Abiding hatred for bicycle derailleur drive trains
#26
Senior Member
OP, heard of rohlof? Great for those that can't turn a wrench. Cheers.
Likes For Leebo:
#27
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,627
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3870 Post(s)
Liked 2,563 Times
in
1,577 Posts
40 years is a lot of time to spend hating and not doing something about it.
Likes For ThermionicScott:
#28
HarborBandS
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Chicago Western Suburbs
Posts: 477
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 266 Post(s)
Liked 104 Times
in
57 Posts
Rear derailleurs are a wonderful and elegant solution to shifting the chain up and down the range of gears on the cassette. Unless you bump them in to something and bend your hanger, they rarely need adjustment, other than a quarter turn of the barrel adjuster from time to time as cable tension decreases.
But front derailleurs are Satan's spawn. You know why.
That said, I'm still not going 1x, as I like the flexibility of multiple front chain rings.
But front derailleurs are Satan's spawn. You know why.
That said, I'm still not going 1x, as I like the flexibility of multiple front chain rings.
Likes For HarborBandS:
#29
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 39,212
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18397 Post(s)
Liked 15,485 Times
in
7,316 Posts
#30
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280
Bikes: Nashbar Road
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times
in
228 Posts
Drive shaft systems eventually require maintenance and it's time consuming and expensive compared to derailleur drive trains. Basically you don't save any time or money, you just put it off.
That, plus the extra weight and drag from variable speed hubs is why drive shaft systems remain unpopular.
That, plus the extra weight and drag from variable speed hubs is why drive shaft systems remain unpopular.
#31
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: San Diego
Posts: 702
Bikes: 1978 Bruce Gordon, 1977 Lippy, 199? Lippy tandem, Bike Friday NWT, 1982 Trek 720, 2012 Rivendell Atlantis, 1983 Bianchi Specialissima?
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 345 Post(s)
Liked 174 Times
in
106 Posts
Several years ago Bike Friday offered the NWT with a CVT hub in back. I don’t think they do anymore. I guess the demand wasn’t there?
#32
Passista
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,595
Bikes: 1998 Pinarello Asolo, 1992 KHS Montaña pro, 1980 Raleigh DL-1, IGH Hybrid, IGH Utility
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 866 Post(s)
Liked 720 Times
in
395 Posts
A friend told me once derailleurs are a crappy design from an engineer's point of view, but they work surprisingly well nonetheless.
#33
aka Tom Reingold
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,495
Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem
Mentioned: 511 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7341 Post(s)
Liked 2,441 Times
in
1,425 Posts
If you know anything about engineering, you know that every problem has constraints, i.e. compromises. Weight and cost are big factors in bicycle design. It's possible to build bikes that don't need frequent repair, but they would be so heavy that few people would want to ride them. Notice how often you get a flat, have to replace a tire, or do any other kind of repair. It wouldn't be tolerated in the car industry. But making bikes appealing to ride is important, and since the human motor is a lot less powerful than the car motor, we have to make the bike light and pleasant to ride.
I don't buy bikes. I've worked as a bike mechanic, so I know how to build and fix bikes, so I build my bikes. I've often thought about using an internally geared hub (IGH). 3-speeds are nice and simple and super reliable, but the gears are too far apart for me. Whenever I ride a 3-speed, I end up using only two gears, and even they are too far apart. Plus they are heavy and expensive. The IGHs with more gears are less reliable and much more expensive, and they're even heavier.
Chains are annoying for sure, but they are energy efficient and cheap. Belt drives for bikes are around now, but the frame has to be specialized (to allow installation and removal), and the belts are expensive. The drivetrain also must be specialized and therefore expensive, and changing your ratio is somewhere between expensive and impossible. Maybe the situation wouldn't be so bad if belts had been invented sooner so chains were not so entrenched, but material science wasn't ready. Maybe belts will become more common in time.
Shaft drives are heavy and expensive.
Weight matters! Cost matters! Everything brings compromise. You can have your ideal bike, even today, but are you willing to pay for it? It is entirely unrealistic to ascribe evil intentions to a whole industry. They are doing the best they can under difficult constraints.
I don't buy bikes. I've worked as a bike mechanic, so I know how to build and fix bikes, so I build my bikes. I've often thought about using an internally geared hub (IGH). 3-speeds are nice and simple and super reliable, but the gears are too far apart for me. Whenever I ride a 3-speed, I end up using only two gears, and even they are too far apart. Plus they are heavy and expensive. The IGHs with more gears are less reliable and much more expensive, and they're even heavier.
Chains are annoying for sure, but they are energy efficient and cheap. Belt drives for bikes are around now, but the frame has to be specialized (to allow installation and removal), and the belts are expensive. The drivetrain also must be specialized and therefore expensive, and changing your ratio is somewhere between expensive and impossible. Maybe the situation wouldn't be so bad if belts had been invented sooner so chains were not so entrenched, but material science wasn't ready. Maybe belts will become more common in time.
Shaft drives are heavy and expensive.
Weight matters! Cost matters! Everything brings compromise. You can have your ideal bike, even today, but are you willing to pay for it? It is entirely unrealistic to ascribe evil intentions to a whole industry. They are doing the best they can under difficult constraints.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
Likes For noglider:
#34
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 2,249
Bikes: 1964 Legnano Roma Olympiade, 1973 Raleigh Super Course, 1978 Raleigh Super Course, 1978 Peugeot PR10, 2002 Specialized Allez, 2007 Specialized Roubaix, 2013 Culprit Croz Blade
Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 741 Post(s)
Liked 818 Times
in
421 Posts
When I was around 10 years or so, my older cousin showed up with his "new" Schwinn Continental, with 10 speeds! How cool was that! Suddenly the Raynal English Racer 3 speed that I loved, was obsolete, at least to me. That was 60 years ago. I have a succession of old and new bikes, from 1961 to 2013, everything from old Campy to Di2, with a few Simplex and Suntours too. I can't imagine riding without derailleurs. They all work as advertised, at least for me. I don't understand fixies, single speeds or even 1× . The older I get the more gears I like. Never had a problem riding, maintaining or working on the derailleurs. To me it's a simple, elegant design, that is about as fool proof as can be. OP is entitled to his rant, as for me, I'm fine with my derailleur bikes, don't see any reason to change what isn't broken. As for my old 3 speed, I still don't understand (or care to find out) how the SA internal geared hub works, but its easy to see how the derailleur works, no mystery, it just works, and that's the important thing to me.
Last edited by Slightspeed; 11-11-19 at 03:15 PM.
#35
Senior Member
I'd say the deraileur drivetrain works well for road bikes that generally don't deal with agressive riding conditions. That way the advantages, mainly light weight and efficiency, outweigh the shortcomings, such as exposure to elements, which in turn lead to more maintenance work.
And understandably, commuter and "gravity" mountain bikes, where light weight and drivetrain efficiency is not of such importance, are more willing to look into other options which are better protected from environment such as mud, sand, salt, twigs, etc. and physical damage.
Hoarses for courses, as they say.
And understandably, commuter and "gravity" mountain bikes, where light weight and drivetrain efficiency is not of such importance, are more willing to look into other options which are better protected from environment such as mud, sand, salt, twigs, etc. and physical damage.
Hoarses for courses, as they say.
#36
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 5,968
Bikes: 2015 Charge Plug, 2007 Dahon Boardwalk, 1997 Nishiki Blazer, 1984 Nishiki International, 2006 Felt F65, 1989 Dahon Getaway V
Mentioned: 54 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1363 Post(s)
Liked 1,674 Times
in
827 Posts
Likes For BobbyG:
#37
Mad bike riding scientist
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 27,341
Bikes: Some silver ones, a red one, a black and orange one, and a few titanium ones
Mentioned: 152 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6200 Post(s)
Liked 4,201 Times
in
2,357 Posts
No, I don’t know why. I don’t consider them to be Satan’s spawn nor all that hard to understand or make work. The principle is the same as the rear and the mechanism works the same. I’ve got about 14 of them in my garage and each one works flawlessly.
I, too, am not going 1x because the range of the triple is far better than anything else that has come along.
Sorry but nearly 40 years of mountain bike use says otherwise. Derailers aren’t all that delicate or prone to failure. Yes, they can be damaged but it takes a lot to wear one out.
I, too, am not going 1x because the range of the triple is far better than anything else that has come along.
I'd say the deraileur drivetrain works well for road bikes that generally don't deal with agressive riding conditions. That way the advantages, mainly light weight and efficiency, outweigh the shortcomings, such as exposure to elements, which in turn lead to more maintenance work.
And understandably, commuter and "gravity" mountain bikes, where light weight and drivetrain efficiency is not of such importance, are more willing to look into other options which are better protected from environment such as mud, sand, salt, twigs, etc. and physical damage.
Hoarses for courses, as they say.
And understandably, commuter and "gravity" mountain bikes, where light weight and drivetrain efficiency is not of such importance, are more willing to look into other options which are better protected from environment such as mud, sand, salt, twigs, etc. and physical damage.
Hoarses for courses, as they say.
__________________
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!
Likes For cyccommute:
#38
Banned.
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 297
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 97 Post(s)
Liked 106 Times
in
66 Posts
If you know anything about engineering, you know that every problem has constraints, i.e. compromises. Weight and cost are big factors in bicycle design. It's possible to build bikes that don't need frequent repair, but they would be so heavy that few people would want to ride them. Notice how often you get a flat, have to replace a tire, or do any other kind of repair. It wouldn't be tolerated in the car industry. But making bikes appealing to ride is important, and since the human motor is a lot less powerful than the car motor, we have to make the bike light and pleasant to ride.
I don't buy bikes. I've worked as a bike mechanic, so I know how to build and fix bikes, so I build my bikes. I've often thought about using an internally geared hub (IGH). 3-speeds are nice and simple and super reliable, but the gears are too far apart for me. Whenever I ride a 3-speed, I end up using only two gears, and even they are too far apart. Plus they are heavy and expensive. The IGHs with more gears are less reliable and much more expensive, and they're even heavier.
Chains are annoying for sure, but they are energy efficient and cheap. Belt drives for bikes are around now, but the frame has to be specialized (to allow installation and removal), and the belts are expensive. The drivetrain also must be specialized and therefore expensive, and changing your ratio is somewhere between expensive and impossible. Maybe the situation wouldn't be so bad if belts had been invented sooner so chains were not so entrenched, but material science wasn't ready. Maybe belts will become more common in time.
Shaft drives are heavy and expensive.
Weight matters! Cost matters! Everything brings compromise. You can have your ideal bike, even today, but are you willing to pay for it? It is entirely unrealistic to ascribe evil intentions to a whole industry. They are doing the best they can under difficult constraints.
I don't buy bikes. I've worked as a bike mechanic, so I know how to build and fix bikes, so I build my bikes. I've often thought about using an internally geared hub (IGH). 3-speeds are nice and simple and super reliable, but the gears are too far apart for me. Whenever I ride a 3-speed, I end up using only two gears, and even they are too far apart. Plus they are heavy and expensive. The IGHs with more gears are less reliable and much more expensive, and they're even heavier.
Chains are annoying for sure, but they are energy efficient and cheap. Belt drives for bikes are around now, but the frame has to be specialized (to allow installation and removal), and the belts are expensive. The drivetrain also must be specialized and therefore expensive, and changing your ratio is somewhere between expensive and impossible. Maybe the situation wouldn't be so bad if belts had been invented sooner so chains were not so entrenched, but material science wasn't ready. Maybe belts will become more common in time.
Shaft drives are heavy and expensive.
Weight matters! Cost matters! Everything brings compromise. You can have your ideal bike, even today, but are you willing to pay for it? It is entirely unrealistic to ascribe evil intentions to a whole industry. They are doing the best they can under difficult constraints.
#39
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 2,249
Bikes: 1964 Legnano Roma Olympiade, 1973 Raleigh Super Course, 1978 Raleigh Super Course, 1978 Peugeot PR10, 2002 Specialized Allez, 2007 Specialized Roubaix, 2013 Culprit Croz Blade
Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 741 Post(s)
Liked 818 Times
in
421 Posts
Recently someone posted on BF a derailleur + IGH combo that had 82 ratios or something. He claimed that there was very little overlap between gears. Sorry to hijack your hijack 😎. Maybe somebody else can find it.
Likes For Slightspeed:
#40
Senior Member
I thought similar to the OP in the past, and because of that, I have the Priority Onyx with Nuvinci CVT (their N330) and another bike with a Nexus 8. In my opinion, the Nexus is much less efficient. The Onyx with the Nuvinci is a bit less efficient, but not significantly. The Nuvinci is really nice while riding up a hill as you can dial the ratio as needed to keep up with slight increases or decreases in slope . . . and, for me, all done while mashing the pedals as I'm up and out of the saddle under a load!
I also have a couple of 1X's (which solves half of the derailleur problem ) and for myself, I can't imagine NEEDING much more than 330% or so of gear range (and I ride some very steep hills too).
I also have a couple of 1X's (which solves half of the derailleur problem ) and for myself, I can't imagine NEEDING much more than 330% or so of gear range (and I ride some very steep hills too).
Last edited by Payton1221; 11-11-19 at 07:52 PM.
#41
With a mighty wind
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 2,576
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1084 Post(s)
Liked 854 Times
in
483 Posts
I got a Sachs 3x7 and a Deore XT 8 speed rear end. Pretty sure I had to switch to thumb shifters to get it to work. I think I had a 34 or 36 tooth up front. I can't remember how I secured it but this was before Narrow Wide and I don't remember dropping the chain.
It worked great actually. The chain that ran inside the hub eventually snapped. I bought a Zaskar LE eventually.
#42
Rouleur
A well taken care of bike will present a drive train with very few issues. New cables when needed, lube on a regular basis, a good, solid cleaning after riding in wet & dirty conditions. However - it always comes down to the "dirty - filthy" part when cleaning that thick black dirty grease off the chain, chainrings & cassette cogs, and that's where two products make life happy, easy and non-stressing. Travabon hand cream and Dr. Bronners Castille Soap. If you've never heard of or tried Travabon - go on Amazon AND GET SOME. You put a dollop in your palm and rub it onto your hands like any other hand lotion. Wait a couple of minutes, then go ahead and grab that chain. Get really filthy - I mean, blacken those hands. Then when you're done with the really dirty part, wash up. The grease that normally is as effective as a tattoo will clean right off. If all of it does not come off, then wash with Dr. Bronners. Then it will. All of it. Go-Jo, all those orange pumice de-greaser simple green super grease cutter soaps are garbage compared to those two products.
Likes For tgenec86:
#43
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,890
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4788 Post(s)
Liked 3,914 Times
in
2,545 Posts
Really good ideas often get adopted for other applications. Early bicycle designers quickly saw that the roller chain had real advantages. Now the rest of the design world has had roughly 80 years to copy the derailleur. Machinery driven with roller chains are common. More than a few also have gearboxes. Derailleurs are lighter, cheaper and very reliable. I have to confess I've had my eyes closed all my life and never noticed any of the industrial derailleur systems out there.
#44
52psi
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 4,014
Bikes: Schwinn Volare ('78); Raleigh Competition GS ('79)
Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 790 Post(s)
Liked 801 Times
in
390 Posts
Holy crap. I'm dying over here. You win.
__________________
A race bike in any era is a highly personal choice that at its "best" balances the requirements of fit, weight, handling, durability and cost tempered by the willingness to toss it and oneself down the pavement at considerable speed. ~Bandera
A race bike in any era is a highly personal choice that at its "best" balances the requirements of fit, weight, handling, durability and cost tempered by the willingness to toss it and oneself down the pavement at considerable speed. ~Bandera
Likes For Fahrenheit531:
#45
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,624
Bikes: iele Latina, Miele Suprema, Miele Uno LS, Miele Miele Beta, MMTB, Bianchi Model Unknown, Fiori Venezia, Fiori Napoli, VeloSport Adamas AX
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1324 Post(s)
Liked 927 Times
in
640 Posts
https://www.sheldonbrown.com/org/otb.html
"The O.T.B. currently sports a Sturmey-Archer AW 3-speed hub, with 7 sprockets, driven by 3 chainwheels: 3 x 7 x 3 = 63."
Cheers
Likes For Miele Man:
#46
Rouleur
It would never work. I mean, seriously - who'd buy them?
Likes For tgenec86:
#48
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: San Diego
Posts: 702
Bikes: 1978 Bruce Gordon, 1977 Lippy, 199? Lippy tandem, Bike Friday NWT, 1982 Trek 720, 2012 Rivendell Atlantis, 1983 Bianchi Specialissima?
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 345 Post(s)
Liked 174 Times
in
106 Posts
My Bike Friday has a SA 3 speed IGH cassette hub. It is designed for 7 speed cassettes but I have 8 cogs on it using Sheldon Brown’s method, which so far has not been worth the effort. It works well enough and, like anything, has its pros and cons that one adjusts to with experience. Does anyone know if SA still makes those?
#49
Senior member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Oakville Ontario
Posts: 8,115
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 942 Post(s)
Liked 656 Times
in
370 Posts
My Bike Friday has a SA 3 speed IGH cassette hub. It is designed for 7 speed cassettes but I have 8 cogs on it using Sheldon Brown’s method, which so far has not been worth the effort. It works well enough and, like anything, has its pros and cons that one adjusts to with experience. Does anyone know if SA still makes those?
Sturmey-Archer | CS-RF3 Silver
Likes For Dan Burkhart:
#50
aka Tom Reingold
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,495
Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem
Mentioned: 511 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7341 Post(s)
Liked 2,441 Times
in
1,425 Posts
@Boxkite, to my thinking, a combo system that uses both an IGH and a derailleur has the disadvantages of both, and that's why it's not that common. But with the IGH you can shift while standing, so at least you retain that advantage.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.