1485 Post(s)
Liked 1,162 Times
in
786 Posts
Be careful when looking only at the tube lengths, since a more-relaxed seat tube angle steals roughly 1cm out of the frame's REACH dimension for each 1 degree of lost seat tube angle.
On taller frame sizes, it might be slightly more than 1cm per degree, but for frames less than 58cm is is slightly less than 1cm (per degree of seat tube angle lost).
I should consider trading frames with you, I'm long-legged. But I usually need a 58cm frame with more like a 56cm frame reach.
The Merckx Century frame was more or less made for folks like myself, the only change was to relax the seat tube angle which shortened the forward reach by a cm or so.
I have a ~56cm raleigh Pro, and the Record seatpost is fully up to the limit line with a non-sagging Brooks Pro saddle on it. The stem is fully up there as well. It's a great-riding bike set up like this, but visually it looks a bit stretched.
On taller frame sizes, it might be slightly more than 1cm per degree, but for frames less than 58cm is is slightly less than 1cm (per degree of seat tube angle lost).
I should consider trading frames with you, I'm long-legged. But I usually need a 58cm frame with more like a 56cm frame reach.
The Merckx Century frame was more or less made for folks like myself, the only change was to relax the seat tube angle which shortened the forward reach by a cm or so.
I have a ~56cm raleigh Pro, and the Record seatpost is fully up to the limit line with a non-sagging Brooks Pro saddle on it. The stem is fully up there as well. It's a great-riding bike set up like this, but visually it looks a bit stretched.
Last edited by dddd; 07-13-19 at 07:05 PM.
#10
señor miembro
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Pac NW
Posts: 8,486
Bikes: '70s - '80s Campagnolo
Mentioned: 91 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3699 Post(s)
Liked 6,120 Times
in
3,044 Posts
My '75 Grand Record has a long top tube. Too long for me, actually.
I wish I had a longer torso. Long reach stems are all kinds of sexy. Sadly, all mine are around 90mm.
I wish I had a longer torso. Long reach stems are all kinds of sexy. Sadly, all mine are around 90mm.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,588
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18043 Post(s)
Liked 4,352 Times
in
3,252 Posts
If you really don't like a tall top tube, you can also look at the Mixte frames.
Soma Buena Vista Mixte came in a 62cm size. I think they've tried to discontinue it, but perhaps there is still some old stock around.
https://www.somafab.com/archives/product/buena-vista
https://www.somafab.com/archives/pro...disc-frame-set
https://www.bikehighway.com/soma-fab...-set-disc.html
Soma Buena Vista Mixte came in a 62cm size. I think they've tried to discontinue it, but perhaps there is still some old stock around.
https://www.somafab.com/archives/product/buena-vista
https://www.somafab.com/archives/pro...disc-frame-set
https://www.bikehighway.com/soma-fab...-set-disc.html
#12
Member
Thread Starter
Wow, thanks so much everyone for all the valuable info.! I learned a lot and still have more to digest. I def could do a mountain bike conversion, I do see bikes that could work, but they don't quite have that vintage style I'm after. So i think I will pursue these Italian frames people have mentioned, and the others mentioned. The problem with just a longer stem is that doesn't get me more centered on the bike. I want the forks and front wheel more in front of me I think.
What do y'all think of this frame I found, it has 60mm top tube. Could I build it up with straight bars, slightly bigger tires? I love the patina, but might paint it eventually:
Crusty but cool 62-cm vintage Italvega "Nuovo Record" Columbus steel lugged butted road bike frameset, nice long pointy chromed lugs with horizontal Campagnolo dropouts. Made in Italy. Chrome dropouts, the rear dropouts have axle adjusters. Has the metal headbadge on it. Made for 700C wheels. Chrome fork blades, fork crown and lugs. Includes the original Stronglight Competition headset and bottom bracket. Color is brown, original paint and some of the decals. Has the Columbus steel sticker on it too........Includes the original headset and bottom bracket, fork, seat post, seat post binder bolt included. Frame size is 62-cm center to center on the seat tube, top tube measures 60-cm center to center. Rear spacing is 120. THE CHROME HAS SOME SURFACE RUST ON IT, though you could probably use some chrome cleaner and some steel wool and shine it up some. No dents, no dings, no crashes, just some weathering on the paint and chrome. Give it some love and bring it back to life..........
Edit: I'm not able to post the pictures, but it looks intact.
What do y'all think of this frame I found, it has 60mm top tube. Could I build it up with straight bars, slightly bigger tires? I love the patina, but might paint it eventually:
Crusty but cool 62-cm vintage Italvega "Nuovo Record" Columbus steel lugged butted road bike frameset, nice long pointy chromed lugs with horizontal Campagnolo dropouts. Made in Italy. Chrome dropouts, the rear dropouts have axle adjusters. Has the metal headbadge on it. Made for 700C wheels. Chrome fork blades, fork crown and lugs. Includes the original Stronglight Competition headset and bottom bracket. Color is brown, original paint and some of the decals. Has the Columbus steel sticker on it too........Includes the original headset and bottom bracket, fork, seat post, seat post binder bolt included. Frame size is 62-cm center to center on the seat tube, top tube measures 60-cm center to center. Rear spacing is 120. THE CHROME HAS SOME SURFACE RUST ON IT, though you could probably use some chrome cleaner and some steel wool and shine it up some. No dents, no dings, no crashes, just some weathering on the paint and chrome. Give it some love and bring it back to life..........
Edit: I'm not able to post the pictures, but it looks intact.
Likes For Demet:
#13
Me duelen las nalgas
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Texas
Posts: 13,490
Bikes: Centurion Ironman, Trek 5900, Univega Via Carisma, Globe Carmel
Mentioned: 197 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4542 Post(s)
Liked 2,770 Times
in
1,783 Posts
Ditto, some 1980s-'90s mountain bikes and MTB-lite/hybrids. My Univega Via Carisma has a conventional diamond frame, and a longish top tube, enough that I needed an albatross swept bar to reduce the reach to suit my old neck and shoulder injuries.
I think it's a 58cm or 60cm frame and technically fits me -- I'm 5'11" with 33" inseam. Even with 175 cranks it feels right while pedaling. But the top tube was uncomfortably long with the original flat bar.
I've considered trying it as a drop bar conversion, but I'd need a shorter stem. Right now it's wearing the zero angle stem from my Centurion Ironman road bike. I have an angled stem too but it tends to set the bar too high, and looks odd with drop bars.
I think it's a 58cm or 60cm frame and technically fits me -- I'm 5'11" with 33" inseam. Even with 175 cranks it feels right while pedaling. But the top tube was uncomfortably long with the original flat bar.
I've considered trying it as a drop bar conversion, but I'd need a shorter stem. Right now it's wearing the zero angle stem from my Centurion Ironman road bike. I have an angled stem too but it tends to set the bar too high, and looks odd with drop bars.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Port Angeles, WA
Posts: 8,016
Bikes: A green one, "Ragleigh," or something.
Mentioned: 194 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1626 Post(s)
Liked 625 Times
in
355 Posts
Avoid vintage Raleighs. They all seem to have 57 - 58cm top tubes. Even the really big ones.
My 86/87 Merckx Corsa Extra really has me stretched out. The LeMond Zurichs I've ridden all have relatively long top tubes, too.
Since you live in Portlandia, you have the luxury of trying out lots of bikes there to get a really good feel before you actually buy. Very active market.
My 86/87 Merckx Corsa Extra really has me stretched out. The LeMond Zurichs I've ridden all have relatively long top tubes, too.
Since you live in Portlandia, you have the luxury of trying out lots of bikes there to get a really good feel before you actually buy. Very active market.
__________________
● 1971 Grandis SL ● 1972 Lambert Grand Prix frankenbike ● 1972 Raleigh Super Course fixie ● 1973 Nishiki Semi-Pro ● 1979 Motobecane Grand Jubile ●1980 Apollo "Legnano" ● 1984 Peugeot Vagabond ● 1985 Shogun Prairie Breaker ● 1986 Merckx Super Corsa ● 1987 Schwinn Tempo ● 1988 Schwinn Voyageur ● 1989 Bottechia Team ADR replica ● 1990 Cannondale ST600 ● 1993 Technium RT600 ● 1996 Kona Lava Dome ●
● 1971 Grandis SL ● 1972 Lambert Grand Prix frankenbike ● 1972 Raleigh Super Course fixie ● 1973 Nishiki Semi-Pro ● 1979 Motobecane Grand Jubile ●1980 Apollo "Legnano" ● 1984 Peugeot Vagabond ● 1985 Shogun Prairie Breaker ● 1986 Merckx Super Corsa ● 1987 Schwinn Tempo ● 1988 Schwinn Voyageur ● 1989 Bottechia Team ADR replica ● 1990 Cannondale ST600 ● 1993 Technium RT600 ● 1996 Kona Lava Dome ●
Last edited by Lascauxcaveman; 07-14-19 at 12:51 AM.
#15
Thrifty Bill
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Mountains of Western NC
Posts: 23,538
Bikes: 86 Katakura Silk, 87 Prologue X2, 88 Cimarron LE, 1975 Sekai 4000 Professional, 73 Paramount, plus more
Mentioned: 96 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1226 Post(s)
Liked 928 Times
in
608 Posts
My main challenge is I have a really long torso. I'm 6'4" but inseam is 33" or so. So on frames I can stand over I end up feeling like I'm way over the front of the bike. On bigger frames where I feel more entered on the bike, the standover is dangerously uncomfortable lol.
Any advice out there?
Step 2: Measure bicycle inseam, not pant inseam, I bet yours is higher than you think.
Step 3: Standover isn't that important. My road bikes all have zero standover clearance (I have really short inseam and a long torso). To get a long enough top tube, short of getting a frame custom made, you have to give up something. One reason I do MTB drop bar conversions is to get a longish top tube.
That Univega looks like not a good choice for someone with a long torso. Typically, seat tubes are measured center to top. So I bet that bike has a 64cm Seat tube and a 60cm TT (top tubes are center to center). Thats one problem on some vintage bikes. As the seat tube gets longer, the top tube does not increase in length proportionally. It varies.
Go to a sizing site and figure out what top tube length you need.
Last edited by wrk101; 07-14-19 at 06:32 AM.
Likes For wrk101:
#17
Member
Thread Starter
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,588
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18043 Post(s)
Liked 4,352 Times
in
3,252 Posts
Interesting older frame. Probably dating back into the late 60's to mid 70's.
I'm not sure that the Italians ever adopted the 27" wheel size, at least on road bikes. So, that bike could have been designed for 700c sewups.
For my old Colnago of a similar era, I usually run 25mm tires on it, although I think I've had up to either 32mm or 35mm tires on it which were a tight fit.
My Colnago frame is "square", with a 60cm Seat tube, and a 60cm Top Tube. And, with some hunting, you may be able to find a 60cm x 60cm frame, although that 62 may fit you too.
As far as your frame. The headset may be toast. But, the light rust on the frame shouldn't be a big problem.
Do you have a better view of the triangle shaped decal on the seat tube?
I'm not sure that the Italians ever adopted the 27" wheel size, at least on road bikes. So, that bike could have been designed for 700c sewups.
For my old Colnago of a similar era, I usually run 25mm tires on it, although I think I've had up to either 32mm or 35mm tires on it which were a tight fit.
My Colnago frame is "square", with a 60cm Seat tube, and a 60cm Top Tube. And, with some hunting, you may be able to find a 60cm x 60cm frame, although that 62 may fit you too.
As far as your frame. The headset may be toast. But, the light rust on the frame shouldn't be a big problem.
Do you have a better view of the triangle shaped decal on the seat tube?
Likes For CliffordK:
#19
Member
Thread Starter
I sent an email asking for more pictures on that frame.
I roughed in some numbers on a bike fit calculator (don't have anyone handy right now to help measure), and it came back with top tube 70cm ctc! Seat tube was 61.5 ctc. I wonder if it would be worth finding a local fitter to help me dial it in. I'd rather spend a little money up front and maybe save me some time/money in long run...?
I roughed in some numbers on a bike fit calculator (don't have anyone handy right now to help measure), and it came back with top tube 70cm ctc! Seat tube was 61.5 ctc. I wonder if it would be worth finding a local fitter to help me dial it in. I'd rather spend a little money up front and maybe save me some time/money in long run...?
#20
Member
Thread Starter
Step 1: Focus on top tube length. Lots of sizing tools out there.
Step 2: Measure bicycle inseam, not pant inseam, I bet yours is higher than you think.
Step 3: Standover isn't that important. My road bikes all have zero standover clearance (I have really short inseam and a long torso). To get a long enough top tube, short of getting a frame custom made, you have to give up something. One reason I do MTB drop bar conversions is to get a longish top tube.
That Univega looks like not a good choice for someone with a long torso. Typically, seat tubes are measured center to top. So I bet that bike has a 64cm Seat tube and a 60cm TT (top tubes are center to center). Thats one problem on some vintage bikes. As the seat tube gets longer, the top tube does not increase in length proportionally. It varies.
Go to a sizing site and figure out what top tube length you need.
Step 2: Measure bicycle inseam, not pant inseam, I bet yours is higher than you think.
Step 3: Standover isn't that important. My road bikes all have zero standover clearance (I have really short inseam and a long torso). To get a long enough top tube, short of getting a frame custom made, you have to give up something. One reason I do MTB drop bar conversions is to get a longish top tube.
That Univega looks like not a good choice for someone with a long torso. Typically, seat tubes are measured center to top. So I bet that bike has a 64cm Seat tube and a 60cm TT (top tubes are center to center). Thats one problem on some vintage bikes. As the seat tube gets longer, the top tube does not increase in length proportionally. It varies.
Go to a sizing site and figure out what top tube length you need.
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: NW Burbs, Chicago
Posts: 11,983
Mentioned: 196 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2911 Post(s)
Liked 3,275 Times
in
1,281 Posts
Italian bikes prior to 1960 typically had a top tube 2cm longer than the seat tube. Except when you got to the bigger frames. You get to 60cm, they are pretty much square.
#22
Member
Thread Starter
The calculator is subjective, don't consider it absolute. Put on an offset seatpost, 100-110 stem, and you'll probably be OK.
Italian bikes prior to 1960 typically had a top tube 2cm longer than the seat tube. Except when you got to the bigger frames. You get to 60cm, they are pretty much square.
Italian bikes prior to 1960 typically had a top tube 2cm longer than the seat tube. Except when you got to the bigger frames. You get to 60cm, they are pretty much square.
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Seattle WA
Posts: 2,870
Bikes: 2009 Handsome Devil, 1987 Trek 520 Cirrus, 1978 Motobecane Grand Touring, 1987 Nishiki Cresta GT, 1989 Specialized Allez Former bikes; 1986 Miyata Trail Runner, 1979 Miyata 912, 2011 VO Rando, 1999 Cannondale R800, 1986 Schwinn Passage
Mentioned: 72 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 796 Post(s)
Liked 520 Times
in
366 Posts
I tend to deal with my long torso by going up a size and having a very snug stand over as Bill said, I have a 30 inch inseam but am 5' 10" and ride mostly 58 cm bikes so I can get the TT length I need. Good luck on your search OP I would try lots of bikes, bring your tape measure and make note of what works and what doesn't. Knowing the dimensions, including reach on my fleet helped add some data to why one bike felt great and one bike felt meh or gave me various aches over longer distances
Likes For ryansu:
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: PDX
Posts: 13,476
Bikes: Merz x 5 + Specialized Merz Allez x 2, Strawberry/Newlands/DiNucci/Ti x3, Gordon, Fuso/Moulton x2, Bornstein, Paisley,1958-74 Paramounts x3, 3rensho, 74 Moto TC, 73-78 Raleigh Pro's x5, Marinoni x2, 1960 Cinelli SC, 1980 Bianchi SC, PX-10 X 2
Mentioned: 260 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4296 Post(s)
Liked 5,739 Times
in
3,343 Posts
I sent an email asking for more pictures on that frame.
I roughed in some numbers on a bike fit calculator (don't have anyone handy right now to help measure), and it came back with top tube 70cm ctc! Seat tube was 61.5 ctc. I wonder if it would be worth finding a local fitter to help me dial it in. I'd rather spend a little money up front and maybe save me some time/money in long run...?
I roughed in some numbers on a bike fit calculator (don't have anyone handy right now to help measure), and it came back with top tube 70cm ctc! Seat tube was 61.5 ctc. I wonder if it would be worth finding a local fitter to help me dial it in. I'd rather spend a little money up front and maybe save me some time/money in long run...?
I would also encourage you to keep in mind that your physiology has likely changed if you have been off the bike for a long time. I would also guess the type of riding you are planning isn't the main type of riding you used to do back when and with your fitting challenges will have a definite impact.
I am at the opposite end of the spectrum from you, at only 6 ft I have a 37 in inseam. I do have fairly long arms so I can reach ok when they get long and tall but don't like to hunch over at all so end up with my bars way up and tilted up and back. I have recently found out that as the numbers tell that I can, should and do ride 64-66 cm frames that work much better for longer and harder for me rides. Funny thing is they "feel" big after riding bikes that are small for me all my life, 2 fists of seatpost, tall Technomic stems and all.
I'm in PDX also and would be glad to meetup to talk. We also have a BF member here in PDX that is a frame builder with a great sense of what it takes to get what you want and need out of a bike and makes many expert mods to get there.
#25
Member
Thread Starter
I would agree with this strategy, plenty of good fitters in PDX, Dave Levy at TiCycles is the guy I would recommend as he builds the frames from his fittings. Micheal Sylvester is a literal guru at Bike Fitting Services who also teaches yoga and among many other things developed the system that Trek finally started using.
I would also encourage you to keep in mind that your physiology has likely changed if you have been off the bike for a long time. I would also guess the type of riding you are planning isn't the main type of riding you used to do back when and with your fitting challenges will have a definite impact.
I am at the opposite end of the spectrum from you, at only 6 ft I have a 37 in inseam. I do have fairly long arms so I can reach ok when they get long and tall but don't like to hunch over at all so end up with my bars way up and tilted up and back. I have recently found out that as the numbers tell that I can, should and do ride 64-66 cm frames that work much better for longer and harder for me rides. Funny thing is they "feel" big after riding bikes that are small for me all my life, 2 fists of seatpost, tall Technomic stems and all.
I'm in PDX also and would be glad to meetup to talk. We also have a BF member here in PDX that is a frame builder with a great sense of what it takes to get what you want and need out of a bike and makes many expert mods to get there.
I would also encourage you to keep in mind that your physiology has likely changed if you have been off the bike for a long time. I would also guess the type of riding you are planning isn't the main type of riding you used to do back when and with your fitting challenges will have a definite impact.
I am at the opposite end of the spectrum from you, at only 6 ft I have a 37 in inseam. I do have fairly long arms so I can reach ok when they get long and tall but don't like to hunch over at all so end up with my bars way up and tilted up and back. I have recently found out that as the numbers tell that I can, should and do ride 64-66 cm frames that work much better for longer and harder for me rides. Funny thing is they "feel" big after riding bikes that are small for me all my life, 2 fists of seatpost, tall Technomic stems and all.
I'm in PDX also and would be glad to meetup to talk. We also have a BF member here in PDX that is a frame builder with a great sense of what it takes to get what you want and need out of a bike and makes many expert mods to get there.
I'll shoot you a PM.