Heavy Bikes are better !
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 155
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 97 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 40 Times
in
28 Posts
Heavy bikes give a better workout, keep the speeds down and are more rugged.
I'll take those clunker tanks .... I love em.
#2
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 155
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 97 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 40 Times
in
28 Posts
Heavy Bikes are better !
Unless you are a professional or amateur racer..... Ride as heavy a bike as you can ! You will get a better workout, You will save money as they are cheaper and more rugged requiring less repair, and your crashes will occur at slower speeds. You go out and ride for two hours and come home. Do you really care if you went 30 instead of 40 miles ? The idea was to burn 2500 calories either way.. In addition, everyone who passes you will respect you more than they would if you could blast past them on a whim. All the bike manufacturers spend millions of dollars to brainwash you into thinking you aint cool if you dont have the latest lightest bleeding edge technology. Are you going to let yourself fall victim to that ? Me personally- I like to ride my sixty pound tandem solo. It rides much like a limousine and has many other benefits. Twice I have been able to given broken down motorists a ride back to town.
Likes For preventec47:
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,379
Bikes: 1982 Bianchi Sport SX, Rayleigh Tamland 1, Rans V-Rex recumbent, Fuji MTB, 80's Cannondale MTB with BBSHD ebike motor
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 667 Post(s)
Liked 529 Times
in
355 Posts
I tried that approach when I needed to lose weight, heavy bike with knobby tires. Yep, didn't go as fast and had to work to do that. But what I found is I didn't ride as long either. Put on some smooth tires and ended up with a better workout
#4
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,095 Times
in
5,053 Posts
Unless you are a professional or amateur racer..... Ride as heavy a bike as you can ! You will get a better workout, You will save money as they are cheaper and more rugged requiring less repair, and your crashes will occur at slower speeds. You go out and ride for two hours and come home. Do you really care if you went 30 instead of 40 miles ? The idea was to burn 2500 calories either way.. In addition, everyone who passes you will respect you more than they would if you could blast past them on a whim. All the bike manufacturers spend millions of dollars to brainwash you into thinking you aint cool if you dont have the latest lightest bleeding edge technology. Are you going to let yourself fall victim to that ? Me personally- I like to ride my sixty pound tandem solo. It rides much like a limousine and has many other benefits. Twice I have been able to given broken down motorists a ride back to town.
For me, there's a happy medium of relatively lightweight bikes well short of the "bleeding edge" and it has nothing to do with marketing--I find it a lot more fun to ride a 20 pound bike than a 50 pound one.
As to the respect thing, I don't think the people passing me on a heavy bike are giving two thoughts about me either way. I do know I annoyed a lot of guys when I passed them on the heavy bike and they couldn't keep up with me. On the flat, weight really isn't that big a factor in speed, it's a much bigger factor in acceleration and hill climbing.
Hey, like what you like, more power to you, but I really don't like being accused of being a "victim". .
Likes For livedarklions:
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: northern Deep South
Posts: 8,895
Bikes: Fuji Touring, Novara Randonee
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2597 Post(s)
Liked 1,924 Times
in
1,208 Posts
Once you're rolling on a flat road, heavy bikes don't take any more energy to pedal than light bikes.
Knobby tires do take more energy, but as Pop notes, they're not as much fun to ride.
Now if you can keep up with a group ride, and ring your bell as you pass the leader going uphill, THAT will give you serious points. Of course, it'll probably piss them off and you'll never see the group again after you get over the hill.
Knobby tires do take more energy, but as Pop notes, they're not as much fun to ride.
Now if you can keep up with a group ride, and ring your bell as you pass the leader going uphill, THAT will give you serious points. Of course, it'll probably piss them off and you'll never see the group again after you get over the hill.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 7,842
Mentioned: 38 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6934 Post(s)
Liked 10,940 Times
in
4,674 Posts
Unless you are a professional or amateur racer..... Ride as heavy a bike as you can ! You will get a better workout, You will save money as they are cheaper and more rugged requiring less repair, and your crashes will occur at slower speeds. You go out and ride for two hours and come home. Do you really care if you went 30 instead of 40 miles ? The idea was to burn 2500 calories either way.. In addition, everyone who passes you will respect you more than they would if you could blast past them on a whim. All the bike manufacturers spend millions of dollars to brainwash you into thinking you aint cool if you dont have the latest lightest bleeding edge technology. Are you going to let yourself fall victim to that ? Me personally- I like to ride my sixty pound tandem solo. It rides much like a limousine and has many other benefits. Twice I have been able to given broken down motorists a ride back to town.
Likes For Koyote:
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 3,947
Bikes: Trek 1100 road bike, Roadmaster gravel/commuter/beater mountain bike
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2281 Post(s)
Liked 1,710 Times
in
936 Posts
You do you, but I'll stick with a lighter bike. Yes, I do care if I've gone 30 vs. 40 miles. Going further is what I care about. Getting totally winded from riding a heavy bike after 10 miles is not my idea of fun.
Likes For Milton Keynes:
#8
Dirty Heathen
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: MC-778, 6250 fsw
Posts: 2,182
Bikes: 1997 Cannondale, 1976 Bridgestone, 1998 SoftRide, 1989 Klein, 1989 Black Lightning #0033
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 889 Post(s)
Liked 906 Times
in
534 Posts
Heavy bikes don’t have to be slow, but it helps.
Likes For Ironfish653:
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Kips Bay, NY
Posts: 2,212
Bikes: Ritchey Swiss Cross | Teesdale Kona Hot | Haro Extreme | Specialized Stumpjumper Comp | Cannondale F1000 | Shogun 1000 | Cannondale M500 | Norco Charger | Marin Muirwoods 29er | Shogun Kaze | Breezer Lightning
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 576 Post(s)
Liked 1,001 Times
in
488 Posts
Heavy bikes are not bad; but better than a lighter bike? Nope.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Tucson Az
Posts: 1,674
Bikes: 2015 Ridley Fenix, 1983 Team Fuji, 2019 Marin Nail Trail 6
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 336 Post(s)
Liked 223 Times
in
135 Posts
Heavy bikes are better? If you say so.....
I'll stick with my lighter bikes.
I'll stick with my lighter bikes.
Likes For Wileyrat:
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Bruce Twp, MI
Posts: 305
Bikes: Huffy Sienna Cruiser
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 54 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
I've been saying this for years. When we do a family ride and I swap my hybrid for one of my sons' wide-tired mountain bikes with suspensions, I notice immediately how much more pedaling I have to do. I coast more and put in less effort on my lighter hybrid.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 3,947
Bikes: Trek 1100 road bike, Roadmaster gravel/commuter/beater mountain bike
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2281 Post(s)
Liked 1,710 Times
in
936 Posts
By that logic I should go back to my old Walmart mountain bike that weighed 40 pounds and was harder than hell to ride. Nope, way too much effort.
#13
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Lincoln Ne
Posts: 9,924
Bikes: RANS Stratus TerraTrike Tour II
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3352 Post(s)
Liked 1,056 Times
in
635 Posts
Remember when the first quasi Mountain Bikes were first ridden and developed out in Calif.. A lot of them were the heavier Schwinn Collegiate frames. Heavy and strong.
#14
Full Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 212
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Liked 33 Times
in
20 Posts
My daily commuter is a steel framed longtail cargo bike with e-assist. Doesn't come much heavier than that. I can still bomb down the MUP if I have a light load and tail wind. But then I get on my aluminum mountain bike and it's like there's nothing underneath me!
#15
Life Feeds On Life
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Hondo,Texas
Posts: 2,143
Bikes: Too many Motobecanes
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4407 Post(s)
Liked 4,520 Times
in
3,022 Posts
I ride a heavier gravel bike on the road with 38s ... Though a bit slower I like the durability and capability to then go from the tarmac to gravel. Holds a frame bag for long rides.. but again I’m not racing or care about speed. No a cheap 1000 pound Huffy isn’t in the same bicycling universe but a heavier stouter high end bike has some advantages.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Hacienda Hgts
Posts: 2,101
Bikes: 1999 Schwinn Peloton Ultegra 10, Kestrel RT-1000 Ultegra, Trek Marlin 6 Deore 29'er
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 822 Post(s)
Liked 1,955 Times
in
941 Posts
My first bike in 25 years was a 37 lbs hardtail 29'er I use as a comfort bike. As long as you have enough gears, battle tanks are fun.
#17
Life Feeds On Life
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Hondo,Texas
Posts: 2,143
Bikes: Too many Motobecanes
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4407 Post(s)
Liked 4,520 Times
in
3,022 Posts
Some gravel roads are too rugged even for a gravel bike so out comes the front suspension 29er. For fun a cruise my fat bike down a gravel road or trail for just the fun of it.
#18
got the climbing bug
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: San Diego
Posts: 10,204
Bikes: one for everything
Mentioned: 82 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 632 Post(s)
Liked 908 Times
in
273 Posts
I like cheating......the wind
my main bike is Aero framed and deep aero wheels
my body is not aero though
my main bike is Aero framed and deep aero wheels
my body is not aero though
__________________
Rule #10 // It never gets easier, you just go faster.
Rule #10 // It never gets easier, you just go faster.
#19
Senior Member
I have an 18 pound bike and a 26 pound bike. I can tell you without reservation that the 18 pound bike is a joy to ride. It's carbon frame and seat post smooth out the bumpiest of roads, and it's much easier to climb hills with grades that exceed 12%. In fact, there are hills where I don't think twice about ascending on my 18 pound bike that aren't even considered on the heavier bike (and that bike has a lower 24/32 gear). At the end of a long hard ride, I feel great getting off the lighter bike, and wonder why I keep the heavier bike (it's now converted to a gravel bike...that's why I keep it).
#20
Klaatu..Verata..Necktie?
Join Date: May 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 17,912
Bikes: Litespeed Ultimate, Ultegra; Canyon Endurace, 105; Battaglin MAX, Chorus; Bianchi 928 Veloce; Ritchey Road Logic, Dura Ace; Cannondale R500 RX100; Schwinn Circuit, Sante; Lotus Supreme, Dura Ace
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10397 Post(s)
Liked 11,855 Times
in
6,071 Posts
I've been working hard at taking weight off MY frame, so I won't be adding any on to the bike's, thank you. And it DOES matter to me how far I go. Plus, I'm not sure how a heavy bike will handle the descents I ride on. Just the other day, I saw a guy on a cheap bike go into a death wobble at less than 30 mph. Good thing the bike lane at that point is two cars wide!
__________________
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."
"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."
"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
#21
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,095 Times
in
5,053 Posts
I ride a heavier gravel bike on the road with 38s ... Though a bit slower I like the durability and capability to then go from the tarmac to gravel. Holds a frame bag for long rides.. but again I’m not racing or care about speed. No a cheap 1000 pound Huffy isn’t in the same bicycling universe but a heavier stouter high end bike has some advantages.
Agreed that heavier is better for certain purposes, but the premise of the OP is that heavier is cheaper. No way is a good gravel bike cheaper than a somewhat lighter road bike of similar quality.
I think if you take OP at face value, the logical conclusion from the post is that the ideal bike would be the WM clunker as that will be as inefficient a machine as you can get.
#23
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,095 Times
in
5,053 Posts
Likes For livedarklions:
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Mission Viejo
Posts: 5,801
Bikes: 1986 Cannondale SR400 (Flat bar commuter), 1988 Cannondale Criterium XTR, 1992 Serotta T-Max, 1995 Trek 970
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1943 Post(s)
Liked 2,164 Times
in
1,323 Posts
John
#25
Tortoise Wins by a Hare!
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Looney Tunes, IL
Posts: 7,398
Bikes: Wabi Special FG, Raleigh Roper, Nashbar AL-1, Miyata One Hundred, '70 Schwinn Lemonator and More!!
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1549 Post(s)
Liked 941 Times
in
504 Posts
It's true that extra weight mostly only come into play when you are accelerating or climbing.
But if this were true you'd be able to maintain bike speed while pulling a freight train on the flats. So more weight does take more energy. Always. It's only a matter of how much depending on the situation.
OP: get a trailer and load it up with bricks... better work out!
OP: get a trailer and load it up with bricks... better work out!
Likes For AlmostTrick: