Road brifter w/MTB front derailleur (more questions/options)
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2020
Location: Stamford, CT
Posts: 10
Bikes: Trek Madone Series 6, Marin Rift Zone 2, building a touring bike on a Salsa Marrakesh frame
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Road brifter w/MTB front derailleur (more questions/options)
I知 building a touring bike based on a Salsa Marrakesh frame, which is an MTB chainlinenspec.
I want to use a drop bar and Shimano roadbike brifters, but will need to use an MTB crank and chainring setup due to the frame geometry.
To solve the FD pull-ratio compatibility problem, as I understand it, I have the following options:
1. Go with a 1x11 MTB chainring and avoid the compatibility problem. I can configure it with an 18-75 gear inch range. That is great on the low end, but translates to 20 mph at a 90 rpm cadence on then upper end. I'm not really sure that's an issue for loaded touring. And even for road rides with my wife, if I'm going faster than 20 I'm probably just coasting...
2. Use a bar end friction shifter on the front for a 2x11 setup and a brifter on the rear. I'm not sure I'd like a bar end on the rear, but as infrequently as I use the larger chain ring, maybe that's a compromise that I can live with.
3. Use a road FD with an MTB chain-ring, and a Shiftmate 7 for changing the pull ratio.
4. Use an IRD Alpina FD which I understand is a roadbike FD that is forgiving with MTB chainrings
Opinions? Other options?
I want to use a drop bar and Shimano roadbike brifters, but will need to use an MTB crank and chainring setup due to the frame geometry.
To solve the FD pull-ratio compatibility problem, as I understand it, I have the following options:
1. Go with a 1x11 MTB chainring and avoid the compatibility problem. I can configure it with an 18-75 gear inch range. That is great on the low end, but translates to 20 mph at a 90 rpm cadence on then upper end. I'm not really sure that's an issue for loaded touring. And even for road rides with my wife, if I'm going faster than 20 I'm probably just coasting...
2. Use a bar end friction shifter on the front for a 2x11 setup and a brifter on the rear. I'm not sure I'd like a bar end on the rear, but as infrequently as I use the larger chain ring, maybe that's a compromise that I can live with.
3. Use a road FD with an MTB chain-ring, and a Shiftmate 7 for changing the pull ratio.
4. Use an IRD Alpina FD which I understand is a roadbike FD that is forgiving with MTB chainrings
Opinions? Other options?
#2
I am potato.
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 3,116
Bikes: Only precision built, custom high performance elitist machines of the highest caliber. 🍆
Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1789 Post(s)
Liked 1,629 Times
in
933 Posts
Why not a vintage 9 speed triple?
Not everything has to be new.
Not everything has to be new.
__________________
I shouldn't have to "make myself more visible;" Drivers should just stop running people over.
Car dependency is a tax.
I shouldn't have to "make myself more visible;" Drivers should just stop running people over.
Car dependency is a tax.
#3
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2020
Location: Stamford, CT
Posts: 10
Bikes: Trek Madone Series 6, Marin Rift Zone 2, building a touring bike on a Salsa Marrakesh frame
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Roswell, GA
Posts: 8,319
Bikes: '93 Trek 750, '92 Schwinn Crisscross, '93 Mongoose Alta
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1438 Post(s)
Liked 1,092 Times
in
723 Posts
Have look at Gevenalle's offerings: https://www.gevenalle.com/shifters/ Use a friction shifter up front and shift anything you want.
#5
I am potato.
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 3,116
Bikes: Only precision built, custom high performance elitist machines of the highest caliber. 🍆
Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1789 Post(s)
Liked 1,629 Times
in
933 Posts
Trp Hy/Rd brakes would get you your hydraulics at a substantial cost savings when you start adding up the whole system.
__________________
I shouldn't have to "make myself more visible;" Drivers should just stop running people over.
Car dependency is a tax.
I shouldn't have to "make myself more visible;" Drivers should just stop running people over.
Car dependency is a tax.
#6
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2020
Location: Stamford, CT
Posts: 10
Bikes: Trek Madone Series 6, Marin Rift Zone 2, building a touring bike on a Salsa Marrakesh frame
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I壇 be happy to be proven wrong!
Then I壇 go with GRX components on the bars and XT on the driveline.
#7
I am potato.
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 3,116
Bikes: Only precision built, custom high performance elitist machines of the highest caliber. 🍆
Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1789 Post(s)
Liked 1,629 Times
in
933 Posts
I may be wrong, but I don稚 think that痴 correct. Unless the 105 FD is different from current Shimano offerings, the pull-ratio of the Shimano STI road and mtn shifters are different. So, as I understand it, you can稚 mix and match road and mtn components on the front. (No issues on the rear.)
I壇 be happy to be proven wrong!
Then I壇 go with GRX components on the bars and XT on the driveline.
I壇 be happy to be proven wrong!
Then I壇 go with GRX components on the bars and XT on the driveline.
Shimano 8,9,10 speed road/mountain rear derailleurs are interchangeable. Most people make the switch to mountain rear derailleurs for the additional capacity & larger mountain cogs. So the "9" of the 3x9 shifters I suggested is a "Go."
The front derailleurs are not always interchangeable. There are definite road fronts & mountain fronts. It depends on the vintage & group set. Others here would have more authority on the specifics than me. What I do know is it's easiest to match the front derailleur to the front shifter & save the compatibility trouble.
In this case, you specify you want a road brifter. So: road Claris, Sora, 105, or Ultegra, "triple" derailleurs are your options. All ought to work with the "3" of the 3x9 shifters I suggested above. So you are a "Go" there as well.
The crankset is built around a particular bottom bracket width. The spacing between the rings & chainline is the same. The primary difference is mountain has a smaller tooth counts across the board. But a tooth or 2 difference in gear diameter is insignificant as far as derailleur height/cage curvature is concerned. So buy the triple crankset that suits your fancy.
Where you often run into fitment issues is puting doubles on (68mm) mountain frames...They exist, & there is a lot out there. The larger diameter rings or narrower crank arm q-factor sometimes causes issues hitting the chain stays. It's seldom an issue going the other way.
If you have an issue with the triple road crank arms from a triple road crankset hitting the chainstays, you may be forced into a mountain triple crankset to move the pedals/crankarms wider...but I don't think that'll be an issue.
Last edited by base2; 05-05-20 at 11:43 AM.
#8
SE Wis
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 10,509
Bikes: '68 Raleigh Sprite, '02 Raleigh C500, '84 Raleigh Gran Prix, '91 Trek 400, 2013 Novara Randonee, 1990 Trek 970
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2746 Post(s)
Liked 3,390 Times
in
2,053 Posts
I may be wrong, but I don稚 think that痴 correct. Unless the 105 FD is different from current Shimano offerings, the pull-ratio of the Shimano STI road and mtn shifters are different. So, as I understand it, you can稚 mix and match road and mtn components on the front. (No issues on the rear.).
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Mission Viejo
Posts: 5,805
Bikes: 1986 Cannondale SR400 (Flat bar commuter), 1988 Cannondale Criterium XTR, 1992 Serotta T-Max, 1995 Trek 970
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1943 Post(s)
Liked 2,164 Times
in
1,323 Posts
Exactly what are you going to be running up front on your triple? Especially the granny.
John
John
#10
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2020
Location: Stamford, CT
Posts: 10
Bikes: Trek Madone Series 6, Marin Rift Zone 2, building a touring bike on a Salsa Marrakesh frame
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
This is a build from the frame up. Just in the planning stage. I was planning to use GRX brifters with hydraulic discs. But, the frame (Salsa Marrakesh) needs a MTB crank as I understand it.
#11
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2020
Location: Stamford, CT
Posts: 10
Bikes: Trek Madone Series 6, Marin Rift Zone 2, building a touring bike on a Salsa Marrakesh frame
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The shifters & the derailleurs need to have matching pull ratios. Having a "group set" is just a convenient means of catagorizing use cases.
Shimano 8,9,10 speed road/mountain rear derailleurs are interchangeable. Most people make the switch to mountain rear derailleurs for the additional capacity & larger mountain cogs. So the "9" of the 3x9 shifters I suggested is a "Go."
The front derailleurs are not always interchangeable. There are definite road fronts & mountain fronts. It depends on the vintage & group set. Others here would have more authority on the specifics than me. What I do know is it's easiest to match the front derailleur to the front shifter & save the compatibility trouble.
In this case, you specify you want a road brifter. So: road Claris, Sora, 105, or Ultegra, "triple" derailleurs are your options. All ought to work with the "3" of the 3x9 shifters I suggested above. So you are a "Go" there as well.
The crankset is built around a particular bottom bracket width. The spacing between the rings & chainline is the same. The primary difference is mountain has a smaller tooth counts across the board. But a tooth or 2 difference in gear diameter is insignificant as far as derailleur height/cage curvature is concerned. So buy the triple crankset that suits your fancy.
Where you often run into fitment issues is puting doubles on (68mm) mountain frames...They exist, & there is a lot out there. The larger diameter rings or narrower crank arm q-factor sometimes causes issues hitting the chain stays. It's seldom an issue going the other way.
If you have an issue with the triple road crank arms from a triple road crankset hitting the chainstays, you may be forced into a mountain triple crankset to move the pedals/crankarms wider...but I don't think that'll be an issue.
Shimano 8,9,10 speed road/mountain rear derailleurs are interchangeable. Most people make the switch to mountain rear derailleurs for the additional capacity & larger mountain cogs. So the "9" of the 3x9 shifters I suggested is a "Go."
The front derailleurs are not always interchangeable. There are definite road fronts & mountain fronts. It depends on the vintage & group set. Others here would have more authority on the specifics than me. What I do know is it's easiest to match the front derailleur to the front shifter & save the compatibility trouble.
In this case, you specify you want a road brifter. So: road Claris, Sora, 105, or Ultegra, "triple" derailleurs are your options. All ought to work with the "3" of the 3x9 shifters I suggested above. So you are a "Go" there as well.
The crankset is built around a particular bottom bracket width. The spacing between the rings & chainline is the same. The primary difference is mountain has a smaller tooth counts across the board. But a tooth or 2 difference in gear diameter is insignificant as far as derailleur height/cage curvature is concerned. So buy the triple crankset that suits your fancy.
Where you often run into fitment issues is puting doubles on (68mm) mountain frames...They exist, & there is a lot out there. The larger diameter rings or narrower crank arm q-factor sometimes causes issues hitting the chain stays. It's seldom an issue going the other way.
If you have an issue with the triple road crank arms from a triple road crankset hitting the chainstays, you may be forced into a mountain triple crankset to move the pedals/crankarms wider...but I don't think that'll be an issue.
Thanks again for all the helpful info.
I guess I wasn稚 complete with my design criteria. Here are some more parameters...
I was hoping to go with the GRX brifters, hydraulic disc brakes, and sub-levers. The choice of GRX is driven by the new ergonomics of the pivot point. If I知 unwilling to go to a different group to get a triple, then I知 limited to a 1X or 2X FD. I suppose I could compromise here as I致e ridden Ultegra for years on my roadbike.
The Marrakash frame simply does not accommodate a road 2X according to Salsa. They say, "...neither the 48/31 or 46/30 GRX cranks will work on the Marrakesh frame. Both the big ring and the crank arms will either directly contact the frame or be close enough to the chainstay that we cannot safely recommend it. The Marakesh frame would have been designed specifically with MTB cranks in mind..."
#12
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2020
Location: Stamford, CT
Posts: 10
Bikes: Trek Madone Series 6, Marin Rift Zone 2, building a touring bike on a Salsa Marrakesh frame
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
the pull ratios of the road & mountain FD/shifters is different... but cranksets aren't incompatible. If the road triple FD ( shifted with a road brifter) can reach all the chainrings on the crank within it's limit screws, and can handle the chainring size differences, road or mountain crank doesn't matter.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Mission Viejo
Posts: 5,805
Bikes: 1986 Cannondale SR400 (Flat bar commuter), 1988 Cannondale Criterium XTR, 1992 Serotta T-Max, 1995 Trek 970
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1943 Post(s)
Liked 2,164 Times
in
1,323 Posts
So, are you saying you want to run a 46-30? With 30t being to smallest tooth count? ... not something like a 22t or 24t?
John
John
#14
SE Wis
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 10,509
Bikes: '68 Raleigh Sprite, '02 Raleigh C500, '84 Raleigh Gran Prix, '91 Trek 400, 2013 Novara Randonee, 1990 Trek 970
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2746 Post(s)
Liked 3,390 Times
in
2,053 Posts
To clarify, I知 looking at the GRX group which only has 1X or 2X FDs. A road 2X crankset doesn稚 work on the Marrakesh frame according to Salsa. They say, "...neither the 48/31 or 46/30 GRX cranks will work on the Marrakesh frame. Both the big ring and the crank arms will either directly contact the frame or be close enough to the chainstay that we cannot safely recommend it. The Marakesh frame would have been designed specifically with MTB cranks in mind...."
Even then a person could come up with a way to move the FD out further with a spacer or something like this.
https://wickwerks.com/?attachment_id=9246
#15
I am potato.
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 3,116
Bikes: Only precision built, custom high performance elitist machines of the highest caliber. 🍆
Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1789 Post(s)
Liked 1,629 Times
in
933 Posts
To clarify, I知 looking at the GRX group which only has 1X or 2X FDs. A road 2X crankset doesn稚 work on the Marrakesh frame according to Salsa. They say, "...neither the 48/31 or 46/30 GRX cranks will work on the Marrakesh frame. Both the big ring and the crank arms will either directly contact the frame or be close enough to the chainstay that we cannot safely recommend it. The Marakesh frame would have been designed specifically with MTB cranks in mind...."
Then a triple crank is your only option then. I'd try a road triple crank, but that's just me & higher gearing. A mountain triple is probably the better choice for your intentions. It would still work with the 3x9 road shifters & road derailleur just fine.
I'm not impressed with 11 speed longevity or cost. But that is a seperate, unrelated issue. The issue is: GRX is not going to fit nor be compatible with your frame & does not offer the gearing range you seem to want.
__________________
I shouldn't have to "make myself more visible;" Drivers should just stop running people over.
Car dependency is a tax.
I shouldn't have to "make myself more visible;" Drivers should just stop running people over.
Car dependency is a tax.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Mission Viejo
Posts: 5,805
Bikes: 1986 Cannondale SR400 (Flat bar commuter), 1988 Cannondale Criterium XTR, 1992 Serotta T-Max, 1995 Trek 970
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1943 Post(s)
Liked 2,164 Times
in
1,323 Posts
Okay, this is just food for thought. I'm not saying to go do this.
My wife got a bike with a triple 30-39-50. It uses a Tiagra 4603 front derailleur. She is never going to use that 50t, so I swapped out the 50t for a 46t. I thought when I checked the Shimano specs were minimum 50t, but if I don't talk in front of the bike it won't know. It shifts great.
You are not going to use a triple, but "if" you are using a 46-30 double setup, it just "might" work with a triple road FD and you can use road brifters. I might have been able to push it to a 28t. Tiagra is not at the top of my list, but since it works it is staying.
The one thing I'm not sure about is the overall throw of the derailleur and whether it will reach far enough with the MTB crank. But, I think your Marrakesh has a 31.8 seat tube. Once upon a time, I took a 34.9 FD and offset it on a 31.8 seat tube. I think I used 34.9 to 28.6 shims and filed/sanded them and effectively moved the derailleur off-center 3mm (no shim at the furthest point). If you have access to a machine shop you can make a slick aluminum setup. There also may be a Problem Solvers clamp-on for braze-on front derailleurs, or you can find someone to make a one that pushes the FD out.
Will it work, how do I know? We can all dream.
John
My wife got a bike with a triple 30-39-50. It uses a Tiagra 4603 front derailleur. She is never going to use that 50t, so I swapped out the 50t for a 46t. I thought when I checked the Shimano specs were minimum 50t, but if I don't talk in front of the bike it won't know. It shifts great.
You are not going to use a triple, but "if" you are using a 46-30 double setup, it just "might" work with a triple road FD and you can use road brifters. I might have been able to push it to a 28t. Tiagra is not at the top of my list, but since it works it is staying.
The one thing I'm not sure about is the overall throw of the derailleur and whether it will reach far enough with the MTB crank. But, I think your Marrakesh has a 31.8 seat tube. Once upon a time, I took a 34.9 FD and offset it on a 31.8 seat tube. I think I used 34.9 to 28.6 shims and filed/sanded them and effectively moved the derailleur off-center 3mm (no shim at the furthest point). If you have access to a machine shop you can make a slick aluminum setup. There also may be a Problem Solvers clamp-on for braze-on front derailleurs, or you can find someone to make a one that pushes the FD out.
Will it work, how do I know? We can all dream.
John
#17
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2020
Location: Stamford, CT
Posts: 10
Bikes: Trek Madone Series 6, Marin Rift Zone 2, building a touring bike on a Salsa Marrakesh frame
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Thanks for the additional ideas! I’m still noodling...
All clever input is appreciated!!
Mike
All clever input is appreciated!!
Mike
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 3,691
Bikes: Too many bikes, too little time to ride
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 430 Post(s)
Liked 460 Times
in
318 Posts
Not seeing what your ideal setup in mind would be? Do you have a certain gear range that you'd like to accomplish (whether that's 1x, 2x, etc)? It's been shown that a 1x setup can cover nearly the same range as a 2x or 3x.
#19
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2020
Location: Stamford, CT
Posts: 10
Bikes: Trek Madone Series 6, Marin Rift Zone 2, building a touring bike on a Salsa Marrakesh frame
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I looked at a 1X. One goal is to have a lower gear of around 18 gear-inches. With a largest spread 1x11 chain ring I can find, that results in a top gear of only 75 gear inches or 20 mph at 90 rpm cadence. That痴 not necessarily a killer for loaded touring, but there are times when using the bike as a gravel bike unloaded, that I might feel constrained.
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 3,691
Bikes: Too many bikes, too little time to ride
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 430 Post(s)
Liked 460 Times
in
318 Posts
Gotcha. Well, one scenario is to run 1x with something between 32-38 up front and go with a 11-50 cassette. It will get you close to your ideal. Yes there will be some gaps larger than you'd like but I have large range cassettes on a few of my bikes and for the most part I am not bothered by the jumps. Having said that I'm in the process of cannibalizing some other close range cassettes to get smaller jumps on the high end (all this on 10 speed setups).
Likes For tFUnK:
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 2,266
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 714 Post(s)
Liked 800 Times
in
475 Posts
Salsa sells that bike complete with Sora shifters and an Alivio Trekking front derailleur. I found that Shimano has a line of Trekking components that seem to be MTB components(with a "T" added to the product number) that are designed to work with Road shifters. The front derailleurs are all made for triples, but will shift a double. The shift cage is made for a wider range of chainring sizes, so they should work fine with an MTB double like the XT with 38/28 chainrings. https://bike.shimano.com/en-EU/compo...erailleur.html.
Likes For dsaul:
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Mission Viejo
Posts: 5,805
Bikes: 1986 Cannondale SR400 (Flat bar commuter), 1988 Cannondale Criterium XTR, 1992 Serotta T-Max, 1995 Trek 970
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1943 Post(s)
Liked 2,164 Times
in
1,323 Posts
Shimano Trekking groups were generally not available in the US, but beyond that the front derailleurs are not compatible with road shifters. The are basically slightly revised MTB components.
Off-topic... I will say that for anyone still using V-brakes and wants 3 finger flat bar brake levers, the trekking levers are nice. The XT ones (BL-T780) are really hard to find, but the Deore (BL-T611) are still around.
John
Off-topic... I will say that for anyone still using V-brakes and wants 3 finger flat bar brake levers, the trekking levers are nice. The XT ones (BL-T780) are really hard to find, but the Deore (BL-T611) are still around.
John
Likes For 70sSanO:
#23
Newbie
Join Date: Nov 2022
Posts: 1
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
3x 9
I am in to touring, bikepacking & commuting these days. I have a hardtail mtb frame w. 120mm suspension that I run 622x38 or 2" tires depending on sand, gravel, mud etc. I have it set up with old dura ace triple brifters. Front derailleur is generic triple & works with a mtb crankset w. 48/ 40 / 24 rings w. 9 cogs on the back 11-32. It works pretty well, although I will change the low chainring to 22 or up the big rear to 34, sooner or later. (quality 9 speed cassettes are expensive.)
I just rebuilt a gravel frame with 3 x 9 drivertrain. My boneyard collection of dura ace & micro new 3x brifters won't pull the chain through more than 2 rings . I ended up putting trekking bars on it with micro new 3x 9 mtb shifters on it. Front crank is mtb 22 / 40 / 48 set up. Just rode it around the hood & it seems smooth. This rigid fork bike has 40 mm tires on it now, but will probably go to 32's & use it for commuting & hard pack / paved touring. The front derailleur is vintage Deore XT, top pull. It doesn't line up perfectly due to a slack seat tube angle. Also many of my boneyard mech's won't fit because seat tube is too close to rear wheel. But this build shifts well, not racing well, but it is smooth and the step from top to middle ring is sweet. I haven't given up on drop bars but this set up is interesting and I like the gear range.
I just rebuilt a gravel frame with 3 x 9 drivertrain. My boneyard collection of dura ace & micro new 3x brifters won't pull the chain through more than 2 rings . I ended up putting trekking bars on it with micro new 3x 9 mtb shifters on it. Front crank is mtb 22 / 40 / 48 set up. Just rode it around the hood & it seems smooth. This rigid fork bike has 40 mm tires on it now, but will probably go to 32's & use it for commuting & hard pack / paved touring. The front derailleur is vintage Deore XT, top pull. It doesn't line up perfectly due to a slack seat tube angle. Also many of my boneyard mech's won't fit because seat tube is too close to rear wheel. But this build shifts well, not racing well, but it is smooth and the step from top to middle ring is sweet. I haven't given up on drop bars but this set up is interesting and I like the gear range.
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: NW Oregon
Posts: 2,975
Bikes: !982 Trek 930R Custom, Diamondback ascent with SERIOUS updates, Fuji Team Pro CF and a '09 Comencal Meta 5.5
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1299 Post(s)
Liked 739 Times
in
534 Posts
To clarify, I’m looking at the GRX group which only has 1X or 2X FDs. A road 2X crankset doesn’t work on the Marrakesh frame according to Salsa. They say, "...neither the 48/31 or 46/30 GRX cranks will work on the Marrakesh frame. Both the big ring and the crank arms will either directly contact the frame or be close enough to the chainstay that we cannot safely recommend it. The Marakesh frame would have been designed specifically with MTB cranks in mind...."
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,992
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2494 Post(s)
Liked 738 Times
in
522 Posts
This is what the o.p. be wantin', arrgh ...
[Edit: for some reason my browser balks when I go through BF, override the caution if you get blocked. It's ok. I promise.]
[Edit: for some reason my browser balks when I go through BF, override the caution if you get blocked. It's ok. I promise.]
Last edited by Leisesturm; 11-12-22 at 06:44 PM.